Electrocardiography (ECG) remains central to cardiovascular screening, yet interpretation remains largely manual and episodic. Clinical practice relies on brief resting ECGs and, when required, long-duration ambulatory recordings, both generating data that require resource-intensive review. Consequently, subtle morphological changes or progressive drift preceding clinically apparent abnormalities may go unnoticed. We propose a motif-based framework that defines beat-aligned ECG motifs as interpretable cardiac signatures and quantifies morphological drift and deviation across short and long-term monitoring. Motifs are representative cardiac cycles capturing dominant morphology. We introduce three interpretable drift metrics: deviation from a normal sinus rhythm (NSR), deviation from a personalised baseline, and a motif instability index. Motifs are extracted by selecting beats that minimise Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance within fixed windows. We evaluate these metrics on short (PTB-XL) and long-duration (MIT-BIH Arrhythmia) ECG datasets. Interpretability is achieved through representative motif overlays and fiducial-based visualisations, enabling direct inspection of morphological changes. In MIT-BIH, the proposed metrics significantly separated predominantly normal from arrhythmic subjects (p<0.01). In PTB-XL, NSR deviation distinguished normal from abnormal ECGs across major diagnostic subtypes (p<1e-4, Cliff's delta up to 0.93). ECG motifs provide an interpretable representation of cardiac morphology, supporting scalable longitudinal monitoring and early detection of morphology-driven change.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are limited by low signal-to-noise ratio in modalities such as electroencephalography, which requires multiple trials to reliably decode user intentions. This induces a speed-accuracy trade-off, whereby higher accuracy comes at the cost of speed. The speed-accuracy balance is application-dependent, motivating controllable trade-offs. Conventional metrics, such as the Information Transfer Rate, combine speed and accuracy obscuring their dependence and potentially introducing biases. In this study, we propose an evaluation framework independent of classifier, paradigm, and early-stopping strategy that separates speed and accuracy. We employ two measures, Gain (relative speed improvement) and Conservation (relative accuracy preservation), and combine them into a tunable Gain-Cons Balance controlled by α, regulating the speed-accuracy trade-off. The parameter adjusts the operating point without modifying the classifier, facilitating deployment across scenarios. The framework was evaluated on P300 event-related potential paradigms using public recordings from 63 subjects as well as multiple classifiers and early-stopping strategies to achieve distinct operating points in speed-accuracy and bitrate. Results show that tuning α yields fast, accurate, or balanced BCI behaviours, demonstrating explicit control of the speed-accuracy trade-off. The method supports subject-level performance prediction and improves explainability of BCI behaviour. Further analysis of the Information Transfer Rate reveals a systematic bias toward speed, explained by the proposed framework through the Gain and Conservation measurements. Overall, this work establishes the speed-accuracy trade-off as a controllable design variable validated on public P300-based paradigms, enabling transparent evaluation and application-specific optimization of BCIs.

Online travel platforms generate vast volumes of user-generated hotel reviews, offering rich opportunities to understand traveler experiences at scale. However, transforming unstructured textual feedback into structured, actionable insights remains a challenging task. This paper presents SentimentLens, a scalable analysis system based on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis that performs knowledge extraction from unstructured hotel reviews and organizes them into interpretable service categories. SentimentLens integrates aspect term extraction, aspect sentiment classification, semantic category assignment, and multi-level analytical modules to support region-level, hotel-level, and category-level evaluation. The system is designed to operate across different geographic contexts and hospitality settings. To demonstrate its practical utility, we apply SentimentLens to a large real-world dataset of over 10,000 publicly available hotel reviews. Through extensive analysis, the framework reveals how traveler sentiment varies across regions, service categories, and hotel archetypes. We further implement a cross-modal reconciliation of textual sentiment and numerical ratings to identify latent operational conflicts, structural inconsistencies in service quality, and high-impact improvement opportunities using importance--performance and entropy-based analyses. The results show that SentimentLens effectively transforms large-scale unstructured reviews into actionable intelligence, supporting data-driven decision-making for hospitality management and tourism policy. While demonstrated using a national case study, the proposed system is generalizable to other destinations and review-driven service domains.

