Symmetry-based disentangled representation learning leverages the group structure of environment transformations to uncover the latent factors of variation. Prior approaches to symmetry-based disentanglement have required strong prior knowledge of the symmetry group's structure, or restrictive assumptions about the subgroup properties. In this work, we remove these constraints by proposing a method whereby an embodied agent autonomously discovers the group structure of its action space through unsupervised interaction with the environment. We prove the identifiability of the true symmetry group decomposition under minimal assumptions, and derive two algorithms: one for discovering the group decomposition from interaction data, and another for learning Linear Symmetry-Based Disentangled (LSBD) representations without assuming specific subgroup properties. Our method is validated on three environments exhibiting different group decompositions, where it outperforms existing LSBD approaches.

Post-training alignment optimizes language models to match human preference signals, but this objective is not equivalent to modeling observed human behavior. We compare 120 base-aligned model pairs on more than 10,000 real human decisions in multi-round strategic games - bargaining, persuasion, negotiation, and repeated matrix games. In these settings, base models outperform their aligned counterparts in predicting human choices by nearly 10:1, robustly across model families, prompt formulations, and game configurations. This pattern reverses, however, in settings where human behavior is more likely to follow normative predictions: aligned models dominate on one-shot textbook games across all 12 types tested and on non-strategic lottery choices - and even within the multi-round games themselves, at round one, before interaction history develops. This boundary-condition pattern suggests that alignment induces a normative bias: it improves prediction when human behavior is relatively well captured by normative solutions, but hurts prediction in multi-round strategic settings, where behavior is shaped by descriptive dynamics such as reciprocity, retaliation, and history-dependent adaptation. These results reveal a fundamental trade-off between optimizing models for human use and using them as proxies for human behavior.

Entity-level unlearning is usually evaluated by what a model says: whether it stops naming the target, refuses a query, or shifts a Truth Ratio distribution. These output-level tests, however, do not show whether a subject's internal representation has been attenuated. We introduce the Entity Representation Unlearning Framework (ERUF), a representation-aware framework that mines subject-specific activation signatures, suppresses the corresponding activation direction, and distills the behavior into LoRA parameters. Among evaluated baselines, ERUF is the only method that jointly achieves surface-level suppression, internal attenuation, and utility preservation. On TOFU forget10, ERUF achieves FQ = 0.99 and MU = 0.62, matching reported oracle utility while approaching oracle forget quality. Across most standard foundation-model settings, ERUF maintains low leakage and low internal target activation, with SMR between 0.00% and 1.10%, EL10 below 0.06, and utility drift below 3%. On Llama-3.1-8B, adversarial entity recovery falls from 63.89% to 20.15%, while name-agnostic recovery decreases by 72.7% to 77.4%. Joint surface/internal diagnostics further reveal scale-dependent behavior in reasoning-prior models that surface metrics alone would miss. We interpret these results as operational evidence of representation-level attenuation, not as a formal guarantee of irreversible deletion.

Reliable epidemiological reasoning requires synthesizing study evidence to infer disease burden, transmission dynamics, and intervention effects at the population level. Existing medical question answering benchmarks primarily emphasize clinical knowledge or patient-level reasoning, yet few systematically evaluate evidence-grounded epidemiological inference. We present EpiQAL, the first diagnostic benchmark for epidemiological question answering across diverse diseases, comprising three subsets built from open-access literature. The three subsets progressively test factual recall, multi-step inference, and conclusion reconstruction under incomplete information, and are constructed through a quality-controlled pipeline combining taxonomy guidance, multi-model verification, and difficulty screening. Experiments on fifteen models spanning open-source and proprietary systems reveal that current LLMs show limited performance on epidemiological reasoning, with multi-step inference posing the greatest challenge. Model rankings shift across subsets, and scale alone does not predict success. Chain-of-Thought prompting benefits multi-step inference but yields mixed results elsewhere. EpiQAL provides fine-grained diagnostic signals for evidence-grounding, inferential reasoning, and conclusion reconstruction.

