Current studies of bias in NLP rely mainly on identifying (unwanted or negative) bias towards a specific demographic group. While this has led to progress recognizing and mitigating negative bias, and having a clear notion of the targeted group is necessary, it is not always practical. In this work we extrapolate to a broader notion of bias, rooted in social science and psychology literature. We move towards predicting interpersonal group relationship (IGR) - modeling the relationship between the speaker and the target in an utterance - using fine-grained interpersonal emotions as an anchor. We build and release a dataset of English tweets by US Congress members annotated for interpersonal emotion -- the first of its kind, and 'found supervision' for IGR labels; our analyses show that subtle emotional signals are indicative of different biases. While humans can perform better than chance at identifying IGR given an utterance, we show that neural models perform much better; furthermore, a shared encoding between IGR and interpersonal perceived emotion enabled performance gains in both tasks. Data and code for this paper are available at https://github.com/venkatasg/interpersonal-bias

Humans use language to accomplish a wide variety of tasks - asking for and giving advice being one of them. In online advice forums, advice is mixed in with non-advice, like emotional support, and is sometimes stated explicitly, sometimes implicitly. Understanding the language of advice would equip systems with a better grasp of language pragmatics; practically, the ability to identify advice would drastically increase the efficiency of advice-seeking online, as well as advice-giving in natural language generation systems. We present a dataset in English from two Reddit advice forums - r/AskParents and r/needadvice - annotated for whether sentences in posts contain advice or not. Our analysis reveals rich linguistic phenomena in advice discourse. We present preliminary models showing that while pre-trained language models are able to capture advice better than rule-based systems, advice identification is challenging, and we identify directions for future research. Comments: To be presented at EMNLP 2020.

We present a novel semantic framework for modeling linguistic expressions of generalization---generic, habitual, and episodic statements---as combinations of simple, real-valued referential properties of predicates and their arguments. We use this framework to construct a dataset covering the entirety of the Universal Dependencies English Web Treebank. We use this dataset to probe the efficacy of type-level and token-level information---including hand-engineered features and static (GloVe) and contextual (ELMo) word embeddings---for predicting expressions of generalization. Data and code are available at decomp.io.

Large language models have advanced rapidly, from pattern recognition to emerging forms of reasoning, yet they remain confined to linguistic simulation rather than grounded understanding. They can produce fluent outputs that resemble reflection, but lack temporal continuity, causal feedback, and anchoring in real-world interaction. This paper proposes a complementary approach in which reasoning is treated as a relational process distributed between human and model rather than an internal capability of either. Building on recent work on "System-2" learning, we relocate reflective reasoning to the interaction layer. Instead of engineering reasoning solely within models, we frame it as a cognitive protocol that can be structured, measured, and governed using existing systems. This perspective emphasizes collaborative intelligence, combining human judgment and contextual understanding with machine speed, memory, and associative capacity. We introduce "The Architect's Pen" as a practical method. Like an architect who thinks through drawing, the human uses the model as an external medium for structured reflection. By embedding phases of articulation, critique, and revision into human-AI interaction, the dialogue itself becomes a reasoning loop: human abstraction -> model articulation -> human reflection. This reframes the question from whether the model can think to whether the human-AI system can reason. The framework enables auditable reasoning traces and supports alignment with emerging governance standards, including the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001. It provides a practical path toward more transparent, controllable, and accountable AI use without requiring new model architectures.

We present an initial investigation into Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for Ukrainian, conducted within the UNLP 2026 Shared Task on Multi-Domain Document Understanding. Our system combines two-stage retrieval (BGE-M3 with BGE reranking) with a lightweight agentic layer performing query rephrasing and answer-retry loops on top of Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct. Our analysis reveals that retrieval quality is the primary bottleneck: agentic retry mechanisms improve answer accuracy but the overall score remains constrained by document and page identification. We discuss practical limitations of offline agentic pipelines and outline directions for combining stronger retrieval with more advanced agentic reasoning for Ukrainian.

