Collective oscillations in neuronal systems often arise from interactions between excitatory and inhibitory populations rather than from recurrent coupling within a single ensemble. Motivated by the coexistence of strongly and partially synchronized regimes in such systems, we study the Kuramoto Sakaguchi model on a bipartite network. Despite its minimal structure, the model exhibits rich collective dynamics, including both continuous and discontinuous transitions from full synchrony to partial synchrony (PS). In the PS regime, global oscillations fail to entrain one of the two populations, whose oscillators display quasiperiodic dynamics with an average frequency that can significantly deviate from that of the global field, as observed in neuronal networks. We show that this PS state constitutes an example of self-organized quasiperiodicity, arising here in the canonical Kuramoto Sakaguchi model despite its purely linear global coupling.

Large-scale power outages are typically caused by cascading failures. These unfold dynamically through complex interactions between network dynamics and individual component failures. In contrast, the study of cascading failures in physics has focused on analyzing line overloads in the quasi-static regime. We introduce a new model that integrates the dynamics of node and line failures with a paradigmatic oscillator model for power grid synchronization. This enables us to investigate the collective cascading behavior of coupled failures for the first time. We study the impact of nodal robustness, the ability of nodes to tolerate transient disturbances, and inertia, the ability of nodes to resist frequency deviations, on cascade sizes. We discover two novel mechanisms driving system fragility: i) While low inertia is widely considered a major challenge for power grids, we find that high inertia can amplify cascade sizes unless accompanied by appropriate adjustments of other dynamical properties. ii) Further, we find that an increase in the robustness of individual nodes can paradoxically lead to larger cascades. This latter phenomenon constitutes a novel type of Braess's paradox. Understanding such counterintuitive collective effects may become central for achieving resilient future power grids.

This paper develops a general framework for analyzing multi-agent systems with feedback loops between agents actions and collective observations. The framework is built on two fundamental agent-level variables: power, which measures agent influence on collective outcomes, and response functions, which determine how agents react to observations. We derive how macroscopic properties, including total power, useful power, entropy, order, fragility, and mobility, emerge from these two variables of heterogeneous agents. To study the trade off between growth and resilience, we introduce a system-level utility function parameterized by a risk-appetite coefficient and derive an optimal degree of order that balances productivity, stability, and adaptability. The analysis suggests that stronger synchronization can increase collective output but may also increase systemic fragility and reduce mobility. We further argue that order, entropy, information, and useful energy are task-dependent and system-relative concepts whose meanings depend on the objectives of the system. By measuring and designing agent power distributions and response functions, it may be possible to better understand, predict, and optimize collective behavior and identify the conditions under which collective intelligence and optimal order emerge.

From ancient Mesopotamia to modern cities, dense human settlements coincide with bursts of economic productivity, cultural innovation, and social change. But how does packing people more tightly together alter social organization in ways that reshape collective outcomes? Here, I use a minimal agent-based model to isolate the effect of population density, holding population size and individual behavior fixed while varying only how closely individuals are placed in space. In the model, individuals form social ties gradually, favoring those nearby and those already well-connected. Under these simple rules, varying population density alone is sufficient to reorganize social network structure: sparse populations develop locally clustered communities, while denser ones form globally integrated networks with shorter social distances and a tightly interconnected core of popular individuals. This structural transition occurs sharply over a narrow range of densities and is governed by whether physical proximity or social popularity dominates tie formation. Simulating contagions on these networks reveals that the consequences of this shift depend on what is spreading. Simple contagions (e.g., information or disease) reach a majority of individuals more quickly in denser populations. Complex contagions (e.g., social norms or collective behaviors) do not spread faster, but instead achieve broader and more reliable adoption as density increases. Together, these results show that population density can act as a structural force independent of the economic and behavioral mechanisms typically invoked to explain why cities are engines of change.

Can intelligence be measured? We propose that intelligence can be defined as the lawful amplification of rare but valid futures: a system increases the probability of outcomes that would be unlikely under passive dynamics but remain admissible under the constraints of the domain. We start with the premise that an intelligent system must model the world and its own place within it. Because the system is part of the world it models, this leads naturally to recursive self-simulation: the system represents futures in which its own actions are part of the trajectory. Our central results give a necessity statement and a conditional near-sufficiency statement connecting this architecture to a precise thermodynamic measure of lawful amplification of rare-valid futures: high rare-valid lift is impossible unless the internal simulation identifies rare-valid futures with high fidelity; conversely, when rare-valid fidelity is high and the simulation contains an effective policy, the achievable lift approaches the actuation-limited optimum. Thus recursive self-simulation is not merely a plausible feature of intelligence but, under the stated assumptions, is necessary and nearly sufficient for high thermodynamic intelligence. The resulting framework makes intelligence measurable on a universal scale, from passive matter and feedback controllers, large language models, and humans as text generators to Maxwell-demon-like information engines.

In contrast to the sequence dependent elasticity of the DNA strand, which is revealed as nonlocal and nonlinear, the geometric constraints derived by differential geometry have not been fully elaborated in DNA strand dynamics, even though these constraints contribute independently to the quantification of related energetics. In this paper, the geometrical constraints on the base pair wise resolution in a curved DNA strand are derived separately from its elasticity, addressing the deformation characteristics during superhelix formation around a simplified core structure, which is the quintessential step in DNA packaging. The constraints derived from the given helicity of DNA strand characterize the conditional affinity for curvature formation, thereby specifying the bend-twist ratio required for superhelix formation. The result includes the conditional kurtosis, which is the deformation perpendicular to the plane defined by the curved strand, determining the height of the superhelix. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation validates the description of the curvature formation process and its sequence dependent affinity.

Soft and active condensed matter represent a class of fascinating materials that we encounter in our everyday lives -- and constitute life itself. Control signals interact with the dynamics of these systems, and this influence is formalized in control theory and optimal control. Recent advances have employed various control-theoretical methods to design desired dynamics, properties, and functionality. Here we provide an introduction to optimal control aimed at physicists working with soft and active matter. We describe two main categories of control, feedforward control and feedback control, and their corresponding optimal control methods. We emphasize their parallels to Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, and provide a worked example problem. Finally, we review recent studies of control in soft, active, and related systems. Applying control theory to soft, active, and living systems will lead to an improved understanding of the signal processing, information flows, and actuation that underlie the physics of life.