Moral sensitivity is the most fundamental capability underlying human moral competence. Although many approaches aim to align large language models (LLMs) with human moral values, they primarily focus on fitting the distributions of morally appropriate texts while overlooking how to enable moral sensitivity acquisition in LLMs. In this paper, we take a step toward addressing the question: How can moral sensitivity be acquired in LLMs? Specifically, we propose a pragmatic inference approach that facilitates moral sensitivity acquisition in LLMs by enabling them to diagnose and correct moral errors. A central strength of our pragmatic inference approach lies in its unified perspective: rather than modeling moral discourses across semantically diverse and complex surface forms, it provides a principled framework for designing pragmatic inference procedures grounded in their inferential load. Empirical evidence demonstrates that our pragmatic approach can enable moral sensitivity acquisition in LLMs and generalizes effectively across tasks.

Recent advances in video generation have revealed an unexpected phenomenon: diffusion-based video models exhibit non-trivial reasoning capabilities. Prior work attributes this to a Chain-of-Frames (CoF) mechanism, where reasoning is assumed to unfold sequentially across video frames. In this work, we challenge this assumption and uncover a fundamentally different mechanism. We show that reasoning in video models instead primarily emerges along the diffusion denoising steps. Through qualitative analysis and targeted probing experiments, we find that models explore multiple candidate solutions in early denoising steps and progressively converge to a final answer, a process we term Chain-of-Steps (CoS). Beyond this core mechanism, we identify several emergent reasoning behaviors critical to model performance: (1) working memory, enabling persistent reference; (2) self-correction and enhancement, allowing recovery from incorrect intermediate solutions; and (3) perception before action, where early steps establish semantic grounding and later steps perform structured manipulation. During a diffusion step, we further uncover self-evolved functional specialization within Diffusion Transformers, where early layers encode dense perceptual structure, middle layers execute reasoning, and later layers consolidate latent representations. Motivated by these insights, we present a simple training-free strategy as a proof-of-concept, demonstrating how reasoning can be improved by ensembling latent trajectories from identical models with different random seeds. Overall, our work provides a systematic understanding of how reasoning emerges in video generation models, offering a foundation to guide future research in better exploiting the inherent reasoning dynamics of video models as a new substrate for intelligence.

Evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) solely from final answers can obscure failures in intermediate steps, especially in multi-hop QA benchmarks without step-level annotations. To address this gap, we introduce Omanic, an open-domain 4-hop QA benchmark designed not only to measure final-answer accuracy but also to diagnose where reasoning breaks down. Omanic contains 10,296 machine-generated training examples (OmanicSynth) and 967 expert-reviewed human-annotated evaluation examples (OmanicBench), with each evaluation question decomposed into single-hop sub-questions, intermediate answers, and structured graph topologies. Experiments with proprietary and open-source LLMs show that Omanic is challenging, while step-wise analysis reveals a later-hop bottleneck, factual knowledge floor, and error propagation along reasoning chains. Fine-tuning on OmanicSynth transfers to six reasoning and mathematics benchmarks, yielding a 7.41-point average gain and validating its effectiveness as supervision for reasoning-capability transfer. We release the data at https://huggingface.co/datasets/li-lab/Omanic and the code at https://github.com/XiaojieGu/Omanic.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) connects large language models (LLMs) to external knowledge, but single-round retrieval is often insufficient for complex multi-hop questions. To enhance search capabilities for complex tasks, most existing works integrate multi-round iterative retrieval with reasoning processes via end-to-end training. While these approaches improve problem-solving performance, they still face challenges in task reasoning and model training, especially ambiguous retrieval execution paths and sparse rewards in end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL), which can lead to inaccurate retrieval results and lower performance. We attribute these failures to hierarchical credit entanglement: a single final reward updates planning and execution together, so the model cannot clearly separate plan errors from retrieval errors. We propose APEX-Searcher, which uses a Refining Credit Assignment paradigm: planning is optimized by RL with a plan-level reward, while execution is learned by SFT. Extensive experiments show consistent gains in both multi-hop RAG and task planning across benchmarks.

