Collective decision-making with higher-order interactions on $d$-uniform hypergraphs
在$d$-一致超图上的高阶交互集体决策
Thierry Njougouo, Timoteo Carletti, Elio Tuci
AI总结 研究在$d$-一致超图上基于群体交互的舆论动力学模型,通过平均场分岔分析识别两个临界阈值,揭示交互组大小和品质比决定共识稳定性,且大组规模可能导致采纳劣质选项。
详情
理解群体交互如何影响舆论动态是研究集体行为的基础。在这项工作中,我们提出并研究了在$d$-一致超图上的舆论动力学模型,其中个体通过基于群体的(高阶)结构而非简单的成对连接进行交互。两种观点$A$和$B$各有一个品质$Q_A$和$Q_B$,智能体根据一个通用机制更新其观点,该机制考虑了支持任一观点的智能体的加权比例以及池化误差$\alpha$,后者是交互过程中信息丢失的代理。通过对平均场模型的分岔分析,我们确定了两个临界阈值$\alpha_{\text{crit}}^{(1)}$和$\alpha_{\text{crit}}^{(2)}$,它们界定了共识状态的稳定性区域。这些分析预测通过在随机和无标度超图上的大量基于智能体的模拟得到了验证。此外,分析框架表明,分岔结构和临界阈值独立于高阶网络的底层拓扑,仅取决于参数$d$(即交互组的大小)和品质比。最后,我们揭示了一个非平凡效应:大的交互组大小可能驱使系统采纳最差的选项。
Understanding how group interactions influence opinion dynamics is fundamental to the study of collective behavior. In this work, we propose and study a model of opinion dynamics on $d$-uniform hypergraphs, where individuals interact through group-based (higher-order) structures rather than simple pairwise connections. Each one of the two opinions $A$ and $B$ is characterized by a quality, $Q_A$ and $Q_B$, and agents update their opinions according to a general mechanism that takes into account the weighted fraction of agents supporting either opinion and the pooling error, $α$, a proxy for the information lost during the interaction. Through bifurcation analysis of the mean-field model, we identify two critical thresholds, $α_{\text{crit}}^{(1)}$ and $α_{\text{crit}}^{(2)}$, which delimit stability regimes for the consensus states. These analytical predictions are validated through extensive agent-based simulations on both random and scale-free hypergraphs. Moreover, the analytical framework demonstrates that the bifurcation structure and critical thresholds are independent of the underlying topology of the higher-order network, depending solely on the parameters $d$, i.e., the size of the interaction groups, and the quality ratio. Finally, we bring to the fore a nontrivial effect: the large sizes of the interaction groups, could drive the system toward the adoption of the worst option.