We propose a new perspective on policy optimization: rather than reweighting all samples by their importance ratios, an optimizer should select which samples are trustworthy enough to drive a policy update. Building on this view, we introduce Rejection-Gated Policy Optimization (RGPO), which replaces the importance sampling ratio r_theta = pi_theta / pi_old with a smooth, differentiable acceptance gate alpha_theta(s, a) = g(r_theta(s, a)) in the range [0, 1]. Unlike prior work that applies rejection sampling as a data-level heuristic before training, RGPO elevates rejection to an optimization principle: the gate participates directly in gradient computation and is implicitly updated alongside the policy. RGPO provides a unified framework: the policy gradients of TRPO, PPO, and REINFORCE all correspond to specific choices of the effective gradient weight w(r) = g'(r) * r. We prove that RGPO guarantees finite, bounded gradient variance even when importance sampling ratios are heavy-tailed (where IS variance diverges). We further show that RGPO incurs only a bounded, controllable bias and provides an approximate monotonic policy improvement guarantee analogous to TRPO. RGPO matches PPO in computational cost, requires no second-order optimization, and extends naturally to RLHF-style preference alignment. In online preference fine-tuning of Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct on Anthropic HH-RLHF (n = 3 seeds), RGPO uses a dual-ratio gate that anchors learning to both the previous policy and the reference model, achieving a Pareto-dominant outcome: the highest reward among online RL methods (+14.8% vs. PPO-RLHF) and the lowest KL divergence to the reference model (-16.0% vs. PPO-RLHF, -53.1% vs. GRPO).

In data-sensitive domains such as healthcare, cross-silo federated learning (CFL) allows organizations to collaboratively train AI models without sharing raw data. However, practical CFL deployments are inherently coopetitive, in which organizations cooperate during model training while competing in downstream markets. In such settings, training contributions, including data volume, quality, and diversity, can improve the global model yet inadvertently strengthen rivals. This dilemma is amplified by non-IID data, which leads to asymmetric learning gains and undermines sustained participation. While existing competition-aware CFL and incentive-design approaches reward organizations based on marginal training contributions, they fail to account for the costs of strengthening competitors. In this paper, we introduce CoCoGen+, a coopetition-compatible data generation and incentivization framework that jointly models non-IID data and inter-organizational competition while endogenizing GenAI-based synthetic data generation as a strategic decision. Specifically, CoCoGen+ formulates each training round as a weighted potential game, where organizations strategically decide how much synthetic data to generate by balancing learning performance gains against computational costs and competition-caused utility losses. We then provide a tractable equilibrium characterization and derive implementable generation strategies to maximize social welfare. To promote long-term collaboration, we integrate a payoff redistribution-based incentive mechanism to compensate organizations for their contributions and competition-caused utility degradation. Experiments on varying learning tasks validate the feasibility of CoCoGen+. The results show how non-IID data, competition intensity, and incentives shape organizational strategies and social welfare, while CoCoGen+ outperforms baselines in efficiency.

Autoregressive decoding in Large Language Models (LLMs) generates one token per step, causing high inference latency. Speculative decoding (SD) mitigates this through a guess-and-verify strategy, but existing training-free variants face trade-offs: retrieval-based drafts break when no exact match exists, while logits-based drafts lack structural guidance. We propose $\textbf{RACER}$ ($\textbf{R}$etrieval-$\textbf{A}$ugmented $\textbf{C}$ont$\textbf{e}$xtual $\textbf{R}$apid Speculative Decoding), a lightweight and training-free method that integrates retrieved exact patterns with logit-driven future cues. This unification supplies both reliable anchors and flexible extrapolation, yielding richer speculative drafts. Experiments on Spec-Bench, HumanEval, and MGSM-ZH demonstrate that RACER consistently accelerates inference, achieving more than $2\times$ speedup over autoregressive decoding, and outperforms prior training-free methods, offering a scalable, plug-and-play solution for efficient LLM decoding. Our source code is available at $\href{https://github.com/hkr04/RACER}{https://github.com/hkr04/RACER}$.

