Systematic investment strategies are exposed to a subtle but pervasive vulnerability: the progressive erosion of their effectiveness as market regimes change. Traditional risk measures, designed to capture volatility or drawdowns, overlook this form of structural fragility. This article introduces a quantitative framework for assessing the durability of systematic strategies through minimum regime performance (MRP), defined as the lowest realized risk-adjusted return across distinct historical regimes. MRP serves as a lower bound on a strategy's robustness, capturing how performance deteriorates when underlying relationships weaken or competitive pressures compress alpha. Applied to a broad universe of established factor strategies, the measure reveals a consistent trade-off between efficiency and resilience -- strategies with higher long-term Sharpe ratios do not always exhibit higher MRPs. By translating the persistence of investment efficacy into a measurable quantity, the framework provides investors with a practical diagnostic for identifying and managing strategy-decay risk, a novel dimension of portfolio fragility that complements traditional measures of market and liquidity risk.

The rapid expansion of remote work following the last pandemic has renewed interest in whether spatial decoupling of residence from workplace can contribute to rebalancing regional development across the European Union. This paper examines four interrelated dimensions of remote work-induced residential mobility using the R-MAP survey dataset, a large-scale cross-sectional survey of over 7,400 remote workers across Europe collected in 2024. First, the spatial direction of post-2020 relocations is analysed, revealing that mobility occurs overwhelmingly within the same urbanisation tier, with urban-to-urban moves accounting for 67% of all relocations. Counter-urban flows to- ward rural areas remain marginal at just 2% of moves, though their relative demograph- ic impact on small rural populations is non-trivial. Second, the motivational structure of relocation decisions is examined, showing that quality-of-life considerations dominate (cited by 78% of movers), followed by economic and housing factors (70%), while digital infrastructure ranks among the least cited reasons. Third, amenity preferences are compared across residential contexts, documenting striking convergence between urban and rural remote workers, with statistically significant differences emerging only for public transport and restaurant access. Fourth, logistic regression models reveal that remote work intensity is a consistent positive predictor of relocation probability, with a transition from 50% to fully remote work associated with a 6.5 percentage point in- crease in relocation likelihood. Age, education, and industry sector also shape mobility patterns. Overall, the findings suggest that remote work primarily stretches metropolitan systems and reinforces peri-urban zones rather than triggering large-scale redistribution toward structurally weaker peripheral regions.

The AKM model introduced by Abowd, Kramarz and Margolis (1999) has become a workhorse to study worker and firm heterogeneity, and to understand the sources of wage dispersion in the labor market using linked employer-employee data. In this article, we introduce the model and estimator, discuss some best practices for estimation, and review some empirical findings on the role of worker and firm heterogeneity in wage dispersion. While the AKM methodology has proven useful to analyze a host of questions in a variety of settings within labor economics and beyond, we also point to the need for methodological developments.

We present a novel Adaptive Distribution Generator that leverages a quantum walks-based approach to generate high precision and efficiency of target probability distributions. Our method integrates variational quantum circuits with discrete-time quantum walks, specifically, split-step quantum walks and their entangled extensions, to dynamically tune coin parameters and drive the evolution of quantum states towards desired distributions. This enables accurate one-dimensional probability modeling for applications such as financial simulation and structured two-dimensional pattern generation exemplified by digit representations(0~9). Implemented within the CUDA-Q framework, our approach exploits GPU acceleration to significantly reduce computational overhead and improve scalability relative to conventional methods. Extensive benchmarks demonstrate that our Quantum Walks-Based Adaptive Distribution Generator achieves high simulation fidelity and bridges the gap between theoretical quantum algorithms and practical high-performance computation.

Quantum computing is becoming strategically relevant to finance because several core financial bottlenecks are already defined by combinatorial search, expectation estimation, rare-event analysis, representation learning, and long-horizon cryptographic resilience. This review examines that landscape across five connected domains: constrained portfolio optimisation, derivative pricing, tail-risk and scenario estimation, quantum machine learning, and post-quantum security. Rather than treating these topics as isolated demonstrations, the article studies them as linked layers of a financial-computation stack. Across all five domains, the review applies a common evaluative logic: identify the financial bottleneck, specify the relevant quantum primitive, compare it with an explicit classical benchmark, and assess the result under realistic implementation and governance constraints. The main conclusion is measured but consequential. The strongest near-term case for quantum finance lies in carefully designed hybrid workflows rather than blanket claims of universal advantage. Quantum optimisation is most credible when constrained search dominates; amplitude-estimation methods matter most when repeated expectation evaluation is the binding cost; quantum machine learning remains task dependent; and post-quantum cryptography is already strategically necessary because financial infrastructures must migrate before fault-tolerant attacks arrive. By combining system-level synthesis with locally reproducible small-scale case studies on simulated qubit registers, the article is intended both as a review of the field and as a handbook-style entry point for future work.

