As Large Language Models shift the programming toward human-guided ''vibe coding'', agentic coding tools increasingly rely on models to self-diagnose and repair their own subtle faults -- a capability central to autonomous software engineering yet never systematically evaluated. We present \name{}, the first empirical decomposition that jointly evaluates two coupled tasks: \emph{Fault-Triggering Test Generation (FT-Test)} constructing a discriminative witness that exposes a latent bug, and \emph{Fault-targeted Program Repair (FPR)}, repairing it under varying diagnostic conditions. \name{} pairs competitive programming problems with LLM-generated solutions that pass partial test suites but fail on semantic edge cases, enabling controlled identification of where the diagnostic chain breaks down. Evaluating 12 frontier LLMs, we find that fault-targeted reasoning does not scale with general coding ability. Models produce syntactically valid test inputs at near-ceiling rates yet collapse on discriminative generation, with fault hypothesis generation -- not output validation -- as the dominant bottleneck. Test-guided repair reveals a complementary insight: when self-generated tests successfully witness a fault, the resulting repair matches or outperforms repair guided by externally provided tests, but tests that fail to witness the fault actively degrade repair below unguided baselines. Together, these results reframe the challenge of autonomous debugging: the binding bottleneck is not code synthesis or test validity but fault-target reasoning, a capability that remains deficient across all frontier models. As Large Language Models shift the programming toward human-guided ''vibe coding'', agentic coding tools increasingly rely on models to self-diagnose and repair their own subtle faults -- a capability central to autonomous software engineering yet never systematically evaluated.

The Internet has evolved by progressively expanding what humanity connects: first computers, then people, and later billions of devices through the Internet of Things (IoT). While IoT succeeded in digitizing perception at scale, it also exposed fundamental limitations, including fragmentation, weak security, limited autonomy, and poor long-term sustainability. Today, advances in edge hardware, sensing, connectivity, and artificial intelligence enable a new phase: the Internet of Physical AI Agents. Unlike IoT devices that primarily sense and report, Physical AI Agents perceive, reason, and act in real time, operating autonomously and cooperatively across safety-critical domains such as disaster response, healthcare, industrial automation, and mobility. However, embedding fast-evolving AI capabilities into long-lived physical infrastructure introduces new architectural risks, particularly around interoperability, lifecycle management, and premature ossification. This article revisits lessons from IoT and Internet evolution, and articulates design principles for building resilient, evolvable, and trustworthy agentic systems. We present an architectural blueprint encompassing agentic identity, secure agent-to-agent communication, semantic interoperability, policy-governed runtimes, and observability-driven governance. We argue that treating evolution, trust, and interoperability as first-class requirements is essential to avoid hard-coding today's assumptions into tomorrow's intelligent infrastructure, and to prevent the high technical and economic cost of getting it wrong.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with temporal fact conflicts due to outdated or evolving information in their training data. Two recent studies with accompanying datasets report opposite conclusions on whether external context can effectively resolve such conflicts. DYNAMICQA evaluates how effective external context is in shifting the model's output distribution, finding that temporal facts are more resistant to change. In contrast, MULAN examines how often external context changes memorised facts, concluding that temporal facts are easier to update. In this reproducibility paper, we first reproduce experiments from both benchmarks. We then reproduce the experiments of each study on the dataset of the other to investigate the source of their disagreement. To enable direct comparison of findings, we standardise both datasets to align with the evaluation settings of each study. Importantly, using an LLM, we synthetically generate realistic natural language contexts to replace MULAN's programmatically constructed statements when reproducing the findings of DYNAMICQA. Our analysis reveals strong dataset dependence: MULAN's findings generalise under both methodological frameworks, whereas applying MULAN's evaluation to DYNAMICQA yields mixed outcomes. Finally, while the original studies only considered 7B LLMs, we reproduce these experiments across LLMs of varying sizes, revealing how model size influences the encoding and updating of temporal facts. Our results highlight how dataset design, evaluation metrics, and model size shape LLM behaviour in the presence of temporal knowledge conflicts.

