We present Tongyi DeepResearch, an agentic large language model, which is specifically designed for long-horizon, deep information-seeking research tasks. To incentivize autonomous deep research agency, Tongyi DeepResearch is developed through an end-to-end training framework that combines agentic mid-training and agentic post-training, enabling scalable reasoning and information seeking across complex tasks. We design a highly scalable data synthesis pipeline that is fully automatic, without relying on costly human annotation, and empowers all training stages. By constructing customized environments for each stage, our system enables stable and consistent interactions throughout. Tongyi DeepResearch, featuring 30.5 billion total parameters, with only 3.3 billion activated per token, achieves state-of-the-art performance across a range of agentic deep research benchmarks, including Humanity's Last Exam, BrowseComp, BrowseComp-ZH, WebWalkerQA, xbench-DeepSearch, FRAMES and xbench-DeepSearch-2510. We open-source the model, framework, and complete solutions to empower the community.

Due to the varying granularity of target states across different tasks, most existing trackers are tailored to a single task, which specificity limits their generalization, preventing them from effectively utilizing multi-task training data and leading to redundancy in both model design and parameters. Although recent unified vision models share partial architectures across tasks, they usually retain task-specific interfaces and overlook the common tracking principle behind different granularities, leaving a gap for truly unified video tracking. To unify video tracking tasks, we present SAM 2++, a unified framework that can handle target states at different granularities, including masks, boxes, and points, through an integrated design of prompt encoding, output decoding, and memory representation. First, to handle different target granularities, we design task-specific prompts that map diverse task inputs into general prompt embeddings, together with a Unified Decoder that produces task results in a common output form without redesigning the overall pipeline. Next, to satisfy memory matching, the core operation of tracking, we introduce a task-adaptive memory mechanism that unifies memory across different granularities while preserving their distinct state semantics, preventing full parameter sharing from causing interference across granularities. Finally, we introduce Tracking-Any-Granularity, the first large and diverse video tracking dataset with rich annotations at three granularities. It is constructed through a customized data engine with phased manual annotation and model-assisted completion, providing a comprehensive resource for training, benchmarking, and analyzing unified tracking models. Comprehensive experiments confirm that SAM 2++ sets a new state of the art across diverse tracking tasks at different granularities, establishing a unified and robust tracking framework.

Deploying real-time spatial perception on edge devices requires efficient multi-task models that leverage complementary task information while minimizing computational overhead. This paper introduces Multi-Mono-Hydra (M2H), a novel multi-task learning framework designed for semantic segmentation and depth, edge, and surface normal estimation from a single monocular image. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on independent single-task models or shared encoder-decoder architectures, M2H introduces a Window-Based Cross-Task Attention Module that enables structured feature exchange while preserving task-specific details, improving prediction consistency across tasks. Built on a lightweight ViT-based DINOv2 backbone, M2H is optimized for real-time deployment and serves as the foundation for monocular spatial perception systems supporting 3D scene graph construction in dynamic environments. Comprehensive evaluations show that M2H outperforms state-of-the-art multi-task models on NYUDv2, surpasses single-task depth and semantic baselines on Hypersim, and achieves superior performance on the Cityscapes dataset, all while maintaining computational efficiency on laptop hardware. Beyond benchmarks, M2H is validated on real-world data, demonstrating its practicality in spatial perception tasks.

Large language models internalize a structural trade-off between truthfulness and obsequious flattery, emerging from reward optimization that conflates helpfulness with polite submission. This latent bias, known as sycophancy, manifests as a preference for user agreement over principled reasoning. We introduce Beacon, a single-turn forced-choice benchmark that isolates this bias independent of conversational context, enabling precise measurement of the tension between factual accuracy and submissive bias. Evaluations across twelve state-of-the-art models reveal that sycophancy decomposes into stable linguistic and affective sub-biases, each scaling with model capacity. We further propose prompt-level and activation-level interventions that modulate these biases in opposing directions, exposing the internal geometry of alignment as a dynamic manifold between truthfulness and socially compliant judgment. Beacon reframes sycophancy as a measurable form of normative misgeneralization, providing a reproducible foundation for studying and mitigating alignment drift in large-scale generative systems.