LLMs often exhibit Aha moments such as self-correction after tokens like "Wait," yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Standard LLMs collapse mainly through silent divergence, where trajectories drift from the correct answer yet remain locally coherent, so no explicit error triggers reactive self-correction. We introduce an information-theoretic framework that separates reasoning into procedural advancement and epistemic verbalization, the token-level externalization of uncertainty, and prove that sporadic verbalization restores convergence toward the correct answer even without explicit error triggers. Empirically, a minimal doubt cue recovers failed trajectories, and small-scale SFT suffices to instill or suppress this capability, suggesting that strong reasoning hinges less on an extraordinary inner mechanism than on the linguistic habit of externalizing uncertainty. Our framework recasts reasoning as strategic information allocation under uncertainty, offering a new lens for understanding and advancing LLM reasoning.

Federated Learning (FL) with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a standard for privacy-preserving LLM fine-tuning. However, existing personalized methods predominantly operated under a restrictive Flat-Model Assumption: they addressed client-side \textit{statistical heterogeneity} but treated the model as a monolithic block, ignoring the \textit{functional heterogeneity} across LLM layers. We argue that these two statistical (horizontal) and functional (vertical) dimensions, are \textit{orthogonal in source yet coupled in interaction}, implying that the optimal depth of parameter sharing is functionally dependent on client similarity. To address this, we propose \textbf{FedTreeLoRA}, a framework employing tree-structured aggregation for fine-grained, layer-wise alignment. By dynamically constructing an aggregation hierarchy, FedTreeLoRA allows clients to share broad consensus on shallow `trunks' while progressively specializing on deep `branches'. Experiments on NLU and NLG benchmarks demonstrate that FedTreeLoRA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by effectively reconciling generalization and personalization.

We present a method for learning large-scale, broad-coverage construction grammars from corpora of language use. Starting from utterances annotated with constituency structure and semantic frames, the method facilitates the learning of human-interpretable computational construction grammars that capture the intricate relationship between syntactic structures and the semantic relations they express. The resulting grammars consist of networks of tens of thousands of constructions formalised within the Fluid Construction Grammar framework. Not only do these grammars support the frame-semantic analysis of open-domain text, they also house a trove of information about the syntactico-semantic usage patterns present in the data they were learnt from. The method and learnt grammars contribute to the scaling of usage-based, constructionist approaches to language, as they corroborate the scalability of a number of fundamental construction grammar conjectures while also providing a practical instrument for the constructionist study of English argument structure in broad-coverage corpora.

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly advanced remote sensing interpretation, enabling them to perform complex, step-by-step reasoning remains highly challenging. Recent efforts to introduce Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to this domain have shown promise, yet ensuring the visual faithfulness of these intermediate steps remains a critical bottleneck. To address this, we introduce GeoSolver, a novel framework that transitions remote sensing reasoning toward verifiable, process-supervised reinforcement learning. We first construct Geo-PRM-2M, a large-scale, token-level process supervision dataset synthesized via entropy-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and targeted visual hallucination injection. Building upon this dataset, we train GeoPRM, a token-level process reward model (PRM) that provides granular faithfulness feedback. To effectively leverage these verification signals, we propose Process-Aware Tree-GRPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm that integrates tree-structured exploration with a faithfulness-weighted reward mechanism to precisely assign credit to intermediate steps. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our resulting model, GeoSolver-9B, achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse remote sensing benchmarks. Crucially, GeoPRM unlocks robust Test-Time Scaling (TTS). Serving as a universal geospatial verifier, it seamlessly scales the performance of GeoSolver-9B and directly enhances general-purpose VLMs, highlighting its remarkable cross-model generalization.

