Usage-based theories of grammars posit that creative productivity of the structures of language is both bolstered and constrained by two distinct frequency signals: entrenchment, stemming from high frequency usage, and preemption, stemming from having never observed a particular linguistic structure in a context where one might expect that structure to appear. Large Language Models are also usage-based, in the sense that the structures of language are learned through exposure to vast amounts of text. Here, we test whether or not the opposing statistical forces of entrenchment and preemption also encourage and constrain linguistic productivity in LLMs. We demonstrate across model architectures that larger models recognize and can reproduce with nonce words constructional productivity (entrenchment) in cases of coercion, wherein the broader constructional context coerces an atypical interpretation of a lexical item. However, we also show that even the largest models do not extend negative evidence to novel language, and statistical preemption does not enable models to avoid overgeneralization of patterns that are semantically felicitous, but never observed in data.

Deploying language-driven agents in robotics requires evaluations that reflect real-world task demands: natural-language instructions with reproducible outcomes. Such agents must connect language models to callable perception and control tools, and be assessed using deployment-critical metrics including latency, accuracy, and error modes. We present SCOPE (Simulation and Camera Operations for Perception and Evaluation), a modular agent for natural-language, open-vocabulary pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) camera control and visual scene understanding, designed explicitly for edge deployment. SCOPE operates both in a Blender-based simulation environment and on a physical PTZ camera, executing all perception, planning, and control locally at the deployment site using edge-accessible compute. We release a 536-task benchmark spanning QA, single- and multi-step commands, counting, spatial reasoning, descriptions, and optical character recognition in a Blender-based simulation environment that exposes realistic PTZ control affordances. Execution traces are combined with an LM-as-Judge to evaluate latency, accuracy, and error modes. We evaluate 19 planner-perception model combinations pairing Qwen3 small language models (SLMs) with Moondream and Qwen vision-language models (VLMs). Stronger SLMs substantially reduce hallucinations and improve tool routing, leading to more reliable closed-loop behavior. Once a sufficiently capable SLM is used, perception becomes the dominant performance bottleneck. Mixture-of-Experts models on both the planning and perception side consistently match or exceed dense alternatives at latencies and memory footprints comparable to much smaller networks. Quantization provides additional efficiency gains with minimal accuracy degradation, identifying a practical, sim-to-real validated design point for real-time, edge-feasible language-driven PTZ control.

Curvature adaptivity is a classical theme in online optimization: for convex Lipschitz losses, adaptive methods interpolate between the optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret for general convex losses and $O(\log T)$ regret under strong convexity. Recent work has shown that Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) achieves optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret even for online non-convex Lipschitz losses, assuming access to an approximate offline-optimization oracle, but these guarantees do not exploit curvature. We show that FTPL can be made curvature-adaptive in the non-convex setting, without knowing in advance how curvature will accumulate over time. Our algorithm replaces the fixed perturbation scale of standard FTPL with a time-varying scale chosen using only past information. We give a simple follow-the-leader tuning rule for this scale and show that it competes, up to constants, with the best choice in hindsight. The resulting method achieves $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret for arbitrary non-convex Lipschitz losses and improves as cumulative curvature grows; with sufficiently accurate oracle calls, it achieves $O(\log T)$ regret when cumulative curvature grows linearly, which includes the classical strongly convex regime. We complement these upper bounds with matching lower bounds for prescribed cumulative-curvature sequences, already for one-dimensional convex losses, showing that the tradeoff between worst-case non-convex regret and curvature-driven fast rates is intrinsic.

Supervised fine-tuning is the predominant approach for adapting autoregressive vision-language models to downstream tasks. Recent work has shown that this paradigm is highly vulnerable to backdoor attacks, and that existing defenses are ineffective in open-ended generation settings. In response, we propose BYORn, a backdoor-robust fine-tuning framework motivated by the observation that poisoned target responses are often semantically implausible given the corresponding image-text inputs and a pretrained model. BYORn identifies such misaligned responses and dynamically replaces them with alternative responses generated by the model, thereby breaking the correlation between triggers and target outputs. The resulting objective gradient corresponds to the gradient of the empirical estimate of the population risk upper bound over the clean data distribution. Empirically, BYORn consistently improves robustness to backdoor attacks while preserving clean-task performance, establishing a new trade-off frontier between generalization and attack success rate. Finally, we demonstrate that BYORn remains effective against adaptive attacks specifically designed to circumvent the proposed defense.

