We prove that a single-layer neural network trained with the online actor critic algorithm converges in distribution to a random ordinary differential equation (ODE) as the number of hidden units and the number of training steps $\rightarrow \infty$. In the online actor-critic algorithm, the distribution of the data samples dynamically changes as the model is updated, which is a key challenge for any convergence analysis. We establish the geometric ergodicity of the data samples under a fixed actor policy. Then, using a Poisson equation, we prove that the fluctuations of the model updates around the limit distribution due to the randomly-arriving data samples vanish as the number of parameter updates $\rightarrow \infty$. Using the Poisson equation and weak convergence techniques, we prove that the actor neural network and critic neural network converge to the solutions of a system of ODEs with random initial conditions. Analysis of the limit ODE shows that the limit critic network will converge to the true value function, which will provide the actor an asymptotically unbiased estimate of the policy gradient. We then prove that the limit actor network will converge to a stationary point.

This paper unveils CG-Eval, the first-ever comprehensive and automated evaluation framework designed for assessing the generative capabilities of large Chinese language models across a spectrum of academic disciplines. CG-Eval stands out for its automated process, which critically assesses models based on their proficiency in generating precise and contextually relevant responses to a diverse array of questions within six key domains: Science and Engineering, Humanities and Social Sciences, Mathematical Calculations, Medical Practitioner Qualification Examination, Judicial Examination, and Certified Public Accountant Examination. Alongside this, we introduce Gscore, an innovative composite index developed from a weighted sum of multiple metrics. Gscore uniquely automates the quality measurement of a model's text generation against reference standards, providing a detailed and nuanced assessment of model performance. This automation not only enhances the efficiency and scalability of the evaluation process but also ensures objective and consistent assessment across various models. The detailed test data and results, highlighting the robust capabilities and comparative performance of the evaluated models, are accessible at http://cgeval.besteasy.com/.

This paper is to introduce an asynchronous and local learning framework for neural networks, named Modular Learning Framework (MOLE). This framework modularizes neural networks by layers, defines the training objective via mutual information for each module, and sequentially trains each module by mutual information maximization. MOLE makes the training become local optimization with gradient-isolated across modules, and this scheme is more biologically plausible than BP. We run experiments on vector-, grid- and graph-type data. In particular, this framework is capable of solving both graph- and node-level tasks for graph-type data. Therefore, MOLE has been experimentally proven to be universally applicable to different types of data.

The development of large-scale Chinese language models is flourishing, yet there is a lack of corresponding capability assessments. Therefore, we propose a test to measure the multitask accuracy of large Chinese language models. This test encompasses four major domains, including medicine, law, psychology, and education, with 15 subtasks in medicine and 8 subtasks in education. We found that the best-performing models in the zero-shot setting outperformed the worst-performing models by nearly 18.6 percentage points on average. Across the four major domains, the highest average zero-shot accuracy of all models is 0.512. In the subdomains, only the GPT-3.5-turbo model achieved a zero-shot accuracy of 0.693 in clinical medicine, which was the highest accuracy among all models across all subtasks. All models performed poorly in the legal domain, with the highest zero-shot accuracy reaching only 0.239. By comprehensively evaluating the breadth and depth of knowledge across multiple disciplines, this test can more accurately identify the shortcomings of the models.

Diabetes is a global health priority, especially in low- and-middle-income countries, where over 50% of premature deaths are attributed to high blood glucose. Community Health Worker (CHW) programs can provide affordable and culturally tailored solutions for early detection and management of diabetes. We introduce an optimization framework to determine personalized CHW visits that maximize glycemic control at a community level. Our framework explicitly models the trade-off between screening new patients and providing management visits to individuals who are enrolled in treatment. We account for patients' motivational states, which affect their decisions to enroll or drop out of treatment and, therefore, the effectiveness of the intervention. By estimating patients' health and motivational states, our model builds visit plans accounting for patients' tradeoffs when deciding to enroll in treatment, leading to reduced dropout rates and improved resource allocation. We apply our approach to generate CHW visit plans using operational data from urban slums in India. We find that our approach can reduce fasting blood glucose by up to 25% with the same capacity as the best baseline method. Our experiments also demonstrate that our approach performs well with imperfect information.