Test-time augmentation, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) or tool use, critically depends on an interplay between a model's parametric knowledge and externally retrieved information. However, the theoretical underpinnings of this relationship remain poorly understood. Specifically, it is not clear how much pre-training knowledge is required to answer queries with a small number of augmentation steps, which is a desirable property in practice. To address this question, we formulate multi-step reasoning as an $s$-$t$ connectivity problem on a knowledge graph. We represent a model's pre-training parametric knowledge as a partial, potentially noisy subgraph. We view augmentation as querying an oracle for true edges that augment the model's knowledge. Then, we characterize the necessary and sufficient number of augmentation steps for the model to generate an accurate answer given partial prior knowledge. One key result shows a phase transition: if the prior knowledge graph over $n$ vertices is disconnected into small components, then finding a path via augmentation is inefficient and requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ queries. On the other hand, once the density of correct knowledge surpasses a threshold, forming a giant component, we can find paths with an expected constant number of queries.

Reinforcement learning (RL) for web agents demands environments that are both effective for evaluation and efficient enough for large-scale on-policy training. Current web environments fall short: server-side Docker setups are too resource-intensive for massive parallel rollouts, while browser-side interfaces produce noisy observations, execute actions unreliably under modern single-page applications, and omit visual interactivity cues. We introduce WebServ, a full-stack, RL-ready web environment that addresses these limitations end-to-end. On the server side, WebServ uses Incus containers with block-level copy-on-write, reducing launch latency by ~5x and persistent storage by ~240x, enabling 200+ concurrent isolated environments on a single host. On the browser side, WebServ provides a compact, site-agnostic observation and action interface derived automatically from the DOM with human-aligned interactivity cues, and a robust action execution backend using network-aware waiting for reliable SPA support. On WebArena-Lite, WebServ achieves state-of-the-art single-prompt results, with controlled comparisons confirming consistent gains across GPT-4o, OpenAI-o3, and Llama-3.1-8B over vanilla WebArena. We further train Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-30B-A3B with RL entirely within WebServ; the RL-trained 4B model achieves 55.5% mean accuracy, surpassing both Claude 4.5 Sonnet (50.0%) and the RL-trained 8B model from WebAgent-R1 (51.8%).

Large language models (LLMs) continue to struggle with low-resource languages, primarily due to limited training data, translation noise, and unstable cross-lingual alignment. To address these challenges, we propose LiRA (Linguistic Robust Anchoring for LLMs)-a plug-and-play framework that requires only lightweight fine-tuning on top of existing pretrained backbones. LiRA jointly optimizes representation stability and cross-lingual semantic consistency by combining two key components: Arca (Anchored Representation Composition Architecture), which aligns low-resource inputs to a shared English semantic space through anchor-based alignment and collaborative encoding; and LaSR (Language-coupled Semantic Reasoner), a lightweight, language-aware head that enforces consistency regularization for unified cross-lingual understanding, retrieval, and reasoning. We theoretically show that under controlled anchoring error and translation-induced bias, LiRA guarantees bounded representation deviation and stable downstream performance under local Lipschitz continuity. To facilitate research, we release a new multilingual product retrieval dataset covering five Southeast Asian and two South Asian languages. Extensive experiments across diverse low-resource benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval, ranking, question answering, and reasoning tasks. Code will be publicly available on GitHub, and the dataset will be hosted on Hugging Face.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to Autoregressive Language Models, yet their inference strategies remain limited to prefix-based prompting inherited from the autoregressive paradigm. In this paper, we propose Template Infilling (TI), a tailored conditioning methodology for DLMs. Unlike conventional prefix prompting, TI flexibly aligns structural anchors across the entire target response space, establishing a global blueprint before filling in the masked segments. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on diverse benchmarks, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and trip planning, achieving consistent improvements of 9.40% over the baseline. Furthermore, we observe that TI provides additional advantages in multi-token generation settings, enabling effective speedup while maintaining generation quality and robustness. By enforcing these global constraints, TI ultimately facilitates System-2 reasoning, empowering the model to deliberate within a structurally defined solution space.

Biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), and electromyography (EMG) encode physiological activity across multiple temporal and spectral scales, yielding representations that are rich but challenging for machine learning. Foundation models trained to predict masked signal tokens have shown promise in learning generalizable biosignal representations, yet their performance depends on the tokenizer's ability to preserve high-frequency dynamics and reconstruct signals with high fidelity. We introduce NeuroRVQ, a modality-adaptive biosignal tokenizer family designed for high-fidelity signal reconstruction. To capture the full frequency spectrum, NeuroRVQ decomposes biosignals into frequency-specific representations via multi-scale temporal convolutions, each encoded into hierarchical RVQ codebooks to preserve high-frequency detail, combined with a novel phase-aware training loss that respects the circular topology of Fourier phase. By tuning the temporal resolution, number and size of temporal kernels and RVQ depth, this design adapts to the spectro-temporal characteristics of each biosignal modality. To validate that tokenizer quality drives downstream performance, we train a simple masked-token foundation model for each modality (NeuroRVQ-FM) using the corresponding NeuroRVQ tokenizer. The NeuroRVQ-FM family achieves competitive or superior downstream performance compared to existing modality-specific foundation models, demonstrating that high-fidelity tokenization is a critical factor for effective biosignal modeling.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking. However, this lengthy reasoning process incurs substantial computational and latency overheads, hindering the practical deployment of LRMs. This work presents a new approach to mitigating overthinking in LRMs via black-box persuasive prompting. By treating LRMs as black-box communicators, we investigate how to persuade them to generate concise responses without compromising accuracy. We introduce Whisper, an iterative refinement framework that generates high-quality persuasive prompts from diverse perspectives. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Whisper consistently reduces token usage while preserving performance. Notably, Whisper achieves a 3x reduction in average response length on simple GSM8K questions for the Qwen3 model series and delivers an average ~40% token reduction across all benchmarks. For closed-source APIs, Whisper reduces token usage on MATH-500 by 46% for Claude-3.7 and 50% for Gemini-2.5. Further analysis reveals the broad applicability of Whisper across data domains, model scales, and families, underscoring the potential of black-box persuasive prompting as a practical strategy for enhancing LRM efficiency.

Deep learning-based weather forecasting (DLWF) models leverage past weather observations to generate future forecasts, supporting a wide range of downstream applications, including tropical cyclone (TC) prediction. In this paper, we investigate their vulnerability to adversarial attacks, where subtle perturbations to the upstream forecasts can alter the downstream TC trajectory predictions. Although research into adversarial attacks on DLWF models has grown recently, it remains challenging to craft perturbed upstream forecasts that steer the downstream outputs toward attacker-specified trajectories. First, conventional TC detection systems are opaque, non-differentiable black boxes, making standard gradient-based attacks infeasible. Second, the extreme rarity of TC events leads to severe class imbalance problem, making it difficult to develop attack methods for perturbing upstream forecasts that produce realistic-looking cyclone paths aligned with attacker's target trajectories. To overcome these limitations, we propose Cyc-Attack, a novel method for perturbing the upstream forecasts of DLWF models to generate adversarial trajectories. The proposed method uses a differentiable surrogate model to approximate the TC detector's output, enabling the application of gradient-based attacks. Cyc-Attack also employs a skewness-aware loss function with kernel dilation strategy to address the imbalance problem. Finally, a distance-based gradient weighting scheme and regularization are used to constrain the perturbations and eliminate unrealistic-looking trajectories, thereby making the adversarial upstream forecasts less easily detectable. Our experiments show that Cyc-Attack achieves a higher true positive rate in matching the attacker's target trajectories, along with lower false alarm rates and stealthier perturbations than conventional attack methods.