Live streaming has emerged as a primary medium for social interaction and digital commerce, yet it is increasingly plagued by sophisticated risks. A fundamental challenge in this domain is \emph{tactical out-of-distribution (OOD) shift}: while malicious actors maintain stable underlying objectives, they continuously redesign narrative packaging to evade detection. Such adversarial shifts expose critical limitations of existing OOD generalization paradigms, whose assumptions are difficult to satisfy in the presence of tightly coupled intent-tactic evolution and ill-defined raw-level counterfactuals. In this paper, we tackle this issue from a \emph{latent causal} perspective and propose \underline{L}atent-\underline{P}redictive \underline{C}ounterfactual \underline{D}ecoupling~(LPCD), a plug-in framework for robust live streaming risk assessment. LPCD enables counterfactual reasoning under adversarial tactical re-packaging by modeling intent and narrative variation at the latent level, and enforces \emph{latent counterfactual consistency} to anchor risk prediction on causally stable malicious intent. At inference time, LPCD applies a lightweight, parameter-free calibration to further mitigate tactic-induced distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on large-scale industrial datasets and online production traffic demonstrate that LPCD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, validating its effectiveness in moderating evolving adversarial risks in real-world live streaming. The project page is available at https://qiaoyran.github.io/LiveStreamingRiskAssessment/.

Interpretable brain-computer interface classifiers that generalize across subjects without calibration remain an open challenge. We test whether prototype-based cross-attention can provide competitive, interpretable event-related potential (ERP) classification under deployment-compatible conditions. We propose ERP-XTTN, a cross-attention architecture that routes input EEG patches to fixed difference-wave prototypes via query-key-only cross-attention with no value projection, so classification depends entirely on attention routing and attention faithfulness is structural rather than post-hoc. Prototypes are derived automatically from extrema in the training-fold difference wave. We evaluate across three public sources (BNCI Horizon 2020, HRI Cursor, and ERP CORE) spanning eight ERP components (ERN, LRP, ErrP, N170, P300, N2pc, MMN, N400), using leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) evaluation with causal filtering at two channel counts (3-channel and full montage), against EEGNet and xDAWN with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN+RG). The mean gap between the best baseline and ERP-XTTN was .018 AUROC at 3 channels and .034 at full montage, arising from two largely distinct sources: a temporal-flexibility cost relative to EEGNet and a spatial-exploitation cost relative to xDAWN+RG, the latter driven by signal-to-noise ratio at full montage. Beyond accuracy, the transparent routing reveals cross-subject signal structure that black-box models cannot: false positives resembled true positives more than true negatives did, indicating that classification errors are neurophysiologically explicable. ERP-XTTN generalizes across diverse ERPs under causal, calibration-free conditions with a small interpretability cost at minimal montages. To our knowledge, this is the first epoch-level LOSO benchmark on ERP CORE.

In this manuscript, we propose and analyze hierarchical Kolmogorov--Arnold neural network architectures employing radial basis functions as activation functions for approximating deterministic functions and random field models. Specifically, we develop a hierarchical radial-basis-function Kolmogorov--Arnold network (hierarchical RBF-KAN) for multidimensional deterministic function approximation and a hierarchical radial-basis-function stochastic Kolmogorov--Arnold network (hierarchical RBF-SKAN) for random field learning. From a theoretical perspective, we establish universal approximation results for both architectures. In particular, we derive quantitative approximation estimates for the hierarchical RBF-KAN, showing that the proposed framework has the potential to partially alleviate the curse of dimensionality in learning high-dimensional functions by reducing the effective dimensionality of the approximation problem. Furthermore, we show that the hierarchical RBF-SKAN can approximate random field models under the Wasserstein-2 metric. Empirically, we show that our proposed radial-basis-function-based neural network structure could effectively learn multivariate functions and random field models.