Corporate bond factor research faces a replication crisis. The crisis stems from two sources that inflate reported factor premia: transaction prices whose measurement error enters both sorting signals and return denominators, creating a correlated errors-in-variables bias, and asymmetric ex-post return filtering that embeds future information into factor construction. Applying our framework to a 'factor zoo' of 108 signals across nine thematic clusters, we show that the majority of previously documented factors do not produce statistically significant bond CAPM alphas after correction. We provide an open source framework via Open Bond Asset Pricing, including error-corrected TRACE data, bias corrected factors, and software for reproducible research.

Cross-sectional dispersion in firm-level realized skewness is significantly and negatively related to future stock market returns. The predictive power of skewness dispersion is robust to in-sample and out-of-sample estimation and is incremental over a broad set of existing predictors, with only a few alternatives retaining independent explanatory ability. Skewness dispersion also delivers substantial economic gains in portfolio allocation. Its forecasting power is concentrated in months with monetary policy announcements, reflecting an information-based mechanism. The empirical evidence suggests that skewness dispersion captures the gradual incorporation of macro news into prices, which is driven by variation in aggregate risk and valuation adjustments.

This paper develops a copula-based time-series framework for modelling sovereign credit rating activity and its dependence dynamics, with extensions incorporating climate risk. We introduce a mixed-difference transformation that maps discrete annual counts of sovereign rating actions into a continuous domain, enabling flexible copula modelling. Building on a MAG(1) copula process, we extend the framework to a MAGMAR(1,1) specification combining moving-aggregate and autoregressive dependence, and establish consistency and asymptotic normality of the associated maximum likelihood estimators. The empirical analysis uses a multi-agency panel of sovereign ratings and country-level carbon intensity, aggregated to an annual measure of global rating activity. Results reveal strong nonlinear dependence and pronounced clustering of high-activity years, with the Gumbel MAGMAR(1,1) specification delivering the strongest empirical performance among the models considered, while standard Markov copulas and Poisson count models perform substantially worse. Climate covariates improve marginal models but do not materially enhance dependence dynamics, suggesting limited incremental explanatory power of the chosen aggregate climate proxy. The results highlight the value of parsimonious copula-based models for sovereign migration risk and stress testing.

Commercial fusion energy requires frameworks to assess both the scientific and economic viability of a wide variety of fusion concepts. Inspired by the Lawson criterion's ability to universally describe fusion energy gain, a generalized framework is developed to determine the economic gain of fusion power plants. The model exploits temporal equilibrium, and engineering and cost parameters normalized to the energy capture surface. The derived criteria for economic gain are therefore independent of the power plant's absolute power, impartial to the particulars of its fusion technology, and can be applied to any fusion confinement concept. The derivation of the economic gain factor, $Q_{econ}$, results in nonlinear equations with ten controlling normalized design parameters ranging from fusion power density and surface component lifetime to energy fluence, price of energy, and component efficiency and cost. These ten controlling parameters are varied over a wide range to provide high-level insights in design, finance and operational tradeoffs that improve the prospects for economically viable fusion energy.

We introduce Prediction Arena, a benchmark for evaluating AI models' predictive accuracy and decision-making by enabling them to trade autonomously on live prediction markets with real capital. Unlike synthetic benchmarks, Prediction Arena tests models in environments where trades execute on actual exchanges (Kalshi and Polymarket), providing objective ground truth that cannot be gamed or overfitted. Each model operates as an independent agent starting with $10,000, making autonomous decisions every 15-45 minutes. Over a 57-day longitudinal evaluation (January 12 to March 9, 2026), we track two cohorts: six frontier models in live trading (Cohort 1, full period) and four next-generation models in paper trading (Cohort 2, 3-day preliminary). For Cohort 1, final Kalshi returns range from -16.0% to -30.8%. Our analysis identifies a clear performance hierarchy: initial prediction accuracy and the ability to capitalize on correct predictions are the main drivers, while research volume shows no correlation with outcomes. A striking cross-platform contrast emerges from parallel Polymarket live trading: Cohort 1 models averaged only -1.1% on Polymarket vs. -22.6% on Kalshi, with grok-4-20-checkpoint achieving a 71.4% settlement win rate - the highest across any platform or cohort. gemini-3.1-pro-preview (Cohort 2), which executed zero trades on Kalshi, achieved +6.02% on Polymarket in 3 days - the best return of any model across either cohort - demonstrating that platform design has a profound effect on which models succeed. Beyond performance, we analyze computational efficiency (token usage, cycle time), settlement accuracy, exit patterns, and market preferences, providing a comprehensive view of how frontier models behave under real financial pressure.

