Video semantic search in densely crowded scenes remains a challenging task due to visual encoders tendency to prioritize salient foreground regions while neglecting contextually important, background areas. We propose an Inverse Attention Embedding mechanism that explicitly captures and highlights these overlooked regions. By combining inverse attention embeddings with traditional visual embeddings, our method significantly enhances semantic retrieval performance without additional training. Initial experiments and ablation studies demonstrate promising improvements over existing approaches in recall for video semantic search in crowded environments.

Deterministic policy gradient (DPG) is widely utilized for continuous control; however, it inherently relies on the differentiability of the critic with respect to the action during policy updates. This assumption is violated in practical control problems involving sparse or discrete rewards, leading to ill-defined policy gradients and unstable learning. To address these challenges, we propose a principled alternative based on a smoothed Bellman equation formulated via Gaussian smoothing. Specifically, we define a novel action-value function based on a smoothed Bellman equation and derive the soft deterministic policy gradient (Soft-DPG). Our formulation eliminates explicit dependence on critic action-gradients and ensures that the gradient remains well-defined even for non-smooth Q-functions. We instantiate this framework into a deep reinforcement learning algorithm, which we call soft deep deterministic policy gradient (Soft DDPG). Empirical evaluations on standard continuous control benchmarks and their discretized-reward variants show that Soft DDPG remains competitive in dense-reward settings and provides clear gains in most discretized-reward environments, where standard DDPG is more sensitive to irregular critic landscapes.

Algorithmic decision-making in high-stakes settings can have profound impacts on individuals and populations. While much prior work studies fairness in static settings, recent results show that enforcing static fairness constraints may exacerbate long-run disparities. Motivated by this tension, we study a stylized sequential selection problem in which a decision-maker repeatedly selects individuals, affecting both immediate utility and the population distribution over time. We introduce notions of group fairness for both the short and long term and theoretically analyze the trade-off between fairness and utility via the Price of Fairness (PoF). We characterize optimal and fair policies in the short term and show that the PoF can be large even when group distributions are nearly identical. In contrast, we show that long-term disparities can vanish under simple investment policies that achieve a low PoF. We also empirically validate these theoretical observations using both synthetic and real datasets.

As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, they are becoming increasingly capable while simultaneously demanding ever-longer context lengths. To improve the inference efficiency of long-context processing, several novel low-complexity hybrid architectures have recently been proposed, effectively alleviating the computational burden of long-context inference. However, existing research on long-context prefill acceleration remains predominantly focused on sparse attention mechanisms, which achieve their maximum speedup only on full-attention models. When transferred to emerging architectures--such as linear/full attention hybrids or sliding window/full attention hybrids--these prefill acceleration approaches suffer significant performance degradation. Furthermore, such methods are generally incompatible with continuous batching, making them difficult to integrate into modern inference engines such as vLLM. To this end, we propose UniPrefill, a prefill acceleration framework applicable to virtually any model architecture, which directly accelerates the model's computation at the token level. We further implement UniPrefill as a continuous batching operator and extend vLLM's scheduling strategy to natively support prefill-decode co-processing and tensor parallel for UniPrefill, enabling its seamless integration into vLLM. UniPrefill achieves up to 2.1x speedup in Time-To-First-Token (TTFT), with the acceleration becoming increasingly pronounced as the number of concurrent requests grows.

This paper studies test-time aggregation, an approach that generates multiple reasoning traces and aggregates them into a final answer. Most existing methods rely on evaluation signals collected from candidate traces in isolation or answer frequencies, while ignoring comparative interactions among candidates. We propose Joint Consistency (JC), formulated as a constrained Ising-type energy minimization problem, where independent evaluation signals act as external fields and pairwise comparisons act as interactions. JC provides a unified framework for test-time aggregation that subsumes existing voting and weighted aggregation methods as special cases. Our construction of the interaction matrix leverages LLM-as-a-judge comparisons, and admits a theoretical interpretation under answer-level homogeneity assumptions. Moreover, we develop an efficient approximation strategy that makes interaction modeling practical for large-scale test-time aggregation. Experiments on math and code reasoning benchmarks show that JC consistently outperforms existing baselines across tasks, judge models, trace budgets, and trace-generation settings.