Explainable AI (XAI) interfaces seek to make large language models more transparent, yet explanation alone does not produce understanding. Explaining a system's behavior is not the same as being able to engage with it, to probe and interpret its operations through direct manipulation. This distinction matters for scientific disciplines in particular: scientists who increasingly rely on LLMs for reading, citing, and producing literature reviews have little means of directly engaging with how these models process and transform the texts they generate. In this ongoing design research project, I argue for a shift from explainability to interpretative engagement. This shift moves away from accounts of system behavior to instead enable users to manipulate a model's intermediate representations. Drawing on textual scholarship, computational poetics, and the history of reading and writing technologies, including practices such as marginalia, glosses, indices, and annotation systems, I propose interpretative interfaces as interactive environments in which non-expert users can intervene in the representational space of a language model. More specifically, such interfaces will allow users to select a token and follow its trajectory through the model's intermediate layers. This way, they can observe how its semantic position shifts as context is processed, and possibly annotate the transformations they find useful or meaningful. The same way readers can create their own maps within a book through annotations and bookmarks, interpretative interfaces will allow users to inscribe their reading of a model's internal representations. The goal of this project is to reframe AI interpretability as an interaction design project rather than a purely technical one, and to open a path toward AI-mediated reading that supports interpretative engagement and critical stewardship of scientific knowledge.

Accurate classification of lung diseases from chest CT scans plays an important role in computer-aided diagnosis systems. However, medical imaging datasets often suffer from severe class imbalance, which may significantly degrade the performance of deep learning models, especially for minority disease categories. To address this issue, we propose a gender-aware two-stage lung disease classification framework. The proposed approach explicitly incorporates gender information into the disease recognition pipeline. In the first stage, a gender classifier is trained to predict the patient's gender from CT scans. In the second stage, the input CT image is routed to a corresponding gender-specific disease classifier to perform final disease prediction. This design enables the model to better capture gender-related imaging characteristics and alleviate the influence of imbalanced data distribution. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the recognition performance for minority disease categories, particularly squamous cell carcinoma, while maintaining competitive performance on other classes.

Global feature effects such as partial dependence (PD) and accumulated local effects (ALE) plots are widely used to interpret black-box models. However, they are only estimates of true underlying effects, and their reliability depends on multiple sources of error. Despite the popularity of global feature effects, these error sources are largely unexplored. In particular, the practically relevant question of whether to use training or holdout data to estimate feature effects remains unanswered. We address this gap by providing a systematic, estimator-level analysis that disentangles sources of bias and variance for PD and ALE. To this end, we derive a mean-squared-error decomposition that separates model bias, estimation bias, model variance, and estimation variance, and analyze their dependence on model characteristics, data selection, and sample size. We validate our theoretical findings through an extensive simulation study across multiple data-generating processes, learners, estimation strategies (training data, validation data, and cross-validation), and sample sizes. Our results reveal that, while using holdout data is theoretically the cleanest, potential biases arising from the training data are empirically negligible and dominated by the impact of the usually higher sample size. The estimation variance depends on both the presence of interactions and the sample size, with ALE being particularly sensitive to the latter. Cross-validation-based estimation is a promising approach that reduces the model variance component, particularly for overfitting models. Our analysis provides a principled explanation of the sources of error in feature effect estimates and offers concrete guidance on choosing estimation strategies when interpreting machine learning models.

We introduce a novel self-supervised learning framework that automatically learns representations from input computer-aided design (CAD) models for downstream tasks, including part classification, modeling segmentation, and machining feature recognition. To train our network, we construct a large-scale, unlabeled dataset of boundary representation (BRep) models. The success of our algorithm relies on two keycomponents. The first is a masked graph autoencoder that reconstructs randomly masked geometries and attributes of BReps for representation learning to enhance the generalization. The second is a hierarchical graph Transformer architecture that elegantly fuses global and local learning by a cross-scale mutual attention block to model long-range geometric dependencies and a graph neural network block to aggregate local topological information. After training the autoencoder, we replace its decoder with a task-specific network trained on a small amount of labeled data for downstream tasks. We conduct experiments on various tasks and achieve high performance, even with a small amount of labeled data, demonstrating the practicality and generalizability of our model. Compared to other methods, our model performs significantly better on downstream tasks with the same amount of training data, particularly when the training data is very limited.