Accurate registration of CAD models to CT scans is essential for establishing ground truth geometry in volumetric imaging. Obtaining reliable object masks is of growing importance in machine learning settings; as recent architectures grow more capable, huge datasets are required to fully utilise their capabilities. Traditional intensity-based methods fail when CT grayscale values lack calibration references, while point-based algorithms (e.g., ICP, RANSAC) require feature correspondence unavailable between idealized CAD geometry and noisy volumetric CT data. We propose a two-stage geometric registration method for cylindrical objects (ionization chambers) that takes advantage of the distinctive geometric features of the objects. First, we estimate the 3D rotation axis by detecting elliptical cross-sections across CT slices, fitting ellipses to edge-detected contours, and performing PCA on the fitted ellipse centers after RANSAC outlier removal. Second, we voxelize the CAD model, orient it along the detected axis, and maximize volumetric overlap with the CT scan through translational adjustment. This approach achieves robust registration with tilt and orientation errors below $0.1^\circ$ without intensity calibration or feature matching. Once registered, the aligned CAD model provides ground truth geometry for applications including machine learning-based object localization and automated analysis in industrial CT workflows.

Older adults are particularly susceptible to falls following perturbations during standing, such as forward loss of balance. Back support devices that assist trunk extension may help mitigate fall risk by preventing excessive trunk flexion. Previous studies have investigated heavy back support devices; however, these systems often introduced adverse effects on stability due to their added mass, which shifted the body's natural center of mass unfavorably. In contrast, lightweight passive devices have shown limited benefits, as they can generate only modest assistive forces during the relatively small trunk flexion associated with forward balance loss. In this study, we evaluated the effects of a lightweight semi-active soft back support device on postural stability following standing perturbations. Our device combines an active element (a pneumatic artificial muscle) in parallel with a passive elastic band. The active element rapidly provides assistive force following a perturbation, overcoming the limitations of passive devices. Experiments conducted with five healthy individuals demonstrated that the semi-active device significantly reduced whole-body angular momentum and increased the margin of stability, indicating improved balance recovery performance. These results highlight the promise of semi-active soft wearable robots as an effective and lightweight strategy for fall prevention during standing perturbations.

Normalization layers such as BatchNorm and LayerNorm have long been considered essential for stable training in deep networks. This work demonstrates that they can be fully replaced by a single learnable activation mechanism. We identify a plasticity suppression effect induced by standard normalization: learnable activation parameters rapidly lose adaptability when paired with normalization layers. Motivated by this observation, we introduce SALU (Saturated Adaptive Linear Unit), \[ \operatorname{SALU}(x;a,b) = \frac{a x}{\sqrt{1 + a b x^2}},\quad a>0,\; b>0 \] a bounded, learnable activation that provides intrinsic signal stabilization without relying on batch statistics or external affine parameters. Building on SALU, we propose SaluNet, a paradigm grounded in total plasticity: SALU replaces normalization layers, while SWALU and GALU replace standard activations. With ResNet-18, SaluNet-C-18 achieves 97.35\% on CIFAR-10 and 83.25\% on CIFAR-100 without normalization, maintaining 93.44\% and 76.23\% at batch size 1 where normalized architectures fail. For transformers, SaluNet-T improves over LayerNorm-GELU from 90.92\% to 91.01\% on CIFAR-10 and from 66.54\% to 68.10\% on CIFAR-100. SaluNet-C-50 reaches 78.67\% Top-1 on ImageNet-1K at $224\times224$, and $79.23\%$ at $288\times288$. These results suggest normalization layers suppress total plasticity, a property biological neurons inherently possess, enabling deep networks to learn effectively.

Autonomous driving perception is typically evaluated on clean benchmark data, yet real-world deployment requires robustness to rare, structured, and potentially adversarial sensor anomalies. This gap is especially critical for LiDAR, where external actors can physically manipulate the sensing process to induce black-box perception failures without accessing the model. Existing LiDAR benchmarks provide little visibility into this failure mode. Prior adversarial LiDAR studies have largely centered on attack hardware, geometric and algorithmic defenses, and early-generation detectors, leaving the robustness of modern perception systems unexplored. To address this evaluation gap, we introduce ATLAS (Adversarial Temporal LiDAR Attack Suite), the first large-scale, physically grounded evaluation benchmark for LiDAR perception models under black-box sensor attacks, simulating the two primary attack modes -- point injection and point removal -- across real driving sequences. Evaluating a broad cross-section of current state-of-the-art LiDAR perception models, ATLAS reveals a surprising robustness asymmetry: models with stronger performance on standard benchmarks tend to better withstand removal attacks, yet are actually more vulnerable to injection attacks than weaker models. We trace this vulnerability to standard object database sampling augmentations, revealing how current training practices can induce architecture-agnostic robustness failures, and study initial directions for mitigating both attack modes. We release the ATLAS generation code to support extensible, reproducible evaluations as attack capabilities evolve, helping make black-box sensor robustness an explicit consideration in future LiDAR perception development.