Reliable seizure prediction is a prerequisite for closed-loop neurostimulation therapy, yet existing methods rarely account for the variability in EEG signal quality encountered in real-world deployment, and the overwhelming majority adopt non-strict evaluation protocols that overestimate generalisation performance. We propose CLSP-REQA (Closed-Loop Seizure Prediction with Real-time EEG Quality Assessment), a unified framework that embeds a lightweight signal quality estimator directly within the prediction pipeline. A Real-time EEG Quality Assessment (REQA) module runs in parallel with a Mamba-BiLSTM backbone, producing a scalar quality score q in [0,1] that modulates output confidence through a tiered non-linear fusion function (ECLO). Under strict cross-patient evaluation on the CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database (n = 23 subjects, 198 seizures), CLSP-REQA achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.7426 +- 0.0199, outperforming the unadapted cross-patient baseline of 0.69 reported by Jemal et al., using only 16 EEG channels compared to 23 in prior work, and without requiring any target-patient data or domain adaptation. On the SIENA Scalp EEG Database (n = 14 subjects, 47 seizures), CLSP-REQA achieves AUC 0.7012 +- 0.0249, substantially surpassing the best domain-adapted cross-patient result of 0.61 on the same dataset, demonstrating strong cross-dataset generalisation. The framework outputs a structured four-tuple (p, q, c, Phi_SHAP) directly compatible with closed-loop neurostimulator interfaces.

We investigate how internal representations emerge across hierarchical processing systems by introducing a neuroscience-inspired framework for analyzing deep spiking neural networks (SNN) through the lens of functional connectivity. Drawing on concepts from systems neuroscience and information theory, we form the first-order functionally-connected (1FC) group of a neuron based on its statistically significant pairwise correlations with neurons from the previous layer of a trained SNN architecture. We then track its response properties during inference under various conditions. Our analysis shows that several principles of functional connectivity previously observed in biological cortex are preserved in spiking ResNet architectures. These 1FC ensembles display interesting properties: their aggregate cofiring reliably predicts downstream neuronal responses through a robust, ReLU-like input-output relationship, whose gain scales systematically with ensemble size. Reliable encoding of the presented class emerges only during high 1FC cofiring events, which themselves occur infrequently, indicating that informative representations are concentrated in rare but highly coordinated activity patterns. Under uniform random noise or adversarial perturbations, these response profiles are disrupted, particularly in early and intermediate layers. This enables a targeted high-resolution interrogation at specific nodes and pathways. We showed that the functional connectivity structure is shaped by learning and this structure breaks under weight permutation. These establish 1FC ensembles as a functionally meaningful substrate for input encoding and information transfer, with potential implications in designing targeted fine-grained diagnostics on the information flow.

Automated extraction of materials composition-property data from scientific literature has advanced considerably with the development of large language model-based pipelines; however, existing frameworks remain limited to textual and tabular content, overlooking the substantial proportion of quantitative property data reported exclusively in scientific figures. Here, we extend ComProScanner, a fully end-to-end multi-agent framework for automated composition-property database construction, with a native vision-language model (VLM) based figure extraction capability. The extension introduces a FigureExtractor utility for caption-keyword-based figure filtering across all supported publishers, and a GraphExtractorTool agent that passes extracted figures to a configurable VLM to recover composition-property pairs from scientific charts and plots. Four VLMs are selected for evaluation on the basis of the LMArena Diagram leaderboard with an input cost criterion of less than \$1.50 per million tokens. Benchmarking on 50 piezoelectric ceramic articles from the established $d_{33}$ test corpus demonstrates that Gemini-3-Flash-Preview achieves the highest performance with a composition accuracy of 0.97 and a normalised F1 score of 0.97, whilst remaining the most cost-effective model among the four evaluated. We additionally introduce a range-based value error threshold parameter into the evaluation framework, providing a more physically meaningful assessment of numeric property values extracted from figures than exact value matching. These contributions establish VLM-integrated ComProScanner as the first materials-specific, fully automated, multimodal literature mining platform capable of extracting structured composition-property data from text, tables, and figures within a single unified pipeline.

