Using Chronos-2, an open-source time-series foundation model, we evaluate pretrained time-series models for economic and financial forecasting with an emphasis on whether multivariate (MV) inputs improve accuracy relative to univariate (UV) baselines. The study covers two panels -- the Magnificent-7 equities and U.S. Treasury interest rates -- as well as a combined panel, using rolling monthly evaluations from 2000--2025. We vary input window lengths and forecast horizons and report RMSE and MAPE. Across datasets, MV forecasts consistently outperform UV forecasts, with especially strong gains for interest rates and meaningful improvements for equities. Series-level comparisons show MV improvements in every case, and error dispersion is generally lower under MV inputs. We also provide parameter-heatmap and time-series visualizations. However, mixing time series across equity and interest rate markets reduces forecast accuracy, indicating that adding noisy context degrades model performance. Overall, the results indicate that foundation models can leverage cross-series information to improve forecast accuracy in finance, and that the benefits are strongest when related series are modeled jointly under disciplined rolling protocols. Other than using an open-source foundation model, this paper also showcases how AI may be used for financial research.

This paper studies what Bitcoin (BTC) premiums in peer-to-peer (P2P) markets measure. Using transaction-level data from LocalBitcoins, we construct BTC premiums for 80 currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and relate them to blockchain transaction conditions, centralized crypto market (CEX) conditions, cross-border payment frictions, and foreign exchange (FX) markets. We show that these premiums reflect both trading frictions within crypto markets and local frictions in access to cross-border payments. They vary systematically with blockchain conditions and broader crypto market conditions, including BTC returns and volatility, and they are larger in countries facing greater frictions in conventional cross-border payment channels. This pattern is especially pronounced in economies with binding institutional constraints, i.e., tight capital controls and non-floating exchange-rate regimes, consistent with greater reliance on P2P crypto markets as an alternative cross-border payment channel. We further show that rising FX pressure is absorbed mainly through prices rather than trading volumes, and that P2P BTC premiums predict subsequent official exchange rate depreciation. Although premium levels differ across countries, their predictive content remains broadly similar. Overall, P2P BTC premiums reflect limits to arbitrage across crypto trading venues, especially where formal cross-border payment channels are more constrained, and they also embed forward-looking information about currency depreciation.

Decision support methods from operations research are widely used to support complex planning decisions. Within the energy sector, energy system models (ESMs) applying modelling to generate alternatives (MGA) generate large sets of near-optimal, different system configurations. However, they typically generate and analyse alternatives in the model variable space without ensuring stakeholder relevance. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), in contrast, provides a structured means to account for conflicting objectives and heterogeneous stakeholder interests but often relies on a limited set of pre-defined alternatives that may not appropriately represent the feasible solution space. To address these limitations, this work proposes value-focused modelling to generate alternatives (VF-MGA), a novel methodology that bidirectionally couples MGA and MCDA. Stakeholder objectives elicited within the MCDA inform the MGA-algorithm, enabling a stakeholder-orientated diversification of the alternatives, which are subsequently evaluated within the MCDA based on elicited stakeholder preferences, thereby providing a comprehensive decision basis. Applied to a case study on the decarbonised energy supply of a large university campus, involving eleven stakeholders representing diverse institutional groups, VF-MGA (i) systematically integrates stakeholder objectives into the generation of 691 alternatives reflecting stakeholder-relevant interests, (ii) enables the identification of stakeholder-relevant alternatives from this large set through MCDA-based evaluation, and (iii) provides more differentiated stakeholder preference information by evaluating a large and diverse set of alternatives, thereby revealing acceptable ranges for system options. With this, VF-MGA provides a generalisable methodology for complex planning decision integrating quantitative modelling with participatory decision analysis.

