Attributing a synthetic utterance to its originating system remains an open challenge: closed-set models fail to reject unseen synthesizers and produce overconfident predictions. To address this, we propose a dual-branch gated fusion framework that pairs XLSR-53 with CORES, a 66-dimensional descriptor that, unlike prior Linear Filter Bank (LFB)-only work, spans cepstral, oscillatory, rhythmic, energy, and spectral dimensions to capture complementary synthesis artifacts. Our analysis shows XLSR-53 remains discriminative in-domain (ID) while CORES generalizes stably under distribution shift (OOD), yet their naive concatenation fails due to SSL representational imbalance. To resolve this, an input-conditioned gate adaptively weights each branch under joint training with cross-entropy, an energy margin loss for ID/OOD separation, and a gate diversity term. On the MLAAD benchmark, our system achieves 97.6\% ID accuracy, 4.9\% EERc, and an 83.5\% relative FPR95 reduction over the Interspeech 2025 baseline.

AI efficiency at scale is becoming critical in finance as market data volumes surge across equities, ETFs, FX, options, and high-frequency trading streams. This growth creates a core challenge for mature financial AI systems: models must learn from larger historical corpora while still meeting real-time latency constraints in trading, risk management, and derivative pricing. We use exact nearest-neighbor learning for high-frequency financial time series as a concrete case study to show that Mojo-based financial AI can address this challenge. We introduce a Mojo SIMD k-d tree with variance-based splitting, contiguous flat-buffer storage, and compile-time vectorized distance computation. We also provide a runtime result showing that, under standard pruning and implementation-cost assumptions, the Mojo SIMD k-d tree asymptotically dominates Mojo SIMD brute force and scikit-learn's k-d tree in the fixed-stock, large-$n$, moderate-dimensional regime. Empirically, across eight financial datasets on x86 and ARM64 with up to 277K training samples, the method achieves 17.5--21.6$\times$ speedup over scikit-learn's k-d tree on x86 and 28.1--43.5$\times$ over scikit-learn brute force on ARM64 equity/ETF datasets, while preserving exact outputs. Beyond nearest-neighbor inference, Mojo's compiled execution enables an Extra Trees-based implied-volatility pricing model to train on $10\times$ more options data, reducing put-IV RMSE by 8.0\%. These results position Mojo as a scalable, production-ready stack for financial AI and a promising foundation for efficient AI in other data-intensive fields. \keywords{Financial AI \and AI Efficiency \and Mojo \and SIMD \and K-D Trees \and KNN \and High-Frequency Trading \and Financial Time Series \and Scaling}

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly fine-tuned on domain-specific datasets that may contain sensitive, dataset-level properties. Recent work has shown that such dataset-level information can be effectively extracted through property inference attacks, posing a confidentiality risk. Existing defenses against these attacks primarily operate by modifying the training data distribution and hence require access to the original data and retraining the model, limiting their applicability to settings where data is unavailable or models are already deployed. In this work, we propose alignment-based defenses for mitigating property inference attacks in LLMs. Our approach reshapes the model's output distribution towards a target property ratio via post-training alignment, without modifying the training data. In particular, we adapt two widely used RLHF frameworks--Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)--as our defenses by constructing preference pairs and defining a specific reward function respectively. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that our alignment based defenses effectively mitigate property inference attacks while maintaining a strong utility confidentiality tradeoff.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) are stealthy, multi-stage cyberattacks whose detection is difficult due to scarce labeled traces, severe class imbalance, and the challenge of generating realistic malicious behavior. These challenges are amplified in cross-operating-system (cross-OS) settings, where a detector trained on one source platform must be deployed on an unlabeled target platform without access to target-domain labels. We study this source-only cross-OS APT detection problem using system-level provenance traces and propose a transport-based framework for ranking anomalous target processes under zero target supervision. The framework abstracts process behavior into structured natural-language descriptions, embeds them using pretrained language models, and constructs a source-normal reference for target scoring. It combines three evidence channels: semantic deviation from source-normal prototypes, structural deviation captured by graph autoencoding, and geometric deviation measured through Optimal Transport (OT). The main contribution is an OT-based barycentric anomaly score that projects target embeddings onto the source-normal manifold and quantifies residual transport mismatch. We further introduce entropy-weighted, angle-aware, and density-aware OT variants to capture uncertainty, directional drift, and sparse-support behavior. Evaluation on DARPA Transparent Computing data spanning Linux, Windows, BSD, and Android, across two APT scenarios and twelve cross-OS transfer pairs, shows that the proposed framework improves ROC-AUC and nDCG over source-only anomaly-detection baselines. The results demonstrate that source-only provenance modeling, combined with semantic abstraction and OT-based anomaly scoring, can support practical cross-platform APT detection without target-domain supervision.

