We define a combinatorial property of a projective Fraisse category which we call the \emph{approximate Ramsey property}. Let $F$ be a continuum, $G$ a closed subgroup of the homeomorphism group of $F$, and $\mathbb{F}$ the limit of projective Fraisse category $\mathcal{F}$ such that $\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb{F})$ is dense in $G$. We prove that $\mathcal{F}$ has the approximate Ramsey property if and only if $G$ is extremely amenable. We prove that the group of homeomorphisms of the universal pseudo-solenoid has non-metrizable universal minimal flow.

Expanding products of modal logics are bimodal logics obtained from the combination of a `horizontal component' logic and a `vertical component' logic, lying between the fusion and the Cartesian product of the two logics. Gabelaia et al. showed that expanding products are often decidable when the first component is Noetherian, although their methods are semantical and do not yield complete axiomatisations. They do, however, propose a candidate, dubbed the expanding commutator of the two logics and known to be complete in many `non-Noetherian' cases. In this paper, we consider various expanding products of modal logics whose vertical component is $\sf GL$. We show that the standard axiomatisation is complete when the horizontal component is either $ {\sf K4}$ or $ {\sf GL} $, but incomplete when it is ${\sf Grz}$ or any logic between ${\sf K4.3}$ and ${\sf Grz.3}$, thus yielding a partial solution to a question posed by Gabelaia et al. more than two decades ago.

Working within Constructive Morse Set Theory (CMST), we introduce axioms for a new notion, jst Pp, intended to capture what it means for P to prove, or justify, p under the BHK interpretation of intuitionistic logic. Since it makes no distinction between terms and formulae -- every term is also a formula, and vice versa -- CMST is well suited to our axiomatic development of justification theory within set theory itself. After stating our axioms for jst Pp, we derive many consequences thereof. In particular, we show that (with certain restrictions) our axioms for jst Pp align with the intended BHK interpretations of the axioms of intuitionistic logic.

We investigate distributive lattices and Heyting algebras definable in o-minimal structures. We give a complete description of one-dimensional bounded distributive lattices definable over an o-minimal structure expanding a real-closed field, and prove a definable analogue of Birkhoff representation, which we use to classify all one-variable equations in the language of Heyting algebras with respect to whether they can be satisfied in a maximal-dimension subset of a given algebra.

We give a new and elementary construction of primitive positive decomposition of higher arity relations into binary relations on finite domains. Such decompositions come up in applications to constraint satisfaction problems, clone theory and relational databases. The construction exploits functional completeness of 2-input functions in many-valued logic by interpreting relations as graphs of partially defined multivalued 'functions'. The 'functions' are then composed from ordinary functions in the usual sense. The construction is computationally effective and relies on well-developed methods of functional decomposition, but reduces relations only to ternary relations. An additional construction then decomposes ternary into binary relations, also effectively, by converting certain disjunctions into existential quantifications. The result gives a uniform proof of Peirce's reduction thesis on finite domains, and shows that the graph of any Sheffer function composes all relations there.

We present a machine-checked completeness theorem, in Lean 4, for the hybrid logic $L(\forall)$: propositional modal logic with nominals, the satisfaction-style binder $\forall$, and the box modality. (Machine-checked completeness for basic hybrid logic, without binders, was pioneered by Asta Halkjær From in Isabelle/HOL.) We build on Alex Oltean's 2023 Lean 4 formalization, which mechanized the syntax, semantics, Hilbert-style proof system, and soundness following Blackburn's Hybrid Completeness (1998), but left completeness unfinished. Finishing it requires manufacturing fresh names at two structurally different points, and our central finding is that they call for two different tools. (1) The root witnessed maximal consistent set, built by an extended Lindenbaum construction, needs at each step a nominal fresh for the whole set; the right tool is structural freshness: extend the language so an infinite supply of nominals is reserved by construction. We survey the design space (Oltean's odd/even encoding inside $\mathbb{N}$, the disjoint-sum $N \oplus \mathbb{N}$ parameterization suggested by Bud Mishra, and From's synthetic-completeness frameworks) and explain the encoding we adopt. (2) The witnessed $\Diamond$-successor of a maximal consistent set cannot be obtained this way: its canonical box-reduct provably mentions every nominal, so no reserved name is fresh. Here the right tool is one Oltean chose but left incomplete: an existence-lemma Henkin construction drawing each witness from the predecessor's witnessedness through a fresh state variable; we complete it with a data-carrying witness accumulator and a compactness argument. The theorem $Γ\models φ\to Γ\vdash φ$ is fully formalized: the development is sorry-free, and #print axioms reports only propext, Classical.choice, and Quot.sound. We port the development to Lean v4.30.0 / mathlib v4.30.0.

Inspired by the model theory of difference fields in characteristic zero, a class of automorphisms of an algebraic variety, here called compound fundamental isotrivial, is introduced. These are algebraic dynamical systems that are built up via a finite sequence of equivariant fibrations from (possibly nonautonomous) algebraic dynamics which trivialise after base extension over themselves. Every wild automorphism of an abelian variety is compound fundamental isotrivial. Conversely, it is shown that the only irreducible projective varieties admitting a wild automorphism that is compound fundamental isotrivial are the abelian varieties. That is, the wild automorphism conjecture of Reichstein, Rogalski, and Zhang is here proven for compound fundamental isotrivial dynamics. Along the way, a counterexample to the naive generalisation of the conjecture to the nonautonomous setting of $σ$-varieties is provided.