This paper investigates whether machine learning forecasts of hourly BTC-USDT returns can be converted into economically meaningful trading performance after transaction costs. Using approximately 70,000 hourly observations from 2018-2026, XGBoost, LSTM, and iTransformer are evaluated in a 27-fold walk-forward protocol. All three models produce positive gross trading performance in selected configurations, but naive sign-based strategies fail once transaction costs of ten basis points are imposed. A cost-aware execution filter, which prevents trades only when the forecast magnitude exceeds a transaction-cost-based threshold, sharply reduces turnover and restores profitability in selected configurations. The strongest long-only XGBoost strategy produces annualised returns above 65% with a Sharpe ratio above one. Additional tests show that technical indicators improve performance in selected cases, EGARCH-derived features do not provide uniformly robust gains, and XGBoost is descriptively stronger than the neural alternatives, although bootstrap evidence does not support formal statistical dominance. Loss-function and model-selection effects are secondary and statistically fragile. The results show that the main obstacle in hourly cryptocurrency trading is not only weak predictability, but also the way forecasts are converted into trades.

This study develops a dimensionless multi-domain physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for electro-osmotic radial consolidation considering smear effects and combined vacuum and surcharge loading. Three PINN-based models are investigated: a standard soft-constrained PINN (Std-PINN), a modified gated PINN (Mod-PINN), and a modified gated PINN with hard-constraint boundary encoding (Mod-HC-PINN). The models are evaluated against FEM reference solutions under four loading cases, including constant vacuum, exponential vacuum, exponential vacuum with ramp surcharge, and exponential vacuum with cyclic haversine surcharge. The results indicate that the gated architecture applied in Mod-PINN improves the resolution of steep pressure gradients near the cathode and smear-zone interface under constant vacuum loading. Under time-dependent loading, the soft-constrained Mod-PINN shows reduced accuracy because it must learn multiple competing objectives simultaneously. The Mod-HC-PINN mitigates this issue by embedding the cathode boundary and initial conditions into the output structure, thereby reducing the optimization burden and improving physical consistency. The Mod-HC-PINN achieves MAE values of 0.43, 0.41, and 0.27 kPa for the exponential vacuum, ramp surcharge, and cyclic surcharge cases, respectively. Sensitivity analyses further demonstrate that the proposed framework remains robust across practical ranges of network architecture, collocation density, and permeability contrast.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in analytical workflows, but their suitability as exploratory data analysis (EDA) agents in business settings remains uncertain. In practice, a deployable EDA agent must provide not only useful average performance but also sufficient repeatability to support trust in its outputs. We evaluate this requirement in a controlled, business-relevant benchmark built on an agent-based supply chain simulation. The task is to identify supplier-product combinations responsible for low quality and downstream sales loss by reasoning from indirect operational traces rather than from explicit labels. Fifteen model-variant configurations from eight model families were evaluated under four experimental conditions that varied data representation, prompt clarity, and signal strength, with five trajectories per condition. Outputs were scored against deterministic ground truth using the Jaccard index and assessed through a framework that combines mean score (ms), coefficient of variation (CV), exploratory cross-condition significance tests, and Business utility, a risk-adjusted metric that we propose to summarise quality and repeatability in a single operational measure. The results show that most configurations are not reliable enough for autonomous EDA use, even when their average scores appear acceptable. GPT-5.4 with extra-high reasoning effort achieved the strongest overall profile, with an experiment-averaged ms of 0.8748 and an experiment-averaged Business utility of 0.6952, while the next-best configurations lost substantially more utility after variability discounting. Our findings suggest that evaluation of EDA agents should treat average quality, repeatability, and condition sensitivity as complementary dimensions of operational trustworthiness.

Large language models (LLMs) are widely recognised for their applications in natural language generation and are increasingly used for code generation tasks. However, concerns about bias in their generated outputs remain significant. This paper focuses on GPT-4o and Gemini, mainstream tools for code generation, and proposes a framework for evaluating bias in LLM-generated code, specifically examining the influence of protected attributes, prompts and web-search capability. We use two metrics: the code bias score (CBS) and the attribute change ratio (ACR), to quantify the prevalence of bias and the degree of influence of different attributes, respectively. In addition, we investigate four lightweight mitigation strategies: Few-Shot, Chain-of-Thought, Few-Shot Chain-of-Thought, and Multi-agent, aimed at mitigating bias in generated code. Our findings reveal that bias remains prevalent across different protected attributes and datasets even after applying mitigation strategies, highlighting the need for more effective approaches to reduce bias in AI-driven code generation systems.