Mixup is a data augmentation technique that creates new examples as convex combinations of training points and labels. This simple technique has empirically shown to improve the accuracy of many state-of-the-art models in different settings and applications, but the reasons behind this empirical success remain poorly understood. In this paper we take a substantial step in explaining the theoretical foundations of Mixup, by clarifying its regularization effects. We show that Mixup can be interpreted as standard empirical risk minimization estimator subject to a combination of data transformation and random perturbation of the transformed data. We gain two core insights from this new interpretation. First, the data transformation suggests that, at test time, a model trained with Mixup should also be applied to transformed data, a one-line change in code that we show empirically to improve both accuracy and calibration of the prediction. Second, we show how the random perturbation of the new interpretation of Mixup induces multiple known regularization schemes, including label smoothing and reduction of the Lipschitz constant of the estimator. These schemes interact synergistically with each other, resulting in a self calibrated and effective regularization effect that prevents overfitting and overconfident predictions. We corroborate our theoretical analysis with experiments that support our conclusions.

Causal Machine Learning (CausalML) is an umbrella term for machine learning methods that formalize the data-generation process as a structural causal model (SCM). This perspective enables us to reason about the effects of changes to this process (interventions) and what would have happened in hindsight (counterfactuals). We categorize work in CausalML into five groups according to the problems they address: (1) causal supervised learning, (2) causal generative modeling, (3) causal explanations, (4) causal fairness, and (5) causal reinforcement learning. We systematically compare the methods in each category and point out open problems. Further, we review data-modality-specific applications in computer vision, natural language processing, and graph representation learning. Finally, we provide an overview of causal benchmarks and a critical discussion of the state of this nascent field, including recommendations for future work.

We prove that Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) based on a Gaussian RBF kernel converges to linear CKA in the large-bandwidth limit. We show that convergence onset is sensitive to the geometry of the feature representations, and that representation eccentricity bounds the range of bandwidths for which Gaussian CKA behaves nonlinearly.

Deep neural networks (DNNs)-powered Electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnosis systems recently achieve promising progress to take over tedious examinations by cardiologists. However, their vulnerability to adversarial attacks still lack comprehensive investigation. The existing attacks in image domain could not be directly applicable due to the distinct properties of ECGs in visualization and dynamic properties. Thus, this paper takes a step to thoroughly explore adversarial attacks on the DNN-powered ECG diagnosis system. We analyze the properties of ECGs to design effective attacks schemes under two attacks models respectively. Our results demonstrate the blind spots of DNN-powered diagnosis systems under adversarial attacks, which calls attention to adequate countermeasures.

In the era of autonomous agents, machine-actionable data is critical for data-driven workflows. For more than a decade, semantic metadata like schema.org has anchored the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) for machine-actionable data and enabled discovery tools like Google Dataset Search. However, the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of navigating the unstructured web raises a fundamental question: Is semantic metadata still necessary for agentic data discovery, or can agents reliably retrieve actionable data directly from the web? We present a comparative analysis of agentic data retrieval across two distinct environments: a Baseline Agent searching billions of open-web documents, and a Semantic Agent leveraging a corpus of 90 million datasets using schema.org. We deploy an "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluation pipeline, mapped directly to the FAIR principles, to assess the semantic relevance, data accessibility, and computational utility of the retrieved data. Our results reveal a clear divergence. The Semantic Agent excels at retrieving actionable data, achieving a 44.9% higher precision for metadata-rich registries and a 46.6% higher precision for pages with machine-readable downloads among its returned results. Conversely, the Baseline Agent frequently suffers "Last-Mile Utility" failures, retrieving prose-heavy pages (20.1% of results) and portal landing pages (8.5%) rather than actual data pages. While the Baseline Agent achieves higher coverage by answering 40% more questions, the Semantic Agent delivers greater accuracy, achieving 65.7% higher overall precision in retrieving FAIR-compliant datasets. We conclude that while unstructured retrieval supports broad exploratory tasks, structured ecosystems remain the indispensable foundation for reliable, execution-oriented autonomous workflows.