Small object detection remains a significant challenge due to feature degradation from downsampling, mutual occlusion in dense clusters, and complex background interference. To address these issues, this paper proposes FSDETR, a frequency-spatial feature enhancement framework built upon the RT-DETR baseline. By establishing a collaborative modeling mechanism, the method effectively leverages complementary structural information. Specifically, a Spatial Hierarchical Attention Block (SHAB) captures both local details and global dependencies to strengthen semantic representation. Furthermore, to mitigate occlusion in dense scenes, the Deformable Attention-based Intra-scale Feature Interaction (DA-AIFI) focuses on informative regions via dynamic sampling. Finally, the Frequency-Spatial Feature Pyramid Network (FSFPN) integrates frequency filtering with spatial edge extraction via the Cross-domain Frequency-Spatial Block (CFSB) to preserve fine-grained details. Experimental results show that with only 14.7M parameters, FSDETR achieves 13.9% APS on VisDrone 2019 and 48.95% AP50 tiny on TinyPerson, showing strong performance on small-object benchmarks. The code and models are available at https://github.com/YT3DVision/FSDETR.

Recent advances in Deep Learning (DL) have strengthened data-driven System Identification (SysID), with Neural and Fuzzy Ordinary Differential Equation (NODE/FODE) models achieving high accuracy in nonlinear dynamic modeling. Yet, system states in these frameworks are often reconstructed without clear physical meaning, and input contributions to the state derivatives remain difficult to interpret. To address these limitations, we propose Explainable FODE (xFODE), an interpretable SysID framework with integrated DL-based training. In xFODE, we define states in an incremental form to provide them with physical meanings. We employ fuzzy additive models to approximate the state derivative, thereby enhancing interpretability per input. To provide further interpretability, Partitioning Strategies (PSs) are developed, enabling the training of fuzzy additive models with explainability. By structuring the antecedent space during training so that only two consecutive rules are activated for any given input, PSs not only yield lower complexity for local inference but also enhance the interpretability of the antecedent space. To train xFODE, we present a DL framework with parameterized membership function learning that supports end-to-end optimization. Across benchmark SysID datasets, xFODE matches the accuracy of NODE, FODE, and NLARX models while providing interpretable insights.

Rapid urbanization and continuous population growth have made municipal solid waste management increasingly challenging. These challenges highlight the need for smarter and automated waste management solutions. This paper presents the design and evaluation of an integrated waste management framework that combines two connected systems, a robotic waste segregation module and an optimized bio-digestor. The robotic waste segregation system uses a MyCobot 280 Jetson Nano robotic arm along with YOLOv8 object detection and robot operating system (ROS)-based path planning to identify and sort waste in real time. It classifies waste into four different categories with high precision, reducing the need for manual intervention. After segregation, the biodegradable waste is transferred to a bio-digestor system equipped with multiple sensors. These sensors continuously monitor key parameters, including temperature, pH, pressure, and motor revolutions per minute. The Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm, combined with a regression model, is used to dynamically adjust system parameters. This intelligent optimization approach ensures stable operation and maximizes digestion efficiency under varying environmental conditions. System testing under dynamic conditions demonstrates a sorting accuracy of 98% along with highly efficient biological conversion. The proposed framework offers a scalable, intelligent, and practical solution for modern waste management, making it suitable for both residential and industrial applications.

Large language models are increasingly integrated into decision-making in areas such as healthcare, law, finance, engineering, and government. Yet they share a critical limitation: they produce fluent outputs even when their internal reasoning has drifted. A confident answer can conceal uncertainty, speculation, or inconsistency, and small changes in phrasing can lead to different conclusions. This makes LLMs useful assistants but unreliable partners in high-stakes contexts. Humans exhibit a similar weakness, often mistaking fluency for reliability. When a model responds smoothly, users tend to trust it, even when both model and user are drifting together. This paper is the first in a five-paper research series on stabilising human-AI reasoning. The series proposes a two-layer approach: Parts II-IV introduce human-side mechanisms such as uncertainty cues, conflict surfacing, and auditable reasoning traces, while Part V develops a model-side Epistemic Control Loop (ECL) that detects instability and modulates generation accordingly. Together, these layers form a missing operational substrate for governance by increasing signal-to-noise at the point of use. Stabilising interaction makes uncertainty and drift visible before enforcement is applied, enabling more precise capability governance. This aligns with emerging compliance expectations, including the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001, by making reasoning processes traceable under real conditions of use. The central claim is that fluency is not reliability. Without structures that stabilise both human and model reasoning, AI cannot be trusted or governed where it matters most.