Language-model unlearning updates a trained model to behave as if it had not seen selected training examples, while preserving utility and avoiding costly retraining. Existing approaches typically fine-tune the pretrained model with a fixed training budget and select the final model afterwards by evaluating several saved checkpoints on downstream validation data. Two sources of unnecessary computation limit scalability: training beyond the desired forget-retain trade-off, and checkpoint selection that requires extra storage and repeated evaluations. To address these limitations, we introduce MArgin Self-Correction (MASC), an efficient unlearning method with an online stopping rule that does not require downstream evaluation. Given a text sequence to be forgotten, MASC actively reduces the logit gap between the original next token and the most likely alternatives. It outputs a final model once this gap is small on average over a sufficiently large proportion of token positions across all forget sequences. On TOFU, MUSE News, and MUSE Books, MASC achieves a competitive forget-retain trade-off at a fraction of the computational cost of existing baselines. We further observe that as we increase model size (a.k.a. number of parameters), the trade-offs improve for both MASC and SimNPO -- the forget metrics remain comparable while retain utility increases.

Visual posters are a compact medium for communicating dense information, yet progress on automatic poster generation remains difficult to measure because existing evaluations are often restricted to paper-only inputs, narrow domains, or surface-level visual similarity. We introduce Any2Poster Bench, a benchmark for any-source poster generation that evaluates systems across eight input modalities--PDFs, URLs, PPTX, DOCX, Markdown, LaTeX, notebooks, and videos--and five content domains. Any2Poster Bench pairs each source with quiz-based probes of verbatim factual retention and interpretive understanding, together with VLM-based judgments of visual quality, layout, readability, content completeness, and logical flow, enabling reproducible assessment of both information fidelity and visual communication. To instantiate and validate this benchmark, we further present Any2Poster Agent, an end-to-end reference agent that parses heterogeneous sources, organizes salient content, plans poster layouts, renders posters, and iteratively refines them using visual feedback. On Any2Poster Bench, Any2Poster Agent achieves 87.25% average accuracy across input modalities and 87.28% across content domains. On PaperQuiz-style evaluation, where prior paper-to-poster agents are directly comparable, Any2Poster Agent improves over PosterAgent-4o from 51.06-51.33% to 72.58% overall accuracy and from 116-121 to 145.16 in density-augmented score. Together, Any2Poster Bench and Any2Poster Agent provide a reusable evaluation resource and a competitive baseline for studying multimodal, domain-general poster generation.

Current research primarily focuses on model performance, while comparatively less attention has been devoted to uncertainty estimation, particularly in settings where LLMs are increasingly used to generate annotated data. We introduce a framework combining conformal prediction with Collaborative Filtering-style annotators' representation to model LLM behavior in relation to human annotators and to analyze patterns of agreement and disagreement. Using Non-Conformity Scores, we introduce the Ghost Prediction metric and the Ghost Annotator representation to quantify cases in which model predictions diverge from all available human annotations. We compute cosine similarity measures to explore differences in model behavior across sociodemographic axes. We evaluated four LLMs of different size and families across four content moderation datasets. Our finding shows that while we find that all models uncertainty increases with annotator disagreement, larger models tend to be more confident in the classification of texts that are not aligned with any human annotation. Finally, the Ghost Annotator framework reveals a consistent and robust pattern of demographic misalignment, suggesting a structural bias likely rooted in pretraining corpora.