Going beyond simple text processing, financial auditing requires detecting semantic, structural, and numerical inconsistencies across large-scale disclosures. As financial reports are filed in XBRL, a structured XML format governed by accounting standards, auditing becomes a structured information extraction and reasoning problem involving concept alignment, taxonomy-defined relations, and cross-document consistency. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise on isolated financial tasks, their capability in professional-grade auditing remains unclear. We introduce FinAuditing, a taxonomy-aligned, structure-aware benchmark built from real XBRL filings. It contains 1,102 annotated instances averaging over 33k tokens and defines three tasks: Financial Semantic Matching (FinSM), Financial Relationship Extraction (FinRE), and Financial Mathematical Reasoning (FinMR). Evaluations of 13 state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial gaps in concept retrieval, taxonomy-aware relation modeling, and consistent cross-document reasoning. These findings highlight the need for realistic, structure-aware benchmarks. We release the evaluation code at https://github.com/The-FinAI/FinAuditing and the dataset at https://huggingface.co/collections/TheFinAI/finauditing. The task currently serves as the official benchmark of an ongoing public evaluation contest at https://open-finance-lab.github.io/SecureFinAI_Contest_2026/.

Code Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing software engineering. However, scaling laws that guide the efficient training are predominantly analyzed on Natural Language (NL). Given the fundamental differences like strict syntax between code and NL, it is unclear whether these laws are directly applicable to code. To address this gap, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of scaling laws for code, comprising 117 experimental runs with model sizes from 0.2B to 3.8B and training tokens from 2B to 128B. We fit the Chinchilla law and the Farsser law. First, the results show that the more expressive Farseer law offers greater accuracy. Second, the analysis reveals that Code LLMs scale effectively with model size. Crucially, code represents a more data-hungry regime, requiring a substantially higher data-to-parameter ratio than NL. Finally, two additional sets of experiments on code-NL mixtures show that NL benefits resource-constrained scenarios, but becomes a detriment at higher compute budgets.

Automated red-teaming has emerged as a scalable approach for auditing Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to deployment, yet existing approaches lack mechanisms to efficiently adapt to model-specific vulnerabilities at inference. We introduce Red-Bandit, a red-teaming framework that adapts online to identify and exploit model failure modes under distinct attack styles (e.g., manipulation, slang). Red-Bandit post-trains a set of parameter-efficient LoRA experts, each specialized for a particular attack style, using reinforcement learning that rewards the generation of unsafe prompts via a rule-based safety model. At inference, a multi-armed bandit policy dynamically selects among these attack-style experts based on the target model's response safety, balancing exploration and exploitation. Red-Bandit achieves state-of-the-art results on AdvBench under sufficient exploration (ASR@10), while producing more human-readable prompts (lower perplexity). Moreover, Red-Bandit's bandit policy serves as a diagnostic tool for uncovering model-specific vulnerabilities by indicating which attack styles most effectively elicit unsafe behaviors.

Calibrated predictions are useful because their numerical values can be interpreted as probabilities. Calibration errors are therefore widely used to evaluate, compare, and tune probabilistic predictors. Recently, Haghtalab et al. (2024) introduced an additional requirement for such measures: truthfulness. A calibration measure is truthful if a predictor minimizes its expected measured error by reporting the true conditional label distribution. Many standard empirical calibration errors are non-truthful: a predictor may appear better calibrated by distorting its probabilities rather than reporting them truthfully. We study the practical role of truthfulness for calibration measurement in multiclass prediction. First, we introduce perfectly truthful calibration errors for multidimensional linear properties of the label distribution, generalizing the truthful calibration error for binary predictions in Hartline et al. (2025). This framework includes full multiclass calibration and classwise calibration. We also identify a truthful correction for confidence calibration. Second, we characterize the decision-theoretic implications of these truthful errors. For calibrated predictors, truthful calibration errors preserve the Blackwell dominance: a more informative calibrated predictor receives no larger expected error. Third, we show that this decision-theoretic interpretation explains and mitigates the well-observed ranking robustness problem of binned calibration errors. Empirically, non-truthful confidence-based errors can reverse model rankings when the number of bins changes, while our truthful errors give more stable rankings across binning choices.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in a wide range of natural language processing tasks and can be adapted through prompting. However, they remain suboptimal in multi-turn interactions, often relying on incorrect early assumptions and failing to track user goals over time, which makes such tasks particularly challenging. Prior works in dialogue systems have shown that long-term planning is essential for handling interactive tasks. In this work, we propose a prompt optimisation framework inspired by reinforcement learning, which enables such planning to take place by only modifying the task instruction prompt of the LLM-based agent. By generating turn-by-turn feedback and leveraging experience replay for prompt rewriting, our proposed method shows significant improvement in multi-turn tasks such as text-to-SQL and task-oriented dialogue. Moreover, it generalises across different LLM-based agents and can leverage diverse LLMs as meta-prompting agents. This warrants future research in reinforcement learning-inspired parameter-free optimisation methods.

