Trajectory data augmentation is a promising approach to mitigate data scarcity in machine learning applications, but its utility has been limited by the complexity of preserving spatio-temporal coherence. Although prior work demonstrated the viability of geometric perturbation, it relied on naive random selection, leaving a critical gap in understanding which trajectories should be augmented for maximal benefit. This thesis addresses this gap by developing a systematic and scalable framework to evaluate five systematic selection strategies: Outlierness, Diversity, Representativeness, Uncertainty, and Random selection. These strategies were rigorously tested across four datasets covering animal behavior (Foxes and Starkey), maritime traffic (AIS), and urban traffic (Car) using a suite of linear and non-linear machine learning models. As part of this evaluation, an Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization loop was integrated to empirically identify the best-performing augmentation parameters for each dataset within the explored search space. The results indicate that, while systematic selection is not a universal solution, it offers distinct advantages over the random baseline. Systematic strategies, particularly Outlierness and Uncertainty, demonstrated higher stability and were less prone to performance degradation observed with random sampling in dense datasets. However, the findings also reveal that the value of augmentation is strictly conditional. Visual analysis via UMAP demonstrates that while systematic augmentation successfully repairs topological fragmentation in sparse datasets, it can act as a corrupting noise signal in high-quality, dense datasets. Furthermore, the study identified physical limitations in high-velocity domains, where standard perturbation techniques lead to divergence in feature space...

AI compilers aggressively rewrite computation graphs through normalization, lowering, and optimization, making it difficult to track the provenance of tensors and operators across compilation. Reliable provenance is essential for attaching platform-specific postprocessing, debugging compiler behavior, and validating transformations, yet existing solutions are either invasive or ad hoc under non-injective graph rewrites. We present a lightweight, generative approach to provenance tracking based on observational semantics. Instead of propagating identifiers through compiler passes, we observe graph transformations and reason about provenance in terms of observable computational actions. We formalize this approach using a coalgebraic model and bisimulation, which preserves provenance even when intermediate nodes are eliminated. Furthermore, we implement this approach in a prototype AI compiler COVAN, demonstrating stable provenance across compilation pipelines with minimal engineering overhead.

A common assumption holds that enough observational and interventional data, given to a strong enough predictor, suffices. We report a failure mode that contradicts it. Across hundreds of structural causal models, on identified quantities a strong predictor and a Bayesian baseline both succeed, but on unidentified quantities (the couplings between counterfactual worlds) the predictor collapses to a point, on 28% of models to one no valid model can produce, while the truth is an admissible interval more data never narrows. The gap is structural: prediction cannot represent uncertainty over counterfactual couplings. We cast a world model as a single positive semidefinite coupling kernel K(T,T') over admissible worlds, whose diagonal is the ordinary posterior (what a predictor recovers) and whose off-diagonal is the cross-world coupling it cannot, which every counterfactual reads. The paper is the theory of that off-diagonal. It is real: two states with identical posteriors differ on a cross-world query, and the off-diagonal is the coupling that fixes counterfactuals. It can be bounded: positive semidefiniteness is partial-identifying information the marginals lack, and enforcing it bounds counterfactuals in polynomial time where the exact response-type program is intractable. Logical structure sharpens it: ontology axioms tighten the bound by up to a third, propagating to couplings they never touch. It can be acquired: targeted scars, constraints learned from encountered infeasibilities, close the gap several times faster than untargeted ones. Its full reconstruction is approximate counting of the admissible worlds, tractable below the Sly-Sun threshold and inapproximable above; we do not claim to beat the worst case.

Subject Customization is a foundational task in modern image generation. By providing a few reference images and a text prompt, users can generate images of a specific object in any desired scene. However, existing methods still struggle to achieve effective pose control for customized subjects. In practice, they often exhibit inaccurate poses or inconsistent cross-pose appearances. These limitations suggest that understanding objects in a volumetric manner remains a significant challenge for 2D-native backbones. To address this challenge, we propose Pose-ICL, a tuning-free framework that leverages 3D-aware In-Context Learning (ICL) to directly adapt to new subjects through multiple paired image-pose references. Its core mechanism,Surface-Anchored Position Embedding (SAPE), equips the model with explicit 3D awareness by anchoring image tokens to the surface coordinates of a volumetric bounding box. Dedicated refinements ensure its seamless compatibility with existing DiT models. Extensive evaluations on both 3D assets and real-world subjects demonstrate that Pose-ICL significantly outperforms current methods in both pose accuracy and identity consistency.