Multi-turn user-facing agents must infer user intent from incomplete requests, collect missing information through dialogue and tools, and execute valid actions. A training trajectory records this process as an interleaved sequence of user messages, agent responses, tool calls, etc. Synthesizing sufficiently complex trajectory has become a central route to train agents: existing pipelines often increase difficulty by composing multiple user requests into longer tasks, producing write-intensive trajectories that train sequential execution. We argue that a single write decision can itself be difficult when the agent must gather and compare substantial read-tool evidence before its arguments become identifiable, a challenge that write-intensive data alone cannot address. Guided by this insight, we propose WRIT (\uline{W}rite-\uline{R}ead \uline{I}ntensive \uline{T}rajectory Synthesis), a pipeline for synthesizing multi-turn agent training trajectories along two complexity axes: the number of write decisions in a task and the evidence burden of each individual decision. WRIT first generates write-intensive and read-heavy tasks. It then diversifies user behavior instructions to reflect realistic conversational variation, and finally simulates agent-user interactions in an executable environment to produce complete training trajectories. The resulting data trains agents not only for longer task execution, but also for robust, evidence-grounded decision making under high information load. With only 2K synthesized trajectories, a 4B model trained on WRIT outperforms GPT-5.1 no-think on $τ^2$-bench and substantially reduces inference-time token usage, showing that compact SFT data can convert part of expensive test-time reasoning into efficient agent behavior.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is increasingly applied to de novo molecular design, but choices in data, rewards, and evaluation can yield uneven performance across disease areas and chemotypes. Despite this, there is no concise synthesis of how fairness is defined, measured, and tested in DRL-based drug discovery. In this rapid evidence review, we synthesize fairness definitions and metrics for DRL-driven molecule generation in healthcare. We focus on three questions: (i) how dataset composition and split strategies, especially scaffold versus random splits, affect evaluation and distribution shift; (ii) how reward design (e.g., QED, docking, toxicity, synthetic accessibility) can create or mitigate bias, with emphasis on cancer targets; and (iii) which measurable metrics best capture fairness. This includes parity across cancer versus non-cancer indications and across cancer subtypes. It also includes distributional balance in key physicochemical descriptors, scaffold/chemotype diversity, groupwise validity, toxicity, and synthetic accessibility. From 2017 onward, we searched major biomedical, computer science, and engineering literature databases and used arXiv for horizon scanning. Records were screened using PRISMA-style procedures and analyzed via content coding to link reported parity outcomes to dataset and reward choices. Our review provides a concise set of fairness definitions and metrics for DRL molecule generation. It offers practical guidance for reporting distribution parity and outcome parity. It also summarizes how dataset and reward choices relate to observed parity effects and identifies open gaps relevant to trustworthy, cancer-relevant DRL generation.

Breast cancer recurrence, a leading cause of long-term mortality among survivors, requires timely and accurate risk assessment to guide follow-up care and treatment planning. Traditional predictive models, often limited to either structured or unstructured data alone, struggle to capture the full clinical context. This study examines the impact of integrating multi-modal clinical data, including treatment records, pathology reports, and clinician notes, on recurrence prediction. By integrating a rule-based regular expression extraction mechanism with a rigorous precedence-based conflict reconciliation strategy, our approach effectively recovers definitive tumor characteristics from free-text pathology narratives to augment structured records. We also benchmark performance against commonly used feature sets from prior breast cancer studies to assess the added value of multi-modal integration. Single-source and multi-modal inputs are evaluated across a range of machine learning models. Results show that multi-modal integration consistently improves predictive accuracy compared to single-modal methods.

The effectiveness of a soft wearable back-support device in enhancing postural stability was investigated under trip-like perturbations using two experimental paradigms: perturbed standing and perturbed walking. Healthy subjects completed trials under three different back-support conditions: no device, device worn with low stiffness, and device activated with high stiffness. Whole-body stability was quantified using the minimum Margin of Stability (MOS) at the point of maximal instability. Results demonstrated increased MOS during device use, indicating enhanced postural stability. In standing, MOS increased significantly with device stiffness, whereas in walking, both device conditions improved MOS relative to no device but did not differ significantly from each other. These findings highlight the potential of soft wearable back-support devices with adjustable stiffness to improve reactive balance control against external perturbations, with important implications for fall prevention. Future research should explore personalized stiffness optimization and evaluate efficacy in populations at elevated risk of falls.

Symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization (Symmetric NMF) approximates a matrix as $WW^T$ with nonnegative rectangular factor $W$. It has broad applications in graph clustering and machine learning. In contrast to the NMF, projected gradient methods for the symmetric problem had been associated with slow convergence. To address this, we introduce SNMPBB, the first adaptation of nonmonotone projected Barzilai-Borwein methods to Symmetric NMF, demonstrating that gradient algorithms are significantly more effective than previously understood. We further extend SNMPBB to graph clustering using the graph Laplacian regularization (Graph-SNMPBB) and to large problems with low-rank approximations (LAI-SNMPBB). For all variants we prove global convergence to first-order stationary points and also that Barzilai-Borwein curvature information is preserved with randomized approximations. On synthetic data, SNMPBB achieves 6 times speedup over the alternative SymANLS for similar residuals, with advantages growing at higher ranks. Across six real-world clustering benchmarks, Graph-SNMPBB matches or exceeds SymANLS accuracy. Lastly, LAI-SNMPBB outperforms state-of-the-art LAI-SymPGNCG on 34 SuiteSparse matrices in both runtime and residual quality.

Reward guidance algorithms steer a learned generative process toward the reward-tilted measure at inference time. While empirically powerful, these methods are prone to reward hacking: the guided model over-optimizes the reward at the cost of fidelity to the learned distribution. Prior work has attributed this to the complexity of neural reward functions or implicit biases in diffusion training, but its fundamental origins remain poorly understood. We show that reward hacking arises from an approximation made in most practical implementations of reward-guided diffusion -- finite-particle plug-in estimation of the Doob h-function -- even in the simplest non-trivial settings of Gaussian and Gaussian mixture targets with quadratic rewards. In closed form, we isolate two distinct failure modes of the plug-in estimator: it leads to reward hacking within each mode and it cannot select high-reward modes. We propose a closed-form reward damping schedule that corrects the within-mode bias with no additional compute, and clarify the role of best-of-n sampling in compensating for the mode selection failure. Experiments on Gaussian mixture targets, a 2D checkerboard, and FLUX.1 text-to-image generation confirm that our theoretical insights carry over to practical settings.

Recommender systems have grown from content-organization tools into sophisticated systems that shape daily behavior. By controlling what we see, they shape what we perceive, raising concerns about filter bubbles, radicalization, polarization, and social inequality. Large language models (LLMs) enable more powerful personalization, intensifying these dynamics. Yet most recommenders are tuned for engagement or limited accuracy metrics, with little attention to broader social implications, e.g. how personalization reshapes exposure in socially consequential domains. We investigate whether LLM-assisted reranking, while improving personalization, inadvertently amplifies exposure to ideologically extreme or conspiratorial political content, a risk theorized but not empirically characterized in news recommendation. Using real news-consumption histories, we rerank YouTube's sidebar candidates through zero-shot, instruction-based prompting. We compare a baseline prompt with a constrained variant that preserves topical relevance and broadens ideological exposure while reducing conspiratorial or extreme content. Without constraints, reranking strengthened personalization but increased exposure to conspiratorial and extremist material for users whose histories contained such content. Lightweight prompt-level regularization reduced promotion of extreme content and increased ideological diversity, with modest relevance loss. Synthetic experiments suggest that LLMs rerank via statistical regularities in language rather than semantic understanding of ideology, clarifying why naive prompts amplify these patterns and why regularization can reshape them. Together, our results highlight the power of LLMs to operationalize contextual nuance in high-stakes recommendation, and the need to evaluate LLM-assisted personalization beyond accuracy and treat prompt design as a value-laden rather than neutral default.

Informed sampling techniques accelerate sampling-based motion planners by focusing the search on promising regions of the state space, yet most existing methods rely on Euclidean heuristics that become inadmissible under configuration-dependent Riemannian metrics. While scalar eigenvalue bounds restore admissibility by uniformly scaling the Euclidean distance, they discard the directional structure of the metric, producing overly conservative informed sets. We propose a matrix-valued admissible heuristic that exploits the Loewner order on symmetric positive definite matrices to compute the tightest constant lower bound on the metric tensor while preserving its full directional structure. The Cholesky factorization of this bound defines a linear map to an isotropic Euclidean space in which the Riemannian informed set reduces to a standard prolate hyperspheroid, enabling direct, rejection-free sampling using existing algorithms. Experiments on manipulation tasks with a 6-DoF UR5, 7-DoF Franka, and 14-DoF PR2 under three distinct Riemannian metrics show that our heuristic produces consistently tighter informed sets than both the Euclidean and scalar eigenvalue bounds, accelerating convergence across multiple state-of-the-art asymptotically optimal planners.