Robustness of neural networks is commonly quantified via local or global Lipschitz constants. However, Lipschitz continuity can be overly coarse or overly restrictive as global robustness measure, failing to capture nuanced, data-dependent behavior. We propose a data-driven, architecture-agnostic framework based on the discrete modulus of continuity (DMOC), a non linear generalization of Lipschitz continuity that provides a finer notion of robustness. Unlike many existing approaches, DMOC does not require access to model internals and instead evaluates regularity relative to the data distribution. This shifts the focus from the model to the data, which provide a data-driven baseline of regularity against which the network's robustness is assessed. We establish convergence results for DMOC-induced seminorms with explicit data-driven rates in terms of the separation distance, and introduce a scalable minibatch algorithm that reduces the quadratic cost of exact computation, enabling application to large-scale data sets such as ImageNet. Empirically, DMOC serves as an architecture independent diagnostic: it distinguishes trained from untrained networks, reveals underfitting and overfitting regimes, and yields, as a special case, tight Lipschitz estimates comparable to state-of-the-art method such as ECLipsE and ECLipsE-fast.

Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution have existed for a long time in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) without ever dominating the academic literature or practical applications. In this work, we use modern empirical and theoretical methods to revisit Lamarckian and Baldwinian evolution and rigorously compare them with the generic Darwinian evolution. On the empirical side, we run a comprehensive suite of experiments on graphs from six different datasets from the recent GraphBench benchmark on Maximum Independent Set and Maximum Cut problems. Our results show that Baldwinian and Lamarckian evolution consistently outperform Darwinian evolution, confirming the great potential of local search augmented evolutionary algorithms. Notably, in the great majority of cases, all EAs outperform recent deep learning baselines and approach the performance of highly specialised heuristic and exact solvers. We furthermore report a high-performing set of generalist parameters for all studied evolution types that we hope will be of use to practitioners in future. On the theoretical side, we extend the existing Deceptive Leading Block benchmark to arbitrary block length and use tools from modern theoretical runtime analysis to prove upper and lower bounds on the expected runtime. For block lengths greater than two, Baldwinian evolution is asymptotically faster than Lamarckian which is asymptotically faster than Darwinian evolution. When accounting for the cost of the local search procedure in fitness evaluations, the ordering depends on the implementation with Baldwinian evolution staying fastest from small block lengths onwards, explaining its strong empirical performance.

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is the clinical standard for myocardial strain estimation. Despite good performance on global strain (GLS), its accuracy for regional strain remains limited, even though this biomarker is highly relevant for early diagnosis and the characterization of subtle abnormalities. from clinical data. Deep learning is a promising alternative, but its development is constrained by the lack of reliable motion references. Existing solutions rely either on STE-derived labels or on simulations generated by physics-based models, but these synthetic sequences still have limited realism compared with clinical data.In this paper, we propose a novel simulation strategy that incorporates speckle decorrelation measures from real videos and uses an iterative refinement process to improve the motion realism in the simulations. We created an open-source photorealistic dataset of 1,478 videos with reference motion, which was used to train an echocardiographic motion estimation algorithm. The proposed method achieves unmatched performance on global and regional strain, notably reaching a GLS variability of 1.42% in an inter-expert setting compared to 1.78% for the clinical reference.

Backpropagation is the core learning mechanism underlying deep learning. However, whether and how this algorithm is implemented in the brain remains highly debated. In particular, while forward activations of pretrained models reliably map onto the cortical hierarchy of visual processing, it is unknown whether backpropagated gradients exhibit a similar correspondence. Here, we address this question using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of human brain responses to natural images. For this, we extend standard encoding analyses of forward activations to map backpropagated gradients onto neural data. Focusing on a recent self-supervised vision model (DINOv3) and reproducing results on eight vision models, we find that backpropagated gradients can reliably predict both fMRI and MEG signals, specifically in higher-level visual cortex and for later latencies. However, the spatial and temporal organization of these backpropagated gradients in the brain diverges from the patterns expected under a biologically plausible backpropagation mechanism: specifically, both the order in which gradients are computed and their spatial organization diverge from the temporal and spatial hierarchies of the human brain. Together, these results suggest that, although deep networks and the brain may share similar representational content, they likely rely on fundamentally different mechanisms to learn those representations.