Recent advances in Deep Learning (DL) have boosted data-driven System Identification (SysID), but reliable use requires Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) alongside accurate predictions. Although UQ-capable models such as Fuzzy ODE (FODE) can produce Prediction Intervals (PIs), they offer limited interpretability. We introduce Explainable Type-2 Fuzzy Additive ODEs for UQ (xFODE+), an interpretable SysID model which produces PIs alongside point predictions while retaining physically meaningful incremental states. xFODE+ implements each fuzzy additive model with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems (IT2-FLSs) and constraints membership functions to the activation of two neighboring rules, limiting overlap and keeping inference locally transparent. The type-reduced sets produced by the IT2-FLSs are aggregated to construct the state update together with the PIs. The model is trained in a DL framework via a composite loss that jointly optimizes prediction accuracy and PI quality. Results on benchmark SysID datasets show that xFODE+ matches FODE in PI quality and achieves comparable accuracy, while providing interpretability.

Nonlinear system identification must balance physical interpretability with model flexibility. Classical methods yield structured, control-relevant models but rely on rigid parametric forms that often miss complex nonlinearities, whereas Neural ODEs are expressive yet largely black-box. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) sit between these extremes, but inverse PINNs typically assume a known governing equation with fixed coefficients, leading to identifiability failures when the true dynamics are unknown or state-dependent. We propose \textbf{SOLIS}, which models unknown dynamics via a \emph{state-conditioned second-order surrogate model} and recasts identification as learning a Quasi-Linear Parameter-Varying (Quasi-LPV) representation, recovering interpretable natural frequency, damping, and gain without presupposing a global equation. SOLIS decouples trajectory reconstruction from parameter estimation and stabilizes training with a cyclic curriculum and \textbf{Local Physics Hints} windowed ridge-regression anchors that mitigate optimization collapse. Experiments on benchmarks show accurate parameter-manifold recovery and coherent physical rollouts from sparse data, including regimes where standard inverse methods fail.

Does reinforcement learning genuinely expand what LLM agents can do, or merely make them more reliable? For static reasoning, recent work answers the second: base and RL pass@k curves converge at large k. We ask whether this holds for agentic tool use, where T rounds of interaction enable compositional strategies that re-sampling cannot recover. We introduce PASS@(k,T), a two-dimensional metric that jointly varies sampling budget k and interaction depth T, separating capability expansion from efficiency improvement. Our main finding is that, contrary to the static-reasoning result, tool-use RL genuinely enlarges the capability boundary: the RL agent's pass-curve pulls above the base model's and the gap widens at large k rather than converging. The expansion is specific to compositional, sequential information gathering; on simpler tasks RL behaves as prior work predicts. Under matched training data, supervised fine-tuning regresses the boundary on the same compositional tasks, isolating self-directed exploration as the causal factor. Mechanism analysis shows RL reweights the base strategy distribution toward the subset whose downstream reasoning more often yields a correct answer, with the improvement concentrated on how the agent integrates retrieved information. These results reconcile optimistic and pessimistic readings of RL for LLMs: both are correct, on different task types.

Most state-of-the-art vein recognition methods rely on closed-set classification, which inherently limits their scalability and prevents the adaptive enrollment of new users without complete model retraining. We rigorously evaluate the computational boundaries of Deep Metric Learning (DML) under strict open-set constraints. Unlike standard closed-set approaches, we analyze the impact of data scarcity and domain shift on recognition performance. Our approach learns discriminative L2-normalised embeddings and employs prototype-based matching with a calibrated similarity threshold to effectively distinguish between enrolled users and unseen impostors. We evaluate the framework under a strict subject-disjoint protocol across four diverse datasets covering finger, wrist, and dorsal hand veins (MMCBNU 6000, UTFVP, FYO, and a dorsal hand-vein dataset). On the large-scale MMCBNU 6000 benchmark, our best model (ResNet50-CBAM) achieves an OSCR of 0.9945, AUROC of 0.9974, and EER of 1.57%, maintaining high identification accuracy (99.6% Rank-1) while robustly rejecting unknown subjects. Cross-dataset experiments evaluate the framework's generalisation across different acquisition setups, confirming that while the model handles large-scale data robustly, performance remains sensitive to domain shifts in low-data regimes. Ablation studies demonstrate that triplet-based objectives combined with a simple 1-NN classifier offer an optimal trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, enabling real-time deployment on commodity hardware.