This paper presents an overview of the inaugural PortraitCraft Challenge, held as one of the official competitions at CVPR 2026. The challenge focuses on portrait composition understanding and generation, aiming to advance AI research in portrait aesthetics analysis and controllable image synthesis. Unlike existing datasets and tasks that primarily focus on global aesthetic scoring, PortraitCraft introduces a unified evaluation framework comprising two complementary tracks. Track 1 requires models to perform structured portrait composition understanding, and Track 2 requires models to generate portrait images from structured composition descriptions under explicit compositional constraints. To support the challenge, we constructed and publicly released a large-scale portrait composition dataset consisting of approximately 50,000 curated real portrait images, providing multi-level supervision. This report describes the challenge setup, evaluation protocols, dataset composition, and final results, along with an analysis of the technical characteristics of the submitted solutions. The PortraitCraft Challenge provides a standardized and reproducible platform for research on portrait composition understanding and generation, and is expected to foster further progress in the fields of portrait aesthetics and controllable image generation.

To showcase products, merchants often incur substantial costs creating high-quality display images. Foreground Conditioned Outpainting (FCO) meets this demand, allowing users to create desired backgrounds for foreground instances at a low cost by adjusting the text prompt. However, existing text-driven FCO methods exhibit critical flaws in their outputs, most notably the presence of artifacts, which refer to regions in the synthesized background that share the same semantics as the foreground instance. Such artifacts diminish the object's prominence and degrade image quality. We attribute the issue to the misalignment between the given instance and text-derived concept embeddings. To address this, we propose the Customized Concept Embedding Diffusion (CCE-Diffusion) framework. Its core is a CCE-Module to customize concept embeddings, bridging the gap between generic noun semantics and a specific visual instance. An Instance-Aware Loss guides the module's optimization, while a Semantic-Preserving Prompt Template prevents customized embeddings from distorting other words in the prompt. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate that CCE-Diffusion significantly reduces artifacts in the outputs. As a plug-and-play component, the CCE-Module can integrate with various FCO methods, enhancing their performance.

Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to continuously learn new classes without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. While recent CIL advances have spurred significant interest across various modalities, the audio-visual setting remains underexplored. Furthermore, although foundational multimodal models like SAM-Audio encapsulate rich static priors, our empirical analysis reveals that these representations struggle in incremental settings. This work bridges this gap by integrating SAM-Audio's audio-visual priors into the CIL setting. Specifically, we leverage its dense audio and visual representations and employ a novel guided attention strategy where the audio features contextually guide the visual representations. To further mitigate catastrophic forgetting, we introduce dual-level distillation objectives at both the feature and logit levels. Extensive evaluations on audio-visual CIL benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Learner agency and autonomy are foundational to personal development, yet a pervasive "jingle-jangle" fallacy (i.e. identical terms denoting different constructs, distinct terms denoting identical ones) has substantially hindered cumulative knowledge. Treating meaning as a phenomenon constituted through use in linguistic practice, we extracted 8,954 definitions and 2,700 scale items from over 14,000 publications, to investigate how researchers actually used learner agency and autonomy with a semantic analysis pipeline. The definitional landscape of two constructs resolves into three dimensions: regulation and control of learning (task), intrinsic motivation and internal decision-making (person), and social-relational action (sociocultural), thereby empirically quantifying the jingle-jangle fallacy. Existing scales, however, systematically underrepresent the sociocultural dimension. Critically, current generative AI research in education concentrates on learning regulation and control, narrowing the behavioral repertoire that AI-mediated learning environments are designed to cultivate. Beyond conceptual clarification, this work carries direct implications for conceptualization, measurement, and practice towards supporting the multidimensional learner agency and autonomy.