Prior research has established that instruction-tuned large language models exhibit left-of-center political bias, measured exclusively through abstract political questionnaires. We show that this finding does not generalize to concrete policy decisions. We introduce a dual-instrument methodology grounded in Swiss democratic reality. The Smartvote questionnaire (75 abstract policy questions) is administered to 66 LLMs from 27 model families and compared to 184 elected members of the Swiss National Council, replicating the established leftward convergence (Cohen's d = 3.64, p = 0.0002). Then, novel to this work, 9 flagship LLMs are confronted with 48 real federal referenda (Volksabstimmungen) in four national languages (German, French, Italian, Romansh) under three information conditions, comparing votes to actual outcomes and party recommendations (Parolen). Three findings challenge the prevailing narrative. (1) Abstract questionnaires do not predict concrete behavior: the left-to-right agreement gradient on Smartvote shifts from left-peaked to center-peaked on Volksabstimmungen, where models align most with centrist Die Mitte and FDP rather than leftist SP and Gruene (Wilcoxon p = 0.008). (2) For some models, the language of a political question changes the answer more than the political content does: cross-linguistic consistency ranges from 50% (Mistral) to 98% (GPT-5.4). (3) Two models exhibit systematic change-aversion rather than political bias, voting Nein on 83-94% of referenda regardless of direction (binomial p < 0.0001). What prior work measured as "leftward bias" may not generalize beyond abstract instruments. On concrete policy decisions, LLMs behave less like coalition partners of the left and more like cautious civil servants: centrist, status-quo-favoring, and inconsistent across languages.

Frontier AI governance often centres on the model-level governance paradigm, which assumes that a model's capability profile is primarily a function of the compute and data used during training. This position paper argues that model-level governance becomes less effective when capability progress is increasingly driven by "non-model gains"--improvements that are independent from advances in the base model. We formalise the concept of non-model gains and provide a taxonomy of three distinct vectors of capability gain: inference gain (scaling compute at test-time), systems gain (post-training enhancements such as scaffolds), and asset gain (enhancing a model with restricted assets). We demonstrate how these vectors--alongside potential future impacts from embodiment, continual learning, and AI diffusion--may undermine risk management strategies that hinge mostly on pre-deployment evaluation and mitigation. We provide an overview of governance approaches that go beyond the model level: system, entity, agent, and cloud governance. Finally, we emphasise the importance of societal resilience as a complement to these governance layers.

Video platforms such as YouTube have reshaped how users engage with entertainment and information, emphasizing brief, highly engaging content such as Shorts. Within this ecosystem, certain content occupies a gray area where it remains allowed but may still have unintended negative effects on some audiences. To study this problem, we introduce TwistedHumor, a dataset of 1,211 YouTube Shorts paired with 33,041 related comments, with hand annotations for humor presence, humor type, harm, topic, rhetorical devices, and stand up context. Beyond dataset creation, we present a multi view analysis of how humor and harm appear in short form social media. Using LLooM based concept induction over video descriptions, we find that dark humor frequently clusters around themes of critique, coping, awkwardness, and identity expression rather than appearing as a single uniform category. We further analyze audience response through linked comments and show that regular humor is associated with more positive sentiment, while dark humor receives more mixed, neutral, and sometimes more toxic reactions. Finally, we evaluate large language models against human annotations and find that they perform better on stand up comedy compared to shorter jokes. Together, these results position TwistedHumor not only as a new benchmark, but as an empirical study of the gray area between humor and harm in short form video, highlighting the need for context aware moderation and more robust multimodal evaluation.

The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical medicine creates a fundamental tension between algorithmic probabilistic reasoning and the experiential intuition of expert physicians; applying Lawrence Lessig's \enquote{Code is Law} framework, I argue that the architecture of clinical AI systems already functions as de facto medical regulation, reshaping liability and the standard of care. Reframing AI \enquote{hallucination} as structurally analogous to well-documented human cognitive failures such as confirmation bias and premature diagnostic closure, I show that both failure modes demand a unified governance response. I therefore propose a dialectical standard of care that treats the integrated AI-physician dyad as the singular responsible diagnostic entity, mandating the synthesis of algorithmic precision with human interpretive authority within robust data governance and patient privacy frameworks.