General-purpose object detectors face fundamental structural limitations when applied to ship detection in satellite imagery, where the ship scale distribution is concentrated at small sizes and high aspect ratios. In conventional You Only Look Once architectures, the deepest feature pyramid level (stride 32) compresses narrow vessels into sub-pixel representations, causing severe spatial feature dilution and compromising accurate ship boundary regression. We propose Less is More YOLO, a streamlined detector built upon the extra-large variant of YOLOv9, to address these domain-specific structural conflicts. From a statistical analysis of ship scale distributions across four major benchmarks (SODA-A, DOTA-v1.5, FAIR1M-v2.0, and ShipRSImageNet), we introduce a Pyramid Level Shift Strategy that shifts the detection head from strides 8, 16, and 32 to strides 4, 8, and 16. This shift satisfies a spatial representability condition derived from the Nyquist-Shannon principle for the narrowest targets, while eliminating the computational redundancy of the deepest pyramid level. To further stabilize training on high-resolution satellite inputs, we incorporate a group-normalized auxiliary projection module that introduces Group Normalization into the projection path, mitigating gradient instability in memory-constrained micro-batch regimes. Validated on these four datasets, our detector attains an mAP_{50-95} of 0.600 with only 21.16 million parameters, a 64.1% reduction from the extra-large YOLOv9 baseline (58.99 million). Despite this compact size, our model surpasses state-of-the-art detectors up to three times larger, validating that a well-targeted pyramid level shift achieves a "Less is More" balance between accuracy and efficiency. The code is available at https://github.com/egshkim/LiM-YOLO.

Deep neural networks for image classification often exhibit overconfidence on out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. To address this, we introduce Geometrically Constrained Outlier Synthesis (GCOS), a training-time regularization framework aimed at improving OOD robustness during inference. GCOS addresses a limitation of prior synthesis methods by generating virtual outliers in the hidden feature space that respect the learned manifold structure of in-distribution (ID) data. The synthesis proceeds in two stages: (i) a dominant-variance subspace extracted from the training features identifies geometrically informed, off-manifold directions; (ii) a conformally-inspired shell, defined by the empirical quantiles of a nonconformity score from a calibration set, adaptively controls the synthesis magnitude to produce boundary samples. The shell ensures that generated outliers are neither trivially detectable nor indistinguishable from in-distribution data, facilitating smoother learning of robust features. This is combined with a contrastive regularization objective that promotes separability of ID and OOD samples in a chosen score space, such as Mahalanobis or energy-based. Experiments demonstrate that GCOS outperforms state-of-the-art methods using standard energy-based inference on near-OOD benchmarks, defined as tasks where outliers share the same semantic domain as in-distribution data. As an exploratory extension, the framework naturally transitions to conformal OOD inference, which translates uncertainty scores into statistically valid p-values and enables thresholds with formal error guarantees, providing a pathway toward more predictable and reliable OOD detection.

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a standard framework for safety alignment, but its reliance on pairwise preference updates makes training sensitive to imperfect supervision. Existing robust DPO methods often address this sensitivity through global loss corrections or external data-level interventions, while largely overlooking how unreliable comparisons distort batch-level optimization dynamics. We propose CompassDPO, a reward-free DPO framework that stabilizes preference optimization through dynamics control. Using the implicit DPO reward margin as a training-time compass, CompassDPO regulates sample influence along two complementary axes: update direction and update magnitude. For directional control, it applies sparse, budgeted, and warm-up delayed loss mixing to attenuate update components that conflict with the emerging preference direction. For magnitude control, it adaptively soft-winsorizes high-loss tail contributions, reducing tail dominance while preserving useful gradients from hard examples. Both mechanisms use only signals available during standard DPO training and require no external reward model or additional supervision. Experiments on PKU-SafeRLHF across four backbones and multiple out-of-distribution safety benchmarks show that CompassDPO consistently improves robustness over vanilla DPO and strong DPO-family baselines, especially under controlled label-flip noise. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CompassDPO-4D00