Illegal logging and timber trade continue to pose significant challenges in the Philippines, where accurate wood species identification is essential for enforcement but limited by the need for specialised equipment and expertise. This study aims to evaluate whether AI models for macroscopic wood identification can be developed and deployed by wood scientists without programming expertise using the Xylorix platform, focusing on five Philippine hardwood species: Mangium (Acacia mangium Willd.), Rain Tree [Samanea saman (Jacq.) Merr.], Banuyo (Wallaceodendron celebicum Koord.), Tindalo [Afzelia rhomboidea (Blanco) Vidal], and Ipil [Intsia bijuga (Colebr.) O. Kuntze]. Binary classifiers were trained on 10,663 verified cross-section images from 260 specimens and evaluated using specimen-level mean scoring to mirror operational field conditions. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.969 (Ipil) to 1.000 (Mangium), and Average Precision (AP) values ranged from 0.589 (Samanea) to 1.000 (Mangium). Four of five species achieved AA grade (AUC and AP both \geq 0.90); Rain Tree received AE (AUC \geq 0.90, AP < 0.60) due to AP compression from its small positive test set (3 specimens). All five classifiers rank their target specimens above non-target specimens with near-perfect fidelity. Specimen-level error analysis revealed 9 false negatives from Ipil, primarily stemming from localized image artifacts and 3 false positives for Rain Tree and 1 false positive for Tindalo caused by shared tribal-level anatomical traits. These findings demonstrate that Xylorix non-programmers can leverage the Xylorix platform to construct operationally reliable wood identification models suitable for field deployment at supply chain checkpoints.

LLM-powered chatbots are increasingly embedded in everyday workflows, raising sustainability concerns due to their energy use. Most mitigation strategies emphasize model or infrastructure efficiency, while the user-interface (UI) layer remains underexplored despite its potential to shape interaction behavior. We investigate whether sustainability-oriented UI interventions can increase users' energy awareness and encourage more energy-responsible chatbot use without reducing usability. We first conducted a baseline survey with 77 participants to assess awareness and receptiveness to intervention concepts. Guided by prior work on persuasive technology and choice architecture, we implemented a web-based chatbot prototype with a three-mode switch (Energy-efficient, Balanced, Performance), per-response energy feedback, pre-send energy estimates, a usage metrics dashboard, and energy analogies. We then evaluated the prototype in a five-day field study with 11 participants. In the baseline survey, 94.8% of respondents reported at least some awareness of AI energy use, yet 88.3% misestimated actual consumption. Although concern about environmental impact was high, only 39.0% indicated willingness to accept a performance trade-off for lower energy use. In the field study, Energy-efficient mode accounted for 55.8% of logged prompts, while 90.9% self-reported actively choosing Eco-mode when high accuracy was not required. Participants did not reduce prompt length, suggesting mode switching as the primary behavioral mechanism. Sustainability-oriented UI interventions can improve awareness and support more energy-responsible interaction patterns in LLM chatbots. These effects are best interpreted as behavioral and model-based estimates that complement backend efficiency work, and the provided prototype and replication package support further research on energy-aware conversational AI design.

Production LLMs receive instructions from sources with very different levels of trust, yet attend to every token with uniform architectural privilege. This is the structural vulnerability that enables malicious prompt injections and, more broadly, leaves models without a principled way to resolve conflicts between legitimate but competing instructions. A common training-based response is to teach models an explicit instruction hierarchy; existing approaches, however, formalize hierarchies of only three or four levels, treat all violations as equally severe, and rarely evaluate the full set of pairwise level interactions. We formalize a k-level instruction hierarchy problem and instantiate it for k=5, yielding ten pairwise priority relations that a compliant model must enforce. We then introduce Gravity-Weighted DPO (GW-DPO), a preference-optimization objective whose per-sample offset scales with the structural distance between conflicting levels under a linear or bilateral schedule, the latter weighting severity by both the privilege gap and the privilege of the victim level. Combined with hierarchy-specific delimiter tokens (Chen et al., 2025) and Instructional Segment Embeddings (ISE; Wu et al., 2025), GW-DPO with the bilateral schedule Pareto-improves over standard DPO and the linear variant on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, raising macro pairwise priority adherence while keeping over-refusal at half the standard DPO rate. Ablations isolate ISE as a refusal-threshold calibrator and recast five- versus three-level training as a generality-specialization tradeoff.

