Predicting counterfactual outcomes in longitudinal data, where sequential treatment decisions heavily depend on evolving patient states, is critical yet notoriously challenging due to complex time-dependent confounding and inadequate uncertainty quantification in existing methods. We introduce the Causal Diffusion Model (CDM), the first denoising diffusion probabilistic approach explicitly designed to generate full probabilistic distributions of counterfactual outcomes under sequential interventions. CDM employs a novel residual denoising architecture with relational self-attention, capturing intricate temporal dependencies and multimodal outcome trajectories without requiring explicit adjustments (e.g., inverse-probability weighting or adversarial balancing) for confounding. In rigorous evaluation on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic tumor-growth simulator widely adopted in prior work, CDM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art longitudinal causal inference methods, achieving a 15-30% relative improvement in distributional accuracy (1-Wasserstein distance) while maintaining competitive or superior point-estimate accuracy (RMSE) under high-confounding regimes. By unifying uncertainty quantification and robust counterfactual prediction in complex, sequentially confounded settings, without tailored deconfounding, CDM offers a flexible, high-impact tool for decision support in medicine, policy evaluation, and other longitudinal domains.

This study analyzes the impacts of exchange rate and inflation on exports in Turkiye. Annual data for the period 1995-2023 were used in the analysis. The Johansen cointegration analysis and Dynamic Least Squares (DOLS) method were employed in the study. Identifying the cointegration relationship enabled the estimation of the long-run coefficients. The results show that an increase in the real effective exchange rate (appreciation of the Turkish lira) and inflation reduce exports with coefficients of -0.185 and -0.125, respectively. Foreign direct investment and imports, added to the study as control variables, have a positive impact on exports with coefficients of 0.117 and 0.849, respectively. These findings indicate that exchange rate stability and inflation control are priorities for improving foreign trade performance. Furthermore, policies that increase foreign direct investment and strategically manage imports complement this process.

We develop a Quantile Bayesian Vector Autoregression (QBVAR) to forecast real oil prices across different quantiles of the conditional distribution. The model allows predictor effects to vary across quantiles, capturing asymmetries that standard mean-focused approaches miss. Using monthly data from 1975 to 2025, we document three findings. First, the QBVAR improves median forecasts by 2-5\% relative to Bayesian VARs, demonstrating that quantile-specific dynamics matter even for point prediction. Second, uncertainty and financial condition variables strongly predict downside risk, with left-tail forecast improvements of 10-25\% that intensify during crisis episodes. Third, right-tail forecasting remains difficult; stochastic volatility models dominate for upside risk, though forecast combinations that include the QBVAR recover these losses. The results show that modeling the conditional distribution yields substantial gains for tail risk assessment, particularly during major oil market disruptions.

Both cluster randomized trials and quasi-experimental designs are used to evaluate the impact of health and social policies and interventions. Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials randomize a staggered adoption approach, while recent difference-in-differences methods allow analysis of non-randomized settings where similar policies are adopted at different time points. These approaches have become common, but the sheer variety of methods for analyzing observational studies with staggered adoption makes it challenging to clearly design and report such studies. We propose that observational and quasi-experimental study investigators can address these challenges by emulating stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in the target trial emulation framework. The conceptual framework and reporting standards of trial emulation will encourage consideration of key features of these designs, such as policy heterogeneity and time-varying effects, and clear reporting of the estimand and assumptions. It also highlights areas where those interested in randomized trials and quasi-experimental designs can benefit from one another's experience by bringing insights across disciplines. Questions of treatment effect heterogeneity, power, spillovers, and anticipation effects, among others, are common to both fields and can benefit from cross-pollination. This article also demonstrates how trial emulation can identify settings that are not well-served by either approach, thereby avoiding studies unlikely to generate high-quality causal evidence. Finally, it informs the bias-variance-generalizability trade-off that arises with design and analysis choices made in these settings, supporting better evidence generation and interpretation in settings where important questions can be answered.