This study analyzes COVID-19 care pathways using the COVID Data for Shared Learning dataset. We build a transparent, reproducible pipeline that transforms heterogeneous clinical tables into a process-mining-ready event log and applies discovery, declarative conformance checking, and outcome analysis. The reconstructed pathways highlight the monitoring backbone of inpatient care, variability at the Emergency department-admission interface, and outcome differences driven by age and exposure to intensive care units. These insights support triage standardization, capacity planning, and step-down coordination from intensive care units to lower-acuity wards, showing how process mining can inform evidence-based hospital governance.

As Generative AI (GenAI) becomes integral to education, fostering GenAI literacy is critical. However, current assessments largely rely on self-reported scales, lacking insights into how literacy manifests in actual learning processes. This study leverages Learning Analytics (LA) to bridge this gap. We collected interaction logs from 162 university students engaged in a GenAI-assisted abstract writing task. Using Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), we modeled and compared the questioning strategies of students with varying GenAI literacy levels. Preliminary results reveal distinct interaction signatures: high-literacy students engage in iterative refinement and strategic questioning, while low-literacy students rely on direct generation commands. This work contributes to the workshop by demonstrating how process data can characterize GenAI literacy, paving the way for data-driven literacy assessment and real-time interventions.

Text-to-Image (T2I) models have shown promising utility across various domains. However, such models are also amplifying harmful societal biases in their outputs. In the context of South Asia, recent work has shown caste biases and stereotypes are being perpetuated through Generative AI (GenAI) systems. While this research offers extremely relevant insight into invisibilized narratives of caste discrimination through the GenAI system, they often treat caste as an identity category. Therefore, in this work we shift our ontology to focus on the relational aspect of caste. This enables us to develop a more nuanced understanding of the mechanics of caste discrimination by and through T2I models. Combining an algorithmic audit with critical discourse analysis, we draw on a conceptual frame challenging Brahminical Normativity to show how caste biases are perpetuated beyond the simple binaries of upper vs lower-caste categories. Our contributions are two-fold. Beyond challenging the categorical understanding of caste as a category, we propose an anti-caste approach to tackle the issue of caste bias and fairness in AI systems.

Machine learning models embedded in deployed AI systems are routinely updated to maintain correct functioning over time. Yet such updates can generate update opacity: users may not be able to understand why the same input now yields a different output. We argue that update opacity is best understood as a diachronic failure of epistemic accessibility: the problem is that materially relevant changes may fail to remain accessible to human users in forms that support understanding, calibrated reliance, and appropriate action under real role- and time-specific constraints. This makes update opacity a governance problem. Not all change is equally relevant, and disclosing every update would itself undermine use through overload. To address this problem, we combine two complementary governance approaches: the EU AI Act, which helps specify the system-level perimeter of normatively relevant change, and Machine Learning Operations, which provides operational tools for tracking and comparing change over time. On this basis, we propose a framework that models system change through trustworthiness profiles and trustworthiness levels, and uses threshold-based disclosure to surface materially relevant within-envelope change to different stakeholders over time. We illustrate the approach with a medical AI example and derive practical implications for lifecycle documentation, post-market monitoring, and update disclosure.

While mechanistic interpretability (MI) has produced important insights into neural network internals, the field has yet to establish a standardized system to audit experiments. As such, many of its findings remain underutilized in safety-critical applications such as medical AI and autonomous systems, as stakeholders cannot certify their validity. Recent work demonstrates this concretely: two papers found conflicting conclusions for the same behavior, and a third study revealed that both were partially correct but incomparable due to methodological inconsistencies. Without standardized auditing, such ambiguities hinder adoption in high-stakes contexts requiring strong correctness guarantees. We call for the MI community to work towards developing a novel reviewing system that complements peer review via: (1) Continuous reviewing supported by a \emph{Collaborative Reviewing Platform} where meta-science results and discussions (such as critiques, negative results, post-hoc extensions, reproductions, replications, and partial results) that fit outside of papers are organized and discussed, allowing for comments and revisions to be made at any time (2) Generalizing good practices found on this platform into expert-verified guidelines and protocols to improve auditing efficiency, and (3) Source-based auditing systems that track arguments which claims depend on. This position paper encourages constructive debate over the necessity, design and implementation of such a framework, providing early concrete examples to help catalyze these dialogues. Overall, we propose that auditing MI itself is essential for its application in AI safety, industry, and governance.

Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) documentation tools are increasingly deployed to reduce clinician documentation burden, but their implications for biased language in clinical notes remain unclear. We conducted a large-scale comparison analysis of AI drafts and corresponding clinician finalized notes to quantify stigmatizing language changes pre- and post-editing. Using a lexicon-based natural language processing (NLP) pipeline, we measured (1) the prevalence of stigmatizing language in AI drafts, (2) the prevalence and term composition in final notes, and (3) the frequency of removal or introduction of stigmatizing terms. Across 66,297 paired note sections, 21.4% of AI draft sections contained at least one stigmatizing language mention, rising to 24.0% in clinician finalized versions. Introductions occurred more often than removals, suggesting clinician editing can be a net source of stigmatizing language entering the EHR with using Ambient AI.

Ambient AI documentation systems generate clinical note drafts that clinicians frequently revise before signing off into electronic health records, yet how these edits alter hedging language remains unclear. We conducted paired analysis of clinician-edited portions of ambient AI drafts and final notes to examine (1) whether these edits change the prevalence of hedging language, (2) whether these edits exhibit a systematic shift toward greater certainty or uncertainty, and (3) whether these changes in hedging prevalence and directionality differ by ambient AI vendors and clinical specialties. Among 62,811 paired note sections, hedging terms were more often introduced into previously non-hedged text than removed from previously hedged text, and post-edit text contained more hedging mentions than pre-edit text. Directionality analyses showed a significant overall tendency toward greater uncertainty in hedging-related replacement edits. Vendor and specialty analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in hedging prevalence, pre-to-post changes in hedging mentions, and directionality.

Operating Systems (OS) courses are among the most challenging in computer science education due to the complexity of internal structures and the diversity of running environments. Traditional teaching methods often fail to address the diverse backgrounds, learning speeds, and practical needs of students. To tackle these challenges, we present SortingHat, a personalized digital teaching assistant tailored specifically for OS education. SortingHat integrates advanced AI technologies, including a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework and multi agent reinforcement learning (MARL), to deliver adaptive, scalable, and effective educational support. SortingHat features a 3D digital human interface powered by large language models (LLMs) to provide personalized, empathetic, and context aware guidance. It generates tailored exercises based on each student's learning history and academic performance, reinforcing weak areas and challenging advanced concepts. Additionally, the system incorporates a robust evaluation pipeline that ensures fair, consistent, and unbiased grading of student submissions while delivering personalized, actionable feedback for improvement. By combining personalized guidance, adaptive content creation, and automated assessment, SortingHat transforms OS education into an engaging, immersive, and scalable experience.

Social conformity is a well-documented phenomenon in which individuals shift their opinions towards those of a social majority. As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life it may also create a novel source of influence giving rise to algorithmic conformity, mechanisms of which are poorly understood. The present study examined whether AI judgements affect moral decision-making in humans (n=165) adapting the classical Asch paradigm. Participants completed a series of moral dilemmas under three different conditions: in presence of social majority, with an AI model providing brief answers and with an AI model providing both answers and explanations of its choices. In all conditions the presented responses contradicted generally accepted moral norms. The results indicated that an AI model with a reasoning component affected the opinion of participants to a degree comparable to that of a human majority. These findings suggest that even moral judgements, despite their sensitivity and personal significance, may be susceptible to algorithmic conformity. However, the mechanism underlying algorithmic conformity appears to differ from the social one. Overall, the study challenges the assumption that moral decision-making lies in "AI inadmissibility zone" - a sphere that is considered as an area in which only human-made decisions are acceptable and highlights the need for a further investigation of this phenomenon as AI-based recommendations become increasingly embedded into human decision-making.