Local loss-landscape stabilization under sample growth is typically measured either pointwise or through isotropic averaging in the full parameter space. Despite practical value, both choices probe directions that contribute little to the dominant local deformation of strongly anisotropic neural landscapes. We recast stabilization as an observational problem and introduce a unified family of criteria parameterized by an aggregation order and a probing distribution; within this family we propose a curvature-aligned criterion $Δ_2^{(D)}$ that probes the loss increment field in the top-$D$ eigenspace of the empirical Hessian near a trained solution. Solely from a local quadratic model, we prove that $Δ_2^{(D)}$ preserves the $O(k^{-2})$ mean-squared rate of the full-space criterion while replacing ambient-dimension curvature dependence with dependence on the subspace dimension $D$; a corollary gives a closed-form spectral expression and a proposition identifies the top-$D$ eigenspace as extremal within the eigenspace-aligned family. We also derive scalable estimators based on Hessian-vector products, subspace Monte Carlo, and a closed-form Gaussian-moment proxy. On a decoder-only transformer, a curvature-aligned probe occupying a tiny fraction of parameter space already reproduces the full-space mean-squared signal to within numerical noise throughout the validated local regime, and the closed-form estimator is orders of magnitude faster than direct Monte Carlo after subspace construction.

4D millimeter-wave (mmWave) radars are increasingly used in robotics, as they offer robustness against adverse environmental conditions. Besides the usual XYZ position, they provide Doppler velocity measurements as well as Radar Cross Section (RCS) information for every point. While Doppler is widely used to filter out dynamic points, RCS is often overlooked and not usually used in modeling and scan matching processes. Building on previous 3D Gaussian modeling and scan matching work, we propose incorporating the physical behavior of RCS in the model, in order to further enrich the summarized information about the scene, and improve the scan matching process.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis, yet their application in intraoral photography remains largely underexplored due to the lack of fine-grained, annotated datasets and comprehensive benchmarks. To address this, we present MetaDent, a comprehensive resource that includes (1) a novel and large-scale dentistry image dataset collected from clinical, public, and web sources; (2) a semi-structured annotation framework designed to capture the hierarchical and clinically nuanced nature of dental photography; and (3) comprehensive benchmark suites for evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs on clinical image understanding. Our labeling approach combines a high-level image summary with point-by-point, free-text descriptions of abnormalities. This method enables rich, scalable, and task-agnostic representations. We curated 60,669 dental images from diverse sources and annotated a representative subset of 2,588 images using this meta-labeling scheme. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs), we derive standardized benchmarks: approximately 15K Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs and an 18-class multi-label classification dataset, which we validated with human review and error analysis to justify that the LLM-driven transition reliably preserves fidelity and semantic accuracy. We then evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs across VQA, classification, and image captioning tasks. Quantitative results reveal that even the most advanced models struggle with a fine-grained understanding of intraoral scenes, achieving moderate accuracy and producing inconsistent or incomplete descriptions in image captioning. We publicly release our dataset, annotations, and tools to foster reproducible research and accelerate the development of vision-language systems for dental applications.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly exposed to adaptive jailbreaking, particularly in high-stakes Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) domains. Although streaming probes enable real-time monitoring, they still make systematic errors. We identify a core issue: existing methods often rely on a few high-scoring tokens, leading to false alarms when sensitive CBRN terms appear in benign contexts. To address this, we introduce a streaming probing objective that requires multiple evidence tokens to consistently support a prediction, rather than relying on isolated spikes. This encourages more robust detection based on aggregated signals instead of single-token cues. At a fixed 1% false-positive rate, our method improves the true-positive rate by 35.55% relative to strong streaming baselines. We further observe substantial gains in AUROC, even when starting from near-saturated baseline performance (AUROC = 97.40%). We also show that probing Attention or MLP activations consistently outperforms residual-stream features. Finally, even when adversarial fine-tuning enables novel character-level ciphers, harmful intent remains detectable: probes developed for the base LLMs can be applied ``plug-and-play'' to these obfuscated attacks, achieving an AUROC of over 98.85%.