Difference-in-Differences (DiD) is a widely used research design that often relies on a conditional parallel trends (CPT) assumption. In contrast to settings with unconfoundedness, where causal graphs provide powerful frameworks for reasoning about valid conditioning variables, general-purpose graphical tools for CPT are missing. We introduce transformed Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs), the $Δ$-SWIGs, and prove that they enable us to read off conditional independencies via $d$-separation that imply CPT. Using $Δ$-SWIGs, we study valid conditioning strategies for DiD in complex settings with multiple periods and time-varying covariates. We show that when time-varying covariates affect the outcome, controlling for post-treatment variables is required for identification. However, even when such controls are included, pre-treatment parallel trends are only informative about a subset of the assumptions required for unbiased post-treatment effects, highlighting the limitations of purely empirical justifications of CPT.

This paper proposes a dynamic network framework for uncovering latent community paths in high-dimensional VAR-type models. By embedding a degree-corrected stochastic co-blockmodel (ScBM) into the transition matrices of VAR-type systems, we separate sending and receiving roles at the node level and summarize complex directional dependence in an interpretable low-dimensional form. Our method integrates directed spectral co-clustering with eigenvector smoothing to track how directional groups split, merge, or persist over time. This framework accommodates both periodic VAR (PVAR) models for cyclical seasonal evolution and generalized VHAR models for structural transitions across ordered dependence horizons. We establish non-asymptotic misclassification bounds for both procedures and provide supporting evidence through Monte Carlo experiments. Applications to U.S.\ nonfarm payrolls distinguish a recurrent business-centered core from more mobile, seasonally sensitive sectors. In global stock volatilities, the results reveal a compact U.S.-centered long-horizon block, a Europe-heavy developed core, and a more dynamic short-horizon reallocation of peripheral and bridge markets.

Count-weighted temporal networks often exhibit unequal dispersion in the edge weights, which cannot be fully explained by modelling observational heterogeneity through latent factors in the conditional mean. Therefore, we propose new dynamic network model classes exploiting the Generalized Poisson distribution to capture both under- and overdispersion. We consider three different dynamic specifications: latent factor dynamics, autoregressive dynamics, and latent position dynamics, and study some theoretical properties of the random networks, showing the impact of the dispersion parameter on the random network's connectivity. After discussing the parameter identification strategy, we present a Bayesian inference procedure along with a posterior sampling algorithm. A numerical illustration demonstrates the effectiveness of the designed algorithm and provides estimates of the misspecification bias when unequal dispersion is neglected. Our new models are then applied to two relevant dynamic datasets considered in previous studies: a set of bike-sharing dynamic networks and a set of dynamic media networks. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly modeling overdispersion for both an accurate in-sample fit and out-of-sample performance.

This paper introduces the Animal Welfare and Policy Risk Index (AWPRI), a composite risk index covering 25 countries over the period 2004-2022 (N=475 country-year observations). The AWPRI is constructed from 15 variables organised across three equal-weighted conceptual layers: Current Welfare State (L1), Policy Trajectory (L2), and AI Amplification Risk (L3). Variables are normalised to [0, 1] using min-max scaling, with higher values denoting greater policy risk. The index is validated through k-means cluster analysis (k=4; silhouette coefficient=0.447), principal component analysis (PCA) of the 15-variable cross-section, and sensitivity analysis under +/- 10 percentage-point layer weight perturbation (mean Spearman \r{ho}=0.993, minimum 0.979; mean Adjusted Rand Index (ARI)=0.684, range 0.477-1.000). Our Hausman specification test favours random-effects (RE) panel estimation (H=2.55, p=0.467). We use a difference-in-differences (DiD) design to exploit the 2019 AI governance risk classification divergence and find that countries identified as high-AI-governance-risk carry AWPRI scores 0.080 points higher than their low-risk counterparts, after controlling for country and year fixed effects (\b{eta}=0.080, SE=0.005, p<0.001). The L3 layer records the highest mean score in the 2022 cross-section (0.552, SD=0.175), significantly exceeding both L1 (Wilcoxon W=102,651, p<0.001) and L2 (W=99,295, p<0.001). China (0.802), Vietnam (0.612), and Thailand (0.586) record the highest composite risk scores in 2022; the United Kingdom (0.308) the lowest. AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)-based projections indicate that Thailand, Brazil, and Argentina face AWPRI risk deterioration by 2030. The AWPRI and its interactive visualisation are publicly accessible at https://awpri.aiinsocietyhub.com/.