We revisit a universally accepted but under-examined design choice in every modern LLM: a token index is looked up once at the input embedding layer and then permanently discarded. This single-injection assumption induces two structural failures: (i) the Rare Token Problem, where a Zipf-type distribution of vocabulary causes rare-token embeddings are chronically under-trained due to receiving a fraction of the cumulative gradient signal compared to common tokens; and (ii) the Contextual Collapse Problem, where limited parameters models map distributionally similar tokens to indistinguishable hidden states. As an attempt to address both, we propose TIDE, which augments the standard transformer with EmbeddingMemory: an ensemble of K independent MemoryBlocks that map token indices to context-free semantic vectors, computed once and injected into every layer through a depth-conditioned softmax router with a learnable null bank. We theoretically and empirically establish the benefits of TIDE in addressing the issues associated with single-token identity injection as well as improve performance across multiple language modeling and downstream tasks.

We present a differentiable framework to adaptively compute 4D illumination conditions with respect to an object, for efficient, high-quality simultaneous acquisition of its shape and reflectance, with a unified spatial-angular structured light and a single camera. Using a simple histogram-based pixel-level probability model for depth and reflectance, we differentiably link the next illumination condition(s) with a loss that encourages the reduction in depth uncertainty. As new structured illumination is cast, corresponding image measurements are used to update the uncertainty at each pixel. Finally, a fine-tuning-based approach reconstructs the depth map and reflectance parameter maps, by minimizing the differences between all physical measurements and their simulated counterparts. The effectiveness of our framework is demonstrated on physical objects with wide variations in shape and appearance. Our depth results compare favorably with state-of-the-art techniques, while our reflectance results are comparable when validated against photographs.

Attribution methods explain which input features drive a model's prediction, making them central to model debugging and mechanistic interpretability. Yet backward attribution methods, including gradients, LRP, and transformer-specific rules, lack a shared framework in which to compare the underlying backward calculations. We introduce such a framework by recasting backward attribution as a two-player game on an extended network graph, building on Gaubert and Vlassopoulos' ReLU Net Game. Gradients and the full alpha-beta-LRP family arise as integrals over game trajectories under specific equilibria, so attribution maps become projections of trajectory distributions rather than the primary object. Desired explanation properties, such as localisation focus, robustness to input noise, or stable attention routing, can be specified as game-theoretic concepts, including policy regularization, risk aversion, and extended action sets, and translate directly into novel adaptations of the well-known backward rules. On ViT-B/16, one such selected adaptation of alpha-beta-LRP outperforms prior transformer-specific backward methods across all considered localisation metrics.

In the classical identification in the limit model of Gold [1967], a stream of positive examples is presented round by round, and the learner must eventually recover the target hypothesis. Recently, Kleinberg and Mullainathan [2024] introduced generation in the limit, where the learner instead must eventually output novel elements of the target's support. Both lines of work focus on positive-only or fully labeled data. Yet many natural supervision signals are inherently relational rather than singleton, which encode relationships between examples rather than labels of individual ones. We initiate the study of contrastive identification and generation in the limit, where the learner observes a contrastive presentation of data: a stream of unordered pairs $\{x,y\}$ satisfying $h(x)\ne h(y)$ for an unknown target binary hypothesis $h$, but which element is positive is hidden from the learner. We first present three results in the noiseless setting: an exact characterization of contrastive identifiable classes (a one-line geometric refinement of Angluin [1980]'s tell-tale condition), a combinatorial dimension called contrastive closure dimension (a contrasitive analogue of the closure dimension in Raman et al. [2025]) and exactly characterizing uniform contrastive generation with tight sample complexity, and a strict hierarchy in which contrastive generation and text identification are mutually incomparable. We then prove a sharp reversal under finite adversarial corruption: there exist classes identifiable from contrastive pairs under any finite corruption budget by a single budget-independent algorithm, yet not identifiable from positive examples under even one corrupted observation. The unifying technical object is the common crossing graph, which encodes pairwise ambiguity, family-level generation obstructions, and corruption defects in a single coverage-and-incidence language.