Teaching large language models (LLMs) to reason during post-training typically relies on reinforcement learning with explicit outcome- or process-based reward functions. However, in many real-world settings, obtaining or defining such reward functions is difficult, especially for complex tasks, making learning from expert demonstrations an attractive alternative. The dominant approach, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), trains models to imitate expert reasoning traces directly, but suffers from the general limitations of off-policy learning: performance can be fragile to inference-time deviations from states explicitly covered by the demonstrations. To address this, we propose Reasoning Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (R-AIRL). Rather than imitating the expert's reasoning, R-AIRL infers the underlying process-level reward from the expert Chain-of-Thoughts. Through experiments on GSM8K, MMLU-Pro and MedReason we show that the reasoning reward function learned with R-AIRL can be effectively used throughout the training and inference pipeline: (1) to provide a training signal for post-training, outperforming SFT in most of the considered settings, (2) for inference-time reranking, improving pass@1 by up to 17.4 points, and (3) for process-level evaluation, localising reasoning failures with up to 86.1% accuracy. Overall, R-AIRL bridges imitation learning and reward-based optimisation, enabling the extraction of meaningful reasoning signals from expert thinking traces.

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables policy optimization from fixed datasets, making it suitable for safety-critical applications where online exploration is infeasible. However, these datasets are often contaminated by adversarial poisoning, system errors, or low-quality samples, leading to degraded policy performance in standard behavioral cloning (BC) and offline RL methods. This paper introduces Density-Ratio Weighted Behavioral Cloning (Weighted BC), a robust imitation learning approach that uses a small, verified clean reference set to estimate trajectory-level density ratios via a binary discriminator. These ratios are clipped and used as weights in the BC objective to prioritize clean expert behavior while down-weighting or discarding corrupted data, without requiring knowledge of the contamination mechanism. We establish theoretical guarantees showing convergence to the clean expert policy with finite-sample bounds that are independent of the contamination rate. A comprehensive evaluation framework is established, which incorporates various poisoning protocols (reward, state, transition, and action) on continuous control benchmarks. Experiments demonstrate that Weighted BC maintains near-optimal performance even at high contamination ratios outperforming baselines such as traditional BC, batch-constrained Q-learning (BCQ) and behavior regularized actor-critic (BRAC).

Deep learning models excel in stationary data but struggle in non-stationary environments due to a phenomenon known as loss of plasticity (LoP), the degradation of their ability to learn in the future. This work presents a first-principles investigation of LoP in gradient-based learning. Grounded in dynamical systems theory, we formally define LoP by identifying stable manifolds in the parameter space that trap gradient trajectories. Our analysis reveals two primary mechanisms that create these traps: frozen units from activation saturation and cloned-unit manifolds from representational redundancy. Our framework uncovers a fundamental tension: properties that promote generalization in static settings, such as low-rank representations and simplicity biases, directly contribute to LoP in continual learning scenarios. We validate our theoretical analysis with numerical simulations and explore architectural choices or targeted perturbations as potential mitigation strategies.