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is the gold standard trust model for privacy-preserving machine learning by guaranteeing privacy at the data source. However, its application to image data has long been considered impractical due to the high dimensionality of pixel space. Canonical LDP mechanisms are designed for low-dimensional data, resulting in severe utility degradation when applied to high-dimensional pixel spaces. This paper demonstrates that this utility loss is not inherent to LDP, but from its application to an inappropriate data representation. We introduce LDP-Slicing, a lightweight, training-free framework that resolves this domain mismatch. Our key insight is to decompose pixel values into a sequence of binary bit-planes. This transformation allows us to apply the LDP mechanism directly to the bit-level representation. To further strengthen privacy and preserve utility, we integrate a perceptual obfuscation module that mitigates human-perceivable leakage and an optimization-based privacy budget allocation strategy. This pipeline satisfies rigorous pixel-level $\varepsilon$-LDP while producing images that retain high utility for downstream tasks. Extensive experiments on face recognition and image classification demonstrate that LDP-Slicing outperforms existing DP/LDP baselines under comparable privacy budgets, with negligible computational overhead.

The expanding integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into recommender systems poses critical challenges to evaluation reliability. This paper identifies and investigates a previously overlooked issue: benchmark data leakage in LLM-based recommendation. This phenomenon occurs when LLMs are exposed to and potentially memorize benchmark datasets during pre-training or fine-tuning, leading to artificially inflated performance metrics that fail to reflect true model performance. To validate this phenomenon, we simulate diverse data leakage scenarios by conducting continued pre-training of foundation models on strategically blended corpora, which include user-item interactions from both in-domain and out-of-domain sources. Our experiments reveal a dual-effect of data leakage: when the leaked data is domain-relevant, it induces substantial but spurious performance gains, misleadingly exaggerating the model's capability. In contrast, domain-irrelevant leakage typically degrades recommendation accuracy, highlighting the complex and contingent nature of this contamination. Our findings reveal that data leakage acts as a critical, previously unaccounted-for factor in LLM-based recommendation, which could impact the true model performance. We release our code at https://github.com/yusba1/LLMRec-Data-Leakage.

Misinformation is a growing societal threat, and susceptibility to misinformative claims varies across demographic groups due to differences in underlying beliefs. As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human behaviors, we investigate whether they can simulate demographic misinformation susceptibility, treating beliefs as a primary driving factor. We introduce BeliefSim, a simulation framework that constructs demographic belief profiles using psychology-informed misinformation taxonomies and survey priors. We study prompt-based conditioning and post-training adaptation, and conduct a multi-fold evaluation using: (i) susceptibility alignment and (ii) counterfactual demographic sensitivity. Across both datasets and modeling strategies, we show that beliefs provide a strong prior for simulating misinformation susceptibility, with alignment up to 92%.

Current code-agent benchmarks primarily evaluate localized issue resolution within a single target repository, leaving under-tested many software engineering tasks that require external knowledge or broader repository-level changes. We introduce BeyondSWE, a 500-instance benchmark drawn from 246 real-world GitHub repositories to evaluate code agents beyond single-repository bug fixing. BeyondSWE covers four representative settings: cross-repository issue resolution, domain-specific issue resolution, dependency-driven migration, and document-to-repository generation, spanning both broader knowledge scope and broader resolution scope. Our evaluation shows that BeyondSWE remains far from saturated: the best OpenHands-based agent reaches 46.12 average score, while the strongest Codex harness with GPT-5.4 (xhigh) reaches 56.65 under a search-aware prompt. To study whether external information access closes this gap, we use SearchSWE as a controlled diagnostic baseline for search-augmented coding. Search access improves most models and substantially helps some tasks, but the gains remain limited and uneven, showing that current agents still struggle to convert retrieved information into precise, version-compatible, and locally actionable code changes. These results suggest that deep search for coding remains an open problem: progress requires agents that can reliably combine external evidence with repository-local reasoning and execution-based verification.

