AI Agent

Leveraging multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) has proven effective for addressing complex, high-dimensional tasks, but current approaches often rely on static, manually engineered multi-agent configurations. To overcome these constraints, we present the Agentic Neural Network (ANN), a framework that conceptualizes multi-agent collaboration as a layered neural network architecture. In this design, each agent operates as a node, and each layer forms a cooperative team focused on a specific subtask. Our framework follows a two-phase optimization strategy: (1) Forward Phase - Drawing inspiration from neural network forward passes, tasks are dynamically decomposed into subtasks, and cooperative agent teams with suitable aggregation methods are constructed layer by layer. (2) Backward Phase - Mirroring backpropagation, we refine both global and local collaboration through iterative feedback, allowing agents to self-evolve their roles, prompts, and coordination. This neuro-symbolic approach enables our framework to create new or specialized agent teams post-training, delivering notable gains in accuracy and adaptability. Across seven benchmark datasets, our work surpasses leading multi-agent baselines under the same configurations, showing consistent performance improvements.

The effectiveness of multi-agent LLM deliberation depends not only on the agents' individual predictions, but also on how they communicate and collaborate. We study this mechanism through the lens of Friedkin-Johnsen (FJ) opinion dynamics, a tractable model for analyzing stubbornness, influence, and opinion change in multi-agent systems that captures empirically observed deliberation patterns. We show that the FJ parameters are input-dependent, turning multi-agent deliberation into a mixture of experts. This perspective implies that multi-agent systems can outperform single agents and static ensembles when routing reflects agent competence. Since competence is latent in practice, we analyze how influence is established through observable proxies: agents' self-assessed confidence, their perceived confidence, and initial alignment with other agents' views.

In social dilemmas self-interested learning agents face the choice between the societal benefit of cooperation and the immediate reward of defection. Significant evidence exists on the benefits of assortment mechanisms such as partner selection for the emergence of cooperation, but this is largely available through agent-based simulations. In this paper, we provide an analytical solution to the problem, studying the policy-gradient dynamics in a multi-agent environment with partner selection. We show how partner selection changes the opponent distribution and hence the reward landscape, and prove this promotes cooperation under simple rules known from the literature. In particular, we find that population variance is a necessary condition for cooperation to emerge. Using a two-dimensional Wiener process, we extend the dynamics to capture the stochastic effects of partner selection and the resulting opponent distribution. We derive a sufficient condition for the population to be cooperation-promoting and prove the existence of a stationary distribution. Simulations confirm that the stochastic model accurately captures the policy-gradient dynamics and clarifies how the learning rate affects the emergence of cooperation.

Automating scientific poster generation requires hierarchical document understanding and coherent content-layout planning. Existing methods often rely on flat summarization or optimize content and layout separately. As a result, they often suffer from information loss, weak logical flow, and poor visual balance. We present PosterForest, a training-free framework for scientific poster generation. Our method introduces the Poster Tree, a structured intermediate representation that captures document hierarchy and visual-textual semantics across multiple levels. Building on this representation, content and layout agents perform hierarchical reasoning and recursive refinement, progressively optimizing the poster from global organization to local composition. This joint optimization improves semantic coherence, logical flow, and visual harmony. Experiments show that PosterForest outperforms prior methods in both automatic and human evaluations, without additional training or domain-specific supervision.

Criticality has been proposed as a key principle underlying complex behavior in biological and artificial systems; however, how criticality translates from individual dynamics to collective behavior remains unclear. We study this question using a multi-agent system with spatially constrained interactions in which agents sense neighboring light signals through exteroceptors and act by switching their own light on or off, thereby forming a dynamical interaction network at the macroscopic level. The agents' internal states are themselves governed by a reservoir dynamical system at the microscopic level. By varying the microscopic parameters around dynamical criticality, together with the macroscopic interaction topology, we systematically investigate the relation between the two levels. We find that near-critical dynamics within individual agents is not sufficient to produce collective critical-like avalanche statistics. Instead, scale-free behavior depends on the effective connectivity of the macroscopic interaction network, which controls activity propagation. As a result, macroscopic critical-like dynamics are enabled by microscopic regimes that deviate from criticality, with the required deviation depending on the properties of the interaction network. Investigating this relation, we find that slightly subcritical micro-level regimes support near-critical dynamics across a wider range of macroscopic parameters. These results show that in this multi-agent system, collective near-critical behavior depends on the interplay between internal dynamics and the interaction structure that governs activity propagation.

This paper studies how market informedness affects market makers' profitability in a computational market environment with heterogeneous learning agents. We develop an agent-based market model in which market makers differ in their information sets and inventory-risk aversion, prices form endogenously, fundamental values evolve exogenously, and market-taker order flow follows a state-dependent self-exciting process. The model provides a controlled computational laboratory for analyzing the interaction between informed trading, adverse selection, price discovery, and liquidity provision. We establish finite-horizon stability properties of the market-taker order-flow process and solve the market-making problem using multi-agent reinforcement learning with centralized training and decentralized execution. The results show that informed market order flow is particularly harmful when aggregate market informedness is low, exposing market makers to severe adverse-selection risk. However, as market informedness increases, market-maker profitability displays an overall upward trend despite local non-monotonicities arising from complex market dynamics and stochastic learning. This suggests that the price-discovery benefits of informed trading can offset its adverse-selection costs. The findings contribute to computational economics by showing how agent heterogeneity, endogenous price formation, and learning-based liquidity provision jointly shape market outcomes.

Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) has shown promise in improving reasoning and reducing hallucinations, yet it remains unclear how information exchange shapes individual reasoning behavior. Empirically, MAD exhibits paradoxical phenomena, including rising accuracy with increasing token entropy and marked differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous agent combinations. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian uncertainty analysis framework for MAD, which decomposes answer-level predictive uncertainty into epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty, corresponding to the potential gain and cost of debate. Across multiple agent configurations, we find that effective debate depends on achieving high epistemic gain under controlled aleatoric cost. Building on this insight, we design an uncertainty-guided multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm that encourages lower aleatoric cost and more effective epistemic information utilization. Experiments show that our approach simultaneously enhances each agent's accuracy and promotes a more productive debate process, providing an operational Bayesian perspective for understanding and improving MAD.