Forecasting crude oil prices remains challenging because market-relevant information is embedded in large volumes of unstructured news and is not fully captured by traditional polarity-based sentiment measures. This paper examines whether multi-dimensional sentiment signals extracted by large language models improve the prediction of weekly WTI crude oil futures returns. Using energy-sector news articles from 2020 to 2025, we construct five sentiment dimensions covering relevance, polarity, intensity, uncertainty, and forwardness based on GPT-4o, Llama 3.2-3b, and two benchmark models, FinBERT and AlphaVantage. We aggregate article-level signals to the weekly level and evaluate their predictive performance in a classification framework. The best results are achieved by combining GPT-4o and FinBERT, suggesting that LLM-based and conventional financial sentiment models provide complementary predictive information. SHAP analysis further shows that intensity- and uncertainty-related features are among the most important predictors, indicating that the predictive value of news sentiment extends beyond simple polarity. Overall, the results suggest that multi-dimensional LLM-based sentiment measures can improve commodity return forecasting and support energy-market risk monitoring.

Engineering analysis automation in product development relies on rigid interfaces between tools, data formats and documented processes. When these interfaces change, as they routinely do as the product evolves in the engineering ecosystem, the automation support breaks. This paper presents a DUCTILE (Delegated, User-supervised Coordination of Tool- and document-Integrated LLM-Enabled) agentic orchestration, an approach for developing, executing and evaluating LLM-based agentic automation support of engineering analysis tasks. The approach separates adaptive orchestration, performed by the LLM agent, from deterministic execution, performed by verified engineering tools. The agent interprets documented design practices, inspects input data and adapts the processing path, while the engineer supervises and exercises final judgment. DUCTILE is demonstrated on an industrial structural analysis task at an aerospace manufacturer, where the agent handled input deviations in format, units, naming conventions and methodology that would break traditional scripted pipelines. Evaluation against expert-defined acceptance criteria and deployment with practicing engineers confirm that the approach produces correct, methodologically compliant results across 10 repeated independent runs. The paper discusses the paradigm shift and the practical consequences of adopting agentic automation, including unintended effects on the nature of engineering work when removing mundane tasks and creating an exhausting supervisory role.

Warning: This article includes red-teaming experiments, which contain examples of compromised LLM responses that may be offensive or upsetting. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to create harmful content, such as generating sophisticated phishing emails and assisting in writing code of harmful computer viruses. Thus, it is crucial to ensure their safe and responsible response generation. To reduce the risk of generating harmful or irresponsible content, researchers have developed techniques such as reinforcement learning with human feedback to align LLM's outputs with human values and preferences. However, it is still undetermined whether such measures are sufficient to prevent LLMs from generating interesting responses. In this study, we propose Amnesia, a lightweight activation-space adversarial attack that manipulates internal transformer states to bypass existing safety mechanisms in open-weight LLMs. Through experimental analysis on state-of-the-art, open-weight LLMs, we demonstrate that our attack effectively circumvents existing safeguards, enabling the generation of harmful content without the need for any fine-tuning or additional training. Our experiments on benchmark datasets show that the proposed attack can induce various antisocial behaviors in LLMs. These findings highlight the urgent need for more robust security measures in open-weight LLMs and underscore the importance of continued research to prevent their potential misuse.

Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper lobe predominant fibrotic lung abnormality associated with increased mortality in established interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical significance of radiologic PPFE progression in lung cancer screening (LCS) populations remains unclear. Methods: We analysed longitudinal low-dose CT scans and clinical data from two LCS studies: National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; n=7,980); SUMMIT study (n=8,561). An automated algorithm quantified PPFE volume on baseline and follow-up scans. Annualised change in PPFE was derived and dichotomised using a distribution-based threshold to define progressive PPFE. Associations between progressive PPFE and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. In SUMMIT cohort, associations between progressive PPFE and clinical outcomes were assessed using incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios (OR). Findings: Progressive PPFE independently associated with mortality in both LCS cohorts (NLST: Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.01--1.56, p=0.042; SUMMIT: HR=3.14, 95% CI: 1.66--5.97, p<0.001). Within SUMMIT, progressive PPFE was strongly associated with higher respiratory admissions (IRR=2.79, p<0.001), increased antibiotic and steroid use (IRR=1.55, p=0.010), and showed a trend towards higher modified medical research council scores (OR=1.40, p=0.055). Interpretation: Radiologic PPFE progression independently associates with mortality across two large LCS cohorts, and associates with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assessment of PPFE progression may provide a clinically relevant imaging biomarker to identify individuals at increased risk of respiratory morbidity within LCS programmes.

Mechanistic modeling provides a biophysically grounded framework for studying the spread of pathological tau protein in tauopathies like Alzheimer's disease. Existing approaches typically model tau propagation as a diffusive process on the brain's structural connectome, reproducing macroscopic patterns but neglecting microscale cellular transport and reaction mechanisms. The Network Transport Model (NTM) was introduced to fill this gap, explaining how region-level progression of tau emerges from microscale biophysical processes. However, the NTM faces a common challenge for complex models defined by large systems of partial differential equations: the inability to perform parameter inference and mechanistic discovery due to high computational burden and slow model simulations. To overcome this barrier, we propose Tau-BNO, a Brain Neural Operator surrogate framework for rapidly approximating NTM dynamics that captures both intra-regional reaction kinetics and inter-regional network transport. Tau-BNO combines a function operator that encodes kinetic parameters with a query operator that preserves initial state information, while approximating anisotropic transport through a spectral kernel that retains directionality. Empirical evaluations demonstrate high predictive accuracy ($R^2\approx$ 0.98) across diverse biophysical regimes and an 89\% performance improvement over state-of-the-art sequence models like Transformers and Mamba, which lack inherent structural priors. By reducing simulation time from hours to seconds, we show that the surrogate model is capable of producing new insights and generating new hypotheses. This framework is readily extensible to a broader class of connectome-based biophysical models, showcasing the transformative value of deep learning surrogates to accelerate analysis of large-scale, computationally intensive dynamical systems.

Multimodal document question answering requires retrieving dispersed evidence from visually rich long documents and performing reliable reasoning over heterogeneous information. Existing multimodal RAG systems remain limited by two bottlenecks: static retrieval that ignores query complexity, and end-to-end Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that couple visual perception with logical reasoning, leading to inefficient computation and unstable answer generation. We propose AutoThinkRAG, a complexity-aware inference architecture for multimodal document QA. It has two components: (1) a Query Complexity Router that analyzes query difficulty and structure to adaptively select retrieval and reasoning paths; and (2) a Perception--Reasoning Decoupling architecture that uses a lightweight VLM as a high-fidelity visual interpreter to convert query-relevant visual cues into textual representations, which are then passed to an LLM for logical reasoning and answer synthesis. This design improves both efficiency and robustness, especially on long-document and unanswerable queries. Experiments on DocBench and MMLongBench show that AutoThinkRAG achieves 82.13\% and 51.29\% overall accuracy, respectively, while reducing per-query token consumption by 18.9\% and monetary cost by 18.2\%. Further analyses show that the gains are most pronounced on complex queries requiring adaptive retrieval and multi-step reasoning.