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in workplaces is transforming how we work. While existing research on human-AI collaboration at work often prioritizes performance, less is known about their experiential outcomes. Through interviews with 24 employees across Information Technology (IT), service-based, and healthcare sectors, this paper examines AI's impact on job satisfaction via perceptions of job decency and meaningfulness, now and in the future. Our results reveal that the anticipated impact of AI on overall job satisfaction varies with the occupational domain, with differing perceptions of its underlying decency and meaningfulness. For instance, IT and healthcare anticipate increased satisfaction with decency aspects like working hours but decreased satisfaction with meaningfulness aspects like social image due to misconceptions about AI handling most of their tasks. Conversely, service workers foresee no improvement in their working hours but a higher social standing due to the perceived status boost associated with working with AI.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by grounding generation in query-relevant external evidence. Beyond unstructured text corpora, Graph RAG integrates knowledge graphs into the retrieval pipeline, enabling LLMs to access entities, relations, and multi-hop dependencies encoded in structured knowledge. However, the same structured knowledge that empowers Graph RAG also creates a new privacy attack surface. We demonstrate that Graph RAG systems can be turned into structural oracles: through adaptive black-box interactions, an adversary can elicit sufficient relational evidence to reconstruct substantial portions of the hidden knowledge graph. We propose a structure-oriented reconstruction framework that recovers targeted graphs from both local and global perspectives. Specifically, Depth-Wise Heuristic Search extracts fine-grained node attributes by recursively expanding entity-centered evidence, while Breadth-Wise Diffusion Search infers graph topology by propagating across relation-induced neighborhoods. Experiments on generic and healthcare scenarios demonstrate that our method can recover over 90\% of the original knowledge graph from representative Graph RAG systems, revealing sensitive entities, relations, and structural dependencies with high fidelity. Existing guradrails provide limited defense against our attack, highlighting the inherent difficulty of safeguarding structural privacy in Graph RAG pipelines.

Cryptographic watermarking is a leading defense for attributing text generated by large language models (LLMs). Existing schemes, including KGW, Unigram, and DipMark, derive their security guarantees from the assumption that the underlying pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) is trustworthy. This work introduces SeedHijack, the first supply-chain attack on LLM watermarking that is simultaneously (i) blind -- requiring no knowledge of the watermark key, detector, or model logits, (ii) integrity-preserving -- amplifying rather than erasing the watermark signal, and (iii) orthogonal to detection -- the attack-induced bias is statistically independent of all content-side detector statistics, ensuring that amplification and evasion coexist without trade-off. Rather than perturbing generated text, SeedHijack replaces the PRNG at the supply-chain layer, biasing green-list selection without altering output tokens or degrading text quality. Across three watermarking schemes and three open-source LLMs, the attack triggers 0/6 state-of-the-art content-side statistical detectors while inflating the watermark z-score up to 2.42x (system-level defenses such as entropy-source attestation remain orthogonal and complementary). A quantum random number generator (QRNG) countermeasure is shown to fully neutralize the attack while preserving benign watermarking utility. These findings establish PRNG integrity as a first-class security requirement for cryptographic content-provenance systems.

This paper studies the stability of low-rank implicit regularization in perturbed deep matrix factorization, where the target matrix is corrupted by a noise matrix. We first derive sufficient spectral conditions under which gradient descent exhibits a low-rank phase in the noiseless setting. These conditions show how the target spectrum, initialization, and step size jointly determine the existence of a nonempty low-rank interval. We then analyze the perturbed gradient descent dynamics, proving convergence guarantees and quantifying how the perturbation affects iteration complexity and eigenvalue recovery. Finally, we show that the low-rank phase persists under perturbation, with explicit dependence on the perturbation size. Numerical experiments support the theoretical findings.