We study the problem of generating synthetic time series that reproduce both marginal distributions and temporal dynamics, a central challenge in financial machine learning. Existing approaches typically fail to jointly model drift and stochastic volatility, as diffusion-based methods fix the volatility while martingale transport models ignore drift. We introduce the Schrödinger-Bass Bridge for Time Series (SBBTS), a unified framework that extends the Schrödinger-Bass formulation to multi-step time series. The method constructs a diffusion process that jointly calibrates drift and volatility and admits a tractable decomposition into conditional transport problems, enabling efficient learning. Numerical experiments on the Heston model demonstrate that SBBTS accurately recovers stochastic volatility and correlation parameters that prior SchrödingerBridge methods fail to capture. Applied to S&P 500 data, SBBTS-generated synthetic time series consistently improve downstream forecasting performance when used for data augmentation, yielding higher classification accuracy and Sharpe ratio compared to real-data-only training. These results show that SBBTS provides a practical and effective framework for realistic time series generation and data augmentation in financial applications.

Over the past three decades, extreme climate events have caused losses of worth USD 4.5 trillion. Using collective bargaining model, I find that the gendered labour supply response to adverse shocks is not straightforward since it depends on relative strength of income and substitution effects of men's and women's participation. Using a panel of 151 countries (1995-2019), I examine how extreme climate conditions shape gender gap in labour force participation. This study finds that the gender gap in paid labour exhibits a U-shaped relationship with droughts and an inverted U-shaped relationship with extreme wet conditions. The drought pattern is primarily driven by gender gap in employment while wetness affects gender gap in participation through unemployment. These relationships vary with country characteristics. Countries with high disaster-displacement risk exhibit declining gender gaps in participation during excess wetness while moderate-risk economies experience expanded gaps during droughts. Furthermore, the drought U-shape is most pronounced in countries with low to moderate empowerment while the nonlinear wet responses is concentrated only in moderately empowered countries. Lastly, both droughts and excess wetness expands gender gap in countries with weak net resilience to climate shocks.

We introduce an operator-theoretic framework for analyzing directional dependence in multivariate time series based on order-constrained spectral non-invariance. Directional influence is defined as the sensitivity of second-order dependence operators to admissible, order-preserving temporal deformations of a designated source component, summarized through orthogonally invariant spectral functionals. We show that the resulting supremum--infimum dispersion functional is the unique diagnostic within this class satisfying order consistency, orthogonal invariance, Loewner monotonicity, second-order sufficiency, and continuity, and that classical Granger causality, directed coherence, and Geweke frequency-domain causality arise as special cases under appropriate restrictions. An information-theoretic impossibility result establishes that entrywise-stable edge-based tests require quadratic sample size scaling in distributed (non-sparse) regimes, whereas spectral tests detect at the optimal linear scale. We establish uniform consistency and valid shift-based randomization inference under weak dependence. Simulations confirm correct size and strong power across distributed and nonlinear alternatives, and an empirical application illustrates system-level directional causal structure in financial markets.

Design and implementation of appropriate social protection strategies is one of the main targets of the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1: No Poverty. Cash transfer (CT) programmes are considered one of the main social protection strategies and an instrument for achieving SDG 1. Targeting consists of establishing eligibility criteria for beneficiaries of CT programmes. In low-income countries, where resources are limited, proper targeting of CTs is essential for an efficient use of resources. Given the growing importance of microinsurance as a complementary tool to social protection strategies, this study examines its role as a supplement to CT programmes. In this article, we adopt the piecewise-deterministic Markov process introduced in Kovacevic and Pflug (2011) to model the capital of a household, which when exposed to proportional capital losses (in contrast to the classical Cramér-Lundberg model) can push them into the poverty area. Striving for cost-effective CT programmes, we optimise the expected discounted cost of keeping the household's capital above the poverty line by means of injection of capital (as a direct capital transfer). Using dynamic programming techniques, we derive the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation associated with the optimal control problem of determining the amount of capital to inject over time. We show that this equation admits a viscosity solution that can be approximated numerically. Moreover, in certain special cases, we obtain closed-form expressions for the solution. Numerical examples show that there is an optimal level of injection above the poverty threshold, suggesting that efficient use of resources is achieved when CTs are preventive rather than reactive, since injecting capital into households when their capital levels are above the poverty line is less costly than to do so only when it falls below the threshold.