Speech sound disorders affect approximately 44% of Korean pediatric communication disorder cases, yet automated assessment tools for Korean toddler speech remain underdeveloped. This paper presents an end-to-end pipeline for automated pronunciation evaluation of Korean toddler speech, combining neural speaker diarization with self-supervised speech representation learning. We introduce a novel IRB-approved corpus of 53 recordings from Korean-speaking children aged 2-5 years. A subset of 53 subjects was annotated by three independent reviewers, yielding 1,190 consonant and 748 vowel word-level binary correctness labels. We evaluate three diarization models, finding that NeMo SortFormer achieves 88.69% speaker count accuracy and 33.04% diarization error rate (DER) owing to its arrival-time-sorted transformer architecture, which handles the acoustic confound between young female caregivers exhibiting aegyo and toddler speech. For pronunciation scoring, we compare three self-supervised learning (SSL) backbones across multiple pooling strategies. A cross-model ensemble routing consonant prediction to HuBERT-large and vowel prediction to WavLM-large achieves balanced accuracies of 0.720 and 0.845, with a mean of 0.782.

Large language models deployed as autonomous agents for enterprise workflows face a key challenge: verbose tool responses from enterprise systems can cause context overflow, stale-state errors, and high inference cost. We study this problem in automated expense itemization in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations using Model Context Protocol tools. We evaluate four GPT-5 configurations on a 50-task hotel expense benchmark: no user model, full conversation history, context pruned to the last 5 tool call/response pairs, and pruning with automated summarization. Results are averaged across 5 independent runs, with the user model held constant for the context-engineering comparison. The no-user-model baseline achieves only 8.0% complete itemization. Full-context retention improves completion to 71.0%, but consumes 1,480,996 tokens and 14.56 hours per benchmark. Pruning to the last 5 tool calls improves completion to 79.0% while reducing token use to 535,274 and runtime to 5.39 hours. Adding summarization achieves the best result: 91.6% complete itemization and 99.64% average amount itemized, with 553,374 tokens and 5.79 hours. We further report confidence intervals, effect-size analysis, sensitivity over pruning and summary windows, failure analysis, results across five expense types grouped into three categories, and cross-model evidence with Claude Sonnet 4.5. These results show that, for this class of enterprise tool-use workflow, selective retention of recent tool interactions plus compact summarization can improve both reliability and efficiency compared with full-history retention.

Demand for older-adult and patient care is growing rapidly as populations age worldwide. Foundation models are increasingly being integrated into robots and interactive agents, with the promise of more flexible communication and personalized assistance. However, care settings require reliable and workflow-compatible systems with accountable human oversight, and it remains unclear whether current embodied systems can translate technical advances into clinical impact. This Perspective synthesizes foundation model-based care robots across three areas: design features, user experience, and evidence for care-related outcomes. Current systems most commonly use foundation models as conversational and reasoning layers within voice-centered socially assistive embodiments, while multimodal grounding and physical autonomy remain limited. Empirical evaluations report positive usability and engagement benefits, but reliability failures persist across the interaction pipeline such as hallucinations and conversational breakdowns. Evidence for care impact remains concentrated in proximal outcomes such as cognitive engagement and participation, with limited evidence for validated clinical or care-related changes. We argue that future research should transition toward care-specific evaluation standards, accountable autonomy, and integration into care workflows to support more responsive and responsible care technologies.

