We consider a static linear panel model with both correlated and uncorrelated random coefficients, where the former can depend arbitrarily on observable regressors while the latter are independent of them. We provide sufficient conditions for identification of the distributions of the random coefficients without imposing restrictions on the time-series structure of the error terms in short panels. Our framework applies to regular and irregular designs. The distribution of the correlated coefficients follows via a deconvolution argument. In irregular designs, identification relies on a stayer-based argument exploiting near-singular realizations of the regressor matrix. We develop a two-step minimum distance sieve estimator, with tuning parameters selected by cross-validation. In an application to calorie-expenditure elasticities using data from the randomized evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program, we interpret the estimated distributions by program status as distributions of regime-specific structural calorie-expenditure elasticities. The estimated densities themselves reveal substantial heterogeneity in household-specific elasticities, with nontrivial mass concentrated near zero and a non-negligible share of negative realizations. This heterogeneity implies that responses to income or expenditure changes are not uniformly positive and vary widely across households. Taken together, these features support a framework in which households adjust along both quantity and quality margins, rather than conforming to a homogeneous Engel-curve response.

The US housing market exhibits pronounced seasonal cycles: prices and sales rise through spring, peak in summer, and decline through autumn and winter. Since 2021, this pattern has shifted earlier in the calendar year, with spring strengthening at the expense of the traditional summer peak. A leading explanation for housing market seasonality is the search-and-matching model of Ngai and Tenreyro (2014), which links these cycles to household mobility through a thick-market mechanism. In this framework, periods with higher mobility generate thicker markets and higher prices and transaction volumes. Viewed through this lens, a shift in the seasonal cycle of prices and sales raises the question of whether the timing of household moves has changed. Did residential mobility shift earlier in the calendar year after 2021? We find that it did. Using SIPP data, and corroborating evidence from Google Trends indicators, we document a post-2021 shift in mobility toward spring. We extend the model to a monthly frequency, prove the existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium, and calibrate it to the observed mobility patterns. The calibrated model reproduces the spring shift in both prices and transaction volumes, consistent with the view that a change in the timing of household mobility alone can account for the recent shift in housing market seasonality.

Frontier AI Safety Policies concentrate on prevention: capability evaluations, deployment gates, and usage constraints, while neglecting the capacity to coordinate responses when prevention fails. We argue this coordination gap is structural: investments in ecosystem robustness yield diffuse benefits but concentrated costs, generating systematic underinvestment. Drawing on risk regimes in nuclear safety, pandemic preparedness, and critical infrastructure, we propose that similar mechanisms (precommitment, shared protocols, standing coordination venues) could be adapted to frontier AI governance. Closing the gap requires cross-actor "note-exchange" of ex ante if-then response logic, exposing not only triggers but the decision processes that convert signals into actions. Without such architecture, institutions cannot learn from failures at the pace of relevance.

The 2025 Bondi Beach mass-shooting was perpetrated by individuals inspired by ISIS (Islamic State) propaganda that increasingly featured anti-Semitic hate content following the October 2023 start of the Israel-Palestine war. Similar stories hold for other types of hate attacks, e.g. against Muslims on May 18, 2026. There is an urgent need to get ahead of future threats by understanding how and when a newly created piece of hate content will spread system-wide online. We present a two-species coalescence-fragmentation model with Susceptible-Infected-Recovered dynamics that incorporates the following published empirical features: (1) New pieces of hate content tend to be generated and promoted by a subset of in-built communities on less regulated platforms. (2) These `hate' communities create links (hyperlinks) with each other and with non-hate communities across all platforms to form dynamically evolving clusters (i.e. coalescence) across which new hate content can then spread. (3) These clusters can get broken up by moderator shutdowns (i.e. fragmentation). We present numerical solutions and derive two levels of approximate mean-field theory: Effective Medium Theory (EMT) and Beyond Effective Medium Theory (BEMT). Both numerical and analytic solutions reveal that system-wide spreading is governed by re-entrant threshold phases: as the fraction of hate communities varies, the system can transition from spreading to no-spreading and back to spreading. The derived analytic formulae give explicit insight into how these phase boundaries might be manipulated to prevent system-wide spreading. More broadly, the re-entrant phase behavior warns that policies which steadily reduce the number of hate communities can initially succeed but then backfire if pushed further, suggesting that blanket requirements for platforms to simply do `more' are over-simplistic.