Automotive 4D imaging radar is well suited for operation in dusty and low-visibility environments, but scan registration remains challenging due to scan sparsity and spurious detections caused by noise and multipath reflections. This difficulty is compounded in feature-poor open-pit mines, where the lack of distinctive landmarks reduces correspondence reliability. We integrate graph-based pairwise consistency maximization (PCM) as an outlier rejection step within the iterative closest points (ICP) loop. We propose a radar-adapted pairwise distance-invariant scoring function for graph-based (PCM) that incorporates anisotropic, per-detection uncertainty derived from a radar measurement model. The consistency maximization problem is approximated with a greedy heuristic that finds a large clique in the pairwise consistency graph. The refined correspondence set improves robustness when the initial association set is heavily contaminated. We evaluate a standard Euclidean distance residual and our uncertainty-aware residual on an open-pit mine dataset collected with a 4D imaging radar. Compared to the generalized ICP (GICP) baseline without PCM, our method reduces segment relative position error (RPE) by 29.6% on 1 m segments and by up to 55% on 100 m segments. The presented method is intended for integration into localization pipelines and is suitable for online use due to the greedy heuristic in graph-based (PCM).

Understanding climate change requires reasoning over complex causal networks. Yet, existing causal discovery datasets predominantly capture explicit, direct causal relations. We introduce ClimateCause, a manually expert-annotated dataset of higher-order causal structures from science-for-policy climate reports, including implicit and nested causality. Cause-effect expressions are normalized and disentangled into individual causal relations to facilitate graph construction, with unique annotations for cause-effect correlation, relation type, and spatiotemporal context. We further demonstrate ClimateCause's value for quantifying readability based on the semantic complexity of causal graphs underlying a statement. Finally, large language model benchmarking on correlation inference and causal chain reasoning highlights the latter as a key challenge.

Test-time compute scaling, the practice of spending extra computation during inference via repeated sampling, search, or extended reasoning, has become a powerful lever for improving large language model performance. Yet deploying these techniques under finite inference budgets requires a decision that current systems largely ignore: which inputs deserve more compute, and which can be answered cheaply? We formalize this as a constrained optimization problem (maximize expected accuracy subject to an average compute budget) and solve it with a two-stage Solve-then-Learn pipeline. In the solve stage, Lagrangian relaxation decomposes the global constraint into per-instance sub-problems, each admitting a closed-form oracle action that optimally prices accuracy against cost. We prove that the induced cost is monotone in the dual variable, enabling exact budget targeting via binary search. In the learn stage, a lightweight classifier is trained to predict oracle actions from cheap input features, amortizing the allocation rule for real-time deployment. We establish that the task-level regret of the learned policy is bounded by its imitation error times the worst-case per-instance gap, yielding a clean reduction from constrained inference to supervised classification. Experiments on MATH and GSM8K with three LLMs (DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4o-mini, Qwen2.5-7B) show that our method consistently outperforms uniform and heuristic allocation baselines, achieving up to 12.8% relative accuracy improvement on MATH under matched budget constraints, while closely tracking the Lagrangian oracle upper bound with over 91% imitation accuracy.