Despite the promise of AI to assist complex decisions, practitioners still lack ways to detect likely failures and inspect the consequences of model edits before committing them. We present RuleEdit, an interactive, rule-guided human-AI model editing system that (i) surfaces likely failures through interpretable mismatch signals from rule tables and (ii) supports user-authored rule feedback with prospective previews of projected performance changes and embedding shifts. We instantiate RuleEdit in stroke rehabilitation assessment and evaluate it with health professionals and students. Rule-guided failure detection significantly increased Human + AI performance by 14.16\% ($p<0.001$) while improving rejection of incorrect AI and reducing both over- and under- reliance as well as ChangedToWrong decisions. In addition, presenting prospective embedding previews improved participants' feedback for model adaptation, increasing post-update local performance gains from 11.50\% to 36.38\% after incorporating users' rule-based feedback ($p<0.001$). Our findings show that mismatch-based failure cues and prospective impact previews can support failure-aware human-AI model editing, while also revealing a local-global tradeoff: edits that help a specific case can degrade performance when transferred globally. We discuss implications of designing failure-aware and controllable human-AI systems.

For patients experiencing cancer, nurse navigation can ease the burden of complex care by enhancing coordination of health services and patient outcomes. However, in under-resourced areas, trained nurse navigators may be limited or non-existent. In the United States, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital health tools are increasingly available and may help address gaps in care coordination; however, most are not designed to specifically support nursing. This perspective piece discusses a human-centered AI framework that integrates empathic and agentic approaches grounded in the American Nurses Association's code of ethics to support nurses in the United States in cancer care navigation. The framework could augment, not replace, human empathy and agency while improving nurse workflow, patient-clinician relationships, and care coordination services in under-resourced areas.

This paper introduces Calligraphy Writing Score Representation (CWSR) and proposes Shu Dao as a framework that interprets East Asian calligraphy as a performative art rather than a static visual artifact. Inspired by traditions such as Japanese Shodō and embodied cultural practices such as Chadao , the framework models calligraphy as a structured performance analogous to musical notation. Instead of representing characters as fixed images, the proposed approach encodes each brush stroke as an ordered and executable action, forming a calligraphy score. Characters are organized within a structured spatial grid, and strokes are annotated with attributes including stroke type, execution order, spatial coordinates, trajectory, compositional role, and dynamic properties such as brush pressure and pacing. This representation captures temporal and expressive aspects of calligraphic writing that are typically absent from image-based representations. The paper makes three main contributions. First, it introduces CWSR as a structured notation system for representing calligraphy across multiple levels, including strokes, character structures, and compositional organization (e.g., layout and zhangfa), together with their rhythmic and performative dynamics. Second, it conceptualizes Shu Dao as a score-mediated framework that models calligraphy as structured performance. Third, it establishes a computational foundation for the analysis, visualization, and executable generation of calligraphic works by AI-based calligraphic agents. Together, these contributions bridge calligraphy, musical notation, and performative cultural practices, supporting human--AI co-creation in computational calligraphy and digital humanities research.

Agentic LLMs with web search change the threat model for text anonymization: weak contextual cues can become cross-referenceable evidence for re-identification, yet those same details also carry downstream analytic value of the text. Existing defenses either remove explicit identifiers, perturb text for formal privacy, or test rewritten text against non-web inference models, leaving underexplored the operating region between resistance to agentic web-search re-identification and utility retention. We introduce AURA (\textbf{A}nonymization with \textbf{U}tility-\textbf{R}etention \textbf{A}daptation), an LLM-powered \textit{mask-reconstruct} framework that decouples privacy localization from utility-preserving reconstruction and selects candidates with adversarial privacy and utility-retention checks. We evaluate AURA on real-user interview transcripts using re-identification attacks carried out by web-search agents, along with a utility evaluation based on interviewee-profile facts, codebook facts, and the joint contextual utility grid. Our results show that AURA improves the privacy-utility frontier by using adaptive privacy scope to strengthen resistance to agentic re-identification and using a mask-reconstruct anonymization method to better preserve contextual utility under fixed privacy scope.