Answering a question of Goode, we show that $k$-triviality collapses to (1-)triviality among simple theories. In particular, every stable theory with quantifier elimination in a relational language of bounded arity is trivial. We use our collapse result, along with other facts about $k$-triviality and $k$-total triviality, to generate examples of (strongly) $k$-distal theories. The collapse result immediately implies that no stable theory can be strictly $k$-distal for some $k\geq 3$, partially answering a question of Walker. Moreover, all known examples of non-distal (strongly) $k$-distal theories are $k$-ary, rendering (strong) $k$-distality moot as a $(k+1)$-ary dividing line; we give four classes of examples that are not $k$-ary. We also show that just as distality is not preserved under taking reducts, neither is (strong) $k$-distality.

The first part of these notes give an introduction to the theory of Polish group actions on compact Hausdorff spaces, leading up to a proof of the Kechris-Pestov-Todorcevic correspondence and discussions of properties of universal minimal flows. The second part proveides some background on descriptive set theory and culminates with B. Miller's proof of the $\mathcal{G}_0$-dichotomy theorem due to Kechris, Solecki, and Todorcevic.

The outlines of a "Galois theory" for bimeromorphic geometry is here developed, via the study of model-theoretic definable binding groups in the theory CCM of compact complex spaces. As an application, a structure theorem about principal meromorphic bundles with algebraic structure group, and admitting no horizontal subvarieties, is deduced. Examples of algebraic groups arising as binding groups are provided, as is a characterisation of when they are linear. Using binding groups in CCM it is shown that, in contrast to the situation in differentially closed fields, there are many algebraic groups which admit nontrivial definable torsors over acl-closed sets in the theory DCCM of existentially closed differential CCM-structures. A self-contained exposition of the binding group theorem in totally transcendental theories, that emphasises the bitorsorial nature of the construction, is also included.

We provide a structural analysis for McCarthy algebras, the variety generated by the three-element algebra defining the logic of McCarthy (the non-commutative version of Kleene three-valued logics). Our analysis will be conducted in a very general algebraic setting by introducing McCarthy algebras as a subvariety of unital bands (idempotent monoids) equipped with an involutive (unary) operation $'$ satisfying $x''\approx x$; herein referred to as i-ubands. Prominent (commutative) subvarieties of i-ubands include Boolean algebras, ortholattices, Kleene algebras, and involutive bisemilattices, hence i-ubands provides an algebraic common ground for several non-classical logics. Our main contributions consist in providing for McCarthy algebras: reduced and equivalent axiomatizations; a semilattice decomposition theorem; and representations as certain decorated posets from which the algebraic structure can be uniquely determined.

We investigate the problem of finding the minimum number of pieces necessary for dividing a three-dimensional sphere or a ball and reassembling it to form $n$ congruent copies of the original object, generalising a known result by Raphael Robinson.

Andréka and Maddux classified the relation algebras with at most 3 atoms, and in particular they showed that all of them are representable. Hirsch and Cristiani showed that the network satisfaction problem (NSP) for each of these algebras is in P or NP-hard. The literature contains many results on representations of relation algebras; in particular, some relation algebras with four atoms are not representable. We extend the result of Cristiani and Hirsch to relation algebras with at most 4 atoms: the NSP is always either in P or NP-hard. To this end, we construct universal, fully universal, or even normal representations for these algebras, whenever possible.

We conduct a computability-theoretic study of Ramsey-like theorems of the form "Every coloring of the edges of an infinite clique admits an infinite sub-clique avoiding some pattern", with a particular focus on transitive patterns. As it turns out, the patterns corresponding to separable permutations play an important role in the computational features of the statement. We prove that the avoidance of any separable permutation is equivalent to the existence of an infinite homogeneous set in standard models, while this property fails for any other pattern. For this, we develop a novel argument for relativized diagonal non-computation.

The paper establishes results following two interconnected directions. 1. Let $G$ be a Roelcke precompact closed subgroup of the group $\mathrm{Sym}(ω)$ of permutations of the natural numbers. Let $\mathrm{Aut}(G)$ denote the group of continuous automorphisms of $G$. Then $\mathrm{Inn}(G)$ is closed in $\mathrm{Aut}(G)$, where $\mathrm{Aut}(G)$ carries the topology of pointwise convergence for its (faithful) action on the cosets of open subgroups. Under the stronger hypothesis that~$G$ is oligomorphic, $\+ N_G/G$ is profinite, where $\+ N_G$ denotes the normaliser of~$G$ in $\mathrm{Sym}(ω)$, and the topological group $\mathrm{Out}(G)= \mathrm{Aut}(G)/\mathrm{Inn}(G)$ is totally disconnected, locally compact. 2a. We provide a general method to show smoothness of the isomorphism relation for appropriate Borel classes of oligomorphic groups. We apply it to two such classes: the oligomorphic groups with no algebraicity, and the oligomorphic groups with finitely many {essential} subgroups up to conjugacy. 2b. Using this method we also show that if $G$ is in such a Borel class, then $\mathrm{Aut}(G)$ is topologically isomorphic to an oligomorphic group, and $\mathrm{Out}(G)$ is profinite.