This study analyses the potential of renewable energy to reduce inflationary pressures arising from energy imports in Turkiye. Annual data for the period 1980-2022 are used in the analysis. In this study, unit root properties are examined using the Zivot-Andrews and Lee-Strazicich tests, both of which explicitly account for structural breaks. Cointegration is investigated via the Johansen and Hatemi-J cointegration tests. Long-run coefficients are subsequently estimated using the DOLS and FMOLS estimators. The robustness of the empirical findings is further assessed using the ARDL approach. In addition, an interaction term is constructed to measure the impact of renewable energy in alleviating inflationary pressures arising from energy imports. The results show that energy imports and exchange rate have an increasing impact on inflation, while renewable energy and the interaction term have a decreasing impact. DOLS, FMOLS, and ARDL results support each other. Moreover, in both models, the impact of renewable energy in mitigating inflationary pressures stemming from energy imports is stronger than the direct disinflationary impact of renewable energy.

We model stochastic choice as environment-dependent switching among a small library of deterministic decision rules. A Random Rule Model generates menu-level choice probabilities via named, interpretable rules weighted by observable menu characteristics. Identification has a two-step structure: within-feature decisive-side variation identifies relative rule weights; cross-feature richness identifies the gate. Applied to binary lottery choices, the estimated weights concentrate on a small subset of rules and shift systematically with complexity and dispersion asymmetry. The model closes nearly all of the prediction gap to a flexible neural-network benchmark, while remaining interpretable, restrictive under permutation diagnostics, and portable to an independent dataset.

In the face of socioeconomic challenges, this paper develops and empirically demonstrates the Gondauri Index (GI) as a reproducible diagnostics-first composite framework for benchmarking macro-financial resilience across heterogeneous economies on a unified 0-100 scale. The GI addresses a key limitation of conventional surveillance dashboards: resilience is multi-dimensional and only partially substitutable, so strength in one area cannot sustainably offset fragility in another. The index integrates three interpretable pillars: Inequality Resilience Score (IRS), Liquidity and Systemic Resilience (LNSR), and Inflation Forecast Coherence (IFC). Cross-country comparability is ensured through robust percentile normalization (p5-p95), a consistent annual country-year design, and explicit missing-data handling via component-level weight renormalization. Empirically, the paper provides a 2024 benchmark snapshot and dynamic evidence for 2005-2024 using 5-year rolling diagnostics and Delta log(GI) contribution decomposition, allowing transparent attribution of resilience changes to pillar-level drivers. A forward-looking extension constructs 2026-2030 scenario pathways and introduces a binding-pillar diagnostic that identifies the dominant constraint on resilience across horizons. Overall, the GI offers a scalable tool for comparative resilience assessment, early-warning diagnostics, and evidence-based policy sequencing.

Many matching markets feature unknown, dynamic arrivals of agents that must match immediately. A caseworker must match an abused child to a foster home, a hospital must assign a patient in critical condition to a room, or a city must place a homeless individual into a shelter. We design an online matching algorithm -- the Sequential Equilibrium Mechanism (SEM) -- that approximates large market equilibria to match arriving agents to objects. SEM is asymptotically efficient, fair, and strategy-proof with probability one. Our application plans to deploy a lab-in-the-field experiment where real caseworkers match vulnerable children to host homes, and we provide simulation evidence that SEM can substantially improve welfare.