Insertion Language Models (ILMs) offer several advantages over left-to-right generation and mask-based generation. However, existing formulations of insertion-based generation have largely been ad-hoc. In this paper, we derive a diffusion-style denoising objective for ILMs from first principles by formulating the noising process as a continuous-time Markov chain on the space of variable-length sequences. We show that previous formulations of ILMs can be viewed as special cases of this denoising framework. Through empirical evaluation on a synthetic planning task, we show that the proposed approach retains the benefits of insertion-based generation over left-to-right generation and masked diffusion models. In language modeling, our diffusion-based approach is competitive with left-to-right generation and masked diffusion models, while offering additional flexibility in sampling compared to existing insertion language models.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) aims to adapt pretrained models with a small trainable parameter subset, however, most existing methods choose this subset from fixed architectural heuristics rather than using dynamic, task-aware criteria. We introduce \textbf{FisherAdapTune}, a Fisher-guided Adaptive Fine-Tuning framework that progressively selects parameter groups by tracking the temporal drift of their Fisher geometry. Starting from a PAC-Bayesian view of fine-tuning, we decompose the generalization error bound into Fisher-weighted update costs and show that parameter groups whose curvature contribution has stabilized can be frozen to reduce the error bound without interrupting the remaining adaptation dynamics. FisherAdapTune formulates this criterion with a scale-invariant Jensen-Shannon distance between consecutive Fisher distributions, yielding an adaptive active parameter set. We evaluate our approach on a downstream segmentation task, and results show FisherAdapTune improves the in-distribution performance and zero-shot transfer in multiple settings, validating that Fisher structural drift is a useful signal for efficient, task-aware adaptation. We release our \href{https://github.com/AtlasAnalyticsLab/FisherAdapTune}{code} publicly to enable further application of our proposed approach.

Climate change research increasingly requires AI systems that reason across text, dynamic visual content, and scientific figures, yet existing climate QA benchmarks are small, mostly textual, and cover a narrow range of models. We introduce MMClima, a large-scale multimodal climate question answering framework with 104k+ expert-validated question-answer pairs spanning articles, video transcriptions, and figures across five core climate science domains. MMClima is constructed via automated claim extraction and QA synthesis with human-in-the-loop validation to ensure both scale and reliability. Using MMClima, we benchmark state-of-the-art multimodal language models on tasks requiring factual recall, visual interpretation, and cross-modal synthesis. We additionally fine-tune on the textual split to produce mmclima-70b-txt, a domain-adapted baseline that outperforms strong open- and closed-source models on textual QA. We release the dataset, evaluation pipeline, fine-tuned model weights, and data creation framework to support standardized multimodal evaluation for climate science.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) relies on the diversity of $K$ rollouts within each group; otherwise, the group-mean advantage $A^{(k)} = r^{(k)} - μ_r$ collapses to zero. This presents a structural challenge for latent-reasoning models like Coconut, which feed continuous hidden states recurrently in place of discrete chain-of-thought tokens. Because the latent phase is inherently deterministic given the parameters and prompt, multiple rollouts produce identical trajectories, stalling GRPO's progress. Consequently, applying group-relative reinforcement learning to continuous latent reasoning has proven difficult. To address this, we propose sourcing the necessary stochasticity through structured dropout. By applying a single Bernoulli mask held constant across all latent recurrence steps for a given rollout, we generate essential trajectory variance. This shared mask effectively treats each rollout as a posterior sample from a variational distribution over parameters, allowing GRPO to optimize the expected reward of a Bayesian model-average policy. We provide both theoretical justification for this method -- including unbiasedness, variance reduction, and the well-definedness of the latent gradient -- and empirical validation. On GSM8K, dropout-GRPO improves a Coconut baseline from $27.29\%$ to $29.01\%$ pass@1, demonstrating the viability of GRPO learning for latent-reasoning models. Our work positions this as a practical, theoretically grounded approach for post-training latent-reasoning LLMs.

Modern Diffusion Transformers for video generation provide limited control over the progression of time and the editing of temporal dynamics. We propose a temporal-control methodology that extends a pretrained DiT with explicit time editing, allowing control over motion speed and temporal structure without redesigning the backbone. Its core implementation augments the pretrained model with a lightweight temporal module, preserving the original generative prior while expanding its controllable dynamic range.