Integrating transcriptomics and histopathology can improve cancer risk modelling, yet practical use is constrained by the limited availability of RNA profiling in routine settings. Here we introduce Mixture of Pathway Experts (MoPE), a knowledge-distillation framework that reframes multimodal learning as privileged distillation for histology-only inference. MoPE is motivated by the partial observability between RNA profiles and whole-slide images: histology can capture morphology-linked consequences of certain molecular programmes, but cannot be expected to reconstruct the full transcriptomic state. MoPE encodes RNA-derived pathways and transfers the molecular supervision to pathway-indexed pathology experts through memory-usage alignment. Across diverse public benchmarks and two independent breast cancer cohorts, MoPE consistently improved WSI-only inference performance relative to baseline methods. Pathway-usage analyses and human-audited visual inspection provide bounded inspection of model behaviour and candidate morphology-linked readouts. These results support pathway-structured privileged distillation as a promising route to using molecular information during training while preserving RNA-free inference.

Randomized smoothing (RS) uses a smoothed classifier to provide architecture-agnostic certificates of $\ell_2$ classification robustness, but its dependence on per-input Monte Carlo (MC) sampling undermines its use in real-time systems. We argue that this cost is structural rather than fundamental, such that it can be significantly reduced by sharing information across the deployment stream. We introduce RRISE, an RS framework that compresses certification into a single forward pass through a learned surrogate. RRISE trains the surrogate against precomputed MC class-count targets via a soft-label cross-entropy loss and converts surrogate predictions into provably conservative certified radii through a one-time conformal calibration step. The resulting certificate is deployment-verifiable: whenever the calibrated radius is positive, the surrogate's prediction provably matches the smoothed classifier's and the smoothed classifier is constant on a ball of that radius around the input. Across image classification benchmarks, RRISE matches fixed-budget MC certified accuracy within $0.84$ percentage points while replacing up to $10^4$ noisy base-model evaluations per query with a single surrogate forward pass, recouping MC training cost after $\approx 10^5$ deployment queries. On CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet, where the only prior offline-surrogate method collapses, RRISE achieves $1.23$ to $1.91\times$ higher certified accuracy, establishing efficient randomized smoothing as a practical path to certified robustness in repeated-deployment settings.

Coding-agent benchmarks evaluate whether a single uninterrupted agent can resolve a repository issue. Real software work is messier: tasks are interrupted, reassigned, reviewed, and resumed from partial states left by another agent or engineer. We study this missing dimension through \emph{handoff debt}: the rediscovery cost imposed when a predecessor's work is opaque or incomplete. Our takeover protocol interrupts a coding agent at deterministic handoff points, freezes the repository, and evaluates successor agents under four handoff views: repository state only, raw trace, summary notes, and structured notes. Across 75 source tasks, the protocol generates 181 handoff-point tasks and 724 takeover runs per successor model. Across three successor models, context-bearing handoffs reduce median agent events by 20--59\% and cumulative prompt tokens by 42--63\% relative to repository-only takeover. Solved-rate effects are smaller and model-dependent, but efficiency gains are consistent. These findings suggest that coding-agent evaluation should report not only whether a task is solved, but also how costly that work is for another agent to resume.

This paper considers the problem of simultaneously controlling an interceptor's impact time and impact angle using its lateral acceleration as the sole control input. With a single control input, the nonlinear engagement kinematics is inherently underactuated, which complicates guidance law synthesis. To overcome this challenge, a hierarchical sliding mode-based guidance law is developed to concurrently regulate the two terminal constraints. The proposed architecture consists of a two-layer sliding manifold. The first layer comprises two sub-sliding surfaces corresponding to the impact time and impact angle error dynamics, respectively, while the second layer introduces a composite sliding manifold that combines the two individual sub-surfaces. Then, a variable-gain adaptive guidance law is designed to ensure time and angle-constrained interception against a stationary target, which is further extended to intercept a constant velocity target. Simulations are conducted for various engagement scenarios to attest to the efficacy of the proposed approach.