Deploying LLMs raises two coupled challenges: (1) monitoring--estimating where a model underperforms as traffic and domains drift--and (2) improvement--prioritizing data acquisition to close the largest performance gaps. We test whether an inference-time signal can estimate slice-level accuracy under domain shift. For each response, we compute an output-entropy profile from final-layer next-token probabilities (from top-$k$ logprobs) and summarize it with different statistics. A lightweight classifier predicts instance correctness, and averaging predicted probabilities yields a domain-level accuracy estimate. We evaluate on ten STEM reasoning benchmarks with exhaustive train/test compositions ($k\in\{1,2,3,4\}$; all $\binom{10}{k}$ combinations), on different classifier models and features across nine LLMs from six families (3B--20B). Estimates often track held-out benchmark accuracy, and several models show near-monotonic ordering of domains, providing evidence for output-entropy profiles being an accessible signal for scalable monitoring and for targeted data acquisition.

Heavy-tailed distributions are ubiquitous in real-world data, where rare but extreme events dominate risk and variability. However, standard Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) employ simple decoder distributions, such as Gaussian distributions, that fail to capture heavy-tailed behavior, while existing heavy-tail-aware extensions remain restricted to predefined parametric families whose tail behavior is fixed a priori. We propose the Phase-Type Variational Autoencoder (PH-VAE), whose decoder distribution is a latent-conditioned Phase-Type (PH) distribution, defined as the absorption time of a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC). This formulation composes multiple exponential time scales, yielding a flexible and analytically tractable decoder that adapts its finite-range tail behavior directly from the observed data. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that PH-VAE accurately approximates diverse heavy-tailed distributions, significantly outperforming Gaussian, Student-t, and extreme-value-based VAE decoders in modeling observed tail behavior and extreme quantiles. In multivariate settings, PH-VAE captures realistic cross-dimensional tail dependence through its shared latent representation. To our knowledge, this is the first work to integrate Phase-Type distributions into deep generative modeling, bridging applied probability and representation learning.

Open-source native GUI agents still lag behind closed-source systems on long-horizon navigation tasks. This gap stems from two limitations: a shortage of high-quality, action-aligned reasoning data, and the direct adoption of generic post-training pipelines that overlook the unique challenges of GUI agents. We identify two fundamental issues in these pipelines: (i) standard SFT with CoT reasoning often hurts grounding, and (ii) step-wise RLVR-tyle training faces partial verifiability, where multiple actions can be correct but only a single demonstrated action is used for verification. This makes offline step-wise metrics weak predictors of online task success. In this work, we present GUI-Libra, a tailored training recipe that addresses these challenges. First, to mitigate the scarcity of action-aligned reasoning data, we introduce a data construction and filtering pipeline and release a curated 81K GUI reasoning dataset. Second, to reconcile reasoning with grounding, we propose action-aware SFT that mixes reasoning-then-action and direct-action data and reweights tokens to emphasize action and grounding. Third, to stabilize RL under partial verifiability, we identify the overlooked importance of KL regularization in RLVR and show that a KL trust region is critical for improving offline-to-online predictability; we further introduce success-adaptive scaling to downweight unreliable negative gradients. Across diverse web and mobile benchmarks, GUI-Libra consistently improves both step-wise accuracy and end-to-end task completion. Our results suggest that carefully designed post-training and data curation can unlock significantly stronger task-solving capabilities without costly online data collection. We release our dataset, code, and models to facilitate further research on data-efficient post-training for reasoning-capable GUI agents.

Zero-shot 3D Anomaly Detection is an emerging task that aims to detect anomalies in a target dataset without any target training data, which is particularly important in scenarios constrained by sample scarcity and data privacy concerns. While current methods adapt CLIP by projecting 3D point clouds into 2D representations, they face challenges. The projection inherently loses some geometric details, and the reliance on a single 2D modality provides an incomplete visual understanding, limiting their ability to detect diverse anomaly types. To address these limitations, we propose the Geometry-Aware Prompt and Synergistic View Representation Learning (GS-CLIP) framework, which enables the model to identify geometric anomalies through a two-stage learning process. In stage 1, we dynamically generate text prompts embedded with 3D geometric priors. These prompts contain global shape context and local defect information distilled by our Geometric Defect Distillation Module (GDDM). In stage 2, we introduce Synergistic View Representation Learning architecture that processes rendered and depth images in parallel. A Synergistic Refinement Module (SRM) subsequently fuses the features of both streams, capitalizing on their complementary strengths. Comprehensive experimental results on four large-scale public datasets show that GS-CLIP achieves superior performance in detection. Code can be available at https://github.com/zhushengxinyue/GS-CLIP.