K-12 science classrooms are rich sites of inquiry where students coordinate phenomena, evidence, and explanatory models through discourse; yet, the multimodal complexity of these interactions has made automated analysis elusive. Existing benchmarks for classroom discourse focus primarily on mathematics and rely solely on transcripts, overlooking the visual artifacts and model-based reasoning emphasized by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). We address this gap with SciIBI, the first video benchmark for analyzing science classroom discourse, featuring 113 NGSS-aligned clips annotated with Core Instructional Practices (CIP) and sophistication levels. By evaluating eight state-of-the-art LLMs and Multimodal LLMs, we reveal fundamental limitations: current models struggle to distinguish pedagogically similar practices, suggesting that CIP coding requires instructional reasoning beyond surface pattern matching. Furthermore, adding video input yields inconsistent gains across architectures. Crucially, our evidence-based evaluation reveals that models often succeed through surface shortcuts rather than genuine pedagogical understanding. These findings establish science classroom discourse as a challenging frontier for multimodal AI and point toward human-AI collaboration, where models retrieve evidence to accelerate expert review rather than replace it.

Eldan's stochastic localization is a probabilistic construction that has proved instrumental to modern breakthroughs in high-dimensional geometry and the design of sampling algorithms. Motivated by sampling under non-Euclidean geometries and the mirror descent algorithm in optimization, we develop a functional generalization of Eldan's process that replaces Gaussian regularization with regularization by any positive integer multiple of a log-Laplace transform. We further give a mixing time bound on the Markov chain induced by our localization process, which holds if our target distribution satisfies a functional Poincaré inequality. Finally, we apply our framework to differentially private convex optimization in $\ell_p$ norms for $p \in [1, 2)$, where we improve state-of-the-art query complexities in a zeroth-order model.

Lakehouses are now the default substrate for analytics and AI, but they remain fragile under concurrent, untrusted change: schema mismatches often surface only at runtime, development and production easily diverge, and multi-table pipelines can expose partial results after failure. We present Bauplan, a code-first lakehouse that aims to eliminate a broad class of these failures by construction. Bauplan builds on a storage substrate that already provides atomic single-table snapshot evolution, and adds three pipeline-level correctness mechanisms: typed table contracts to make transformation boundaries checkable, Git-like data versioning to support reproducible collaboration and review, and transactional runs that guarantee atomic publication of an entire pipeline execution. We describe the system design, show how these abstractions fit together into a unified programming model for humans and agents, and report early results from a lightweight Alloy model that both validates key intuitions and exposes subtle counterexamples around transactional branch visibility. Our experience suggests that correctness in the lakehouse is best addressed not by patching failures after the fact, but by restricting the programming model so that many illegal states become unrepresentable.

The growing reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) models in high-stakes decision-making systems, particularly within emerging telecom and 6G applications, underscores the urgent need for transparent and standardized fairness assessment frameworks. While global toolkits such as IBM AI Fairness 360 and Microsoft Fairlearn have advanced bias detection, they often lack alignment with region-specific regulatory requirements and national priorities. To address this gap, we propose Nishpaksh, an indigenous fairness evaluation tool that operationalizes the Telecommunication Engineering Centre (TEC) Standard for the Evaluation and Rating of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Nishpaksh integrates survey-based risk quantification, contextual threshold determination, and quantitative fairness evaluation into a unified, web-based dashboard. The tool employs vectorized computation, reactive state management, and certification-ready reporting to enable reproducible, audit-grade assessments, thereby addressing a critical post-standardization implementation need. Experimental validation on the COMPAS dataset demonstrates Nishpaksh's effectiveness in identifying attribute-specific bias and generating standardized fairness scores compliant with the TEC framework. The system bridges the gap between research-oriented fairness methodologies and regulatory AI governance in India, marking a significant step toward responsible and auditable AI deployment within critical infrastructure like telecommunications.

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, understanding how they express political positioning is important for evaluating alignment and downstream effects. We audit 26 contemporary LLMs using three political psychometric inventories (Political Compass, SapplyValues, 8Values) and a news bias labeling task. To test robustness, inventories are administered across multiple semantic prompt variants and analyzed with a two-way ANOVA separating model and prompt effects. Most models cluster in a similar ideological region, with 96.3% located in the Libertarian-Left quadrant of the Political Compass, and model identity explaining most variance across prompt variants ($η^2 > 0.90$). Cross-instrument comparisons suggest that the Political Compass social axis aligns more strongly with cultural progressivism than authority-related measures ($r=-0.64$). We observe differences between open-weight and closed-source models and asymmetric performance in detecting extreme political bias in downstream classification. Regression analysis finds that psychometric ideological positioning does not significantly predict classification errors, providing no evidence of a statistically significant relationship between conversational ideological identity and task-level behavior. These findings suggest that single-axis evaluations are insufficient and that multidimensional auditing frameworks are important to characterize alignment behavior in deployed LLMs. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/sakhadib/PolAlignLLM.