Purpose: Adaptive skip modules can improve medical image segmentation, but searching for them is computationally costly. Implantable Adaptive Cells (IACs) are compact NAS modules inserted into U-Net skip connections, reducing the search space compared with full-network NAS. However, the original IAC framework still requires a 200-epoch differentiable search for each backbone and dataset. Methods: We analyzed the temporal behavior of operations and edges within IAC cells during differentiable search on public medical image segmentation benchmarks. We found that operations selected in the final discrete cell typically emerge among the strongest candidates early in training, and their architecture parameters stabilize well before the final epoch. Based on this, we propose a Jensen--Shannon-divergence-based stability criterion that tracks per-edge operation-importance distributions and progressively prunes low-importance operations during search. The accelerated framework is called IAC-LTH. Results: Across four public benchmarks (ACDC, BraTS, KiTS, AMOS), several 2-D U-Net backbones, and a 2-D nnU-Net pipeline, IAC-LTH discovers IAC cells whose patient-level segmentation performance matches and sometimes slightly exceeds that of cells found by the original full-length search, while reducing wall-clock NAS cost by 3.7x to 16x across datasets and backbones. These results are consistent across architectures, benchmarks, and both non-augmented and augmented training settings, while preserving the gains of IAC-equipped U-Nets over strong attention-based and dense-skip baselines. Conclusion: Competitive IAC architectures can be identified from early-stabilizing operations without running the full search, making adaptive skip-module design more practical for medical image segmentation under realistic computational constraints.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks through extended chains of thought but suffer from high inference latency due to autoregressive reasoning. Recent work explores using Small Reasoning Models (SRMs) to accelerate LRM inference. In this paper, we systematically characterize the capability boundaries of SRMs and identify three common types of reasoning risks: (1) path divergence, where SRMs lack the strategic ability to construct an initial plan, causing reasoning to deviate from the most probable path; (2) cognitive overload, where SRMs fail to solve particularly difficult steps; and (3) recovery inability, where SRMs lack robust self-reflection and error correction mechanisms. To address these challenges, we propose TrigReason, a trigger-based collaborative reasoning framework that replaces continuous polling with selective intervention. TrigReason delegates most reasoning to the SRM and activates LRM intervention only when necessary-during initial strategic planning (strategic priming trigger), upon detecting extraordinary overconfidence (cognitive offload trigger), or when reasoning falls into unproductive loops (intervention request trigger). The evaluation results on AIME24, AIME25, and GPQA-D indicate that TrigReason matches the accuracy of full LRMs and SpecReason, while offloading 1.70x - 4.79x more reasoning steps to SRMs. Under edge-cloud conditions, TrigReason reduces latency by 43.9\% and API cost by 73.3\%. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/QQQ-yi/TrigReason}{https://github.com/QQQ-yi/TrigReason}

Retail theft costs the global economy over \$100 billion annually, yet existing AI-based detection systems require expensive custom model training on proprietary datasets and charge \$200-500/month per store. We present Paza, a zero-shot retail theft detection framework that achieves practical concealment detection without training any model. Our approach orchestrates multiple existing models in a layered pipeline - cheap object detection and pose estimation running continuously, with an expensive vision-language model (VLM) invoked only when behavioral pre-filters trigger. A multi-signal suspicion pre-filter (requiring dwell time plus at least one behavioral signal) reduces VLM invocations by 240x compared to per-frame analysis, bounding calls to <=10/minute and enabling a single GPU to serve 10-20 stores. The architecture is model-agnostic: the VLM component accepts any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, enabling operators to swap between models such as Gemma 4, Qwen3.5-Omni, GPT-4o, or future releases without code changes - ensuring the system improves as the VLM landscape evolves. We evaluate the VLM component on the DCSASS synthesized shoplifting dataset (169 clips, controlled environment), achieving 89.5% precision and 92.8% specificity at 59.3% recall zero-shot - where the recall gap is attributable to sparse frame sampling in offline evaluation rather than VLM reasoning failures, as precision and specificity are the operationally critical metrics determining false alarm rates. We present a detailed cost model showing viability at \$50-100/month per store (3-10x cheaper than commercial alternatives), and introduce a privacy-preserving design that obfuscates faces in the detection pipeline. The source code is available at https://github.com/xHaileab/Paza-AI.

