Researchers using panel data to estimate causal effects routinely choose among three approaches to using past outcomes: difference-in-differences (DID), conditioning on lagged outcomes (matching, M), and a hybrid that does both (DIDM). The corresponding identifying assumptions are non-nested, leaving little guidance on which to report. We give conditions under which the corresponding estimands are ordered, with DIDM bracketed between matching and DID. This makes DIDM the minimax-regret choice among the three under a broad class of loss functions. We recommend reporting DIDM as the headline estimate, with matching and DID as bounds. We illustrate in applications.

Scholarly debates on China's agricultural growth between 1949 and 1986 continue to differ over the extent of the price scissors, the effect of heavy industrial investment, the role of the 1978 reforms, and the impact of decollectivization on irrigation. Using a single dataset and complementary econometric methods, this paper addresses each of these controversies. The results show that 1952--1957 was the only net extraction period across all three channels, after which the state channelled a net inflow of about 168.6 billion yuan into agriculture via fiscal and credit instruments. Heavy industrial investment exerted a significant positive lagged effect on agriculture, while the contemporaneous negative correlation stemmed from the zero-sum nature of the investment share indicator. The input-output elasticity shifted abruptly in 1970, and collective agricultural loans broke in 1971, both pointing to the rectification effects of the North China Agricultural Conference. Disaster prevention capacity fell from 0.70 under the collective era to 0.53 after household contracting, mainly because the collective maintenance system collapsed rather than because state investment declined. After 1979 the price elasticity of agricultural supply approached zero, suggesting that the 1979 procurement price increase acted more like a one-off recalibration than a sustained marginal incentive.

This study constructs novel biodiversity related media risk indicators for France, Germany, Italy, and Spain over 2015-2025, capturing media attention to biodiversity threats using the GDELT Global Knowledge Graph. Using panel Granger causality tests and an augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) event-study design, we find highly significant evidence that biodiversity risk reduces stock prices, with effects peaking between 3 and 10 months after a shock. Moreover, we uncover a marked asymmetry whereby the positive effects of low biodiversity risk episodes outweigh the negative effects of high-risk episodes. Results are robust across quantiles of the return distribution and hold when controlling for European equity market volatility and economic policy uncertainty. Our findings provide the first evidence that biodiversity media narratives drive stock market valuations in Europe.

Two-sample IV is a popular estimation method when the outcome and treatment variables are available in different samples, whereas instruments are available in both samples. The standard estimator is two-sample two-stage least squares estimator, which is efficient under homoskedasticity and homogeneity of the samples. We develop a robust two-step procedure for efficient estimation under general heteroskedasticity and heterogeneity of the samples, and propose a related two-sample Hansen overidentification test. A key feature of our approach is that only summary statistics from the linear regressions of the reduced form and first-stage in the two samples are needed. These are the six objects of the estimated coefficient vectors, and the homoskedastic and heteroskedasticity robust estimated variance matrices. We further show that the first-stage F-statistic in the treatment sample can be used as a test for weak instruments in the standard way under homoskedasticity and homogeneity, with the relative bias here a proportional bias. We propose an extension of the effective F-statistic of Montiel-Olea and Pflueger (2013) for the heteroskedastic case, following the generalization in Windmeijer (2025). We illustrate the estimators and tests in an application studying the effect of education on voting behavior from Marshall (2019), with cluster robust inference.

We study ramping procurement co-optimized with economic dispatch under net-demand uncertainty. We examine two flexible ramp product designs implemented by grid operators: single-interval and multi-interval co-optimization. Both rely on rolling-window stochastic optimization with binding and advisory interval decisions. We develop analytical frameworks to evaluate generator profits, consumer payments, bid cost recovery (BCR), and operational efficiency. In particular, net-demand uncertainty may lead to generator under-compensation, requiring discriminatory BCR. While operational efficiency is invariant to energy and ramp prices, producer profits and consumer payments depend critically on pricing. We examine locational marginal pricing (LMP) and two uniform pricing: maximum dispatch cost pricing (MDCP) and maximum temporal locational marginal pricing (MTLMP). With out-of-market BCR, LMP yields discriminatory energy prices, whereas MDCP eliminates BCR and MTLMP does so in most cases. This property enables us to establish truthful bidding incentives for price-taking generators under MDCP. Our analysis highlights trade-offs between single- and multi-interval co-optimization and pricing designs: single-interval energy-ramp co-optimization is advantageous under high forecast uncertainty and moderate ramping requirements, whereas multi-interval co-optimization is superior when net-demand forecasts are relatively accurate and ramp needs are challenging. Empirical results on CAISO and ERCOT data show that MDCP and MTLMP increase producer profits with negligible BCR, albeit at the expense of higher consumer payments relative to LMP.