In this paper, we describe a federated compute platform dedicated to support Artificial Intelligence in scientific workloads. Putting the effort into reproducible deployments, it delivers consistent, transparent access to a federation of physically distributed e-Infrastructures. Through a comprehensive service catalogue, the platform is able to offer an integrated user experience covering the full Machine Learning lifecycle, including model development (with dedicated interactive development environments), training (with GPU resources, annotation tools, experiment tracking, and federated learning support) and deployment (covering a wide range of deployment options all along the Cloud Continuum). The platform also provides tools for traceability and reproducibility of AI models, integrates with different Artificial Intelligence model providers, datasets and storage resources, allowing users to interact with the broader Machine Learning ecosystem. Finally, it is easily customizable to lower the adoption barrier by external communities.

We introduce a novel pipeline for joint audio-visual editing that enhances the coherence between edited video and its accompanying audio. Our approach first applies state-of-the-art video editing techniques to produce the target video, then performs audio editing to align with the visual changes. To achieve this, we present a new video-to-audio generation model that conditions on the source audio, target video, and a text prompt. We extend the model architecture to incorporate conditional audio input and propose a data augmentation strategy that improves training efficiency. Furthermore, our model dynamically adjusts the influence of the source audio based on the complexity of the edits, preserving the original audio structure where possible. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches in maintaining audio-visual alignment and content integrity.

This paper investigates a lightweight deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-assisted weighting framework for CSI-free multi-satellite positioning in LEO constellations, where each visible satellite provides one serving beam (one pilot response) per epoch. A discrete-action Deep Q-Network (DQN) learns satellite weights directly from received pilot measurements and geometric features, while an augmented weighted least squares (WLS) estimator provides physics-consistent localization and jointly estimates the receiver clock bias. The proposed hybrid design targets an accuracy-runtime trade-off rather than absolute supervised optimality. In a representative 2-D setting with 10 visible satellites, the proposed approach achieves sub-meter accuracy (0.395m RMSE) with low computational overhead, supporting practical deployment for resource-constrained LEO payloads.

Meritocratic systems, from admissions to hiring, aim to impartially reward skill and effort. Yet persistent disparities across race, gender, and class challenge this ideal. Some attribute these gaps to structural inequality; others to individual choice. We develop a game-theoretic model in which candidates from different socioeconomic groups differ in their perceived post-selection value--shaped by social context and, increasingly, by AI-powered tools offering personalized career or salary guidance. Each candidate strategically chooses effort, balancing its cost against expected reward; effort translates into observable merit, and selection is based solely on merit. We characterize the unique Nash equilibrium in the large-agent limit and derive explicit formulas showing how valuation disparities and institutional selectivity jointly determine effort, representation, social welfare, and utility. We further propose a cost-sensitive optimization framework that quantifies how modifying selectivity or perceived value can reduce disparities without compromising institutional goals. Our analysis reveals a perception-driven bias: when perceptions of post-selection value differ across groups, these differences translate into rational differences in effort, propagating disparities backward through otherwise "fair" selection processes. While the model is static, it captures one stage of a broader feedback cycle linking perceptions, incentives, and outcome--bridging rational-choice and structural explanations of inequality by showing how techno-social environments shape individual incentives in meritocratic systems.

