- Journal ref
- Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, (2017) 25: 2444 - 2454
AI中文摘要
本研究旨在提供特征检测器/描述符方法的详细性能比较,特别是当其各种组合用于图像匹配时的表现。通过移动机器人在室内环境中的定位实验作为案例研究,使用3090张查询图像和127张数据集图像。研究包括五种特征检测器方法(FAST、ORB、SURF、SIFT、BRISK)和五种特征描述符方法(BRIEF、BRISK、SIFT、SURF、ORB)。这些方法在23种不同组合中使用,通过本研究定义的性能标准获得有意义且一致的比较结果。所有方法作为独立的特征检测器或描述符分别使用。性能分析展示了各种检测器和描述符组合的判别能力。分析使用五个参数:(i)准确性,(ii)时间,(iii)关键点之间的角度差,(iv)正确匹配的数量,(v)正确匹配关键点之间的距离。在60°范围内,覆盖系统五个旋转姿态点,FAST-SURF组合具有最低的距离和角度差值以及最高的匹配关键点数量。SIFT-SURF是准确度最高的组合,正确分类率为98.41%。最快的算法是ORB-BRIEF,匹配560张在运动中捕获的图像和127张数据集图像的总运行时间为21,303.30秒。
英文摘要
The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed performance comparison of feature detector/descriptor methods, particularly when their various combinations are used for image-matching. The localization experiments of a mobile robot in an indoor environment are presented as a case study. In these experiments, 3090 query images and 127 dataset images were used. This study includes five methods for feature detectors (features from accelerated segment test (FAST), oriented FAST and rotated binary robust independent elementary features (BRIEF) (ORB), speeded-up robust features (SURF), scale invariant feature transform (SIFT), and binary robust invariant scalable keypoints (BRISK)) and five other methods for feature descriptors (BRIEF, BRISK, SIFT, SURF, and ORB). These methods were used in 23 different combinations and it was possible to obtain meaningful and consistent comparison results using the performance criteria defined in this study. All of these methods were used independently and separately from each other as either feature detector or descriptor. The performance analysis shows the discriminative power of various combinations of detector and descriptor methods. The analysis is completed using five parameters: (i) accuracy, (ii) time, (iii) angle difference between keypoints, (iv) number of correct matches, and (v) distance between correctly matched keypoints. In a range of 60°, covering five rotational pose points for our system, the FAST-SURF combination had the lowest distance and angle difference values and the highest number of matched keypoints. SIFT-SURF was the most accurate combination with a 98.41% correct classification rate. The fastest algorithm was ORB-BRIEF, with a total running time of 21,303.30 s to match 560 images captured during motion with 127 dataset images.