Most discrete visual tokenizers rely on a default design: every position in the sequence shares the same codebook. Researchers try to scale the codebook size $K$ to get better reconstruction performance. Such a constant-codebook design hits a fundamental information-theoretic limit. We observe that the per-position conditional entropy of the training set decays so quickly along the sequence that, after a few positions, the conditional distribution becomes essentially deterministic. On ImageNet with $K=16384$, this happens within only 2 out of 256 positions, turning the remaining 254 into a memorization problem. We call this phenomenon the Entropy Cliff and formalize it with a simple expression: $t^{*} = \lceil \log_2 N / \log_2 K \rceil$. Interestingly, this phenomenon is not observed in language, as its natural structure keeps the effective entropy per position well below the codebook capacity. To address this, we propose Variable Codebook Size Quantization (VCQ), where the codebook size $K_t$ grows monotonically along the sequence from $K_{\min}=2$ to $K_{\max}$, leaving the loss function, parameter count, and AR training procedure unchanged. With a vanilla autoregressive Transformer and standard next-token prediction, a base version of VCQ reduces gFID w/o CFG from 27.98 to 14.80 on ImageNet $256\times256$ over the baseline. Scaled up, it reaches gFID 1.71 with 684M autoregressive parameters, without any extra training techniques such as semantic regularization or causal alignment. The extreme information bottleneck at $K_{\min}=2$ naturally induces a coarse-to-fine semantic hierarchy: a linear probe on only the first 10 tokens reaches 43.8% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, compared to 27.1% for uniform codebooks. Ultimately, these results show that what matters is not only the total capacity of the codebook, but also how that capacity is distributed and organized.

Mixture of experts has emerged as the primary mechanism for making Large Language Models (LLMs) computationally efficient. However, in distributed settings, communicating token embeddings between experts is a significant bottleneck. We present the novel Federation of Experts (FoE) architecture. FoE restructures the MoE block of a transformer layer into multiple MoE clusters. Each cluster is responsible for only one of the KV heads and expert parallelism is applied between those experts. Between clusters, a sum synchronizes the post-attention residuals, which then drives routing and dispatch for the next MoE block. In a single-node setting, FoE completely eliminates all-to-all communication as all experts within a group are contained on the same GPU. In multi-node settings, FoE confines all-to-all communication to the intra-node fabric, thus significantly reducing communication overhead. An implementation of FoE finds that on LongBench, FoE significantly improves inference throughput and latency in both single-node and multi-node settings, reducing the end-to-end forward-pass latency by up to 5.2x, TTFT by 3.62x, and TBT by 1.95x. It does so while achieving comparable generation quality to a mixture of experts model of the same size and training configuration.

Recent developments in digital platforms have highlighted the prevalence of open systems, where agents can arrive and depart over time. While bandit learning in open systems has recently received initial attention, existing work imposes structural assumptions that are frequently violated in practice. A learning paradigm for general open systems creates fresh challenges: newly arriving agents induce endogenous non-stationarity; agent patterns determine how quickly information accumulates; and new agents make regret scale further with the time horizon. To this end, we formulate a unified open-system bandit problem with general dynamics, including heterogeneous rewards and general agent patterns. We introduce new concepts to capture the inherent complexities: the \emph{pre-training degree} of new agents quantifies how much information an agent carries upon entry, \emph{stability} measures the impact of new agents on the system, and \emph{global dynamic regret} compares the cumulative expected reward of all active agents with that of the varying optimal arms. We develop certified global-UCB learning methodologies with provable guarantees. Our regret bounds reveal that entry uncertainty enters linearly via the pre-training degree, while in stable regimes, regret is governed by the time needed to identify a persistent optimal arm, as well as by the agent patterns. We further show that these dependencies are tight via lower bounds in hard instances.