What does it mean for a machine to recognize beauty? While beauty remains a culturally and experientially compelling but philosophically elusive concept, deep learning systems increasingly appear capable of modeling aesthetic judgment. In this paper, we explore the capacity of neural networks to represent beauty despite the immense formal diversity of objects for which the term applies. By drawing on recent work on cross-model representational convergence, we show how aesthetic content produces more similar and aligned representations between models which have been trained on distinct data and modalities - while unaesthetic images do not produce more aligned representations. This finding implies that the formal structure of beautiful images has a realist basis - rather than only as a reflection of socially constructed values. Furthermore, we propose that these realist representations exist because of a joint grounding of aesthetic form in physical and cultural substance. We argue that human perceptual and creative acts play a central role in shaping these the latent spaces of deep learning systems, but that a realist basis for aesthetics shows that machines are not mere creative parrots but can produce novel creative insights from the unique vantage point of scale. Our findings suggest that human-machine co-creation is not merely possible, but foundational - with beauty serving as a teleological attractor in both cultural production and machine perception.

Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by sudden, severe blood pressure (BP) spikes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Early, accurate detection is essential to prevent cardiovascular complications, yet current monitoring methods are either invasive or rely on subjective symptom reporting, limiting applicability in daily file. This study presents a non-invasive, explainable machine learning framework for detecting AD using multimodal wearable sensors. Data were collected from 27 individuals with chronic SCI during urodynamic studies, including electrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), bioimpedance (BioZ), temperature, respiratory rate (RR), and heart rate (HR), across three commercial devices. Objective AD labels were derived from synchronized cuff-based BP measurements. Following signal preprocessing and feature extraction, BorutaSHAP was used for robust feature selection, and SHAP values for explainability. We trained modality- and device-specific weak learners and aggregated them using a stacked ensemble meta-model. Cross-validation was stratified by participants to ensure generalizability. HR- and ECG-derived features were identified as the most informative, particularly those capturing rhythm morphology and variability. The Nearest Centroid ensemble yielded the highest performance (Macro F1 = 0.77+/-0.03), significantly outperforming baseline models. Among modalities, HR achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.93), followed by ECG (0.88) and PPG (0.86). RR and temperature features contributed less to overall accuracy, consistent with missing data and low specificity. The model proved robust to sensor dropout and aligned well with clinical AD events. These results represent an important step toward personalized, real-time monitoring for individuals with SCI.

As news reporting becomes increasingly global and decentralized online, tracking related events across multiple sources presents significant challenges. Existing news summarization methods typically utilizes Large Language Models and Graphical methods on article-based summaries. However, this is not effective since it only considers the textual content of similarly dated articles to understand the gist of the event. To counteract the lack of analysis on the parties involved, it is essential to come up with a novel framework to gauge the importance of stakeholders and the connection of related events through the relevant entities involved. Therefore, we present SUnSET: Synergistic Understanding of Stakeholder, Events and Time for the task of Timeline Summarization (TLS). We leverage powerful Large Language Models (LLMs) to build SET triplets and introduced the use of stakeholder-based ranking to construct a $Relevancy$ metric, which can be extended into general situations. Our experimental results outperform all prior baselines and emerged as the new State-of-the-Art, highlighting the impact of stakeholder information within news article.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming widely used to support various workflows across different disciplines, yet their potential in discrete choice modelling remains relatively unexplored. This work examines the potential of LLMs as assistive agents in the specification and, where technically feasible, estimation of Multinomial Logit models. We implement a systematic experimental framework involving twelve versions of seven leading LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Gemma, Llama, and Mistral) evaluated under five experimental configurations. These configurations vary along three dimensions: (i) modelling goal (suggesting vs. suggesting and estimating MNL models); (ii) prompting strategy (Zero-Shot vs. Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT)); and (iii) information availability (full dataset vs. data dictionary summarising variable names and types). Each specification suggested by the LLMs is implemented, estimated, and evaluated based on goodness-of-fit metrics, behavioural plausibility, and model complexity. Our findings reveal that proprietary LLMs can generate valid and behaviourally sound utility specifications, particularly when guided by structured prompts (CoT). Open-weight models such as Llama and Gemma struggled to produce meaningful specifications. Notably, some LLMs performed better when provided with just data dictionary, suggesting that limiting raw data access may enhance internal reasoning capabilities. Among all LLMs, GPT o3, operating in an agentic setting, was uniquely capable of correctly estimating its own specifications by executing self-generated code. Overall, the results demonstrate both the promise and current limitations of LLMs as assistive agents in discrete choice modelling, not only for model specification but also for supporting modelling decision and estimation, and provide practical guidance for integrating these tools into choice modellers' workflows.