Investment in renewable electricity generation is highly capital intensive and therefore strongly dependent on financing conditions. In Europe, much of this investment has occurred under public support schemes that resemble long-term public contracts such as feed-in tariffs (FiTs) and contracts-for-differences (CfDs). These contracts not only subsidize renewable generation but also stabilize project cash flows by reducing exposure to electricity price volatility, thereby improving debt capacity and lowering financing costs. At the same time, they may distort operational and investment incentives by weakening exposure to wholesale market price signals. This paper studies how alternative public contract designs reduce revenue risk and how this translates into financing outcomes. Using a novel dataset of hourly turbine-level generation covering 63 German onshore wind parks over the period 2013-2024, we simulate project cash flows under two-sided CfDs, one-sided CfDs, and financial CfDs. We then evaluate their implications for cash-flow volatility, debt capacity, and the levelized cost of electricity using a project finance model based on a conservative debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR) constraint. We find that financial CfDs provide hedging performance comparable to conventional two-sided CfDs. The results suggest that the commonly assumed trade-off between revenue stabilization and efficient market integration is not inherent but depends on contract design. More broadly, public contracts can substitute missing long-term hedging markets. These results have direct policy implications for the design of renewable energy support schemes.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to transform work, but less is known about how firms reorganize labor demand as the technology diffuses. Existing research has largely focused on which occupations are exposed to AI or whether exposed jobs decline. We extend this debate by examining whether firms adjust by changing where they hire, what jobs contain, or both. Using a nationwide dataset of job postings in the United States, covering all sectors of the economy, we construct a dynamic, posting-level measure of generative AI exposure with a two-stage large language model pipeline. The pipeline identifies the tasks described in each posting and classifies the extent to which generative AI can perform or assist them. We then decompose changes in aggregate exposure into two margins: reallocation of demand across jobs and redesign of tasks within jobs. We document three main findings. First, generative AI exposure is dynamic rather than fixed, changing substantially over time. Second, labor demand adjusts through both margins. Hiring reallocation explains the largest share of the aggregate decline in exposure, accounting for 52% on average, while within-job redesign becomes increasingly important, accounting for 39.5%. A complementary Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition shows that shifts in occupational composition account for about 90% of the exposure change attributable to observable job characteristics. Third, adjustment differs across the job ladder. Senior jobs adjust earlier and mainly through reallocation, whereas junior jobs adjust through a broader mix of reallocation, redesign, and their interaction. These findings suggest that labor-market adjustment to generative AI is a process of organizational reconfiguration, in which firms reshape both hiring demand and the task architecture of work.

We explore the application of LLM-driven algorithm optimization to several common tasks in quantitative finance. MadEvolve, a general-purpose algorithm optimization framework inspired by DeepMind's Alpha-Evolve, was recently developed to optimize algorithms in computational cosmology. Here we demonstrate the utility of MadEvolve to optimize algorithmic trading strategies and alpha generation at the example of Bitcoin trading. On our simulation and backtesting setup, we achieve significant improvements on all tasks we considered, such as evolving feature sets for signal generation, optimizing separate components of the trading strategy, and jointly evolving the feature pipeline together with the execution strategy. Additionally, we compare our method to other agentic search approaches, specifically Claude Code, and carefully evaluate p-hacking probabilities on our simulation setup. Our findings strongly support the utility of AI-driven agentic and evolutionary algorithms for algorithmic trading and quantitative finance.

This paper examines how firm-level determinants of industrial emissions evolve over time as firms adapt to environmental regulation, economic conditions, and organisational constraints. Using a panel of 204 U.S. industrial facilities observed from 1992 to 2023, we link facility-level emissions from the Toxics Release Inventory to firm financial characteristics, managerial attributes, local labour-market conditions, and aggregate macroeconomic indicators. We employ a time-varying mean-group estimator that allows average relationships to change smoothly over time while accommodating persistent heterogeneity across facilities. We find several covariates display episodic associations with emissions growth. The results reveal pronounced stage-like dynamics in emissions determinants, with firm-level characteristics and aggregate conditions dominating in different periods. From an innovation-policy perspective, the findings highlight that firms' responses to environmental regulation are time-dependent and shaped by their adaptive capacity.

Decentraland, a decentralized virtual reality platform operating within the expanding Metaverse ecosystem, utilizes its native MANA token to facilitate virtual asset transactions and governance. This study investigates the integration of Discord community sentiment with multi-modal financial data to enhance cryptocurrency price prediction within virtual world economies. We address: (1) identifying sentiment patterns within Decentraland's Discord community, and (2) evaluating the impact of multi-modal features on token return forecasting. Using a BERT-based large language model for sentiment analysis, we develop two LSTM architectures: a baseline incorporating historical prices and a multi-modal variant integrating sentiment scores, trading volume, and market capitalization. Results indicate predominantly neutral community sentiment with a positive skew. The multi-modal model significantly outperforms the price-only baseline in prediction accuracy. These findings demonstrate the predictive value of community-derived signals for virtual economy forecasting and establish a foundation for future research at the intersection of immersive virtual environments, natural language processing, and cryptocurrency market analysis.

