Smart target point control for Gaussian Splatting methods
智能目标点控制用于高斯溅射方法
Pratik Singh Bisht, Andreas Kolb
AI总结 本文提出一种智能目标点控制方案,通过调整高斯溅射的参数以跟踪二次目标计数轨迹,确保所有方法和视图获得相等的密集化和修剪周期,实现更公平的评估。
详情
标准的高斯溅射方法依赖于启发式的密集化和修剪来适应性地分配基础元素,而由此产生的高斯计数强烈影响重建质量和运行时间。这使得方法间的比较容易产生偏差:改进可能源于更高的表示能力而非算法设计。常见的解决方法是在达到目标计数时停止或预算密集化/修剪,这会偏训练,因为不同方法在不同时间达到上限,导致不同视图的密集化/修剪暴露不均和点分布不均。我们提出了一种目标点控制方案,保留标准的密集化窗口和节奏,但仅调整现有的密集化和透明度剔除超参数以跟踪二次目标计数轨迹。此配额控制器在15000次迭代内达到所需计数,确保所有方法和视图获得相等的密集化和修剪周期,实现更公平、容量匹配的评估。
Standard Gaussian splatting methods rely on heuristic densification and pruning to adaptively allocate primitives during training, and the resulting Gaussian count strongly influences both reconstruction quality and runtime. This makes comparisons across methods fragile: improvements can stem from higher representational capacity rather than algorithmic design. A common and naive workaround for this is hard-stopping or budgeting densification/pruning once a target count is reached, which biases training because different methods hit the cap at different times, yielding non-uniform densify/prune exposure across views and uneven point distributions. We propose a target point control scheme that preserves the standard densification window and cadence, but adjusts only the existing densification and opacity-culling hyper-parameters to track a quadratic target count trajectory. This quota-governor reaches the desired count by 15k iterations without abrupt cutoffs, ensuring that all methods and views receive equal densification and pruning cycles, enabling fairer, capacity-matched evaluation.