Abridged: Clinicians commonly interpret 3D medical images by examining multiple anatomical planes rather than relying on volumetric views. In clinical CT workflows, the axial plane often serves as the primary diagnostic reference, while the auxiliary planes provide complementary spatial context. However, many existing 3D deep learning approaches either process volumetric data holistically or assign equal importance to all planes, failing to reflect this asymmetric, axial-centric interpretation strategy. To address this, we propose an axial-centric cross-plane attention architecture for 3D medical image classification that models asymmetric dependencies between anatomical planes. The architecture employs large-scale axial CT images pretrained MedDINOv3 as a frozen feature extractor for axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. RICA blocks and intra-plane transformer encoders capture plane-specific positional and contextual information, while axial-centric cross-plane transformer encoders selectively condition axial representations on complementary auxiliary representations. Experiments on six datasets from the MedMNIST3D benchmark show that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing 3D and multi-plane models in ACC and AUC. A lightweight variant, AC-Tiny, achieves competitive performance with substantially fewer trainable parameters, suggesting that architectural design contributes more to performance gains than increased model scale. Ablation studies further validate the importance of axial-centric querying, QKV allocation, directional cross-plane fusion, residual-free cross-attention, and classification head design. Slice-level Grad-CAM visualizations demonstrate that the model identifies diagnostically relevant regions across all planes. These findings highlight the value of aligning architectural design with clinical interpretation workflows for robust 3D medical image analysis.

Socio-economic causal effects depend heavily on their institutional and environmental contexts. The same intervention can produce different, even opposite, effects across regulatory regimes, market conditions, time periods, or populations. This poses a challenge for large language models (LLMs) in decision-support roles: can they infer the direction of a causal effect under a specified context, and revise that judgment when the context changes? To address this, we introduce EconCausal, a large-scale benchmark of 10,490 context-annotated causal triplets extracted from 2,595 high-quality empirical studies in top-tier economics and finance journals, constructed through a rigorous four-stage pipeline with multi-run consensus, context refinement, and multi-critic filtering. Across models, LLMs often fail to condition their predictions on context. While top models reach 88% accuracy in fixed, explicit contexts, accuracy falls by 32.6~pp on cases that require revising the sign across contexts (73.9% to 41.3%), and drops below 50% once misleading signed evidence is introduced. Models also over-commit to directional (+/-) signs, recognizing null effects only 13.8% of the time while remaining poorly calibrated on these categories. The dataset and benchmark are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/econcausal-benchmark-6F12.

We introduce DeepInterestGR, a novel framework that integrates deep interest mining into the generative recommendation pipeline. This addresses the "Shallow Interest" problem - existing generative methods rely on surface-level textual features and fail to capture latent user motivations, limiting personalization depth and recommendation interpretability. Our approach leverages Multi-LLM Interest Mining (MLIM) via structured reasoning prompting, Reward-Labeled Deep Interest (RLDI) for quality control, and Interest-Enhanced Item Discretization (IEID) via RQ-VAE, combined with a two-stage SFT-GRPO training pipeline guided by an Interest-Aware Reward. We validate DeepInterestGR on three Amazon Review benchmarks (Beauty, Sports, Instruments), comparing against 14 state-of-the-art baselines including SASRec, BERT4Rec, TIGER, LC-Rec, and S-DPO. Our method achieves 5.8%-8.3% relative improvements on HR@10 and 7.7%-9.9% on NDCG@10 over the strongest baseline, with cross-domain generalization gains of +24.8%. These results provide evidence that incorporating deep semantic interests can effectively improve SID-based generative recommendation.

