A Two-Stage Framework for Fast Proton Spot Map Generation in Pencil Beam Scanning Prostate SBRT Planning
一种用于笔束扫描前列腺SBRT计划中快速质子点图生成的两阶段框架
Xueyan Tang, Hok Wan Chan Tseung, Mark Pepin, Jiasen Ma, David M. Routman, Doug J. Moseley, Brandon Reber, Jed E. Johnson, Jing Qian
AI总结 提出GenSpot两阶段框架,利用物理信息投影质子点图表示,结合3D SwinUNETR预测和列非负Lasso回归重建,从CT和剂量生成可交付的质子点图,在单机构前列腺SBRT队列中实现与临床计划高度一致的蒙特卡洛剂量。
详情
背景:在笔束扫描(PBS)质子治疗中,治疗计划以质子点图(PSM)形式交付。尽管深度学习可以快速预测3D剂量,但将剂量直接转换为可交付的点模式仍然有限。目的:我们开发了GenSpot,一个两阶段框架,从CT和剂量推断可交付的PSM,并通过比较GenSpot和临床PSM的蒙特卡洛(MC)剂量在前列腺SBRT中进行评估。方法:GenSpot使用物理信息投影质子点图(PrPSM)表示,通过CT投影点,利用水等效厚度和PDD信息将点与CT/剂量网格对齐,同时保持与点权重的线性关系。数据集包括来自259个前列腺SBRT计划的1036个射野,按80%/10%/10%分为训练、验证和测试集。3D SwinUNETR从CT和剂量预测PrPSM。使用列非负Lasso回归和预计算的PDD曲线重建射野特定PSM。使用MAE、3D伽马分析和复合计划DVH指标比较GenSpot和临床MC剂量。结果:在测试集上,SwinUNETR的PrPSM MAE为0.06±0.02,与临床PrPSM高度相似。GenSpot MC剂量在非零剂量区域的MAE为0.07±0.03 Gy,射野级和计划级伽马通过率分别为0.90和0.97。靶区和危及器官的复合DVH差异在1 Gy以内,但CTV显示适度的高剂量增加。点复杂度与临床计划相似,点数量略多。预测和重建平均每射野耗时0.02秒和2.1秒。结论:GenSpot从CT和剂量生成机器可交付的PSM,其MC剂量在单机构前列腺SBRT队列中与临床PSM剂量紧密匹配。这种物理信息驱动的剂量到点框架可能支持自动化PBS计划和自适应再计划,有待更广泛的验证。
Background: In pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, plans are delivered as proton spot maps (PSMs). Although deep learning can rapidly predict 3D dose, direct conversion of dose into deliverable spot patterns remains limited. Purpose: We developed GenSpot, a two stage framework that infers deliverable PSMs from CT and dose, and evaluated it in prostate SBRT by comparing Monte Carlo (MC) doses from GenSpot and clinical PSMs. Methods: GenSpot uses a physics informed projected proton spot map (PrPSM) representation, projecting spots through CT with water equivalent thickness and PDD information to align spots with the CT/dose grid while preserving linearity with spot weights. The dataset included 1,036 fields from 259 prostate SBRT plans, split 80%/10%/10% for training, validation, and testing. A 3D SwinUNETR predicted PrPSMs from CT and dose. Field specific PSMs were reconstructed using column wise nonnegative Lasso regression with precomputed PDD curves. GenSpot and clinical MC doses were compared using MAE, 3D gamma analysis, and composite plan DVH metrics. Results: On the test set, SwinUNETR achieved PrPSM MAE of 0.06 +/- 0.02 with high similarity to clinical PrPSMs. GenSpot MC doses showed low MAE of 0.07 +/- 0.03 Gy in the nonzero dose region and gamma passing rates of 0.90 at the field level and 0.97 at plan level. Composite DVH differences were within 1 Gy for targets and organs at risk, though the CTV showed a modest high dose increase. Spot complexity was similar to clinical plans, with slightly more spots. Prediction and reconstruction averaged 0.02 s and 2.1 s/field. Conclusions: GenSpot generated machine deliverable PSMs from CT and dose whose MC doses closely matched clinical PSM doses in a single institution prostate SBRT cohort. This physics informed dose to spots framework may support automated PBS planning and adaptive replanning, pending broader validation.