While end-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving has become the dominant research direction, production vehicles continue to rely on modular multi-NN pipelines for a non-trivial transitional period. The subject of this paper is the design of an architecture that, during this phase, supports a modular pipeline and an E2E path side by side and embeds a path for staged migration. Transplanted to a production SoC, egalitarian late fusion is compute-inefficient and offers no natural unit for staged E2E substitution. As an alternative, we propose three design principles: (i) Primary-Path, which explicitly selects a primary perception chain and prioritizes its enclosure within a single SoC pair over the non-critical paths (ii) Exposure-Time-Aligned, which propagates the primary sensor's exposure time $τ_{\rm exp}$ as a tag along the chain and event-drives the fusion node on matched $τ_{\rm exp}$ rather than a fixed cycle and (iii) Co-Path Coexistence, which, building on (i) and (ii), lets an E2E output path co-run with the modular pipeline within the same $τ_{\rm exp}$ cycle. On a Dual-SoC production AD-ECU, the implementation closes camera-shutter to planner-output latency at a mean of 296 ms within the 350 ms design budget. Under (iii), the modular pipeline is primary at production launch and the E2E path runs as shadow on real vehicles, and the E2E scope is expanded as evaluation evidence accumulates.

A multi-similarity Siamese neural network unifies zero-day anomaly detection and one-shot classification in optical networks, achieving over 99% accuracy and instant adaptability across lightpaths and unseen anomaly types without any retraining.

There is no doubt that over the last decade, techniques from the field of machine learning have revolutionized how we process and interpret data, especially images and text. For underwater observations acoustics is a primary source of information, and naturally, deep learning methods have been applied to echograms and other acoustics data, but so far with rather modest results. Here, we argue that due to intrinsic properties of acoustic data, substantial advances will likely require research into deep learning methods beyond mere recycling of models and techniques from image processing. Currently, the potential for breakthroughs in method development is hindered by the lack of standard data formats and organization, and even more by the lack of readily available, high quality data sets with established performance goals. To advance the field, these shortcomings should be remedied

Pretrained time series foundation models (TSFMs) have enabled zero-shot forecasting on unseen target series. However, existing TSFMs often incur high computational cost and provide limited support for diverse variable types, often failing to account for covariates that exogenously influence target variability. To address these challenges, we propose CITRAS-FM, a tiny 7M-parameter TSFM that supports univariate, multivariate, and covariate-informed zero-shot forecasting with real-time CPU inference. Built on a patch-based, decoder-only Transformer, CITRAS-FM introduces Shifted Attention into the cross-variate module to effectively exploit known covariates accessible throughout the forecast horizon. Moreover, to enable covariate-aware pretraining despite the scarcity of covariate-rich corpora, we propose CovSynth, which synthesizes realistic covariates from decomposed components of target series. Experiments on fev-bench, spanning 100 tasks across various settings, demonstrate that CITRAS-FM achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot accuracy among sub-10M TSFMs while delivering sub-0.1-second CPU inference, offering a strong balance between forecasting accuracy and real-time deployability.

Zero-shot learning (ZSL) for inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based human activity recognition (HAR) faces a central challenge: bridging the gap between sensor embeddings and semantic class representations. We systematically evaluate seven configurations combining three inference methods with two training pipelines on the PAMAP2 dataset, using 14 seen and 4 unseen activity classes with subjects 108 and 109 held out for testing. We find that the modality gap is a training-time phenomenon governed by the encoder objective. A temporal convolutional network (TCN) trained with cross-entropy over label-name Sentence- BERT prototypes yields sensor embeddings with a mean cosine similarity of 0.30 to the corresponding text prototypes, while replacing the label-name prototype targets with discriminative activity descriptions raises this to 0.69. This alignment improvement transfers consistently across all three inference methods. The strongest result combines contrastive training with inverted softmax correction, achieving 73.2% accuracy and 0.583 macro F1 on unseen classes, compared to 58.3% accuracy and 0.34 macro F1 for the label-name baseline. A secondary finding is that richer text descriptions reduce inter-prototype separability in Sentence-BERT space, because shared biomechanical vocabulary causes the language model to compress the prototype cloud. This effect does not negate the benefits of contrastive alignment provided prototype descriptions retain sufficient discriminative vocabulary. We also demonstrate that overall accuracy is a misleading primary metric when test-set class distributions are imbalanced, and recommend macro-averaged F1 as the standard reporting metric for ZSL-HAR benchmarks.