Organizations and researchers show increasing interest in using large language models (LLMs) in place of human participants in A/B tests, in the hope of experimenting faster and at lower cost. We study when a treatment effect estimated on LLM outcomes can recover the effect that would have been measured on the human population of interest. Distributional equivalence between LLM and human outcomes would make any standard estimator valid but is unrealistic. We therefore develop a statistical framework that adapts surrogate endpoint theory to LLMs, showing that calibrating LLM outcomes to human outcomes identifies the average treatment effect under surrogacy and comparability conditions that are jointly weaker than distributional equivalence. We present a falsification test for surrogacy and a bound on the worst-case bias from limited overlap between the LLM and human samples. We further show that the stochasticity inherent to LLMs can weaken surrogacy for identification while also introducing bias and variance during estimation, but that using an average over multiple LLM draws per unit as the surrogate mitigates these issues. Simulations validate the results, and an empirical application to A/B tests on Upworthy headlines shows that raw LLM predictions recover only 39\% of the human treatment effect while nonparametric calibration closes the gap. A central takeaway is that A/B testing on LLMs yields correct results only by assumption, whereas A/B testing on humans is correct by design, and that the required assumptions are hardest to justify precisely where A/B testing on LLMs promises the greatest benefit. We discuss the role of LLM choice, prompting, and temperature as design variables, the compounded challenge posed by long-term outcomes, and how to size human pilot studies for validation.

We revisit size controllability results in Pötscher and Preinerstorfer (2025) concerning heteroskedasticity robust test statistics in regression models. For the special, but important, case of testing a single restriction (e.g., a zero restriction on a single coefficient), we povide a necessary and sufficient condition for size controllability, whereas the condition in Pötscher and Preinerstorfer (2025) is, in general, only sufficient (even in the case of testing a single restriction).

A utility function has been proposed that values more lives that are lost than those that are saved. I do not dispute the ethical motivation behind this kind of asymmetry. However, I show with a simple example that the scope of applicability of such a decision criterion is considerably more limited than it may first appear.

We propose a new method to estimate structural parameters in multi-way networks while controlling for rich structures of fixed effects. The method is based on a series of classification tasks and is agnostic to both the number and structure of fixed effects. In contrast to full maximum likelihood approaches, our estimator does not suffer from the incidental parameter problem. For sparsely connected networks, it is also computationally faster than PPML. We provide empirical evidence that our estimator yields more reliable confidence intervals than PPML and its bias-correction strategies. These improvements hold even under model misspecification and are more pronounced in sparse settings. While PPML remains competitive in dense, low-dimensional data, our approach offers a robust alternative for multi-way models that scales efficiently with sparsity. The method is applied to study the causal effect of a policy reform on spatial accessibility to health care in France.

The drastic changes in the global economy, geopolitical conditions, and disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the cost of living and quality of life. It is essential to comprehend the long-term implications of the cost of living and quality of life in major economies. A transparent and comprehensive living index must include multiple dimensions of living conditions. In this study, we present an approach to quantifying the quality of life through the Global Ease of Living Index that combines various socio-economic and infrastructural factors into a single composite score. Our index utilises economic indicators that define living standards, which could help in targeted interventions to improve specific areas. We present a machine learning framework to address missing data for certain economic indicators in specific countries. We then curate and update the data and use a dimensionality reduction approach (Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis) to create the Ease of Living Index for major economies since 1970. Our work significantly adds to the literature by offering a practical tool for policymakers to identify areas needing improvement, such as healthcare systems, employment opportunities, and public safety. Our approach with open data and code can be easily reproduced and applied to various contexts, providing transparency and accessibility for ongoing research and policy development in quality-of-life assessment.

Environmental problems are receiving increasing attention in socio-economic and health studies, fostering advances in recording and data collection of related real-life processes. However, traditional tools for data processing are often found too restrictive as they do not account for the rich nature of such data sets. In this paper, we propose a simple statistical perspective on forecasting environmental data collected sequentially over time across some predefined geographic region. We treat such data set as a surface (or functional) time series with a possibly complicated geographical domain. Using techniques from functional data analysis, we develop a forecasting methodology that allows to account for both geographic and temporal dependencies. This methodology allows integration of traditional multivariate techniques to provide forecasts surfaces. We demonstrate the practical value of our approach with a forecasting example of ground-level ozone concentration across Germany, showcasing its effectiveness and potential for broad application.