Computer Vision (CV)-based continuous, automated and precise salmon welfare monitoring is a key step toward reduced salmon mortality and improved salmon welfare in industrial aquaculture net pens. Available CV methods for determining welfare indicators focus on single indicators and rely on object detectors and trackers from other application areas to aid their welfare indicator calculation algorithm. This comes with a high resource demand for real-world applications, since each indicator must be calculated separately. In addition, the methods are vulnerable to difficulties in underwater salmon scenes, such as object occlusion, similar object appearance, and similar object motion. To address these challenges, we propose a flexible tracking framework that uses a pose estimation network to extract bounding boxes around salmon and their corresponding body parts, and exploits information about the body parts, through specialized modules, to tackle challenges specific to underwater salmon scenes. Subsequently, the high-detail body part tracks are employed to calculate welfare indicators. We construct two novel datasets assessing two salmon tracking challenges: salmon ID transfers in crowded scenes and salmon ID switches during turning. Our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art pedestrian tracker, BoostTrack, for both salmon tracking challenges. Additionally, we create a dataset for calculating salmon tail beat wavelength, demonstrating that our body part tracking method is well-suited for automated welfare monitoring based on tail beat analysis. Datasets and code are available at https://github.com/espenbh/BoostCompTrack.

In this paper, we introduce a combination of novel and exciting tasks: the solution and generation of linguistic puzzles. We focus on puzzles used in Linguistic Olympiads for high school students. We first extend the existing benchmark for the task of solving linguistic puzzles. We explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), including recent state-of-the-art models such as OpenAI's o1, for solving linguistic puzzles, analyzing their performance across various linguistic topics. We demonstrate that LLMs outperform humans on most puzzles types, except for those centered on writing systems, and for the understudied languages. We use the insights from puzzle-solving experiments to direct the novel task of puzzle generation. We believe that automating puzzle generation, even for relatively simple puzzles, holds promise for expanding interest in linguistics and introducing the field to a broader audience. This finding highlights the importance of linguistic puzzle generation as a research task: such puzzles can not only promote linguistics but also support the dissemination of knowledge about rare and understudied languages.

General-purpose robotic skills from end-to-end demonstrations often leads to task-specific policies that fail to generalize beyond the training distribution. Therefore, we introduce FunCanon, a framework that converts long-horizon manipulation tasks into sequences of action chunks, each defined by an actor, verb, and object. These chunks focus policy learning on the actions themselves, rather than isolated tasks, enabling compositionality and reuse. To make policies pose-aware and category-general, we perform functional object canonicalization for functional alignment and automatic manipulation trajectory transfer, mapping objects into shared functional frames using affordance cues from large vision language models. An object centric and action centric diffusion policy FuncDiffuser trained on this aligned data naturally respects object affordances and poses, simplifying learning and improving generalization ability. Experiments on simulated and real-world benchmarks demonstrate category-level generalization, cross-task behavior reuse, and robust sim2real deployment, showing that functional canonicalization provides a strong inductive bias for scalable imitation learning in complex manipulation domains. Details of the demo and supplemental material are available on our project website https://sites.google.com/view/funcanon.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across a variety of domains. However, training MLLMs is often inefficient, as much of the computation is redundant due to the long input sequences from multimodal data and underutilized inter-layer operations. Notably, such redundancy is not static but varies across different stages of training. Building on this observation, we shift the focus to the training process itself and propose a training-efficient framework based on sparse representations, termed the Sparse Training Scheme (STS). Instead of applying a uniform sparsity strategy, STS adopts a stage-aware design that adapts to different sources of redundancy during training. Specifically, the framework consists of two complementary components: the Visual Token Compressor, which reduces the information load by compressing visual tokens during modality alignment, and the Layer Dynamic Skipper, which mitigates computational overhead by dynamically skipping unnecessary layers during instruction tuning. Our approach is broadly applicable to diverse MLLM architectures and has been extensively evaluated on multiple benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness and efficiency.