Behavioral Profile (BP) annotation is difficult to automate because it requires simultaneous coding across multiple linguistic dimensions. We treat BP annotation as a bundle of annotation skills rather than a single task and evaluate LLM-assisted BP annotation from this perspective. Using 3,134 concordance lines of 30 Chinese metaphorical color-term derivatives and a 14-feature BP schema, we implement a skill-file-driven pipeline in which each feature is externally defined through schema files, decision rules, and examples. Two human annotators completed a two-round schema-only protocol on a 300-instance validation subset, enabling BP skills to be classified as directly operable, recoverable under focused re-annotation, or structurally underspecified. GPT-5.4 and three locally deployable open-source models were then evaluated under the same setup. Results show that BP annotation is highly heterogeneous at the skill level: 5 skills are directly operable, 4 are recoverable after focused re-annotation, and 5 remain structurally underspecified. GPT-5.4 executes the retained skills with substantial reliability (accuracy = 0.678, \k{appa} = 0.665, weighted F1 = 0.695), but this feasibility is selective rather than global. Human and GPT difficulty profiles are strongly aligned at the skill level (r = 0.881), but not at the instance level (r = 0.016) or lexical-item level (r = -0.142), a pattern we describe as shared taxonomy, independent execution. Pairwise agreement further suggests that GPT is better understood as an independent third skill voice than as a direct human substitute. Open-source failures are concentrated in schema-to-skill execution problems. These findings suggest that automatic annotation should be evaluated in terms of skill feasibility rather than task-level automation.

Current single-cell foundation model benchmarks universally extract final layer embeddings, assuming these represent optimal feature spaces. We systematically evaluate layer-wise representations from scFoundation (100M parameters) and Tahoe-X1 (1.3B parameters) across trajectory inference and perturbation response prediction. Our analysis reveals that optimal layers are task-dependent (trajectory peaks at 60% depth, 31% above final layers) and context-dependent (perturbation optima shift 0-96% across T cell activation states). Notably, first-layer embeddings outperform all deeper layers in quiescent cells, challenging assumptions about hierarchical feature abstraction. These findings demonstrate that "where" to extract features matters as much as "what" the model learns, necessitating systematic layer evaluation tailored to biological task and cellular context rather than defaulting to final-layer embeddings.

Recent advancements in whole-body control through deep reinforcement learning have enabled humanoid robots to achieve remarkable progress in real-world chal lenging locomotion skills. However, existing approaches often struggle with flexible transitions between distinct skills, cre ating safety concerns and practical limitations. To address this challenge, we introduce a hierarchical multi-skill system, Switch, enabling seamless skill transitions at any moment. Our approach comprises three key components: (1) a Skill Graph (SG) that establishes potential cross-skill transitions based on kinematic similarity within multi-skill motion data, (2) a whole-body tracking policy trained on this skill graph through deep reinforcement learning, and (3) an online skill scheduler to drive the tracking policy for robust skill execution and smooth transitions. For skill switching or significant tracking deviations, the scheduler performs online graph search to find the optimal feasible path, which ensures efficient, stable, and real-time execution of diverse locomotion skills. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Switch empowers humanoid to execute agile skill transitions with high success rates while maintaining strong motion imitation performance.

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for clinical documentation tasks such as SOAP note generation remains challenging. Unlike standard summarization, these tasks require clinical abstraction, normalization of colloquial language, and medically grounded inference. However, prevailing evaluation methods including automated metrics and LLM as judge frameworks rely on lexical faithfulness, often labeling any information not explicitly present in the transcript as hallucination. We show that such approaches systematically misclassify clinically valid outputs as errors, inflating hallucination rates and distorting model assessment. Our analysis reveals that many flagged hallucinations correspond to legitimate clinical transformations, including synonym mapping, abstraction of examination findings, diagnostic inference, and guideline consistent care planning. By aligning evaluation criteria with clinical reasoning through calibrated prompting and retrieval grounded in medical ontologies we observe a significant shift in outcomes. Under a lexical evaluation regime, the mean hallucination rate is 35%, heavily penalizing valid reasoning. With inference aware evaluation, this drops to 9%, with remaining cases reflecting genuine safety concerns. These findings suggest that current evaluation practices over penalize valid clinical reasoning and may measure artifacts of evaluation design rather than true errors, underscoring the need for clinically informed evaluation in high context domains like medicine.