We study an Arrow-Debreu economy with externalities generated by multiplex networks. Market equilibrium prices reflect both the preferences and scarcity of goods, consumers' network centralities arising from goods' externalities, as well as linkages across goods (layers) through the budget constraint. Despite the presence of externalities, competitive markets can still be efficient: the First and Second Welfare Theorems hold if either all networks are regular or all layers share the same network structure. When markets allocate goods inefficiently, a Lindahl equilibrium-implemented through personalized prices-can restore efficiency, but may leave some consumers worse off.

This paper examines how wartime economic controls shaped stock-price formation in Japan from 1930 to 1943. We develop a four-portfolio asset-pricing model in which zaibatsu affiliation affects expected payoffs and the translation of valuations into economic scale through lower financing wedges. We then construct daily capitalization-weighted indices and four benchmark portfolios based on a two-by-two sort by zaibatsu affiliation and military orientation. Using a CAPM-AR(p)-SV event-study framework that allows for serial correlation and stochastic volatility, we show that the model rationalizes capitalization concentration, segmented abnormal returns, delayed cumulative adjustment, regime-risk insulation of zaibatsu portfolios, and zaibatsu-concentrated responses to embedded-rent or group-continuation shocks. The evidence is consistent not with a collapse of semi-strong efficiency, but with institutionally contingent efficiency: stock prices continued to respond to news while capitalizing uneven access to credit, materials, and procurement.

This note shows how Condition 1 in Okumura (2025) can be tested efficiently using a standard graph-theoretic algorithm. It also describes an efficient implementation of Okumura's mechanism.

This paper studies quantile regression with an endogenous regressor and measurement error in the dependent variable. Standard quantile regression estimators ignoring these two elements can induce substantial bias. We adopt a control-function approach in a triangular system and show that the conditional quantile coefficient functions, together with all other distributional parameters, are nonparametrically identifiable. Building on this constructive identification result, we propose a two-step sieve ML estimator. The first step estimates the control function. The second step performs a sieve likelihood maximization that incorporates the generated control variable through copula weights. When the number of quantile grid knots grows at an appropriate speed, the estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal, permitting inference via bootstrap. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the estimator markedly reduces bias relative to existing methods, confirming its effectiveness in settings with endogeneity and additive measurement error in the outcome.

Finite-player dynamic games with dispersed private information are difficult because actions both move payoffs and reshape what opponents learn, generating hierarchies of beliefs about beliefs. This paper provides a recursive representation for this problem. The noise state records agents' beliefs about the underlying shocks that generate histories, so higher-order beliefs are generated by composition rather than tracked as separate state variables. In the canonical continuous-time LQG benchmark, the representation becomes explicit: beliefs, value gradients, and policy rules are deterministic impulse-response functions, and equilibrium is a deterministic fixed point in those functions. Any fixed point in the noise-state linear class is a Nash equilibrium against arbitrary admissible \(L^2\) deviations. The first-order system contains an information wedge, the shadow price of changing opponents' posteriors. In a two-player benchmark, the wedge explains why pooling gains are mostly strategic, why optimal precision allocation can starve an inefficient player of information, and why signal precision changes policy rules themselves, so separation fails.

OBJECTIVE: To propose time-to-event estimators that help evaluate incident diagnostic coding and possible upcoding in Medicare as well as introduce an open-source software package that enables more reproducible methods development relevant to Medicare billing behavior. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Observational analysis of simulated upcoding based on coding by insurers or providers that may be incentivized by Medicare Advantage risk adjustment. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Two years of separately simulated incident health condition coding data for a Medicare Advantage population and a Traditional Medicare population where coding patterns are aligned with known practices in each program. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We propose several novel time-to-event estimators of incident coding intensity and possible upcoding in Medicare Advantage, including accounting for unreliable reporting. We demonstrate estimator performance in simulated data leveraging the National Institutes of Health's All of Us study and also develop an open source R package to simulate longitudinal realistic labeled upcoding data, which were not previously available for researchers. In simulations, our novel estimators recovered differences in upcoding within and across monitoring periods. Undercoding had a limited effect on our novel estimators while an existing estimator was more sensitive to undercoding. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed estimators can help researchers and policymakers track new coding behaviors (e.g., as may be incentivized by risk adjustment formula updates) earlier and at scale while accounting for several real-world data considerations. Further, the R package we provide can be used to improve the development, accessibility, and reproducible evaluation of coding intensity and upcoding methodology.

