Contemporary cybersecurity governance assumes that professionals apply risk reasoning. Yet major organisational failures persist despite investment in tools, staffing, and credentials. This study investigates the structural source of that paradox. Cybersecurity speaks the language of risk, but its training architecture has shaped the profession to think in terms of threats. A sequential mixed-methods design integrated four analyses; NLP of the NIST NICE Framework v2.0.0 (2,111 TKS statements), SEM (n = 126 cybersecurity professionals), a control-group comparison (n = 133 general professionals), and thematic coding of seven leadership interviews. Four convergent findings emerged. First, "likelihood" and "probability" appear zero times across all TKS statements. Risk management content accounts for 4.5% of high-confidence semantic classifications, ranking 18th of 29 competency domains. NICE codifies threat-management activity while invoking risk mainly at the category level. Second, SEM showed that training exposure significantly predicts risk management competence directly and indirectly through conceptual salience, for a total effect of Beta = .629. However, the theoretically four-dimensional competence construct collapsed into a single factor, indicating epistemic compression. Third, cybersecurity professionals showed no measurable advantage over the general professional population in foundational risk reasoning; only 11.9% showed high differentiation. Fourth, all seven leaders expected Likelihood x Impact reasoning, yet five did not articulate the formula themselves. These findings support a structural conclusion: cybersecurity has taken professional form as a threat-management discipline that has borrowed risk vocabulary. Remediation requires redesign of professional formation, not marginal curriculum reform.

We investigate the optimal execution of contracts that are used in merger\&acquisition deals. We consider cash-settled and physically delivered contracts between a broker and a counterpart. Contracts are linear (total returns swaps), nonlinear (collar contracts) or Asian type (TWAP based contracts). We derive the optimal execution strategy and the optimal fee through indifference utility arguments allowing for linear market effects of trades. We show that linear cash-settled contracts are more expensive and more exposed to manipulation/statistical arbitrages by the broker. Also nonlinear and Asian type contracts are exposed to these phenomena.

Biodiversity loss is accelerating at an unprecedented pace, threatening ecosystem stability, economic resilience, and human well-being, with billions required to reverse current trends. Against this backdrop, biodiversity finance has emerged as a rapidly expanding but highly fragmented field spanning ecology, economics, finance, accounting, and policy. However, it remains emerging and complex, with the majority of relevant knowledge being produced in non-finance journals. This study employs quantitative bibliometric analysis to examine a corpus of 189,456 references underlying 3,998 articles related to biodiversity and finance. The analysis identifies eight primary research streams within the field that concern (1) strategic and financial approaches in global biodiversity conservation, (2) the impact and implementation of payments for environmental services (PES) in developing countries, (3) neoliberal influences and implications in environmental conservation, (4) biodiversity offsets and conservation, (5) ecosystem services and biodiversity, (6) integrating conservation and community interests in biodiversity management, (7) balancing agricultural intensification with biodiversity conservation, and (8) global and corporate biodiversity reporting. The characteristics of each research stream and its prevalent publications are outlined, alongside an analysis of their temporal evolution and the degree of information exchange among the research streams. The findings provide a structured map of the intellectual architecture of biodiversity finance, document pronounced silos between economically-oriented and critical/political-economy research streams, and translate these patterns into a focused research agenda and implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and corporate actors.

Frozen large language model (LLM) checkpoints extract information from pre-cutoff public text that is associated with future fundamentals and equity returns beyond standard contemporaneous valuation measures. Because each frozen checkpoint has a fixed knowledge cutoff, it can be interpreted as a compressed representation of publicly available textual information at a given point in time. We treat twelve OpenAI snapshots spanning 2021-2025 as time-stamped summaries of the public textual record and extract a sector-neutral LLM outlook score for roughly 7,000 U.S. equities per cross-section. The outlook score is positively associated with analyst revisions, target-price changes and one-month cross-sectional returns in both Fama-MacBeth regressions and pooled panels with model fixed effects (t = 6.02), after direct controls for market-implied valuation and standard factors. Predictability broadly increases with the return horizon, despite a non-monotonic intermediate dip, and, in the pooled panel, is stronger for firms with high analyst coverage, consistent with the view that the bottleneck is not investor inattention but the cost of aggregating dispersed qualitative information across many documents.

This paper studies cost pass-through in differentiated-product oligopoly. I derive a general representation of the pass-through matrix that decomposes equilibrium price responses into the roles of demand curvature, substitution, and multiproduct ownership. This extends the classic insight in single-product monopoly to multiproduct settings in which diversion and ownership also matter. I then develop a tractable first-order approximation that yields a sufficient-statistics characterization for empirically relevant demand systems. Finally, I characterize the small-share limit and show how common demand specifications impose tail restrictions that shape pass-through. The results provide a practical framework for applied work on tax incidence, merger analysis, and related questions in imperfect competition.

Do large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic ideological bias when reasoning about economic causal effects? As LLMs are increasingly used in policy analysis and economic reporting, where directionally correct causal judgments are essential, this question has direct practical stakes. We present a systematic evaluation by extending the EconCausal benchmark with ideology-contested cases - instances where intervention-oriented (pro-government) and market-oriented (pro-market) perspectives predict divergent causal signs. From 10,490 causal triplets (treatment-outcome pairs with empirically verified effect directions) derived from top-tier economics and finance journals, we identify 1,056 ideology-contested instances and evaluate 20 state-of-the-art LLMs on their ability to predict empirically supported causal directions. We find that ideology-contested items are consistently harder than non-contested ones, and that across 18 of 20 models, accuracy is systematically higher when the empirically verified causal sign aligns with intervention-oriented expectations than with market-oriented ones. Moreover, when models err, their incorrect predictions disproportionately lean intervention-oriented, and this directional skew is not eliminated by one-shot in-context prompting. These results highlight that LLMs are not only less accurate on ideologically contested economic questions, but systematically less reliable in one ideological direction than the other, underscoring the need for direction-aware evaluation in high-stakes economic and policy settings.