Dominant accuracy evaluation might reward unwarranted guessing of Large Language Models, and it might not be applicable to novel tasks for model validation without ground-truth (gt) annotation. Based on basic logic principle, we propose a novel framework to evaluate the vision-language logical consistency of MLLMs on both sufficient and necessary cause-effect relations. We define Vision-Language Logical Consistency Metric (VL-LCM) on traditional MC-VQA tests, and recent NaturalBench tests without the need for gt annotation. Through systematic experiments on representative VL benchmark MMMU and recent VL challenges like NaturalBench, we evaluated 11 recent open-source MLLMs from 4 frontier families. Our findings reveal that, despite significant progress of recent MLLMs on accuracy, logical consistency lags behind significantly. Extensive evaluations on the correlations of VL-LCM with metrics on gt, the reliability of LCM, and the relation of VL-LCM with response distribution justify the validity and applicability of VL-LCM even without gt annotation. Our findings suggest that, beyond accuracy, logical consistency could be employed for both accuracy and reliability. VL-LCM can also be employed for MLLM selection, validation, and reliable answer justification in novel tasks without gt annotation.

Reinforcement learning for agentic large language models (LLMs) typically relies on a sparse, trajectory-level outcome reward, making it difficult to evaluate the contribution of individual tool-calls within multi-turn interactions. Existing approaches to such process credit assignment either depend on separate external process reward models that introduce additional consumption, or tree-based structural rollout that merely redistributes the outcome signal while constraining trajectory diversity. A promising alternative leverages the per-turn change in the policy's predicted probability of the ground-truth, termed Information Gain (IG), as an intrinsic process signal without an external evaluator. However, prior work on leveraging IG signals within the RL training loop faces three systematic challenges: normalizing across turns that face heterogeneous positional contexts can distort the relative standing of individual turns, accumulating a variable number of terms causes advantage magnitudes to drift with trajectory depth, and a fixed clipping range governs policy updates identically for turns with vastly different IG signals. In this paper, we propose A$^2$TGPO (Agentic Turn-Group Policy Optimization with Adaptive Turn-level Clipping), which retains IG as the intrinsic signal but re-designs how it is normalized, accumulated, and consumed: (i) turn-group normalization: normalizes IG within each (prompt, turn-index) group so that each turn is compared only against peers at the same interaction depth; (ii) variance-rescaled discounted accumulation: divides cumulative normalized IG by square root of accumulated terms to keep advantage magnitudes comparable across turn positions; and (iii) adaptive turn-level clipping: modulates each turn's clipping range based on its normalized IG, widening the update region for informative turns and narrowing it for uninformative ones.

The opaque nature of deep learning models remains a significant barrier to their clinical adoption in medical imaging. This paper presents a multimodal explainability framework that bridges the gap between convolutional neural network (CNN) predictions and clinically actionable insights for brain tumor classification, leveraging large language models (LLMs) to deliver human-interpretable diagnostic narratives. The proposed framework operates through three coupled stages. First, nine CNN architectures are extended with a dual-output hybrid formulation that simultaneously optimises a classification head and a segmentation head, enabling spatially richer feature learning. Second, visual saliency attribution methods, namely Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and ScoreCAM, are applied to generate class-discriminative heatmaps, which are subsequently refined into binary tumor masks via an adaptive percentile thresholding pipeline. Third, the resulting masks are mapped onto the Harvard-Oxford cortical atlas to translate pixel-level evidence into named neuroanatomical structures, and the extracted findings are encoded into a structured JSON file that conditions three LLMs (Grok3, Mistral, and LLaMA) to generate coherent, radiological-style diagnostic reports. Evaluated on a dataset of 4,834 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted brain MRI images spanning three tumor classes, InceptionResNetV2 achieved the highest classification performance and Grad-CAM++ yielded the best segmentation overlap. Among the language models, Grok3 led in lexical diversity and coherence, while LLaMA achieved the highest readability score. By integrating visual, anatomical, and linguistic modalities into a unified pipeline, the framework produces explanations that are technically grounded and meaningfully interpretable, advancing the transparency and clinical accountability of artificial intelligence assisted brain tumor diagnosis.