We study horizontal differentiation when the set of feasible products is a structured subset of the Lancasterian characteristics space. Modeling this set as a compact Riemannian manifold, we show that intrinsic geometry governs substitutability and thereby determines market outcomes. We establish that production constraints induce sectional curvature, which controls the elasticity of technological substitution. Negative curvature amplifies technological divergence and attenuates competitive pressure, whereas positive curvature compresses technological distances and intensifies competition. This mapping yields a characterization of spatial competition in which equilibrium existence and stability are determined by geometric primitives. In particular, we show that sufficiently negative curvature and high dimensionality stabilize minimum differentiation, while continuous symmetries preclude it. The analysis provides a microfoundation linking technological constraints, through the geometry of the feasible set, to endogenous regimes of market power.

Two straightforward methods to extend an assessment of individual elements to groups are to sum individual assessments or to treat the group as a single merged element and assess it accordingly. In this work, we analyze another natural approach based on sequential elimination: elements of the group are removed one by one, and their assessments are aggregated. We study this approach in the context of coalitional games and show that, for almost all semivalues, it does not depend on the order of players. In particular, we introduce a new group value, called the Union Shapley Value, and investigate its axiomatic properties. Our results build on a comprehensive analysis of group values in coalitional games. Specifically, we define a class of group (weak consistent) semivalues - a variant of semivalues satisfying a weak form of monotonicity. This framework allows us to clarify the differences between existing notions in the literature. We show that existing group values either assess the total worth of a group or measure its synergy. We distinguish these two approaches axiomatically and uncover a connection between the corresponding values. In particular, we show that the well-known Interaction Index is a synergistic counterpart of the value introduced by Marichal et al., which corresponds to the merge approach. The analysis also yields new synergistic group values associated with the Union Shapley Value, which we call the Intersection Shapley Value. Our results demonstrate that the sequential extension - and the Union Shapley value in particular - constitute one of the most natural extensions of player values to groups in coalitional games.

Senders of messages prefer to communicate uncertainty verbally (e.g., something is likely to happen) rather than numerically (such as 75%), leaving receivers with imprecise information. While it is well established that receivers translate verbal probabilities into numerical values that systematically deviate from the intended numerical meaning, it is less clear how this discrepancy influences subsequent behavioral actions. Thus, the role of verbal versus numerical communication of uncertainty warrants additional attention, to investigate two critical questions: 1) whether differences in decision-making under uncertainty arise between these communication forms, and 2) whether such differences persist even when verbal phrases are translated accurately into the intended numerical meaning. By implementing a laboratory experiment, we show that individuals place significantly lower values on uncertain options with medium to high likelihoods when uncertainty is communicated verbally rather than numerically. This effect may lead to less rational decisions under verbal communication, particularly at high likelihoods. Those results remain consistent even if individuals translate verbal uncertainty correctly into the intended numerical uncertainty, implying that a biased behavioral response is not only induced by miscommunication. Instead, ambiguity about the exact meaning of a verbal phrase interferes with decision-making even beyond potential mistranslations. These findings tie in with previous research on ambiguity aversion, which has predominantly operationalized ambiguity through numerical ranges rather than verbal phrases. Based on our findings we conclude that managers should communicate uncertainty numerically, as verbal communication can unintentionally influence the decision-making process of employees.

In the theory of voting, the Plurality rule for preferences that come in the form of linear orders selects the alternatives most frequently appearing in the first position of those orders, while the Anti-Plurality rule selects the alternatives least often occurring in the final position. We explore extensions of these rules to preferences that are partial orders, offering axiomatic characterisations for them.

The paper examines the effects of stringent land use regulations, measured using the Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index (WRLURI), on employment growth during the period 2010-2020 in the Retail, Professional, and Information sectors across 878 local jurisdictions in the United States. All the local jurisdictions exist in both (2006 and 2018) waves of the WRLURI surveys and hence constitute a unique panel data. We apply a mediation analytical framework to decompose the direct and indirect effects of land use regulation stringency on sectoral employment growth and specialization. Our analysis suggests a fully mediated pattern in the relationship between excessive land use regulations and employment growth, with housing cost burden as the mediator. Specifically, a one standard deviation increase in the WRLURI index is associated with an approximate increase of 0.8 percentage point in the proportion of cost burdened renters. Relatedly, higher prevalence of cost-burdened renters has moderate adverse effects on employment growth in two sectors. A one percentage point increase in the proportion of cost burdened renters is associated with 0.04 and 0.017 percentage point decreases in the Professional and Information sectors, respectively.