Machine unlearning (MU) aims to remove the influence of specific "forget" data from a trained model while preserving its knowledge of the remaining "retain" data. Existing MU methods based on label manipulation or model weight perturbations often achieve limited unlearning effectiveness. To address this, we introduce CoUn, a novel MU framework inspired by the observation that a model retrained from scratch using only retain data classifies forget data based on their semantic similarity to the retain data. CoUn emulates this behavior by adjusting learned data representations through contrastive learning (CL) and supervised learning, applied exclusively to retain data. Specifically, CoUn (1) leverages semantic similarity between data samples to indirectly adjust forget representations using CL, and (2) maintains retain representations within their respective clusters through supervised learning. Extensive experiments across various datasets and model architectures show that CoUn consistently outperforms state-of-the-art MU baselines in unlearning effectiveness. Additionally, integrating our CL module into existing baselines empowers their unlearning effectiveness.

Labeled data is a fundamental component in training supervised deep learning models for computer vision tasks. However, the labeling process, especially for ordinal image classification where class boundaries are often ambiguous, is prone to error and noise. Such label noise can significantly degrade the performance and reliability of machine learning models. This paper addresses the problem of detecting and correcting label noise in ordinal image classification tasks. To this end, a novel data-centric method called ORDinal Adaptive Correction (ORDAC) is proposed for adaptive correction of noisy labels. The proposed approach leverages the capabilities of Label Distribution Learning (LDL) to model the inherent ambiguity and uncertainty present in ordinal labels. During training, ORDAC dynamically adjusts the mean and standard deviation of the label distribution for each sample. Rather than discarding potentially noisy samples, this approach aims to correct them and make optimal use of the entire training dataset. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on benchmark datasets for age estimation (Adience) and disease severity detection (Diabetic Retinopathy) under various asymmetric Gaussian noise scenarios. Results show that ORDAC and its extended versions (ORDAC_C and ORDAC_R) lead to significant improvements in model performance. For instance, on the Adience dataset with 40% noise, ORDAC_R reduced the mean absolute error from 0.86 to 0.62 and increased the recall metric from 0.37 to 0.49. The method also demonstrated its effectiveness in correcting intrinsic noise present in the original datasets. This research indicates that adaptive label correction using label distributions is an effective strategy to enhance the robustness and accuracy of ordinal classification models in the presence of noisy data.

In this letter, we report the first experimental demonstration of the recently emerged new paradigm in hovering and flapping flight physics called (Natural Hovering Extremum Seeking (NH-ES)) [doi.org/10.1103/4dm4-kc4g], which theorized that stable hovering flight physics observed in nature by flapping insects and hummingbirds can be generated via a model-free, real-time, computationally-basic, sensory-based feedback mechanism that only needs the built-in natural oscillations of the flapping wing as both the control and the propulsive input. We run experiments of moth-like, light source-seeking, on a flapping-wing body in a total model-free setting that is agnostic to morphological parameters and body/aerodynamic models. We show that the flapping body using NH-ES gains altitude and stabilizes autonomously the servos responsible for flapping, including with pitching dynamics (believed in literature to be a main reason of instability in open-loop hovering). The flapping body effectively/stably hovers about the light source, needing only feedback of local measurements of light intensity. Our results were also achieved under delay/noise effects, supporting earlier observations that NH-ES is robust against potential processing delays and noisy-sensations.

Depth estimation is a fundamental component of spatial perception for autonomous driving and other unmanned systems operating in open urban environments. Existing depth datasets such as KITTI, nuScenes, and DDAD have advanced the field but are limited in diversity and scalability, and benchmark performance on them is approaching saturation. A less discussed constraint is \emph{sensor economics}: the bespoke multi-LiDAR rigs behind these datasets are expensive, power-hungry, and difficult to replicate at fleet scale, which caps the geographic and temporal diversity that any single benchmark can cover. We present ROVR, a large-scale, diverse, and cost-efficient depth dataset designed to capture the complexity of real-world driving. ROVR comprises 200K high-resolution frames across highway, rural, and urban scenarios, spanning day/night cycles and adverse weather conditions, collected across North America, Europe, and Asia. We additionally release the calibration, synchronization, preprocessing, and privacy pipeline so that the platform can be reproduced by third parties. The lightweight acquisition pipeline enables scalable collection, while sparse but statistically sufficient ground truth -- validated by a density ablation -- supports robust model training. Extensive ablation studies further characterize performance across scene types, illumination, weather conditions, and ground-truth sparsity levels, and identify three qualitatively distinct failure modes -- photometric collapse, geometric confusion, and range saturation -- that current architectures share. The dataset, data loaders, calibration and privacy pipelines, and evaluation code are publicly available at \url{https://xiandaguo.net/ROVR-Open-Dataset}.