Classical portfolio models degrade under structural breaks, whereas flexible machine-learning allocation methods often lack arbitrage consistency and interpretability. We propose Causal PDE-Control Models (CPCMs), a framework that integrates structural causal drivers, nonlinear filtering, and forward-backward PDE control to produce robust and transparent allocation rules under partial information. We construct driver-conditional risk-neutral measures on the observable filtration via filtering together with the corresponding martingale representation, linking pricing, hedging, and portfolio choice under a common information set. We further establish a projection-divergence duality showing that restricting portfolios to the causal driver span selects the feasible allocation closest to the unconstrained optimum under a convex divergence, thereby quantifying the stability cost of deviations from the causal manifold, and derive a causal completeness condition identifying when a finite driver span captures systematic premia. Markowitz, CAPM/APT, and Black-Litterman arise as limiting cases, while reinforcement learning and deep hedging appear as unconstrained approximations within the same pricing-control geometry. Empirically, on a U.S.equity panel with more than 300 candidate drivers, CPCM solvers achieve higher Sharpe ratios, lower turnover, and more persistent premia than econometric and machine-learning benchmarks.

This paper introduces a new event-based measure of bilateral geopolitical alignment and provides evidence that it shapes economic growth. The measure is built from 373,020 geopolitical events across 193 countries over 1960--2024, compiled using large language models. With local projections exploiting within-country temporal variation, we find that a one-standard-deviation permanent improvement in geopolitical alignment increases GDP per capita by approximately 10 percent over 25 years. These effects are associated with improvements in domestic stability, investment, productivity, trade, and human capital. In accounting exercises, geopolitical factors account for GDP variations ranging from -30 to +30 percent across countries and time periods.

Recent advances in quantum computing have demonstrated its potential to significantly enhance the analysis and forecasting of complex classical data. Among these, quantum reservoir computing has emerged as a particularly powerful approach, combining quantum computation with machine learning for modeling nonlinear temporal dependencies in high-dimensional time series. As with many data-driven disciplines, quantitative finance and econometrics can hugely benefit from emerging quantum technologies. In this work, we investigate the application of quantum reservoir computing for realized volatility forecasting. Our model employs a fully connected transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian as the reservoir with distinct input and memory qubits to capture temporal dependencies. The quantum reservoir computing approach is benchmarked against several econometric models and standard machine learning algorithms. The models are evaluated using multiple error metrics and the model confidence set procedures. To enhance interpretability and mitigate current quantum hardware limitations, we utilize wrapper-based forward selection for feature selection, identifying optimal subsets, and quantifying feature importance via Shapley values. Our results indicate that the proposed quantum reservoir approach consistently outperforms benchmark models across various metrics, highlighting its potential for financial forecasting despite existing quantum hardware constraints. This work serves as a proof-of-concept for the applicability of quantum computing in econometrics and financial analysis, paving the way for further research into quantum-enhanced predictive modeling as quantum hardware capabilities continue to advance.

Capital growth, at large scales only, arrives with no help from net saving, and consequently with no help from consumption constraint. Net saving, at large scales, is sacrifice of consumption with nothing in return.

Recent waves of technological transformation are reshaping work in uncertain and hard-to-predict ways. However, jobs at the forefront of the digitizing economy offer an early glimpse of these changes and leave rich activity traces. We exploit such traces in tens of millions of Question and Answer posts on Stack Overflow for the creation of a fine-grained taxonomy of software skills to analyze human capital in the global software industry. Constructing a software skill space that maps relations among these skills reveals that real-world software jobs demand highly coherent skill sets and that programmers learn through a process of related diversification. The latter process often leads to the acquisition of lower-value skills. However, when programmers use Python they preferentially target higher-value skills, offering a potential explanation for Python's successful rise as a dominant general purpose language.