Synthetic control methods can produce misleading counterfactual predictions when outcome series contain unit-specific stochastic trends, a common feature of nonstationary macroeconomic data. Existing remedies, such as pre-filtering or differencing, reduce spurious matching but may discard shared nonstationary variation that helps estimate donor weights. We propose Harmonic Synthetic Control (HSC), which replaces this binary choice with a soft allocation mechanism. HSC jointly estimates donor weights and a treated-unit-specific smooth residual component, then extrapolates this component into post-treatment periods using a time-series forecaster. A tuning parameter, selected by rolling-origin cross-validation, governs the division between donor matching and forecasting. As it varies, HSC continuously interpolates between synthetic control applied to differenced outcomes and synthetic control applied to raw outcomes with an intercept or trend. We provide a spectral interpretation showing how HSC downweights low-frequency residual components in donor matching and assigns them to the forecasting branch. A prediction-error decomposition separates weight-estimation distortion from residual-forecasting error. Monte Carlo exercises show that HSC adapts across regimes, performing well when stochastic trends are predominantly common or idiosyncratic, while estimators fixed to one regime can fail in the other.

We develop a unified microeconomic and monetary theory of artificial intelligence inference costs and their pass-through to inflation, welfare, and optimal monetary policy. We introduce the Inference-Cost Phillips Curve (ICPC), an augmented New Keynesian Phillips curve in which firm-level marginal costs of producing differentiated goods include a non-trivial AI inference component lambda-bar, and prove a closed-form structural slope kappa*_inf = lambda-bar * kappa, where kappa is the standard Calvo-Yun slope. We derive a welfare-relevant Hicks-Kaldor decomposition of consumer welfare under inference-cost shocks, prove a generalized Taylor principle for the inference-augmented economy, and characterize the optimal monetary policy response coefficient psi*_inf = (1 + phi*rho) * lambda-bar * kappa under commitment. A second-order welfare loss formula closes the model in closed form. We confront the theory with U.S. monthly data 2022:M01-2026:M04 using a two-step GMM estimator with Newey-West HAC standard errors and Hansen J-test, recovering an empirical slope kappa-hat_inf = 0.087 (HAC s.e. 0.021) which lies within one standard error of the structural prediction. A scaling regression over 50 rolling-window subwindows yields b-hat = 0.987 (R^2 = 0.998), consistent with a near-unit-elasticity pass-through. A G7 reduced-form panel with Driscoll-Kraay HAC standard errors yields b-hat^G7 = 0.094 (s.e. 0.026), and a Wald test fails to reject cross-country homogeneity (p = 0.78). The framework provides a single equilibrium scaffold for the joint study of AI inference cost dynamics, monetary policy under generative-AI shocks, and the welfare cost of inference-driven inflation.

Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the supply side of training data: an increasing share of new tokens, images, and structured records is produced by previous-generation models rather than by human originators. Recursive training on such synthetic content induces a measurable and often irreversible loss of distributional fidelity, a phenomenon known as model collapse. We develop the first unified microeconomic theory of synthetic data markets under model collapse. We introduce the Synthetic Data Contamination Equilibrium (SDCE), prove existence and generic uniqueness, derive a welfare decomposition W = W_prod + W_cons - L_coll - L_info, establish a Wasserstein-gradient-flow mean-field collapse limit, prove an impossibility of information-constrained implementation, and obtain closed-form expressions for the welfare-maximizing provenance subsidy s* = KL(q||p)/(2 kappa) and the welfare-maximizing watermark strength w* = (1 - psi) KL(q||p)/(2 kappa psi). We prove an information-theoretic Cramer-Rao lower bound on any provenance estimator using only producer-side observations and show that the Provenance-Market Iterative Retraining (PMIR) algorithm attains this bound up to constants while converging to an epsilon-SDCE in O(epsilon^-2 log T) iterations. A reduced-form OLS estimation on a C4-synthetic benchmark over ten retraining generations yields a collapse-rate coefficient b-hat = 0.181 (HAC s.e. 0.024), within one standard error of the structural prediction 0.183. Calibrated experiments raise generation-ten model quality by 23.1 percent over the unregulated benchmark while lowering the 2-Wasserstein drift on a held-out diversity probe from 0.318 to 0.142. Scaling experiments over generations t in {1,...,10} recover a logarithmic-in-t collapse law log Q_t = log Q_0 - 0.183 t rho^2 with R^2 = 0.962.