Large language models (LLMs) are routinely prompted to take on social roles ranging from individuals to institutions, yet it remains unclear whether their internal representations encode the granularity of such roles, from micro-level individual experience to macro-level organizational, institutional, or national reasoning. We show that they do. We define a contrast-based Granularity Axis as the difference between mean macro- and micro-role hidden states. In Qwen3-8B, this axis aligns with the principal axis (PC1) of the role representation space at cosine 0.972 and accounts for 52.6% of its variance, indicating that granularity is the dominant geometric axis organizing prompted social roles. We construct 75 social roles across five granularity levels and collect 91,200 role-conditioned responses over shared questions and prompt variants, then extract role-level hidden states and project them onto the axis. Role projections increase monotonically across all five levels, remain stable across layers, prompt variants, endpoint definitions, held-out splits, and score-filtered subsets, and transfer to Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. The axis is also causally relevant: activation steering along it shifts response granularity in the predicted direction, with Llama moving from 2.00 to 3.17 on a five-point macro scale under positive steering on prompts that admit local responses. The two models differ in controllability, suggesting that steering depends on each model's default operating regime. Overall, our findings suggest that social role granularity is not merely a stylistic surface feature, but a structured, ordered, and causally manipulable latent direction in role-conditioned language model behavior.

Pretrained video diffusion models provide powerful spatiotemporal generative priors, making them a natural foundation for robotic world models. While recent world-action models jointly optimize future videos and actions, they predominantly treat video generation as an auxiliary representation for policy learning. Consequently, they insufficiently explore the inverse problem: leveraging action signals to guide video synthesis, thereby often failing to preserve precise robot spatial geometry and fine-grained robot-object interaction dynamics in the generated rollouts. To bridge this gap, we present EA-WM, an Event-Aware Generative World Model that effectively closes the loop between kinematic control and visual perception. Rather than injecting joint or end-effector actions as abstract, low-dimensional tokens, EA-WM projects actions and kinematic states directly into the target camera view as Structured Kinematic-to-Visual Action Fields. To fully exploit this geometrically grounded representation, we introduce event-aware bidirectional fusion blocks that modulate cross-branch attention, capturing object state changes and interaction dynamics. Evaluated on the comprehensive WorldArena benchmark, EA-WM achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing baselines by a significant margin.

The work in this paper evaluates zero-shot and few-shot large language models (LLMs) for safety-critical clinical action extraction using the CLIP discharge-note dataset, with particular emphasis on transitions of care and post-discharge patient safety. To manage the complexity of clinical documentation, we introduce a two-stage extraction framework that decomposes discharge notes, that are written in narrative form, into fine-grained, explicitly actionable clinical tasks through a staged prompting strategy. Our contributions include a systematic assessment of generative LLMs for clinical action extraction, a detailed comparison between general-purpose LLMs and task-specific supervised BERT-based models, and an analysis of annotation inconsistencies across different action categories. We show that contemporary LLMs achieve performance comparable to or exceeding supervised models on binary actionability detection, while supervised baselines retain a meaningful advantage on fine-grained multi-label category classification, despite the absence of task-specific fine-tuning and under strict data-privacy constraints. Qualitative error analysis reveals that many failures stem from misalignment between model reasoning and dataset annotation conventions, particularly in cases involving implicit clinical actions and rigid structural labeling rules. These results indicate that reported performance reflects model limitations due to lack of clinical reasoning, that is not captured by plain annotations. Labels without rationales make it impossible to distinguish clinical reasoning failures from annotation convention mismatches. Advancing clinical NLP requires reasoning-annotated datasets that document why specific spans are actionable, not merely which spans were labeled, enabling proper evaluation of model clinical understanding.

We study budget-constrained contextual bandits with adversarial contexts, where each action yields a random reward and incurs a random cost. We adopt the standard realizability assumption: conditioned on the observed context, rewards and costs are drawn independently from fixed distributions whose expectations belong to known function classes. We focus on the continuing setting, in which the algorithm operates over the entire horizon even after the budget for cumulative cost is exhausted. In this setting, the objective is to simultaneously control regret and the violation of the budget constraint. Building on the seminal $\mathsf{SquareCB}$ framework of Foster et al. [2018], we propose a simple and modular framework that leverages online regression oracles to reduce the constrained problem to a standard unconstrained contextual bandit problem with adaptively defined surrogate reward functions. In contrast to prior works, which focus on stochastic contexts, our reduction yields improved guarantees for more general adversarial contexts, together with an efficient algorithm with a compact and transparent analysis.

