Lake Detection and Water Quality Estimation in Sentinel-2 Data
Sentinel-2 数据中的湖泊检测与水质估计
Iulia Pleşu, Alexandra Băicoianu, Ioana Cristina Plajer
AI总结 本文比较了三种机器学习架构用于水体识别与监测,并提出了针对水质指数的有意义配色方案,以提高可解释性和决策支持。
详情
随着气候变化和人类对自然景观的压力增加,内陆水资源变得越来越稀缺、脆弱且难以可持续管理。因此,可靠且自动化的地表水体检测、监测和评估方法具有日益增长的科学和实践重要性。在本文中,我们研究并比较了三种不同的机器学习架构用于水体识别与监测。通过定量指标和实际案例评估其性能。此外,在代表性测试图像上与经典的 NDWI 阈值法进行直接比较,以突出数据驱动方法与基于指数方法之间的差异。这一分析使我们能够识别出在准确性、鲁棒性和实际适用性方面表现最佳的模型。除了检测之外,有意义的水质评估的一个主要挑战在于光谱水指数的一致且可解释的可视化。标准颜色映射技术通常不足或可能对环境应用产生误导。为弥补这一差距,我们提出了一套适用于水质指数的有意义配色方案,有助于人类用户更清晰地解释、比较和决策。
With climate change and increasing human pressure on natural landscapes, inland water resources are becoming progressively scarcer, more vulnerable, and more difficult to manage sustainably. Reliable and automated methods for detecting, monitoring, and assessing surface water bodies are therefore of growing scientific and practical importance. In this paper, we investigate and compare three distinct machine learning architectures for water body identification and monitoring. Their performance is evaluated through quantitative metrics and real-world examples. Furthermore, a direct comparison with classical NDWI thresholding is conducted on a representative test image to highlight differences between data-driven and index-based approaches. This analysis allows us to identify the best-performing model in terms of accuracy, robustness, and practical applicability. Beyond detection, a major challenge for meaningful water quality assessment lies in the consistent and interpretable visualization of spectral water indices. Standard color mapping techniques are often inadequate or potentially misleading for environmental applications. To address this gap, we propose a suite of meaningful color schemes adapted for water quality indices, facilitating clearer interpretation, comparison, and decision-making for human users.