Market instability has been extensively studied using mathematical approaches to characterize complex trading dynamics and detect structural change points. This study explores the potential for early warning of market instability by applying the Dynamical Network Marker (DNM) theory to order placement and execution data from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. DNM theory identifies indicators associated with critical slowing down -- a precursor to critical transitions -- in high-dimensional systems of many interacting elements. In this study, market participants are identified using virtual server IDs from the trading system, and multivariate time series representing their trading activities are constructed. This framework treats each participant as an interacting element, thereby enabling the application of DNM theory to the resulting time series. The results suggest that early warning signals of large price movements can be detected on a daily time scale. These findings highlight the potential to develop practical DNM-based early-warning systems for large price movements by further refining forecasting horizons and integrating multiple time series capturing different aspects of trading behavior.

Governments are increasingly interested in using AI to make administrative decisions cheaper, more scalable, and more consistent. But for probabilistic AI to be incorporated into public administration it must be embedded in a compliance layer that makes decisions reviewable, repeatable, and legally defensible. That layer can improve oversight by making departures from law easier to detect. But it can also create a stable approval boundary that political successors learn to navigate while preserving the appearance of lawful administration. We develop a formal model in which institutions choose the scale of automation, the degree of codification, and safeguards on iterative use. The model shows when these systems become vulnerable to strategic use from within government, why reforms that initially improve oversight can later increase that vulnerability, and why expansions in AI use may be difficult to unwind. Making AI usable can thus make procedures easier for future governments to learn and exploit.

Limit order books can transition rapidly from stable to stressed conditions, yet standard early-warning signals such as order flow imbalance and short-term volatility are inherently reactive. We formalise this limitation via a three-regime causal data-generating process (stable $\to$ latent build-up $\to$ stress) in which a latent deterioration phase creates a prediction window prior to observable stress. Under mild assumptions on temporal drift and regime persistence, we establish identifiability of the latent build-up regime and derive guarantees for strictly positive expected lead-time and non-trivial probability of early detection. We propose a trigger-based detector combining MAX aggregation of complementary signal channels, a rising-edge condition, and adaptive thresholding. Across 200 simulations, the method achieves mean lead-time $+18.6 \pm 3.2$ timesteps with perfect precision and moderate coverage, outperforming classical change-point and microstructure baselines. A preliminary application to one week of BTC/USDT order book data shows consistent positive lead-times while baselines remain reactive. Results degrade in low signal-to-noise and short build-up regimes, consistent with theory.

A credit rating of AAA asserts near-certainty of repayment. This paper asks whether the pre-crisis information environment could have supported that assertion for structured products. Bayes' theorem implies that any reliability target requires a minimum level of statistical discrimination between instruments that will repay and those that will not. At structured-finance base rates, a four-nines reliability target demands discrimination on the order of 10,000 to 1. A three-nines target demands 1,000 to 1. Nothing in the published credit-prediction literature provides an affirmative basis for believing that discrimination of this magnitude was achievable with the data available at rating time. Retrospectively, the realized system fell short of the four-nines benchmark by roughly 90,000-fold. The framework accommodates the historical feasibility of corporate AAA ratings, where high base rates and rich information produce low required discrimination. Illustrative calibrations for contemporary collateralized loan obligations suggest that material tension between the precision target and the information environment persists. The central implication is that the AAA precision claim itself likely exceeded what the available information could support.

Accurate forecasting of recovery rates (RR) is central to credit risk management and regulatory capital determination. In many loan portfolios, however, RR modeling is constrained by data scarcity arising from infrequent default events. Transfer learning (TL) offers a promising avenue to mitigate this challenge by exploiting information from related but richer source domains, yet its effectiveness critically depends on the presence and strength of distributional shifts, and on potential heterogeneity between source and target feature spaces. This paper introduces FT-MDN-Transformer, a mixture-density tabular Transformer architecture specifically designed for TL in RR forecasting across heterogeneous feature sets. The model produces both loan-level point estimates and portfolio-level predictive distributions, thereby supporting a wide range of practical RR forecasting applications. We evaluate the proposed approach in a controlled Monte Carlo simulation that facilitates systematic variation of covariate, conditional, and label shifts, as well as in a real-world transfer setting using the Global Credit Data (GCD) loan dataset as source and a novel bonds dataset as target. Our results show that FT-MDN-Transformer outperforms baseline models when target-domain data are limited, with particularly pronounced gains under covariate and conditional shifts, while label shift remains challenging. We also observe its probabilistic forecasts to closely track empirical recovery distributions, providing richer information than conventional point-prediction metrics alone. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of distribution-aware TL architectures to improve RR forecasting in data-scarce credit portfolios and offer practical insights for risk managers operating under heterogeneous data environments.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to a wide range of predictions about its long-term impact on humanity. A central focus is the potential emergence of transformative AI (TAI), eventually capable of outperforming humans in all economically valuable tasks and fully automating labor. Discussed scenarios range from unprecedented economic growth and abundance ("post-scarcity" or "cornucopia") to human extinction after a misaligned TAI takes over ("AI doom"). However, the probabilities and implications of these scenarios remain highly uncertain. We contribute by organizing the various scenarios and evaluating their associated existential risks and economic outcomes in terms of aggregate welfare. Our results imply that even low-probability catastrophic outcomes justify substantial investments in AI safety and alignment research. This result highlights that current global efforts in AI safety and alignment research are insufficient relative to the scale and urgency of the risks posed by TAI.