Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data
减轻二元黑洞合并参数估计中的系统误差:O1-O3 LIGO-维格数据
Sumit Kumar, Max Melching, Frank Ohme, Harsh Narola, Tom Dooney, Chris Van Den Broeck
AI总结 本文通过参数模型减少O1-O3 LIGO-维格数据中二元黑洞合并参数估计的系统误差,特别关注数据中的异常和不一致结果。
Comments 24 pages, 13 figures, 2 tables. updated figures and text. Comments are welcome
详情
引力波合并参数估计中的系统误差可能来源于波形系统误差、噪声误判、数据分析伪影及其他未知因素。本文分析了LIGO-维格-凯拉拉合作组织O1-O3观测运行中选定的事件,这些事件在不同研究中被标记为可能受系统误差影响。我们使用之前开发的几个参数模型重新分析这些事件,这些模型考虑了引力波波形相位和幅度的不确定性。在数据驱动方法中,我们应用足够宽的先验分布来考虑潜在的系统误差。我们的发现表明,所提出的方法有效减少了系统误差,即使这些误差来源于数据伪影,如信号附近发生的故障和引力波框架文件中的去故障过程。同样,不同波形模型的不一致结果在我们的框架中变得一致。我们研究的一个值得注意的事件是GW191109_010717,其特别有趣之处在于其反向对齐的自旋特性。我们报告说,在我们的框架中,该事件仍然表现出反向对齐的自旋特性,但推断结果在原始和去故障框架文件之间以及不同波形模型之间变得一致。对于事件GW200129_065458,我们观察到类似的趋势,该事件之前在不同波形模型中给出了高但不一致的进动参数。相反,我们观察到IMRPhenomXPHM、IMRPhenomXO4a和NRSur7dq4波形模型中非零且一致的χ_p值分别为0.60±0.31, 0.58±0.30, 0.56±0.31。
Systematic errors in the parameter estimation (PE) of gravitational wave (GW) mergers can arise from various sources, including waveform systematics, noise mischaracterization, data analysis artifacts, and other unknown factors. In this study, we analyze selected events from the first three observing runs of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) collaboration. We choose events that have been flagged in various studies as potentially affected by systematic errors. Here, we reanalyze these events using a couple of parametric models developed in previous work that incorporate uncertainties in both the phase and amplitude of the GW waveform. In this data-driven approach, we apply sufficiently broad priors on the uncertainty parameters to account for potential systematic errors. Our findings show that the proposed method effectively reduces systematic errors, even those arising from data artifacts, such as glitches occurring near a signal and the deglitching process in GW frame files. Similarly, inconsistent results from different waveform models become much more consistent in our framework. One noteworthy event we examine is GW191109\_010717, which is particularly interesting due to its anti-aligned spin properties. We report that, within our framework, the event still exhibits anti-aligned spin characteristics, but the inference results become consistent across raw and deglitched frame files, as well as across the waveform models used for this event (IMRPhenomXPHM, IMRPhenomXO4a, and NRSur7dq4). A similar trend is observed for the event GW200129\_065458, which previously yielded a high, but inconsistent precession parameter among different waveform models. In contrast, we observe a non-zero and consistent value of $χ_{p}=0.60^{+0.31}_{-0.33}, 0.58^{+0.30}_{-0.29}$ and $0.56^{+0.31}_{-0.28}$ for the IMRPhenomXPHM, IMRPhenomXO4a, and NRSur7dq4 waveform models, respectively.