Human manipulation skills represent a pinnacle of their voluntary motor functions, requiring the coordination of many degrees of freedom and processing of high-dimensional sensor input to achieve remarkable dexterity. Thus, we set out to answer whether the human hand, with its associated biomechanical properties, sensors, and control mechanisms, is an ideal that we should strive for in robotics. Do robots need anthropomorphic hands? We start by extracting characteristics of the human hand in terms of biomechanics and perception to compare them with currently commercially available robotic hands. From this comparison, we derive our research questions that connect manipulation system complexity to skill repertoire size and dexterity. We attempt to answer these with a systematic literature review, in which we analyze the manipulation capabilities demonstrated in 125 papers from 2019-2025. Although complex five-fingered hands are often considered the ultimate goal for robotic manipulators, they are not necessary for all tasks. We find that in-hand manipulation does not benefit from anthropomorphic hand design as simpler mechanisms are sufficient, but mechanism complexity correlates with the breadth of manipulation tasks a hand can perform. Sensor integration and intelligent manipulation strategies remain underexplored, which may be because of a misalignment with hand design: instead of replicating the number of fingers and degrees of freedom, focusing on robustness and softness would allow more intelligent control and learning to exploit environmental contacts and integrate more sensors. Finally, we argue for standardized evaluation criteria to enable systematic comparison of hand designs and manipulation systems.

Gene expression analysis holds the key to many biomedical discoveries, yet extracting insights from raw transcriptomic data remains formidable due to the complexity of multiple large, semi-structured files and the need for extensive domain expertise. Current automation approaches are often limited by either inflexible workflows that break down in edge cases or by fully autonomous agents that lack the necessary precision for rigorous scientific inquiry. GenoMAS charts a different course by presenting a team of LLM-based scientists that integrates the reliability of structured workflows with the adaptability of autonomous agents. GenoMAS orchestrates six specialized LLM agents through typed message-passing protocols, each contributing complementary strengths to a shared analytic canvas. At the heart of GenoMAS lies a guided-planning framework: programming agents unfold high-level task guidelines into Action Units and, at each juncture, elect to advance, revise, bypass, or backtrack, thereby maintaining logical coherence while bending gracefully to the idiosyncrasies of genomic data. On the GenoTEX benchmark, GenoMAS reaches a Composite Similarity Correlation of 89.13% for data preprocessing and an F$_1$ of 60.48% for gene identification, surpassing the best prior art by 10.61% and 16.85% respectively. Beyond metrics, GenoMAS surfaces biologically plausible gene-phenotype associations corroborated by the literature, all while adjusting for latent confounders. Code is available at https://github.com/Liu-Hy/GenoMAS.

This work introduces MediQAl, a French medical question answering dataset designed to evaluate the capabilities of language models in factual medical recall and reasoning over real-world clinical scenarios. MediQAl contains 32,603 questions sourced from French medical examinations across 41 medical subjects. The dataset includes three tasks: (i) Multiple-Choice Question with Unique answer, (ii) Multiple-Choice Question with Multiple answer, and (iii) Open-Ended Question with Short-Answer. Each question is labeled as Understanding or Reasoning, enabling a detailed analysis of models' cognitive capabilities. We validate the MediQAl dataset through extensive evaluation with 14 large language models, including recent reasoning-augmented models, and observe a significant performance gap between factual recall and reasoning tasks. Our evaluation provides a comprehensive benchmark for assessing language models' performance on French medical question answering, addressing a crucial gap in multilingual resources for the medical domain.