Designing novel inorganic materials through generative models remains an important challenge for material science, driven by the complexity and diversity of inorganic structures across expansive chemical compositions and structural landscape. The vast combinatorial space of inorganic compounds demands innovative, AI-driven approaches to overcome limitations in generative accuracy and efficiency. To address this, we introduce a novel method that redefines the encoding and generation of inorganic materials by utilizing domain-specific symmetry-aware representation. Our approach not only refines the representation of intricate inorganic structures but also contributes to the field of material discovery by enhancing the precision and stability of generated candidates. Central to our methodology is a novel padding technique that exploits crystal symmetry information to enhance the encoding process. By integrating Wyckoff position length-aware padding into an encoder architecture, we achieve a more robust informed representation of inorganic materials. This symmetry-driven enhancement improves deep learning models to generate stable, previously unexplored inorganic structures with superior accuracy and computational efficiency. Furthermore, we introduce an end-to-end system that leverages the machine learning potential models to seamlessly generate novel, even those unseen in the training data, and stable inorganic materials from initial data to validated output. This pipeline integrates advanced generative models with stability analysis, marking a significant leap forward in the automated exploration and design of next-generation inorganic materials. Our method improved reconstruction accuracy 5.3% in proton conductor data, and generated 63.5% more novel stable inorganic material to baseline model on the perov-5 dataset.

Astrophysical observations from Earth are subject to weather, environmental, and scientific constraints that lead to sparse, irregular light curves. On the eve of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time, its dataset offers unprecedented opportunities for transient science. Yet a key challenge remains its cadence, sparse and irregular across six bands, limiting inference. Interpolation helps mitigate this, with Gaussian Processes the standard, but they struggle with cross-band correlations, require a priori kernel specification, and must be fit to each light curve individually, hence scaling poorly. Here, we introduce the neural process family for light curve reconstruction, combining the probabilistic framework of Gaussian Processes with the scalability of deep learning. By meta-learning on diverse simulated transients, Attentive Neural Processes shift the bulk of computation to training, enabling rapid, amortized inference with a class-agnostic model. Evaluated on realistic Rubin cadences across 15 transient classes, we show that even an unoptimized, out-of-the-box Attentive Neural Process consistently outperforms all benchmarks -- a suite of Gaussian Processes and neural networks -- on every tested metric, spanning regression quality, astrophysical feature recovery, and probabilistic calibration. Our model interpolates all bands simultaneously in microseconds, over four orders of magnitude faster than the next-best neural benchmark and five faster than Gaussian Processes, demonstrating the potential of neural processes for the nightly Rubin alert stream. Attentive Neural Processes avoid the overconfidence of standard neural networks and the underconfidence of Gaussian Processes, delivering sharp, well-calibrated uncertainties. This work establishes the neural process family as a scalable, probabilistic foundation for real-time transient science in the Rubin era.

LLM-based agents for industrial asset operations show limited accuracy when reasoning over flat document stores. AssetOpsBench (KDD 2026) establishes that GPT-4 agents achieve 65% on 139 industrial maintenance scenarios, and compares LLM orchestration paradigms (Agent-As-Tool vs. Plan-Execute) on a fixed data layer. We ask the orthogonal question: how much does the data model behind the tools matter? We treat a typed knowledge graph as a grounding substrate and route each question by how it is best answered: (i) LLM-generated Cypher for structured retrieval, which lifts the same GPT-4 model from 65% to 82-83%; (ii) native graph and optimization primitives, with no LLM, reaching 99% on graph-answerable scenarios; and (iii) generation-augmented knowledge (GAK) for answers absent from the data -- the engine's agent materializes the missing facts as provenance-tagged graph nodes, then answers. A recurring theme is inverted LLM usage: we constrain the LLM to query generation or one-shot enrichment from a typed schema and let the graph execute deterministically. On the 88 real AssetOpsBench failure-mode scenarios the benchmark itself flags non-deterministic -- ten equipment types absent from the graph -- GAK lifts answerability from zero to 100% of equipment types and answers 81.8% of scenarios, every materialized fact tagged source:LLM-derived for auditability. We also contribute 40 graph-native scenarios. For structured operational domains the data layer -- not the LLM orchestration -- is the primary lever, and a typed knowledge graph serves as a grounding substrate between raw industrial data and LLM reasoning.