This position paper argues that the AI/ML community should stop overclaiming and retire the label "positive backdoor," and instead treat trigger-activated hidden behaviors as Secret Alignment. Crucially, protective claims based on Secret Alignment should be presumed not secure by default unless supported by rigorous, standardized evaluation. The Private AI era, enabled by open-weight LLMs and accessible training/inference stacks, turns language models into privately owned digital assets, creating security concerns around unauthorized access, model theft, and behavioral misuse. Recently, a line of work framed as "positive backdoors" has been proposed to address these challenges. To ground our position in evidence, we unify these proposals as covert trigger-behavior associations for access gating, ownership attribution, and safety enforcement, and evaluate three representative applications across six core properties: effectiveness, harmlessness, persistence, efficiency, robustness, and reliability. Our results reveal substantial brittleness - especially in the confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) - of trigger-behavior mappings often underrepresented by existing claims. We further relate these outcomes to behavior density and decision complexity, offering a behavioral lens for understanding deployment-time risks and motivating community-wide evaluation that makes Secret Alignment claims provable.

\textsc{DarkEmulator2} is a neural network emulator of the nonlinear matter power spectrum in a nine-dimensional $w_0 w_a νo \mathrm{CDM}$ parameter space, developed as the emulator component of the \textsc{Dark Quest II} (DQ2) program. It is trained on simulations generated with the \textsc{Ginkaku} code, whose numerical implementation, accuracy tests, and post-processing pipeline are described in the companion paper. The design follows a unified strategy: in addition to the cosmological parameter vector, we supplement the neural network's inputs with three families of physically motivated auxiliary quantities -- the linear matter power spectrum, descriptors of the simulation resolution, and a low-dimensional summary of the initial Gaussian random field -- that are expected to improve generalization across the parameter space. Training a single network jointly across three simulation resolution tiers allows the emulator to exploit a small number of high-resolution simulations while retaining broad coverage from lower-resolution simulations. For a $L_{\mathrm{box}}=1\,\hiGpc$ box with $N=3000^{3}$ particles, the emulator reproduces the simulated matter power spectrum to subpercent accuracy up to the particle Nyquist scale, $k_{\mathrm{Ny}}\simeq 10\,\hMpci$. The emulator remains accurate over the calibrated wavenumber range, while its highest-$k$ predictions depend on the simulation resolution and shot noise. We validate the emulator on independent test suites and, through a cross-comparison with several public emulators and widely used fitting formulas, characterize the inter-model consistency and the parameter-dependent trends in their residuals.

In this article, we present an improved version of the PULSE method (Partition function Unsupervised Learning Sampling and Evaluation) for estimating the thermodynamic properties of chemically disordered compounds. The aim is to reduce the computational cost of Monte Carlo approaches for this type of material and to demonstrate that this generative tool can estimate thermodynamic properties by sampling and estimating the partition function of the system. To validate this innovative approach, we use the 2D Ising model as a benchmark. We demonstrate that our method accurately reproduces average properties with high precision and efficiency compared to traditional Monte Carlo sampling methods. Our results highlight the efficiency and adaptability of the PULSE method, making it a valuable tool for studying materials for which conventional methods are too inefficient to compute properties affected by chemical disorder at low cost.

We analyzed 3,984 AI agent skills from major marketplaces and found 76 confirmed malicious payloads, including credential theft, backdoor installation, and data exfiltration. 13.4% of all skills contain at least one critical-level security issue and at least 8 manually confirmed malicious skills remain publicly available on clawhub.ai as of the date of publication. This report documents our methodology, presents a threat taxonomy based on real-world samples, and details the attack patterns we observed. As skill marketplaces grow rapidly and AI agents gain access to sensitive credentials and systems, automated security analysis is no longer optional.