Neurosymbolic AI combines neural networks with symbolic programs to create robust and explainable predictions. One such framework is NeurASP, which trains a neural network to predict concepts and reasons over them using rules written in answer set programming (ASP) to solve downstream tasks. Crucially, labels are only provided for the downstream prediction produced by the symbolic rules, not for the latent concepts themselves.Backpropagation through the non-differentiable ASP component requires expensive probability and gradient calculations, which has hindered scalability to more sophisticated tasks.In this paper, we address the current limitations of NeurASP by improving its computational performance through vectorization, batch processing and caching of intermediate computations during training. We compare computation speeds between the original and our new implementation of NeurASP and report speedups of multiple orders of magnitude for larger tasks. To this end, we propose a new dataset of difficult tasks involving playing cards, which we use to test the capabilities of NeurASP's enhanced learning function.

The adoption and integration of heterogeneous stacks in most of today's open-source based networks brings clear benefits like interoperability and availability of advanced features. Yet, on the other hand the increasing number of interconnecting components and moving parts requires maintaining an ever increasing base of interdisciplinary knowledge of different tools in different domains to ensure proper operation. To alleviate such efforts, this work proposes a Decision Support System (DSS) to guide infrastructure operators through the selection of security approaches (e.g. tools) to adopt in their environments. This framework easily captures the end-user high-level requirements on the security triad for different domains and runs inference on the designated models to provide the identified tools (security mechanisms) that better serve such needs. The presented DSS aims at delivering an understandable and extensible framework to accommodate varying requirements and Bayesian Network (BN) models. The architecture and modelling of the system are proposed, aligned with its theoretical framework. Its performance is evaluated in terms of time and prediction accuracy.

Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) over lossy wireless networks faces two key challenges: selection bias, where updates from poor-quality links are systematically underrepresented due to partial model reception, and update staleness, where asynchronous nodes contribute outdated information. We show that uniform gossip aggregation with local-fill reconstruction introduces persistent link-quality-induced bias, while completeness-based weighting further amplifies this effect. To address these challenges, we propose DFL-AA (Decentralized Federated Learning with Adaptive AoI-weighted Aggregation), which combines Inverse Probability Weighting with online EWMA-based channel estimation to correct selection bias and Age-of-Information-based weighting to mitigate staleness without requiring global synchronization. We theoretically show that DFL-AA removes link-quality distortion in expectation and experimentally demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines across varying loss rates, network sizes, and heterogeneous wireless conditions.

We introduce ArabiGEE, the first comprehensive Arabic grammatical error explanation (GEE) taxonomy grounded in explicit error types. Unlike existing GEE approaches that treat explanation generation as free-form text, ArabiGEE organizes grammatical explanations through a hierarchical structure spanning orthographic, morphological, syntactic, and lexical dimensions. The taxonomy consists of 27 error types, 140 correction types, and 324 associated explanations. We apply ArabiGEE to manually annotate portions of existing Arabic grammatical error correction corpora and demonstrate how structured grammatical explanations can support automatic evaluation of LLMs on Arabic GEE. Our code and data are publicly available.

Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly moving from conversational interfaces to software components that plan, invoke tools, maintain memory, and act on external environments. This transition changes the nature of security risk. In agentic settings, failures are no longer limited to unsafe text generation. Untrusted content may redirect control flow, misuse tool privileges, corrupt persistent state, leak sensitive information, or trigger harmful external actions. At the same time, research on LLM agent security is expanding quickly but remains fragmented across attack families, defense layers, application domains, and evaluation settings. This paper synthesizes 247 papers through a lifecycle-based, systems-oriented framework that models agent security around the interaction of information flow, delegated authority, and persistent state. We organize the literature around four questions: how LLM agent security should be modeled, which threat surfaces and attack families dominate, what defenses have been proposed and with what tradeoffs, and how security claims are evaluated. We find that prompt injection and tool-mediated control-flow hijacking still dominate the field, while persistent state corruption and multi-agent propagation are becoming central emerging concerns. We further find that current defenses provide useful building blocks but remain weakly compositional, and that existing benchmarks still underrepresent long-horizon, stateful, and deployment-sensitive risks. We argue that secure LLM agents require explicit trust boundaries, principled privilege control, provenance-aware state management, and evaluation practices aligned with realistic operational settings.

