Interpretable vs Learned Encoders for High-Cardinality Fraud Detection
可解释编码器与学习型编码器在高基数欺诈检测中的对比
机构 * Goizueta Business School Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA(埃默里大学戈伊苏埃塔商学院) ; Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Kirkland, WA(加州大学伯克利分校计算机科学系) ; Stern School of Business New York University New York, NY, USA(纽约大学斯特恩商学院) ; School of Data Science University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA(宾夕法尼亚大学数据科学学院) ; Pratt School of Engineering Duke University Durham, NC, USA(达特茅斯大学普拉特工程学院)
AI总结 在IEEE-CIS欺诈数据集上比较7种分类编码方法,实体嵌入在AUC-ROC上最优(0.9612),与CatBoost(0.9602)无显著差异,优于其他编码器;CatBoost在AUC-PR上领先(0.822 vs 0.793),无编码器同时主导两个指标。