We introduce flow control of vision-language-action (VLA) models, a simple and effective way to steer VLA actions in real-time through generic inputs, such as a keyboard. This method can be used out-of-the-box and does not require retraining or fine-tuning VLAs. It enables relatively crude user inputs to steer a VLA to align with user intent. The VLA transforms these inputs into action samples drawn from the VLA expert action distribution learned during training, so that the generated actions are high quality (conformity to the action expert distribution) and high fidelity (reflecting the user's intent). We demonstrate that flow control has many desirable properties: (1) flow control accurately and responsively steers robot actions with user inputs, (2) it is robust to suboptimal user inputs, (3) it enables users to steer VLAs to achieve significantly higher success rates and faster task completion, and (4) fine-tuning a VLA on flow control trajectories improves the autonomous policy. Together, these results provide a simple and intuitive way for users to help steer VLA actions, increasing task performance.

Wildfire detection and monitoring are critical for mitigating fire spread and reducing environmental and infrastructural damage. In this work, we introduce GWFP (Global Wildfire Prevention Dataset), a large-scale, open-source dataset of wildfire images and videos designed to support early fire and smoke detection research. GWFP contains geographically diverse wildfire scenes, including flames, smoke, Waterdog/Fog environmental conditions, Near Infrared (NIR) imagery, Ember, and challenging negative samples collected from real-world scenarios worldwide. To evaluate dataset robustness and cross-domain generalization, we benchmark multiple convolutional and transformer-based architectures across both in-domain and cross-dataset settings. Additionally, we explore lightweight frequency--spatial feature interaction using Hadamard-enhanced residual connections (HTE-ResNet) to analyze representation robustness under domain-shift conditions. Experimental results demonstrate strong cross-dataset generalization and practical utility for real-world wildfire monitoring applications. The dataset and source code will be publicly released upon acceptance.

As AI systems move into operating systems, privacy no longer turns only on whether a model runs locally. A local assistant may assemble email, calendar entries, files, screenshots, notifications, and app intents; retain embeddings or summaries; invoke tools; emit telemetry; or route difficult requests to cloud infrastructure. Local inference reduces some exposure, but it answers only one question: where computation occurs. It does not answer who may assemble context, what derived state persists, which actions are authorized, or how updates change the system's authority. We develop an OS-centered privacy framework for on-device AI that treats privacy as an institutional accountability problem rather than a deployment attribute. The framework specifies a threat model, a six-part privacy risk taxonomy, privacy-by-architecture controls, and a four-level audit rubric. We demonstrate the rubric through a documentation-bounded comparison of Apple Intelligence/Foundation Models, Android AICore/Gemini Nano, and Microsoft Recall. Meaningful privacy in on-device AI depends on constrained information flow, bounded authority, visible user control, and auditable governance across the operating-system lifecycle.

This paper extends the concept of Learning Entropy (LE) from temporal adaptive systems to spatial learning in multilayer perceptron networks (MLPs) applied to image data. Instead of evaluating image structure directly from gradients or covariance operators, as local neighborhood methods do, the proposed approach analyzes the learning process itself through Learning Entropy. An MLP is trained to predict the intensity of a center pixel from its surrounding spatial context, while LE is evaluated from the incremental adaptation of neural weights during learning across image-derived samples. The resulting Spatial Learning Entropy Maps (SLEM) identify unusual image points and regions that induce strong adaptation of the neural network and therefore have an important role in the learning process. The results indicate that spatial Learning Entropy provides a complementary perspective to conventional feature extraction and explainability methods by highlighting spatial locations that are particularly informative for network learning. Spatial Learning Entropy provides a complementary perspective to conventional feature extraction and explainability methods by identifying image points and regions according to their learning impact rather than their local structural properties. The proposed framework may open new directions for learning-driven image or scene analysis in computer vision, manufacturing, and robotics.