Users of search-augmented LLMs rely on citations as evidence that responses are grounded in real sources, and rarely verify the cited pages themselves. Millions of queries per day now pass through these systems, making citation quality a silent determinant of whether users are informed or misled-yet existing benchmarks each address one facet in isolation, leaving the joint structure that determines citation trustworthiness unmeasured. We construct CITETRACE, a large-scale dataset that traces the full citation chain from user query through retrieved source to generated answer: 11,200 real-world queries from 28 communities paired with 112,000 responses from ten models across five providers, yielding 761,495 evaluable citation pairs. We design a three-dimension evaluation framework that scores each citation on intent-purpose alignment, source suitability, and answer-source fidelity, using expert-validated predefined matrices and a five-level fidelity rubric; the framework applies to any system that produces citation-bearing responses. Applying this framework at scale, we identify a systematic pattern we call VERIFIED MISGUIDANCE (VM): models cite real, accessible sources yet fail along one or more dimensions, producing a fidelity-suitability trade-off in which faithful models select inappropriate sources and vice versa. Across our pool, 30.6% of citations distort their sources and 27.1% originate from domain-inappropriate sources; at the response level, up to 96% of users encounter at least one structurally misleading citation. Provider-level differences explain 88-96% of citation-quality variance, suggesting that source selection is governed more by factors beyond individual model capability than by the LLMs themselves. Together, CITETRACE and its evaluation framework provide the first resource for diagnosing structural citation failures in deployed search-augmented systems.

LLMs are increasingly used for software modernization, code translation, and database migration. However, LLM-based Oracle2PostgreSQL migration remains constrained by high token consumption, long-context degradation, dialect-specific semantic differences, and the risk of semantic drift during query transformation. Direct inclusion of large Oracle SQL/PL-SQL artefacts, schema definitions, procedural logic, and migration instructions into the model context increases cost and may reduce generation quality. This paper shows token optimization as a constrained transformation problem in LLM-based Oracle2PostgreSQL migration. The study formalizes and evaluates twelve token optimization strategies: baseline representation, context pruning, minification, DSL-based semantic compression, metadata augmentation, context refactoring, schema distillation, adaptive routing, AST-based minification, identifier masking, output constraint enforcement, and hybrid optimization. The strategies are evaluated on samples of 10 and 100 Oracle SQL queries using Valid Syntax Rate, Exact Match, Semantic Match, CodeBLEU, and Token Efficiency. The results show that mild context pruning preserves semantic quality almost at the baseline level, achieving 89.75% Semantic Match on the 100-query sample compared with 89.80% for the unoptimized baseline. Adaptive routing provides the best practical trade-off, reducing input tokens by 8.72% and output tokens by 5.49% while maintaining 88.40% Semantic Match and increasing Token Efficiency by 6.67%. Aggressive schema distillation increases Token Efficiency by 132.22% but results in a 44.50-percentage-point decrease in Semantic Match. The findings demonstrate that token optimization cannot be treated as simple prompt shortening; it must be evaluated as a multi-objective migration problem balancing cost, syntactic validity, semantic preservation, and structural fidelity.

Simulation-based inference with neural posterior estimation (NPE) often yields overconfident and unreliable posteriors under limited simulation budgets. To address this, we propose DRO-NPE, a distributionally robust approach that replaces the standard NPE objective with a worst-case loss over a Wasserstein ambiguity set. We introduce KL-based metrics for miscoverage and miscalibration, and use these to show that the DRO-NPE objective controls overfitting and reduces posterior overconfidence. Our method is tractable, parallelisable, and readily integrates with standard normalising flows. Across benchmark SBI tasks, DRO-NPE consistently improves coverage and calibration, while narrowing the gap between empirical and population NPE loss, leading to more reliable inference in low-simulation regimes.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become an integral part of software development, especially with the advent of agentic capabilities. Yet, many frontier LLMs are affiliated with specific providers. This raises the question of whether generated code favors the provider's own ecosystem over comparable alternatives, potentially constraining developers' choices and increasing dependence on a single provider. We define this behavior as Vertical Integration Bias (VIB) and introduce \textsc{VIBench}, a benchmark for measuring VIB in direct and agentic code generation across $20$ provider-selectable software-integration scenarios. Evaluating $10$ frontier provider-affiliated models against $3$ non-affiliated controls, we find positive VIB in direct generation, with six of ten affiliated models showing statistically significant effects up to $+18.8$ percentage points (pp). Agentic workflows further amplify VIB, reaching $+39.2$ pp. Moreover, early affiliated-ecosystem choices in agentic workflows can persist into conceptually decoupled downstream files, with persistence as high as $90.3\%$. These findings underscore the need to measure and account for VIB in code generation, especially as agentic capabilities become more prevalent.

Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) provides an efficient and convenient gateway to information access. However, it can cause overreliance when users blindly trust AI and accept its answers without fact-checking. Information search increasingly follows a hybrid interaction paradigm that combines conversational AI with web search, making fact-checking easier. In this paper, we examine whether this interaction paradigm is effective in curbing reliance. We further investigate the underlying factors (e.g., digital literacy and conversation warmth) that drive users to verify AI answers. We conduct a mixed-subjects question-answering experiment where participants interact with either a warm or a neutral chatbot. Our findings reveal that reliance persists despite users having access to both conversational and web search. The decision to verify is driven primarily by existing user perceptions (e.g., prior trust in chatbots) rather than answer properties, with some users fact-checking regardless of the context and others trusting chatbots by default. Warm conversational style has an indirect yet critical influence on reliance by increasing agreement with the chatbot when it is incorrect. Consulting additional AI sources predicts higher accuracy, while traditional web search does not. Our study extends overreliance research by: (a) demonstrating its persistence despite access to fact-checking, (b) identifying verification behavior as user-dependent, and (c) revealing conversational warmth's indirect effect on overreliance with implications for designing trustworthy conversational search systems.

Audio agents extend large audio-language models (LALMs) by decomposing audio questions into tool calls, intermediate evidence, and iterative reasoning steps. However, as LALMs become stronger, the key challenge shifts from enabling tool use to determining when agentic evidence acquisition genuinely benefits audio understanding. We propose Audio-Mind, an auditable and pluggable framework for conditional evidence acquisition in audio understanding. Audio-Mind dynamically combines a strong frontend with planner-guided tool use, preserving frontend judgment when initial evidence is sufficient while acquiring bounded external evidence for questions with unresolved evidence gaps. Experiments on MMAR and MSU-Bench show that Audio-Mind outperforms prior audio-agent baselines, reaching 80.4% accuracy on MMAR and 82.8% accuracy on MSU-Bench. A matched-backbone comparison highlights why this design matters: under strong audio frontends, agentic decomposition can become an orchestration bottleneck when the workflow does not preserve the frontend's holistic audio-grounded judgment. Beyond accuracy, Audio-Mind produces higher-quality, auditable reasoning traces that expose uncertainty, tool evidence, and answer rationales, offering a potential basis for more reliable audio-QA annotation and error analysis.

Reinforcement learning with multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation has become an important framework due to its flexibility and broad applicability. While existing studies have established regret guarantees under worst-case analysis, they do not capture how performance depends on the variability of the interaction between the learner and the environment. In this paper, we develop a new theoretical analysis for MNL-based Markov decision processes that yields explicit variance-adaptive regret bounds. Our algorithm is computationally efficient and achieves the instance-wise optimal rate of regret, narrowing the gap between upper and lower bounds. Our numerical experiments validate that our method learns optimal policies more efficiently than conventional approaches.

Cartesian Genetic Programming has traditionally been using mutation as its main and often sole genetic operator to drive evolutionary search. Despite advancements in recent years, recombinationbased approaches have long been avoided, due to apparent lack of performance gains. This study examines two recently suggested recombination-based operators, subgraph crossover and discrete phenotypic recombination on SRBench, a benchmarking platform for symbolic regression. Using the implementations provided in the TinyverseGP framework, we perform hyperparameter optimisation of the respective representations with these two operators. Our work demonstrates that hyperparameter optimisation can lead to improvements in performance for recombination-based Cartesian Genetic Programming.