We develop at-the-money call-price and implied volatility asymptotic expansions in time to maturity for a class of asset-price models whose log returns follow a Lévy process. Under mild assumptions placing the driving Lévy process in the small-time domain of attraction of an $α$-stable law with $α\in (1,2)$, we give first-order at-the-money call-price and implied volatility asymptotics. A key observation is that both the stable domain of attraction and the finiteness of the centering constant $\barμ$ are preserved under the share measure transformation, so that all of the distributional input needed for the call-price expansion can be read off from the regular variation of the Lévy measure near the origin. When the Lévy process has no Brownian component, new rates of convergence of the form $t^{1/α} \ell(t)$ where $\ell$ is a slowly varying function are obtained. We provide an example of an exponential Lévy model exhibiting this behavior, with $\ell$ not asymptotically constant, yielding a convergence rate of $(t / \log(1/t))^{1/α}$. In the case of a Lévyprocess with Brownian component, we show that the jump contribution is always lower order, so that the leading $\sqrt{t}$ behavior of the at-the-money call price is universal and driven entirely by the Gaussian part of the characteristic triplet.

Understanding public demand for urban ecosystem services (ES) is crucial for effective green space management, yet the intricate relationships and potential trade-offs among these diverse demands remain poorly understood. Previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings, often limited by small samples or reliance on indirect proxies. Here, we provide the first national-scale, direct assessment of the relationship among demands for nine urban park ES using a survey dataset comprising 20,075 responses across China and a point-allotment experiment that directly quantifies the trade-off patterns among service demands. We found particularly strong preferences among urban residents in China for air purification and recreation services, at the expense of other services. These preferences were further reflected in three distinct demand bundles: air purification-dominated, recreation-dominated, and balanced demands, each delineating a typical group of people with distinct representative characteristics. Socio-economic and environmental factors, such as age, environmental interest, and mean annual precipitation, significantly influence the trade-off intensity among service demands. Our study pioneers the direct, quantitative analysis of relationships among ecosystem service demands, and the results underscore the need for tailored urban park designs that address diverse service demands to sustainably enhance the quality of city life in China and beyond.

We present a simple, numerically efficient but highly flexible non-parametric method to construct representations of option price surfaces which are both smooth and strictly arbitrage-free across time and strike. The method can be viewed as a smooth generalization of the widely-known linear interpolation scheme, and retains the simplicity and transparency of that baseline. Calibration of the model to observed market quotes is formulated as a linear program, allowing bid-ask spreads to be incorporated directly via linear penalties or inequalities, and delivering materially lower computational cost than most of the currently available implied-volatility surface fitting routines. As a further contribution, we derive an equivalent parameterization of the proposed surface in terms of strictly positive "discrete local volatility" variables. This yields, to our knowledge, the first construction of smooth, strictly arbitrage-free option price surfaces while requiring only trivial parameter constraints (positivity). We illustrate the approach using S&P 500 index options

What happens when the strongest alliance member pressures a weaker member over territory and strategic control? We examine the Greenland sovereignty crisis as a stress test for LLM geopolitics, centered on the 2019-2026 U.S. push to acquire Greenland from the Kingdom of Denmark. The crisis nests two collective-action problems: Arctic strategic control and whether NATO can enforce alliance norms against the dominant member. We develop three games (asymmetric coercion; a NATO assurance game with a critical-mass tipping point; a triadic extensive-form game with social preferences) and test them with a multi-agent simulation in which eight frontier LLMs play six geopolitical roles (United States, Denmark, Greenland, NATO, Russia, Canada) across 3,604 completed games and 108,120 action observations. Using inverse game theory, we recover each model's structural utility parameters (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, eta) for material self-interest, reciprocity, inequality aversion, norm respect, and commitment consistency. Three findings stand out. First, all eight models become more escalatory under coercion framing (four-action escalation rises from 10.7% to 28.6%). Second, Chinese-origin models show systematically different power-weight profiles from Western-origin models when playing the U.S. role. Third, peaceful US acquisition emerges in only 1.9% of clean games and only 3 of 8 frontier models ever achieve it, most prominently DeepSeek V3.2, which executes a stable five-round playbook through the metropole. Prompts emphasizing jus cogens and self-determination reduce escalation back near baseline in the English-only confirmatory sample; multilingual contrasts are reported as exploratory sensitivity checks. We position this as a structural benchmark for LLM geopolitical behavior, complementing action-frequency benchmarks.