In the research and development (R&D) and verification and validation (V&V) phases of autonomous driving decision-making and planning systems, it is necessary to integrate human factors to achieve decision-making and evaluation that align with human cognition. However, most existing datasets primarily focus on vehicle motion states and trajectories, neglecting human-related information. In addition, current naturalistic driving datasets lack sufficient safety-critical scenarios while simulated datasets suffer from low authenticity. To address these issues, this paper constructs the Risk-Informed Subjective Evaluation and Eye-tracking (RISEE) dataset which specifically contains human subjective evaluations and eye-tracking data apart from regular naturalistic driving trajectories. By leveraging the complementary advantages of drone-based (high realism and extensive scenario coverage) and simulation-based (high safety and reproducibility) data collection methods, we first conduct drone-based traffic video recording at a highway ramp merging area. After that, the manually selected highly interactive scenarios are reconstructed in simulation software, and drivers' first-person view (FPV) videos are generated, which are then viewed and evaluated by recruited participants. During the video viewing process, participants' eye-tracking data is collected. After data processing and filtering, 3567 valid subjective risk ratings from 101 participants across 179 scenarios are retained, along with 2045 qualified eye-tracking data segments. The collected data and examples of the generated FPV videos are available in our website.

Diffusion models (DMs) have recently been introduced as a regularizing prior for PET image reconstruction, integrating DMs trained on high-quality PET images with unsupervised schemes that condition on measured data. While these approaches have potential generalization advantages due to their independence from the scanner geometry and the injected activity level, they forgo the opportunity to explicitly model the interaction between the DM prior and noisy measurement data, potentially limiting reconstruction accuracy. To address this, we propose a supervised DM-based algorithm for PET reconstruction. Our method enforces the non-negativity of PET's Poisson likelihood model and accommodates the wide intensity range of PET images. Through experiments on realistic brain PET phantoms, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms or matches state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods quantitatively across a range of dose levels. We further conduct ablation studies to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed components in our model, as well as its dependence on training data, parameter count, and number of diffusion steps. Additionally, we show that our approach enables more accurate posterior sampling than unsupervised DM-based methods, suggesting improved uncertainty estimation. Finally, we extend our methodology to a practical approach for fully 3D PET and present example results from real [$^{18}$F]FDG brain PET data.

We study the problem of clustering $T$ trajectories of length $H$, each generated by one of K unknown ergodic Markov chains over a finite state space of size $S$. We derive an instance-dependent, high-probability lower bound on the clustering error rate, governed by the stationary-weighted KL divergence between transition kernels. We then propose a two-stage algorithm: Stage I applies spectral clustering via a new injective Euclidean embedding for ergodic Markov chains, a contribution of independent interest enabling sharp concentration results; Stage II refines clusters with a single likelihood-based reassignment step. We prove that our algorithm achieves near-optimal clustering error with high probability under reasonable requirements on $T$ and $H$. Preliminary experiments support our approach, and we conclude with discussions of its limitations and extensions.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the major technological advancements of this century, bearing incredible potential for users through AI-powered applications and tools in numerous domains. Being often black-box (i.e., its decision-making process is unintelligible), developers typically resort to eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to interpret the behaviour of AI models to produce systems that are transparent, fair, reliable, and trustworthy. However, presenting explanations to the user is not trivial and is often left as a secondary aspect of the system's design process, leading to AI systems that are not useful to end-users. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review on Explanation User Interfaces (XUIs) to gain a deeper understanding of the solutions and design guidelines employed in the academic literature to effectively present explanations to users. To improve the contribution and real-world impact of this survey, we also present a platform to support Human-cEnteRed developMent of Explainable user interfaceS (HERMES) and guide practitioners and scholars in the design and evaluation of XUIs.