External memory has become a core component of modern web agents, enabling long-horizon reasoning through the retrieval of past experiences. However, this paradigm introduces a critical vulnerability: malicious content injected into memory can be persistently recalled and repeatedly influence agent behavior. In this work, we identify and systematically study multimodal memory poisoning, an overlooked yet practical attack surface in web-agent systems. We propose MemVenom, a unified black-box attack framework that poisons graph-structured external memory with coordinated text-image evidence. Our method consists of a two-stage design: (1) a trigger-conditioned retrieval attack that ensures high-probability recall of malicious memory, and (2) a post-retrieval attack induction that leverages adversarial perturbations and stealthy OCR injection to override the original user objective. Unlike prior attacks that operate on prompts or text-only memory, our approach enables persistent, reusable, and goal-agnostic attacks without modifying model parameters or re-optimizing malicious tasks. Experiments across multiple web-agent frameworks and vision-language models demonstrate that MemVenom achieves strong end-to-end attack success with minimal impact on benign performance, reaching up to 99.15% on GPT-5-family web agents, while transferring effectively across architectures and model scales.

Failures in multi-turn reasoning models are largely invisible to terminal-score evaluation. A model can lock onto an unsafe stance early in a long dialogue, yet its final-turn refusal rate may appear indistinguishable from a robustly aligned baseline. To expose these hidden temporal dynamics, we propose a trace-level diagnostic - the CoT-Output 2x2 safety matrix. This framework labels every turn along two independent axes (internal reasoning and visible output), yielding four operationally defined failure cells: robust alignment, alignment faking, overt jailbreak, and a distinct failure mode we term context-injection failure (where the CoT maintains safe reasoning, but the visible output produces harm, highlighting a multi-turn manifestation of reasoning unfaithfulness). We evaluate three distilled reasoning targets against a fixed attacker across five oversight conditions, collecting 6750 turn-level observations on the Information-Hazard scenario. Our analysis reveals two reproducible vulnerabilities: an oversight paradox where explicit monitoring cues paradoxically increase alignment-faking rates rather than suppress them, and a context-injection failure where models lock onto unsafe external outputs despite safe internal states. We release the full dataset of multi-turn dialogues and CoT traces to support follow-up trace-diagnostic research.

The use of GRPO-style algorithms has become the standard strategy for training LLM search agents under outcome-only rewards. With these algorithms, a query contributes to parameter updates only when its rollout group mixes successes and failures; all-correct (too-easy) and all-incorrect (too-hard) groups are zero-variance and waste rollout cost. Existing approaches treat zero-variance as a static property and either discard or pre-filter such groups. We hypothesize and empirically validate that queries flip between zero-variance and signal-bearing states as the policy evolves during training. Building on this intuition, we propose query recycling, which returns zero-variance groups to a mutable pool for future resampling, so that the effective training distribution co-evolves with the policy. With the proposed technique, a 1.7B parameter model trained on synthetic data can reach 66.0 average Pass@1 accross seven multi-hop QA benchmarks, matching or surpassing systems with up to 7B parameters trained on benchmark-derived supervision. Analysis of recycling patterns shows that recycled queries supply roughly three quarters of the effective batch by the end of training, with contributions split between recovery from policy improvement and policy drift.

Reinforcement learning promises to optimize sequential decisions in large-scale systems. Semiconductor manufacturing systems are stochastic and highly constrained environments where heterogeneous wafers traverse hundreds of processing steps across extensive equipment networks. These characteristics yield complex, high-dimensional decision problems with delayed feedback and long-horizon requirements, complicating production planning and control. We propose a deep reinforcement learning framework for multi-objective policy optimization at this scale. Specifically, we formulate control as a centralized-agent problem, where a core policy coordinates system-wide decisions, while system evolution is represented as an interconnected temporal process driven by discrete events. Accordingly, we develop a tailored event-driven temporal-difference formulation that remains general and can be integrated with various policy optimization methods under relevant training settings. We investigate several core model-free algorithms incorporated into this framework and evaluate their effectiveness using high-fidelity simulations of diverse, industry-real operating scenarios. Across extensive validation experiments, agents trained in both offline and online settings show significant and consistent gains in throughput and utilization. We further evaluate performance and generalization across training phases, clarifying the relative strengths of alternative reinforcement learning formulations and algorithms. Overall, the results support the scalability, generality, and transferability of the proposed framework for controlling event-driven complex adaptive systems.