Recent learning-based path planners use neural networks to process visual map representations and approximate heuristics for classical search algorithms, yielding near-optimal paths with reduced search effort. However, these methods are tied to the shortest-path objective implicit in their supervision, which limits their flexibility to accommodate alternative criteria. We introduce FlexPath, a two-stage framework that decouples feasibility from preference. In Stage 1, we use imitation learning to acquire a task-independent spatial prior over feasible paths from visual map inputs. In Stage 2, differentiable Path Shape Objectives (PSOs) adapt this prior toward task-specific criteria without relearning path structure, requiring only efficient objective-level adaptation. A single pretrained model can be adapted to multiple objectives. For shortest-path planning, FlexPath reduces search effort on TMP by 14.3% compared to the state-of-the-art TransPath, while also finding lower-cost paths on average and demonstrating strong zero-shot generalization across three unseen domains. For obstacle clearance with minimum clearance distance 2, it achieves 96.8% full obstacle avoidance while maintaining low search cost. The framework further extends to semantic-aware avoidance and waypoint guidance via objective-level adaptation, and remains compatible with classical planners at inference time. Data and code are available at https://github.com/FraunhoferIVI/FlexPath.

Current cross-view localization methods predominantly rely on satellite imagery as the aerial modality. Although recent work explores planimetric maps (e.g., OpenStreetMap tiles), these approaches often lag in performance. Yet both modalities are widely available and possess complementary properties. Satellite images are closer to ground-level camera imagery, offering finer detail, whereas planimetric maps contain annotated objects (e.g., streetlamps) and remain informative in areas where the ground is occluded, such as by foliage. Despite this, only one prior work provides an end-to-end method to fuse the two modalities, and it does not demonstrate their potential within state-of-the-art methods. To combine the strengths of both modalities, we propose a new fusion module that augments standard encoders and demonstrates that integrating satellite imagery with planimetric maps improves state-of-the-art single-modality methods. The module comprises (i) cross-modal conditioning, which processes each modality's encoding with awareness of the other, and (ii) a patch-level fusion rule that controls the granularity of information exchange. We achieve state-of-the-art results, reducing the mean localization error by 30.13\%. Qualitatively, the fusion adaptively selects the more informative modality, improving overall accuracy.

AI is increasingly used to support scientific peer review, from manuscript screening, reviewer assistance to editorial triage. Although such systems promise to reduce reviewer burden and accelerate publication, their robustness to strategic manipulation remains poorly understood. Here we show that AI-mediated peer review is vulnerable to a simple, low-cost manipulation: superficial rephrasing of the manuscript abstract. Without changing the underlying scientific content and communication, and even without knowledge of the reviewing model, adversarially rewritten abstracts substantially improve AI review outcomes. We see this across disciplines and publication venues, for both human-written and AI-generated papers. Our strongest attack achieves an attack-success-rate of about 38%, increasing acceptance ratings by +1.31 for Gemini 3 Flash reviewers and by +0.88 for GPT 5.4 Mini reviewers on a 10-point scale. When the original AI review suggests 'reject', the success rate rises to more than 50%. This effect extends beyond overall score inflation, increasing review confidence and scores on core scientific criteria such as soundness, significance and perceived contribution. The attack is practical, requiring only about 5 minutes and $1 for a 10-page AI conference submission, and is hard to distinguish from ordinary scientific editing. Inflated AI reviews could bias downstream human decision-making, shifting editorial recommendations from rejection towards acceptance. These findings reveal a general vulnerability in AI-assisted scientific evaluation: when AI-generated review influence editorial decisions, authors may be incentivized to optimize manuscripts for AI judgment rather than scientific merit. Our results suggest that AI tools should not be treated as neutral evaluators in high-stakes peer review without systematic robustness testing, transparent safeguards and careful human oversight.

As recommender systems transition toward agentic, multi-turn conversational interfaces, evaluation paradigms have struggled to keep pace. Current benchmarks often rely on "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluations, which introduce subjectivity, high costs and inconsistency. We present $τ$-Rec, a benchmark for agentic recommender systems that replaces subjective evaluation with verifiable rewards and a reveal-tagged elicitation (RTE) mechanism that controls how task constraints surface during dialogue. By testing agents against structured catalog predicates and employing a pass^k reliability metric, $τ$-Rec provides a systematic test for consistent reasoning. Our evaluation of nine configurations across five model families -- GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3-32B and GPT-5 mini -- reveals a steep reliability cliff, where even the best model achieves only ~57% at pass^1 and ~38% at pass^4, highlighting a critical gap in current conversational agent deployment. All code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/nbharaths/tau-rec.