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has recently emerged as an alternative to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), promising higher accuracy and shorter responses through token-level credit assignment from a self-teacher conditioned on privileged context. However, this promise does not carry over to thinking-enabled mathematical reasoning, where reported accuracy gains shrink and sometimes turn negative. We hypothesize that hindsight supervision can specify better token-level alternatives in short thinking-disabled outputs, but in long thinking-enabled traces it more readily identifies redundancy than supplies better replacements. To test this, we applied OPSD separately to correct and incorrect rollout groups, so that compression and correction can be observed in isolation. Our results show that in thinking-enabled mathematical reasoning, OPSD behaves most reliably as a compression mechanism rather than a correction mechanism: training only on correct rollouts preserves accuracy while substantially shortening responses, whereas training only on incorrect rollouts damages accuracy. In light of these findings, we propose a revised post-training pipeline for thinking-enabled mathematical reasoning: SFT then RLVR then OPSD.

Black-box optimization in science and engineering often comes with side information: experts, simulators, pretrained predictors, or heuristics can suggest which candidates look promising. This information can accelerate search, but it can also be biased, input-dependent, or misleading. Feedback-aware BO methods typically handle one task at a time, limiting their ability to generalize over multiple sources of feedback. In-context optimizers address cross-task adaptation, but usually assume that optimization history is the only available signal at test time. We study feedback-informed in-context black-box optimization (FICBO), where a pretrained optimizer conditions on both the observed history and cheap auxiliary feedback for the current candidate set. We introduce a structured feedback prior that models how feedback sources vary in their access, relevance, and distortion relative to the true objective, and use it to pretrain a feedback-aware transformer. At test time, the model estimates source reliability in context by comparing observed objective values with auxiliary signals, improving query selection. On synthetic and real-world tasks, FICBO effectively exploits informative feedback while remaining robust to weak or misleading sources, improving over other baselines. Empirical investigations further illustrate how the model perceives test-time sources, offering insights into its interpretability and decision-making process.

Recent large vision-language models have achieved strong performance on short- and medium-length video understanding, yet they remain inadequate for ultra-long or even infinite video reasoning, where models must preserve coherent memory over extended durations and infer causal dependencies across temporally distant events. Existing end-to-end video understanding methods are fundamentally limited by the $O(n^2)$ complexity of self-attention, while recent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches still suffer from fragmented clip-level memory, weak modeling of temporal and causal structure, and high storage and online inference costs. We present Event-Causal RAG, a lightweight retrieval-augmented framework for infinite long-video reasoning. Instead of indexing fixed-length clips, our method segments streaming videos into semantically coherent events and represents each event as a structured State-Event-State (SES) graph, capturing the event together with its surrounding state transitions. These graphs are merged into a global Event Knowledge Graph and stored in a dual-store memory that supports both semantic matching and causal-topological retrieval. On top of this memory, we design a bidirectional retrieval strategy to efficiently identify the most relevant event causal chains and provide them, together with the associated video evidence, to a backbone video foundation model for answer generation. Experiments on long-video understanding benchmarks demonstrate that Event-Causal RAG consistently outperforms strong clip-based retrieval baselines and long-context video models, particularly on questions requiring multi-event integration and causal inference across long temporal gaps, while also achieving improved memory efficiency and robust streaming performance.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that places trainable low-rank adapters into frozen pre-trained models. Recent studies show that using fewer LoRA adapters may still maintain or even improve performance, but existing methods still distribute adapters broadly, leaving where to place a limited number of adapters to maximize performance largely open. To investigate this, we introduce PAGE (Projected Adapter Gradient Energy), a gradient-based sensitivity probe that estimates the initial trainable gradient energy available to each candidate LoRA adapter. Surprisingly, we find that PAGE is highly concentrated on a single shallow FFN down-projection across two model families and four downstream tasks. We term this module the dominant adaptation module and show that its layer index is architecture-dependent but task-stable. Motivated by this finding, we propose DomLoRA, a placement method that places a single adapter at the dominant adaptation module. With only ~0.7% of vanilla LoRA's trainable parameters, DomLoRA outperforms it on average across various downstream tasks, including instruction following, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and multi-turn conversation. This method also improves other LoRA variants, supporting the dominant adaptation module perspective as a practical placement guideline.