This paper bridges social security design and general equilibrium theory to conceive optimally balanced pay-as-you-go systems. The design is based on the backward calculation algorithm from Dognini (2025), which is used to find optimal monetary equilibria of prone-to-savings non-stationary overlapping generations economies with heterogeneous households. In particular, this algorithm makes the design applicable for reforming pay-as-you-go systems in countries undergoing demographic transitions. Due to households balanced budgets under equilibrium prices (i.e., Walras' law), these optimally balanced pay-as-you-go systems resemble the well-known notional accounts systems. The design is illustrated in a simplified framework using the past and forecast demographic and productivity dynamics of Brazil, China, India, Italy, and the United States from 1950 to 2070.

What drives cross-state differences in U.S. energy consumption? We combine LMDI decomposition, stochastic frontier analysis, and variable-importance methods on a panel of 50 states plus DC over the 2006--2022 period. The observed 12.8% decline in per capita energy use is driven almost entirely by intensity improvements. A variance decomposition attributes 63% of cross-state variation in log energy use to the demand frontier, 34\% to inefficiency above it, and 3% to noise. Within the frontier, energy prices account for roughly 26% of cross-state variation and state efficiency policies for about 13%, while GDP and climate together explain only around 10\%. Efficiency policies also operate through a second channel by reducing inefficiency, adding a further 6 percentage points to their total contribution. The results suggest that pricing and regulation are the primary drivers of cross-state energy use differences.

This paper proposes a two-step empirical framework to study the repricing of the Brazilian DI curve around Copom-related events. The empirical strategy separates the initial market reaction associated with the underlying shock from the subsequent repricing observed between the shock and the first Copom statement that follows it. The dataset combines a hand-built event calendar, daily market data, Focus expectations, and structured textual features extracted from Copom statements, including tone, forward-guidance direction and explicitness, and uncertainty indicators. In the updated sample, 59 events retain both analytical windows, allowing the second stage to include the full set of same-day Copom events. Baseline results suggest that the framework is most informative at the front and intermediate sections of the curve, especially for the DI 252d maturity, for which the baseline OLS specification reaches an in-sample R2 of about 0.43. By contrast, explanatory power is materially weaker for the DI 504d maturity and for slope adjustments, and out-of-sample performance remains limited. The textual variables display economically plausible signs, but their statistical contribution is not uniformly robust across specifications. The main contribution of the paper is therefore methodological and applied: it offers an implementable event-based decomposition for assessing how shocks and Copom communication jointly shape curve dynamics in Brazil.

As global political tensions rise and the anticipation of additional tariffs from the United States on international trade increases, the issues of economic independence and supply chain resilience become more prominent. The importance of supply chain resilience has been further underscored by disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing war in Ukraine. In light of these challenges, ranging from geopolitical instability to product supply uncertainties, governments are increasingly focused on adopting new trade policies. This study explores the impact of several of these policies on the global electric vehicle (EV) supply chain network, with a particular focus on their effects on country clusters and the broader structure of international trade. Specifically, we analyse three key policies: Country Plus One, Friendshoring, and Reshoring. Our findings show that Friendshoring, contrary to expectations, leads to greater globalisation by increasing the number of supply links across friendly countries, potentially raising transaction costs. The Country Plus One policy similarly enhances network density through redundant links, while the Reshoring policy creates challenges in the EV sector due to the high number of irreplaceable products. Additionally, the effects of these policies vary across industries; for instance, mining goods being less affected in Country Plus One than the Friendshoring policy.