Quantized checkpoints are often screened first with quality metrics and only later, if at all, with direct safety tests. This paper audits that shortcut on a matched 51-row matrix spanning 6 models, 4 families, a 7-level GGUF ladder, and AWQ/GPTQ INT4 checkpoints. In this matrix the shortcut fails: all 36 quality-safety pairings split direction across models, and 9 hidden-danger rows plus 1 near-hidden-danger row show quality stable or improved while refusal falls by 12-68 percentage points. Seven of the 11 AWQ/GPTQ rows are hidden-danger. A four-probe mechanistic follow-up over the 17 Hugging Face-backed FP16/AWQ/GPTQ cells does not rescue it: entropy, refusal-direction, and calibration probes are weak or null separators of dangerous rows, and although probe-identified safety-associated neurons absorb 1.39$\times$ more quantization error overall ($p < 5 \times 10^{-7}$), the effect is not regime-specific. Claude Sonnet 4 relabels 11,470 items in a predefined stratified set, agrees with the primary gemma3:12b judge on 89.9\% of rows ($κ= 0.873$, 95\% CI [0.866, 0.881]), and changes 0/10 hidden-danger cells. A calibrated study-internal behavioral screen -- the Refusal Template Stability Index (RTSI), built from four refusal-template drift features and calibrated on this matrix -- routes 10/10 hidden- or near-hidden-danger rows to direct safety testing (Wilson 95\% CI lower bound 0.72) while leaving 23 of 45 non-baseline rows in a low-risk bucket under both in-sample scoring and row-level leave-one-out validation; on the same matrix, the best single-feature baselines (unique-prefix-rate-delta, raw refusal-rate delta) recover 9/10 and 8/10 respectively at matched bucket size, and cross-stack transfer requires recalibration. For the quantized checkpoints, model families, and safety outcomes studied here, retained quality cannot waive direct safety evaluation.

Learning the compositional nature of the physical world requires joint observation of interacting factors. However, because practical data is often decentralized, these factors are fragmented across isolated silos. Existing decentralized generative approaches focus only on modeling the union of siloed data, overlooking novel combinations implied by the collective whole. To bridge this gap, we introduce Decentralized Compositional Flow Matching (DCFM), a framework that enforces structural constraints across the global set of generative factors, without exchanging any raw data. DCFM enables novel combinations to emerge through peer interactions, even when no single data source can independently support the composition. Empirically, DCFM substantially outperforms federated learning and mixture-of-experts baselines across conditional image generation, robotic spatial planning, and medical attribute co-occurrence modeling.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can listen and see, but how do audio and visual signals actually travel through the network to shape an answer? Despite their growing role in research and real-world applications, the internal pathways through which audio and visual tokens influence the final prediction remain poorly understood. In this study, we examine audio-visual information flow inside Audio-Visual Large Language Models (AVLLMs), tracing how AVLLMs route, utilize, and integrate audio and visual information across two input configurations, audio-visual video and multiple interleaved audio-visual items. We find that for audio-visual video, AVLLMs follow the sequential information flow pathway established for VLMs and VideoLLMs, with audio and visual contribution flowing along this pathway in proportion to the task's reliance on each modality. In settings with multiple interleaved audio-visual items, this routing shifts to different parallel streams. Furthermore, we demonstrate that audio-visual and other token types can be discarded once their information is transferred to LLM, with minimal impact on the model's prediction or even slight improvement, generalizing across multiple tasks and datasets, enabling more efficient inference. These findings hold across multiple models and scales, Qwen2.5-Omni and Video-SALMONN2 Plus at 3B and 7B scales, leading to hypotheses on why these flow structures emerge. Together, these results deliver the first coherent picture of how AVLLMs orchestrate sound and sight inside the network and lay the groundwork for the next wave of interpretability, design, and efficiency advances in audio-visual and broader MLLMs.