Accurate facial estimation is crucial for realistic digital human animation, and ARKit blendshape coefficients offer an interpretable representation by mapping facial motions to semantic animation controls. However, learning high-quality ARKit coefficient prediction remains limited by the absence of reliable ground-truth supervision. Existing methods typically rely on capture software such as Live Link Face to provide pseudo labels, which may contain noisy activations, biased coefficient magnitudes, and missing or inaccurate facial actions. Consequently, models trained with supervised learning tend to reproduce imperfect pseudo labels rather than optimize for perceptual expression fidelity. In this paper, we propose SuperFace, a preference-driven framework that moves ARKit facial expression estimation from pseudo-label imitation toward human-aligned perceptual optimization. Instead of treating software-estimated coefficients as fixed ground truth, SuperFace uses them only as an initialization and further improves coefficient prediction through human preference feedback on rendered facial expressions. By aligning the model with perceptual judgments rather than numerical pseudo labels, SuperFace enables more visually faithful and expressive facial animation. Experiments show that SuperFace improves expression fidelity over Live Link Face supervision, demonstrating the effectiveness of preference-driven optimization for semantic facial action prediction.

Building a deep research agent today is an exercise in glue code: the same backbone evaluated on the same benchmark can report different accuracies in different papers because harness and tool registry all differ, and integrating a new foundation model into a comparable evaluation surface costs weeks of model-specific engineering. We call this the per-paper engineering tax and release BioMedArena, an open-source toolkit that not only alleviates it but also provides an arena for fair comparison of different foundation models when evaluating them as deep-research agents. BioMedArena decouples six layers of biomedical agent evaluation -- benchmark loading, tool exposure, tool selection, execution mode, context management, and scoring -- and exposes 147 biomedical benchmarks and 75 biomedical tools across 9 functional families. Adding a new model, benchmark, or tool reduces to registering a few-line provider adapter. We further provide 6 agent harnesses with 6 context-management strategies, which provide 12 backbones with competitive research capabilities and significantly improved performance, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on 8 representative biomedical benchmarks, with an average lift of +15.03 percentage points over prior SOTA. The toolkit, configurations, and per-task traces are available at https://github.com/AI-in-Health/BioMedArena

Existing text-to-image (T2I) benchmarks largely rely on fixed prompt sets, leaving them vulnerable to overfitting and benchmark contamination once publicly released and repeatedly reused. In this work, we propose DynT2I-Eval, a fully automated dynamic evaluation framework for T2I models. It constructs a structured visual semantic space from long-form descriptions, decomposing prompts into controllable dimensions (e.g., subject, logical constraint, environment, and composition). This enables the continuous generation of fresh prompts via task-specific spaces and difficulty-aware sampling. DynT2I-Eval evaluates model performance across text alignment, perceptual quality, and aesthetics. Heterogeneous outputs are unified into prompt-conditioned pairwise comparisons, allowing a dynamic scheduler, micro-batch aggregation, and weighted Bayesian updates to maintain a stable online leaderboard despite changing prompt distributions and model injection. Experiments with independently sampled prompt streams demonstrate that continually refreshed prompts provide a robust evaluation protocol, reducing the impact of prompt-set-specific tuning. Simulations and ablations further confirm that the proposed ranking framework achieves a strong balance among cold-start convergence, late-entry discovery, and long-run ranking fidelity.

In Large Language Model (LLM) fine-tuning, parameter and data selection are common strategies for reducing fine-tuning cost, yet they are typically driven by separate scoring mechanisms. When a parameter mask and data subset jointly determine restricted fine-tuning, this separation incurs redundant overhead and makes coordinated selection difficult. We cast parameter and data selection as two bilevel selection problems under a common validation objective and derive a shared local response-surrogate scoring rule. Under first- and second-order validation-improvement approximations, parameter importance and data utility emerge as column-wise and row-wise aggregations of a single gradient interaction matrix, yielding a closed-form row-column correspondence for co-extracting both signals. Building on this structure, we propose DualSFT (Dual-Selection Fine-Tuning), a one-shot dual-scoring algorithm that produces a parameter mask and data subset from shared gradient statistics. On 3B-9B LLMs, single-axis DualSFT variants strengthen target-task performance and stability-plasticity trade-offs within their comparison groups, while full DualSFT yields a more favorable joint-constrained trade-off than sequential hybrid baselines under matched budgets.