Identifying customer needs (CNs) is fundamental to product innovation and marketing strategy. Yet for over thirty years, Voice-of-the-Customer (VOC) applications have relied on professional analysts to manually interpret qualitative data and formulate "jobs to be done." This task is cognitively demanding, time-consuming, and difficult to scale. While current practice uses machine learning to screen content, the critical final step of precisely formulating CNs relies on expert human judgment. We conduct a series of studies with market research professionals to evaluate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate CN abstraction. Across various product and service categories, we demonstrate that supervised fine-tuned (SFT) LLMs perform at least as well as professional analysts and substantially better than foundational LLMs. These results generalize to alternative foundational LLMs and require relatively "small" models. The abstracted CNs are well-formulated, sufficiently specific to guide innovation, and grounded in source content without hallucination. Our analysis suggests that SFT training enables LLMs to learn the underlying syntactic and semantic conventions of professional CN formulation rather than relying on memorized CNs. Automation of tedious tasks transforms the VOC approach by enabling the discovery of high-leverage insights at scale and by refocusing analysts on higher-value-added tasks.

In this paper, we explore the pricing and hedging strategies for an innovative insurance product called the equity protection swap(EPS). Notably, we focus on the application of EPSs involving cross-currency reference portfolios, reflecting the realities of investor asset diversification across different economies. The research examines key considerations regarding exchange rate fluctuations, pricing and hedging frameworks, in order to satisfy dynamic requirements from EPS buyers. We differentiate between two hedging paradigms: one where domestic and foreign equities are treated separately using two EPS products and another that integrates total returns across currencies. Through detailed analysis, we propose various hedging strategies with consideration of different types of returns - nominal, effective, and quanto - for EPS products in both separate and aggregated contexts. The aggregated hedging portfolios contain basket options with cross-currency underlying asset, which only exists in the OTC market, thus we further consider a superhedging strategy using single asset European options for aggregated returns. A numerical study assesses hedging costs and performance metrics associated with these hedging strategies, illuminating practical implications for EPS providers and investors engaged in international markets. We further employ Monte Carlo simulations for the basket option pricing, together with two other approximation methods - geometric averaging and moment matching. This work contributes to enhancing fair pricing mechanisms and risk management strategies in the evolving landscape of cross-currency financial derivatives.

We study a canonical collective action game with incomplete information. Individuals attempt to coordinate to achieve a shared goal, while also facing a temptation to free-ride. Consuming more similar information about the fundamentals can help them coordinate, but it can also exacerbate free-riding. Our main result shows that more similar information facilitates (impedes) achieving a common goal when achieving the goal is sufficiently challenging (easy). We apply this insight to show why insufficiently powerful authoritarian governments may face larger protests when attempting to restrict press freedom, and why informational diversity in committees is beneficial when each vote carries more weight.

Finance, especially option pricing, is a promising industrial field that might benefit from quantum computing. While quantum algorithms for option pricing have been proposed, it is desired to devise more efficient implementations of costly operations in the algorithms, one of which is preparing a quantum state that encodes a probability distribution of the underlying asset price. In particular, in pricing a path-dependent option, we need to generate a state encoding a joint distribution of the underlying asset price at multiple time points, which is more demanding. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach that uses a Matrix Product State (MPS), which can be encoded into a state of qubits, as a generative model for time series generation. We focus on the training of such an MPS and present its procedure in detail. To validate our approach, taking the Heston model as a target, we conduct numerical experiments to generate time series in the model. Our findings demonstrate the capability of the MPS model to generate paths in the Heston model, highlighting its potential for path-dependent option pricing on quantum computers.

We develop a labor demand model that encompasses pre-match hiring cost arising from tight labor markets. Through the lens of the model, we study the effect of labor market tightness on firms' labor demand by applying novel shift-share instruments to the universe of German firms. In line with theory, we find that a doubling in tightness reduces firms' employment by 5 percent. Taking into account the resulting search externalities, the wage elasticity of firms' labor demand reduces from -0.7 to -0.5 through reallocation effects. In light of our results, pre-match hiring cost amount to 40 percent of annual wage payments.

We study the consequences of job markets' heavy reliance on referrals. Referrals lead to more opportunities for workers to be hired, which lead to better matches and increased productivity, but also disadvantage job-seekers with few or no connections to employed workers, increasing inequality. Coupled with homophily, referrals also lead to immobility. We identify conditions under which distributing referrals more evenly reduces inequality and improves future productivity and mobility. We use the model to examine the short and long-run welfare impacts of policies such as affirmative action and algorithmic fairness.