Recent advances in 3D generation have led to substantial improvements in realism, controllability, and efficiency, yet the evaluation of 3D assets remains underexplored. Existing evaluation paradigms, including human evaluation, learned metrics, and vision-language models (VLMs) as judges, suffer from limitations in cost, scalability, resolution handling, or task-specific alignment. In this work, we focus on 3D mesh evaluation and introduce DB-3DME, the Dataset and Benchmark for 3D Mesh Evaluation. DB-3DME contains 2,619 synthetic 3D meshes paired with human ratings on Geometry and Prompt Adherence. Using this dataset, we systematically benchmark state-of-the-art VLMs and identify visual encoding of 3D representations as a key factor for human-aligned evaluation performance. Motivated by this finding, we fine-tune an open-weight VLM, Qwen-2.5-VL-7B, for 3D mesh evaluation by adapting the visual encoder while freezing the language model. The fine-tuned model substantially outperforms existing pre-trained VLMs across multiple evaluation dimensions, establishing a new benchmark for automatic 3D mesh evaluation. We publicly release the benchmark dataset on GitHub and Hugging Face to facilitate future research.

A common assumption in strategic classification is that the classifier is public knowledge. However, it remains unclear whether, and why, a system would choose to commit to full disclosure. We study a setting in which regulation requires the system to disclose some, but not all, of the information. This induces a learning task in which the learner must jointly optimize the classifier and the uncertainty surrounding it. To this end, we adopt from robust mechanism design the notion of ambiguity, which in our setting allows the learner to reveal a set or range of possible classifiers, while privately choosing which of them to ultimately realize. We investigate how ambiguity affects the learning task, develop efficient algorithms for computing best-responses and training, and empirically explore strategic learning and its outcomes in this novel setting and using our approach.

Semantic segmentation in remote sensing requires costly pixel-level annotations, and nearly every problem demands a new dataset since models rarely transfer across sensors, platforms, or geographies. Existing human-in-the-loop frameworks expand sparse clicks into dense supervision via auxiliary machinery (pseudo-labels, propagation, CRFs, foundation-model prompts, auxiliary heads), all operating on the model's predictive distribution. A confidently wrong pixel is indistinguishable from a confidently correct one in that distribution by construction, so no rule reading it can separate the two; the distinguishing signal is external to the model. This paper hypothesizes that expert clicks targeting confident model errors, not arbitrary pixels, suffice to match dense supervision, with no expansion machinery. iSAGE (Iterative Sparse Annotation Guided by Expert) realizes this hypothesis on an integrated open-source platform, where an error-weighted loss amplifies the gradient at each click and the annotation record itself is the dataset, extensible, correctable, and auditable. Experiments use a minimum-effort regime: at most one labeled pixel per class per frame. On BsB Aerial, iSAGE recovers 97.2% of dense supervision (74.79% mIoU on 0.040% of pixels) with contrasting class dynamics: amorphous classes (permeable areas) saturate from the seed, while small classes (cars) require late-iteration effort. On ISPRS Vaihingen (external benchmark), iSAGE reaches 76.78% mIoU with 0.011% of pixels, matching the dense baseline (76.65%) and exceeding all published methods. Under the same pipeline, four output-reading mechanisms (oracle entropy across budgets 1--100x, pseudo-labels across thresholds 0.90--0.99, CRF-based propagation, uniform random) plateau 7.4 to 14.5 pp below iSAGE. Across 31 surveyed methods, iSAGE is the only iterative human-in-the-loop framework operating without auxiliary machinery.

While deep Reinforcement Learning (deep-RL) has been increasingly applied to parameter control in evolutionary algorithms, rigorous theoretical analysis of parameter control remains largely restricted to single-parameter settings, owing to the difficulty of deriving effective, interpretable multi-parameter policies amenable to formal study. We demonstrate how deep-RL can be leveraged to overcome this barrier, using the (1+($λ$,$λ$))-genetic algorithm optimizing OneMax, one of the few problems where a super-constant speedup of dynamic control has been formally proven, as a representative case study. We first show that standard approaches struggle to converge in this multi-parameter setting, and introduce algorithm-agnostic enhancements targeting action-space decomposition, reward shifting, and long-horizon discounting. With these in place, we compare common deep-RL methods and find that Double Deep Q-Networks uniquely avoid the policy collapse observed in Proximal Policy Optimization, yielding trajectories suitable for downstream analysis. Crucially, we move beyond the ``black-box'' nature of neural networks by distilling the learned behaviors into a transparent, symbolic control policy. This resulting policy does not only offer interpretability for future theoretical analysis but also yields exceptional performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines across a wide range of problem sizes.