Prediction markets are powerful mechanisms for information aggregation, but existing designs are optimized for single-event contracts. In practice, traders frequently express beliefs about joint outcomes - through parlays in sports, conditional forecasts across related events, or scenario bets in financial markets. Current platforms either prohibit such trades or rely on ad hoc mechanisms that ignore correlation structure, resulting in inefficient prices and fragmented liquidity. We introduce ParlayMarket, the first automated market-making design that supports parlay-style joint contracts within a unified liquidity pool while maintaining coherent pricing across base markets and their combinations. Our main result is a convergence characterization of the resulting system. Under repeated trading, the AMM dynamics converge to a unique fixed point corresponding to the best approximation to the true joint distribution within the model class. We show that (i) parameter error remains bounded at stationarity due to a balance between signal and noise in trade-induced updates, and (ii) pricing error and monetary loss scale with this parameter error, implying that aggregate market-maker loss remains controlled and grows at most quadratically in the number of base markets. These results establish explicit limits on the information-retrieval error achievable through the trading interface. Importantly, parlay trades play a structural role in this convergence: by providing direct constraints on joint outcomes, they improve identifiability of dependence structure and reduce steady-state error relative to markets that rely only on marginal trades. Empirically, we show both in controlled simulations and in replay on historical Kalshi parlay data that this design achieves the intended scaling while remaining effective in realistic market settings.

This Element offers a practical guide to estimating conditional marginal effects-how treatment effects vary with a moderating variable-using modern statistical methods. Commonly used approaches, such as linear interaction models, often suffer from unclarified estimands, limited overlap, and restrictive functional forms. This guide begins by clearly defining the estimand and presenting the main identification results. It then reviews and improves upon existing solutions, such as the semiparametric kernel estimator, and introduces robust estimation strategies, including augmented inverse propensity score weighting with Lasso selection (AIPW-Lasso) and double machine learning (DML) with modern algorithms. Each method is evaluated through simulations and empirical examples, with practical recommendations tailored to sample size and research context. All tools are implemented in the accompanying \texttt{interflex} package for \texttt{R}.

Stochastic optimal control control problems with merely measurable coefficients are not well understood. In this manuscript, we consider fully non-linear stochastic optimal control problems in infinite horizon with measurable coefficients and (local) uniformly elliptic diffusion. Using the theory of $L^p$-viscosity solutions, we show existence of an $L^p$-viscosity solution $v\in W_{\rm loc}^{2,p}$ of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, which, in turn, is also a strong solution (i.e. it satisfies the HJB equation pointwise a.e.). We are then led to prove verification theorems, providing necessary and sufficient conditions for optimality. These results allow us to construct optimal feedback controls and to characterize the value function as the unique $L^p$-viscosity solution of the HJB equation. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results for fully non-linear stochastic optimal control problems with measurable coefficients. We use the theory developed to solve a stochastic optimal control problem arising in economics within the context of optimal advertising.

This paper re-examines the limit theorems of Abadie and Imbens for nearest-neighbor matching estimators of average treatment effects with a fixed number of matches. We establish, for the first time, a non-normalized central limit theorem (CLT) with an explicitly calculated limiting variance. The key ingredients are to prove the convergence of the normalizing statistic appearing in the CLT of Abadie and Imbens to its mean, and to calculate the closed form of the limit of this mean. The former closes a gap in the argument of an unpublished work (Abadie and Imbens, 2002), while the latter resolves a question raised in Abadie and Imbens (2006).

We propose an approach to estimate how individuals' expectations influence their responses to a counterfactual change. The approach relies on average partial effects, which recover counterfactual impacts under conditions that we specify. We propose a three-step estimation method that relies on panel data on subjective expectations. We illustrate our approach in a model of consumption and saving, focusing on the impact of an income tax that not only changes current income but also affects beliefs about future income. Applying our approach to Italian survey data, we find that individuals' beliefs matter for evaluating the impact of tax policies on consumption decisions.