Industrial robotics has established itself as an integral component of large-scale manufacturing enterprises. Simultaneously, collaborative robotics is gaining prominence, introducing novel paradigms of human-machine interaction. These advancements have necessitated a comprehensive revision of safety standards, specifically incorporating requirements for cybersecurity and protection against unauthorized access in networked robotic systems. This article presents a comparative analysis of the ISO 10218:2011 and ISO 10218:2025 standards, examining the evolution of their structure, terminology, technical requirements, and annexes. The analysis reveals significant expansions in functional safety and cybersecurity, the introduction of new classifications for robots and collaborative applications, and the normative integration of the technical specification ISO/TS 15066. Consequently, the new edition synthesizes mechanical, functional, and digital safety requirements, establishing a comprehensive framework for the design and operation of modern robotic systems.

In environmental monitoring, data collection is often costly, sparse, and shaped by urgent public-health needs. This is particularly true for cancer-causing PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) contamination, where discussions with domain experts and environmental organizations highlight the need to strategically identify high-risk, under-observed regions under tight sampling budgets. More broadly, similar challenges arise in disaster response and public health settings, where dynamic environments make it essential to efficiently uncover hidden targets from limited ground truth. Yet sparse and biased geospatial labels limit the applicability of existing learning-based methods, such as reinforcement learning. To address this, we propose a unified geospatial discovery framework that integrates active learning, online meta-learning, and concept-guided reasoning. Our approach introduces two key innovations built on a shared notion of *concept relevance*, capturing how domain-specific factors influence target presence: a *concept-weighted uncertainty sampling strategy*, where uncertainty is modulated by learned relevance from readily available concepts such as land cover and source proximity; and a *relevance-aware meta-batch formation strategy* that promotes semantic diversity during online-meta updates, improving generalization in dynamic environments. We evaluate our framework on PFAS contamination discovery as a real-world inspired environmental monitoring task, demonstrating robust target discovery under limited data and changing conditions.

Multi-turn LLM evaluation is typically reported as a single win-rate scalar, conflating distinct capabilities. We introduce AIDG (Adversarial Information Deduction Game), formalizing multi-turn adversarial dialogue as a two-player partially observable stochastic game (POSG) and decomposing performance along Seeker (extraction) and Holder (containment) roles. The decomposition isolates three failure modes: cooperative-prior leakage, constraint-reasoning interference, and inefficient hypothesis-space traversal. Across 439 games over six frontier LLMs, defensive performance is tightly clustered (sigma = 1.9 ELO) while offensive performance varies substantially (sigma = 53.3 ELO); confirmation framing increases extraction odds 7.75x over uninformed deduction (p < 0.00001); and constraint violations account for 41.3% of deductive failures, uncorrelated with scale (rho = 0.0). We position the containment-over-extraction gap not as a surprising finding but as a measurable consequence of locally resolvable defensive decisions versus globally coupled offensive planning, and use the decomposition to attribute the gap per model. All design choices, including turn-decay weighting and the Bradley-Terry rating model, are derived from explicit assumptions.

Diffusion models have been used as priors for solving inverse problems. However, existing approaches typically overlook side information that could significantly improve reconstruction quality, especially in severely ill-posed settings. In this work, we propose a novel framework that incorporates side information into existing diffusion-based inverse problem solvers via inference-time search, in a plug-and-play, training-free manner. Through extensive experiments across a range of inverse problems, including inpainting, super-resolution, and several deblurring tasks, and across multiple diffusion-based inverse problem solvers (DPS, DAPS, and MPGD), we show that augmenting each solver with our framework consistently improves the quality of the reconstructions over the corresponding original method. To demonstrate the generality of our approach, we consider diverse forms of side information, including reference images, textual descriptions, and anatomical MRI scans. The code is available at this \href{https://github.com/mahdi-farahbakhsh/DISS}{repository}\footnote{https://github.com/mahdi-farahbakhsh/DISS}.