Interpretability methods routinely use population-level summary statistics over observed model behaviour to license claims about the effects of targeted interventions on specific computations; in Pearl's terms, they treat rung-1 associational evidence as if it supported rung-2 interventional conclusions, a move whose validity is rarely tested. We examine one concrete instance: the use of routing statistics in Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) pruning, where utilization rates, activation norms, and routing weight distributions are treated as predictors of which experts can be removed without functional cost. A token-level interventional audit across three high-redundancy MoE architectures (OLMoE-1B-7B-0924, Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) finds no observational metric predicts causal expert importance after multiple-comparison correction in any model, with effect sizes below Cohen's $d = 0.17$ across all 60 metric-layer combinations. A per-token routing weight control rules out insufficient power, recovering a single Bonferroni-significant signal at OLMoE's final MoE layer ($d = +0.231$, $p = 0.0013$). Existing pruning methods succeed in this regime not by identifying dispensable experts but because early-layer redundancy renders most selection criteria interchangeable. Our results provide an explicit counterexample to the common inferential step from population-level observational summaries to token-level interventional claims about expert importance, and illustrate how interventional audits can calibrate the evidential standards for interpretability claims.

In the production process of network cables, ensuring the correct color sequence of wire pairs inside the standard connector plays a critical role in the final performance of the cable, as any misplacement or color-ordering error can lead to defective products and impose significant costs. Traditional inspection methods based on visual examination through digital microscopes are typically time-consuming, tedious, and prone to human error. In this study, an intelligent system based on the twelfth version of the YOLO1 object detection model was developed to identify the position and verify the correct color sequence of wires in patch cords. The dataset used consisted of 2,500 images captured from microscopic views of network connectors, which were divided into 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing. The proposed model, leveraging a single-stage architecture and attention mechanisms during learning, achieved highly accurate wire detection with approximately 98% precision. Additionally, the overall mean accuracy, classification precision, and recall were around 95%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. The results demonstrate that this system can reliably and in real time verify the correctness of wire color sequencing on the production line without the need for human intervention, thereby reducing human error and enhancing efficiency in the manufacturing process.

Neural distinguishers are a cryptanalysis method for symmetric-key cryptography that trains machine learning models on pairs of plaintexts and ciphertexts with specific differences in order to recover a secret key. To the best of our knowledge, no existing work has explored the use of large language models (LLMs) for neural distinguishers. In this paper, we propose LLM-based neural distinguishers through a prompt design and conduct extensive experiments with them on SPECK-32/64 to investigate whether LLMs can strengthen neural distinguishers. We then found three key insights. First, by comparing the results of LLM-based neural distinguishers with ResNet in the existing work, we demonstrate that LLMs provide no observable improvement in the performance of neural distinguishers. Second, we confirm that, at high rounds, the choice of differences is no longer effective for LLM-based neural distinguishers as well as ResNet. Third, we show that the performance of LLM-based neural distinguishers can be significantly improved by incorporating only the XOR operation results as a prompt design.

Autonomous driving relies on computationally intensive perception pipelines to continuously detect and track objects in the surrounding environment. While some objects are key to plan safe and effective maneuvers, others may not be relevant and have no impact on the autonomous vehicle's driving decisions. Focusing on relevant objects allows a more efficient usage of available computational resources, reduces processing latencies, and limits the downstream propagation of perception noise. In this work, we propose a novel self-supervised approach based on counterfactual analysis to develop a relevance model - an AI-based tool that quantifies the relevance of objects for an autonomous vehicle. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach, we train a relevance model on a synthetic causal dataset generated in a selected urban scenario. Results show that the relevance model is able to accurately estimate the objects' relevance with millisecond-level latency, enabling real-time relevance estimation also in high-density scenarios. We also show that the relevance model can be used to build relevance heatmaps that offer valuable insights into the autonomous vehicle's driving policy and can be used to proactively inform perception and planning tasks. We openly release both the relevance model and the causal dataset.

Concept-based models (CMs), deep neural networks that ground their predictions on representations aligned with human-understandable concepts (e.g., "round", "stripes", etc.), have been shown to learn representations that leak concept-irrelevant information. As the traditional narrative goes, this leakage is undesirable and should be eradicated as it leads to uninterpretable models. In this paper, we posit that this conventional view of leakage in CMs is not only ill-posed, as the evidence of how leakage makes a model less interpretable is often inconclusive, but also bound to lead to impractical CMs under common real-world constraints. Specifically, we argue that in real-world settings where concept incompleteness is the norm, some leakage is often necessary for constructing accurate and intervenable CMs. To this end, we propose that there is such a thing as benign leakage and show that, by optimizing a reframing of the typical CM training objective, CMs can encourage and exploit this form of leakage without sacrificing accuracy or intervenability.