The link between attitudes and behaviour has been a key topic in choice modelling for two decades, with the widespread application of ever more complex hybrid choice models. This paper proposes a pragmatic and computationally tractable alternative framework for empirically examining the relationship between attitudes and behaviours using latent class choice models (LCCMs). Rather than embedding attitudinal constructs within the structural model, as in hybrid choice frameworks, we recover class-specific attitudinal profiles through posterior inference. This approach enables analysts to explore attitude-behaviour associations without the complexity and convergence issues often associated with integrated estimation. Two case studies are used to demonstrate the framework: one on employee preferences for working from home, and another on public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. Across both studies, we compare posterior profiling of indicator means, fractional multinomial logit (FMNL) models, factor-based representations, and hybrid specifications. We find that posterior inference methods provide behaviourally rich insights with minimal additional complexity, while factor-based models risk discarding key attitudinal information, and full-information hybrid models offer little gain in explanatory power and incur substantially greater estimation burden. Our findings suggest that when the goal is to explain preference heterogeneity, posterior inference offers a practical alternative to hybrid models, one that retains interpretability and robustness without sacrificing behavioural depth.

Manski's nonparametric bounds partially identify the average treatment effects (ATEs) under minimal assumptions, yielding an interval-valued estimand with endpoints that depend on the outcome support - typically treated as known or fixed. In many empirical settings, however, credible bounds on the outcome support are often unavailable and outcomes may be heavy-tailed, so common empirical implementations that rely on ad-hoc truncation or observed extrema can compromise finite-sample coverage. We develop concATE, a hybrid confidence band for interval-identified ATEs that explicitly accounts for tail uncertainty without imposing parametric assumptions. The inference method combines a distribution-free concentration bound for the outcome distribution based on the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality with the asymptotic delta-method inference for smooth mean components, and allocates size across bound endpoints using Bonferroni's inequality to guarantee joint coverage. We further extend concATE to a group-sequential procedure that controls the family-wise error rate using Pocock correction. Applying the method to panel data on 901 listed firms (2015Q2--2022Q1), we find that senior-level gender diversity has a statistically significant positive effect on firm value (Tobin's Q) only after crossing substantial representation thresholds: in Growth & Innovation sectors, significance emerges at approximately 55% female leadership, while in Defensive sectors it appears only beyond about 60%.

In experimental applications of bounded-reasoning models, behavior is often summarized by distributions of "levels". We argue that such summaries conflate two conceptually distinct dimensions: a player's type, capturing beliefs about what types their opponents might be, and the depth of higher-order reasoning about rationality. Distinguishing these dimensions matters for interpreting experimental evidence and for understanding when cross-environment variation should be read as changes in beliefs versus changes in cognitive depth, but existing frameworks provide no language to do so. We develop a unified framework by "lifting" static complete-information games into incomplete-information versions in which players are explicitly uncertain about opponents' types. Within this framework, bounded reasoning about opponents' types is represented by transparent first-order belief restrictions, while (higher-order) reasoning depth is captured by bounds on belief in rationality. We analyze three benchmark instances: downward rationalizability, a robust baseline, and two refinements, $\mathsf{L}$-rationalizability and $\mathsf{C}$-rationalizability, which provide epistemic foundations -- with an important nuance -- for classic level-$k$ and Cognitive Hierarchy, respectively, and clarify what "level-$k$" behavior can and cannot reveal about underlying reasoning processes.

Travel behaviour modellers have an increasingly diverse set of models at their disposal, ranging from traditional econometric structures to models from mathematical psychology and data-driven approaches from machine learning. A key question arises as to how well these different models perform in prediction, especially when considering trips of different characteristics from those used in estimation, i.e. out-of-distribution prediction, and whether better predictions can be obtained by combining insights from the different models. We focus on trip distance as a key example of a variable where the application context might go beyond the estimation data. Across two case studies, we show that while data-driven approaches excel in predicting mode choice for trips within the distance bands used in estimation, beyond that range, the picture is fuzzy. To leverage the relative advantages of the different model families and capitalise on the notion that multiple `weak' models can result in more robust models, we put forward the use of a model averaging approach that allocates weights to different model families as a function of the distance between the characteristics of the trip for which predictions are made, and those used in model estimation. Overall, we see that the model averaging approach gives larger weight to models with stronger behavioural or econometric underpinnings the more we move outside the interval of trip distances covered in estimation. Across both case studies, we show that our model averaging approach obtains improved performance both on the estimation and test data, and crucially also when predicting mode choices for trips of distances outside the range used in estimation.

Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear models can exhibit substantial instability in finite samples when the data provide limited information about certain parameters. Such instability is driven by rare but extreme realizations of the estimator, which can dominate mean squared error (MSE) and lead to poor performance of conventional estimators. To address this issue, we consider ridge estimators that directly target MSE through regularization and thereby control extreme realizations. Developing this approach raises several challenges, including characterizing finite-sample MSE, selecting the penalty parameter, and achieving oracle risk performance. We address these challenges using a unified framework based on a finite-sample approximation to the MSE. Building on higher-order expansions, we derive an explicit first-order approximation to the finite-sample MSE of generalized ridge estimators in a broad class of nonlinear models. This approximation reveals an explicit bias--variance trade-off and shows that generalized ridge estimators can improve upon the MLE in terms of MSE at the first-order level, even under target misspecification. It also provides a tractable foundation for analyzing data-driven tuning, enabling us to show that the proposed MSE-based selection rule achieves oracle risk consistency. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method substantially reduces the frequency and impact of extreme realizations, leading to large improvements in finite-sample risk relative to both the maximum likelihood estimator and cross-validation-based methods. An empirical illustration shows that the proposed MSE-based tuning approach can stabilize first-stage propensity score estimation and reveal sensitivity in subsequent treatment effect estimates that remains hidden under conventional estimators.

Survey experiments are widely used to identify causal effects in political science and the social sciences. Yet researchers are typically interested in more than the internal validity of an experimentally induced contrast. They also want to know whether the estimated effect corresponds to the effect in the real world. We develop a formal theory of survey experiment generalizability grounded in behavioral microfoundations. The theory highlights two mechanisms. First, the survey environment shapes attention: it determines which considerations enter the respondent's active consideration set. Second, it shapes salience: conditional on consideration, it influences the relative weight assigned to those considerations. This framework yields two main results. Consideration-set compression generates amplification: survey-experimental effects can be larger in magnitude than their real-world counterparts, even for the same individuals, treatment content, and outcome. Context-dependent salience generates sign instability: the direction of the survey effect need not coincide with the direction of the corresponding real-world effect. The theory clarifies what survey experiments identify, when those effects are likely to generalize, and how survey designs can be modified to improve decision-environment transportability.

We study a linear statistical model where outcomes depend on regressors with fixed population coefficients and observation-specific latent coefficients, along with measurement errors. A decision-maker estimates population coefficients and uses the estimates to predict the latent coefficients for a given observation. We analyze how misspecification of some population coefficients distorts predictions, investigating comparative statics with respect to: (1) residual information in regressors associated with misspecified coefficients after projecting out those associated with free coefficients, (2) alignment between misspecification vector and latent-to-coefficient mapping. Applications include employee rating with unconscious bias and LLM-mediated consumer research.

The growth of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) broadband satellite megaconstellations is rapidly increasing the number of rocket launches. While improving broadband Internet helps achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there are also significant environmental emissions produced from burning rocket fuels. We present sustainability analytics for phase 1 of the three main LEO constellations including Amazon Kuiper (3,236 satellites), Eutelsat Group's OneWeb (648 satellites), and SpaceX Starlink (4,425 satellites). We find that LEO megaconstellations provide substantially improved broadband speeds for rural and remote communities but are roughly 6-8 times more emissions intensive (250 kg CO2eq/subscriber/year) than comparative terrestrial 4G mobile broadband. Policy makers must carefully consider the trade-off between improving broadband Internet to further the SDGs while mitigating the growing space sector environmental footprint, particularly regarding phase 2 plans to launch an order-of-magnitude more satellites.