An information-geometric framework for mapping maximum potential biodiversity
一种用于映射最大潜在生物多样性的信息几何框架
Shinto Eguchi
AI总结 提出信息几何框架,通过约束变分原理定义潜在组成和多样性差距,统一处理Hill型多样性和Rao二次熵,为生态保护提供基准比较。
详情
- Comments
- 22 pages, 1 figure
生物多样性度量通常被描述性地使用:从观测或估计的群落组成计算多样性指数,并将结果值映射到空间上。然而,保护规划还需要一个特定地点的基准,以便将观测到的群落与之进行比较。本章为这种“潜在多样性”和相关的“多样性差距”开发了一个信息几何框架。核心对象是物种单纯形上的一对概率向量:观测或实现的组成\(p^{\mathrm{obs}}\),以及通过约束变分原理获得的潜在组成\(p^{\mathrm{pot}}\)。然后通过比较这两个组成处的多样性泛函来定义差距。该框架针对Hill型多样性(衡量丰度和均匀度)和Rao二次熵(包含物种间的性状、系统发育或生态差异)进行了开发。空间点过程解释阐明了如何在进入单纯形之前定义局部生态容量。然后,护航约束、容量约束和散度投影提供了一种统一的方法来定义超出均匀分布的非平凡基准。得到的公式区分了两个不同的问题:一个群落有多多样化,以及它离局部允许的潜在基准有多远。它还将暗多样性的生态概念与概率单纯形上的连续、丰度加权比较联系起来。我们还概述了一个动态扩展,其中容量、物种迁移和气候驱动的变化随时间变化。使用大规模公民科学生物多样性数据和性状数据库的实证实施留待未来工作。
Biodiversity measures are often used descriptively: one computes a diversity index from an observed or estimated community composition and maps the resulting values across space. Conservation planning, however, also requires a site-specific benchmark against which the observed community can be compared. This chapter develops an information-geometric framework for such \emph{potential diversity} and the associated \emph{diversity gap}. The central object is a pair of probability vectors on the species simplex: an observed or realized composition \(p^{\mathrm{obs}}\), and a potential composition \(p^{\mathrm{pot}}\) obtained by a constrained variational principle. The gap is then defined by comparing a diversity functional at these two compositions. The framework is developed for both Hill-type diversity, which measures abundance and evenness, and Rao's quadratic entropy, which incorporates trait, phylogenetic, or ecological dissimilarities among species. A spatial point-process interpretation clarifies how local ecological capacities can be defined before passing to the simplex. Escort constraints, capacity constraints, and divergence projections then provide a unified way to define nontrivial benchmarks beyond the uniform distribution. The resulting formulation separates two distinct questions: how diverse a community is, and how far it is from a locally admissible potential benchmark. It also connects the ecological idea of dark diversity with a continuous, abundance-weighted comparison on the probability simplex. We also outline a dynamic extension in which capacities, species migration, and climate-driven shifts vary over time. Empirical implementation with large-scale citizen-science biodiversity data and trait databases is left for future work.