Covariate-Adjusted Functional Principal Components Analysis for Modeling Hazard Rates of Physical Activity in the US Population
协变量调整的功能主成分分析用于建模美国人口体力活动的风险率
Md Rokibul Hasan, Pratim Guha Niyogi
AI总结 提出基于风险函数的分布分析方法,利用功能主成分分析(FPCA)从腕部加速度计数据中刻画个体活动强度分布变异,优于均值摘要。
详情
体力活动在人类健康中起着至关重要的作用。其整体分布因人而异。常用的汇总指标无法描述这种分布模式。我们提出了一种基于分布的分析方法,通过从腕部加速度计数据中导出的风险函数来建模个体活动强度模式,从而描述体力活动。我们分析了2011-2012年国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)中4297名连续佩戴设备7天的成年人的分钟级独立于监测器的运动摘要(MIMS)数据。我们使用基于生存的方法为每个个体在共同强度网格上导出了非参数活动强度风险,将MIMS的风险曲线及其对数变换后的MIMS都视为功能对象。我们在MIMS的两个尺度上使用功能主成分分析(FPCA)来表征活动强度分布的主要变异模式。组均值风险函数在低强度水平上差异很小,而在高强度水平上我们观察到显著差异。我们的结果表明,基于风险的功能表示方法能够捕捉个体间体力活动强度分布的差异,提供了一种灵活且可解释的方式来表征异质性。该方法优于基于均值的摘要,并支持对人口亚组之间体力活动模式进行有原则的比较。
Physical activity plays a vital role in human health. Its entire distribution differs among people. Commonly used summary measures cannot describe this distributional pattern. We present a distribution-based analytical approach to describe physical activity by modeling individual-level activity-intensity patterns through hazard functions derived from wrist-worn accelerometer data. We analyzed minute-level Monitor-Independent Movement Summary (MIMS) data of 4297 adults with seven continuous days of device wear from the 2011- 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We derived a nonparametric activity-intensity hazard using a survival-based approach for each individual on a common intensity grid, treating both the hazard curves from MIMS and their log-transformed MIMS as functional objects. We used functional principal component analysis (FPCA) on both scales of MIMS to characterize dominant modes of variation in activity-intensity distributions. Group-wise mean hazard functions showed little difference at lower intensity levels, while we observed a substantial difference at higher intensity levels. Our results demonstrate that hazard-based functional representations for capturing differences in physical activity intensity distributions across individuals offer a flexible and interpretable way to characterize heterogeneity. This approach works better than mean-based summaries and supports principled comparisons of physical activity patterns across population subgroups.