Large reasoning models improve performance by generating extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, but this behavior becomes inefficient when applied to LLM agents. Current LLM agents often generate verbose textual reasoning at every decision step and allocate reasoning effort nearly uniformly across turns, leading to substantial inefficiency in multi-turn agentic trajectories. We propose Adaptive Latent Agentic Reasoning (ALAR), a dual-mode framework that uses compact latent reasoning for routine turns and selectively escalates to explicit chain-of-thought when deeper deliberation is needed. ALAR learns latent reasoning by using the agent's actions as supervision anchors and is further optimized to use latent reasoning when it is sufficient for task success and reserve explicit CoT for harder decisions. Experiments on agentic search and tool-use benchmarks show that ALAR maintains comparable or better task accuracy while substantially reducing generated tokens by up to 43.6% in search and 84.6% in tool use. These results demonstrate that ALAR improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off of LLM agents by reducing unnecessary textual reasoning while preserving explicit deliberation for harder decision steps.

Human behaviour during epidemics affects infectious disease dynamics, but quantifying this remains deeply challenging. Here we introduce the Epi-LLM framework: a novel integration of agent-based modelling, real-life epigames, and large language models (LLMs) in which a synthetic society of agents reasons and adapts dynamically over an outbreak contact network. Comparing synthetic agent behaviour against a no-intervention SEIR baseline and human participant data from the AUIB epigame study, we find that LLM agents across four different architectures reduced peak active infections, with quarantine compliance peaking at 58-65% on day six of the 15-day simulation. A binomial generalised linear model showed that perceived health severity was the strongest predictor of quarantine behaviour ($β= 0.33, p = 0.002$), yielding a pseudo-$R^2$ of 0.055, comparable to the 0.072 observed in the human trial. LLM architecture is a key determinant of epidemic dynamics: low-variance architectures offer greater internal validity for testing behavioural rules, while high-variance models may better represent real-world decision-making. Geographic labels alone do not induce culturally differentiated behaviour; explicit attitudinal parameterisation is required. This proof-of-principle work lays the groundwork for deploying the Epi-LLM framework as a scalable, risk-free simulation environment for pandemic preparedness research.

When does multi-agent debate help data cleaning, and when does it hurt? Across three benchmarks, four model families, and over 6,000 task-condition pairs, we find debate's effect reverses sign: it degrades generation across all four models (-1.6 to -15.5pp) through critique-induced confusion (CIC), hallucinated Critic feedback that the Generator accepts uncritically, yet improves error detection (+27.4pp F1, d=1.0). We derive a debate benefit condition: debate helps when the probability of rescuing a wrong output (Critic verification odds weighted by fixability) exceeds the probability of destroying a correct one. A factorial experiment proves adversarial separation is essential: self-verification with identical tools fails, while a separate Critic with code-execution grounding and evidence-gated generation produces the first debate configuration to significantly exceed single-agent on a generative task (+5.3pp, p<0.05). The condition correctly predicts all nine task types and generalizes with zero false positives across 19 published comparisons in seven domains.

AI-Driven Research Systems (ADRS) -- systems coupling LLMs with automated evaluation to discover algorithms, proofs, and designs -- are being optimized and adopted across domains, but the tools to analyze them have not kept pace. ADRS performance depends on component interactions that are poorly understood, expensive to explore, and (as we show) not well captured by standard convergence guarantees. These guarantees rely on structural assumptions that do not hold under the ADRS process we formalize. We introduce GAMBLe, a framework that decomposes ADRS behavior into four parameters (generator $G$, assessor $\mathcal{A}$, discovery mechanism $\mathcal{M}$, budget $B$) and one compositional object, the effective landscape $L_{\text{eff}} = \mathcal{A} \circ G$, which reveals that distinct generator-assessor pairs induce structurally different per-problem optimization landscapes. We exercise the framework on 760+ replicated runs (>46,000 iterations) spanning generators from single LLMs to dynamically-adaptive ensembles, mechanisms from greedy selection to co-evolutionary meta-search, and three NP-hard problems whose assessors range from continuous scoring to cliff functions. The experiments reveal no total ordering of generators or mechanisms: frontier models can underperform open-source alternatives and the simplest mechanism sometimes outperforms state-of-the-art meta-search. Results show that even under limited budgets (60 iterations per run), the right component choices can improve performance by 13-67% and search efficiency by 6-39x.