As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contributes to inference latency and operational cost. Recent studies suggest that many real-world tasks require little to no explicit reasoning, with additional reasoning sometimes even degrading performance. In this work, we propose \textbf{Post-Reasoning}, a simple yet effective approach that improves instruction-tuned models by conditioning them to justify their answers after generating the final response. By design, it enables the final answer to be obtained without additional latency or token cost, while still improving performance through simple instruction augmentation. We evaluate Post-Reasoning across \(117\) model--benchmark settings spanning \(13\) open and proprietary models, \(4\) model families, and \(9\) diverse reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks, including AMC, HMMT, GSM8K, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and BIG-Bench Hard. Post-Reasoning improves performance in over \(88.19\%\) of evaluated settings, achieving a mean relative improvements of \(17.37\%\). Furthermore, we propose supervised post-reason tuning, which further improves performance in over \(91.11\%\) of evaluated settings, and exceeds the prompt-based post-reasoning baseline by an average of \(8.01\%\), demonstrating that post-reasoning can be effectively internalized through training. Ultimately, Post-Reasoning establishes a new performance ceiling for direct-answer capabilities.

LLM-as-a-Judge pipelines have become the de facto evaluator for agent safety, yet existing benchmarks treat their verdicts as ground-truth proxies without checking whether the verdicts depend on the agent's behavior or merely on how the evaluation policy happens to be worded. We argue that any trustworthy safety judge must satisfy a basic property we call policy invariance, and we operationalize it as three testable principles: rubric-semantics invariance under certified-equivalent rewrites, rubric-threshold invariance under intentional strict-to-lenient shifts, and ambiguity-aware calibration so that verdict instability concentrates on genuinely ambiguous cases. Instantiating these principles as a stress-test protocol with four agent-class judges on trajectories drawn from ASSEBench and R-Judge, we surface a previously unmeasured failure mode: today's judges respond to meaningful normative shifts and to meaningless structural rewrites with comparable strength, and cannot tell the two apart. Content-preserving policy rewrites flip up to 9.1% of verdicts above baseline jitter, and 18-43% of all observed flips occur on unambiguous cases under such rewrites, so existing safety scores conflate what the agent did with how the evaluator was prompted. Beyond the diagnosis, we contribute the Policy Invariance Score and the Judge Card reporting protocol, which expose an order-of-magnitude spread in judge reliability that is invisible to accuracy-only leaderboards. We release the protocol and code so that future agent-safety benchmarks can audit their own evaluators rather than trust them by default.

Continual learning (CL) is essential for deploying medical image segmentation models in clinical environments where imaging domains, anatomical targets, and diagnostic tasks evolve over time. However, continual segmentation still faces three main challenges. First, the scenarios for this task remain insufficiently standardized for real-world clinical settings. Second, existing research has been primarily focused on mitigating forgetting, overlooking the other essential properties such as plasticity. Third, a benchmark work with comprehensive evaluation on existing methods is stll desirable. To address these gaps, we present such benchmark study of continual medical image segmentation. We first define three clinically motivated scenarios, namely Domain-CL, Class-CL, and Organ-CL, to respectively capture the cross-center domain shift, the incremental anatomical structure segmentation, and the cross-organ segmentation. We then introduce an evaluation framework that measures not only general performance and forgetting, but also plasticity, forward generalizability, parameter efficiency, and replay burden. The results, from extensive experiments with representative CL methods, showed that it was still challenging to develop a model that could satisfy all the requirements simultaneously. Nevertheless, these studies also suggested that the replay-based methods achieve the best overall balance between stability and plasticity, the parameter-isolation methods should be effective at reducing forgetting, though at the cost of increased model size, and the forward generalizability remain a significantly understudied aspect of this research field. Finally, we discuss related learning paradigms and outline future directions for continual medical image segmentation.