Personalized persuasive text generation can improve relevance and engagement, but demographic conditioning may also introduce unequal framing across groups. We study fairness mitigation in personalized generation as a constrained multi-objective alignment problem: reduce demographic disparities while preserving personalization fidelity. We propose a Pareto-guided teacher alignment framework that combines revision-based candidate generation, pair-aware feasibility gating, Pareto-style candidate selection, and optional preference optimization through supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. We evaluate the framework on climate change and vaccination persuasion tasks using a controlled context-rich demographic grid with matched gender and age pairs and a unified five-audit evaluation suite spanning persuasion bias, formality disparity, emotional framing disparity, lexical association disparity, and personalization fidelity. Across both domains and cross-family transfer settings, no single alignment strategy dominates all objectives simultaneously. Instead, methods occupy different regions of a fairness-personalization Pareto frontier: some achieve stronger disparity reductions, while others better preserve personalization or demographic stability. Our results show that fairness mitigation effects are objective-dependent and transfer inconsistently across domains and model families, motivating bounded-regression, multi-audit model selection over single-metric optimization for fairness-sensitive personalized generation.

Federated learning (FL) is often subject to aggregation variance if clients do not consistently participate in training rounds. While reusing stale model updates from inactive clients is a common technique to reduce this variance, we find that with skewed client participation, the resulting update staleness can become severe enough to destabilize training. To remedy this, we propose FedSteer, a novel method that constructs a gradient subspace from a cache of recent client gradients to serve as a low-dimensional representation of the current optimization landscape. FedSteer projects an active client's true gradient onto this subspace to find a set of optimal coordinates. For an inactive client, FedSteer reuses these coordinates with the now-evolved subspace drifted by other active clients. This process effectively "steers" outdated gradients toward the current global objective. This is complemented by a selective caching strategy that identifies a representative client subset to form the subspace, reducing server memory. Experiments demonstrate that FedSteer significantly outperforms baselines, preventing performance collapse in challenging scenarios while delivering accuracy gains of over 7% in others.

Accurate lesion segmentation from whole-body Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) scans is essential for cancer staging and treatment planning. PET provides functional metabolic information with different radiotracers, while CT offers anatomical localization. Lesion delineation from PET/CT imaging is clinically challenging due to subtle imaging features, confounders, and inter-reader variability. Existing deep learning approaches suffer from training-related stochasticity, inconsistent predictions, missed lesions in high tumor-burden cases, and lack uncertainty quantification, limiting their clinical reliability. Using nnU-Net as a baseline, we propose an uncertainty-aware framework for whole-body PET/CT lesion segmentation that integrates (1) Bayesian ensembling to reduce training stochasticity, (2) voxel-wise uncertainty quantification with epistemic and aleatoric decomposition, and (3) epistemic uncertainty-augmented training to improve lesion detection. Two public datasets, AutoPET-III (1,611 scans) and Deep-PSMA (200 scans), comprising FDG and PSMA studies across multiple cancer types, are used for training and evaluation. Bayesian ensembling improves robustness and performance over deterministic nnU-Net models on the unseen AutoPET-III test set. Uncertainty maps highlight regions of model disagreement and correlate with misclassifications, particularly false positives. Uncertainty-augmented training improves lesion recovery at the cost of increased FPVol, reflecting a precision-recall trade-off. A case-adaptive routing strategy further improves Dice by selecting between the base and augmented models. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically investigate uncertainty quantification in multi-tracer, pan-cancer PET/CT segmentation and to combine Bayesian ensembling with uncertainty-aware modeling for this task.